Session 3: When Do You Do Conformity? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Transportation Conformity Process.
Advertisements

Isolated Rural Areas US EPA Conformity Training Summer 2004 Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Transportation Conformity Basics Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
State of North Carolina v. EPA. Introduction The Clean Air Act gives the States the primary responsibility for air quality within their borders and requires.
1 SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008.
Session 6: What do I include in my PM 2.5 conformity analysis? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Air Quality-Related Features of SAFETEA-LU Review by Michael Brady, Caltrans Air Quality/Conformity Coordinator (916)
Front Range Ozone Early Action Compact Presentation to WESTAR Regional Ozone Conference Steven Arnold Air Pollution Control Division March 9th, 2004.
Session 7: Other Conformity Rule Changes FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze Timeline Dan Johnson Western States Air Resources Council.
Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments Net Conference June 23, 2004 Hosted by the Federal Highway Administration Office of Natural and Human Environment.
Yolo-Solano AQMD Regulatory Update Mat Ehrhardt, P.E. October 8, 2014.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Transportation & Air Quality Planning AMPO MPO Educational Series November 8,
ADEM Air Update Ron Gore November, National Issues EPA is delaying many controversial decisions and issues: Implementation of new SO 2 NAAQS Setting.
UNLOCK THE MYSTERIES TO AIR QUALITY Bernadette Dupont, FHWA-KY June 2007.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 Fugitive Dust Estimation Methods & On Road Mobile Sources An MPO’s Perspective.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Conformity Determination Graciela Lubertino, PhD November 7, 2012.
1 SJVAPCD DRAFT SCHEDULES May 2, Hr OZONE ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN PM10 ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Clean Air Act  The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the national air pollution control effort.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
Joelle Burleson Planning Section, Rules Development Branch Division of Air Quality Status of Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules per Regulatory.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Fine Particulate Matter SIP for Washington DC Special Stakeholder Meeting February 20, 2008.
1 Designations & Classifications for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Truck Stop Electrification And Air Quality Conformity Presented by Bob Dickinson South East Texas Regional Planning Commission Air Innovation Conference.
Survivor’s Guide to Ozone Conformity Breakout Session 9: Air Quality 2015 California Transportation Planning Conference: Partnering for Sustainable Transportation.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Air Quality Update Regional Council February 28, 2007.
Determining Attainment Dates for Different Types of Nonattainment Areas Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality and Standards June 20, 2007.
EPA Planning and implementation Update Western Regional Air Partnership November 11, 2009.
Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Clean Air Act The law that defines EPA's responsibilities for protecting and improving the nation's air quality and the stratospheric ozone layer. Draft.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Update on Exceptional Events and MAG Five Percent Plan for PM-10 MAG Regional Council July 28, 2010.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
US Air Quality Management Jake Schmidt, Senior Policy Analyst Center for Clean Air Policy ********* Improving Air Quality in the enlarged EU September.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
1 8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – AWMA AB3 Comments on Lagrangian and Eulerian Long Range Transport/Regional Models By Bob Paine, ENSR.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
PM 2.5 Attainment Re-designation Approvals
EPA’s 2014 Draft RIA EPA’s 2104 Draft RIA continues to rely heavily on PM2.5 co-benefits:
Transportation Improvement Program and Air Quality Conformity Analysis
Bill Harnett USEPA NACAA Membership Meeting October 21, 2008
Updated Oil & Gas Emissions Projections for 2023 and Aug. 11, 2016
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
PM 2.5 Designation Process and Timeline
Uinta Basin General Conformity
PM2.5 Status - TEA-21 (Group 1 = data, Group 2 = data)
Presentation transcript:

Session 3: When Do You Do Conformity? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004

New Nonattainment Areas l CAA and conformity rule provide a one- year grace period for newly designated nonattainment areas l After one year: »conforming plan and TIP must be in place »subject to conformity frequency requirements

When will conformity apply for the new air quality standards? l Conformity applies one year after the effective date of EPA’s nonattainment designation for a given standard l June 15, 2005: Conformity applies for most 8- hour ozone areas (e.g., except EACs) »1-hour ozone standard will be revoked l Jan/Feb 2006: Conformity applies for PM2.5

When is the first conformity determination required? l First conformity determination for the new standards must be completed: »for metropolitan and donut areas, by the end of the one-year grace period or plan/TIP conformity will lapse »for isolated rural areas, by the first FHWA/FTA project phase approval (no lapse will occur in these areas, however, since these areas do not have plans/TIPs) »conformity determinations can be completed voluntarily during the grace period –effective date of conformity determinations can be during the grace period

Does DOT have to make a determination by the end of the grace period? l Yes, both the MPO and DOT must make plan and TIP conformity determinations by the end of the grace period »In order to avoid a lapse

What requirements apply for other standards during grace period? l Until the standard is revoked 1-hour areas must continue to comply with the rule’s 1-hour requirements and existing 1-hour SIP budgets l 1-hour conformity determinations required: »for plan or TIP updates or amendments »to satisfy triggers (e.g., 18 months after a 1-hour budget is found adequate) » to satisfy other frequency requirements l Conformity for other pollutants continues as applicable

Do all determinations during grace period have to address new standard? l No, conformity to a new air quality standard cannot be required during its grace period l An area could decide to not address a new standard during the grace period, »even if it was addressed in a previous determination during the grace period l However, by the end of the grace period a DOT plan/TIP conformity determination must be made for new standard to avoid lapse

When does 3-year conformity clock start for new standards? l Refresher: A new conformity determination and regional emissions analysis required at least every 3 years l PM2.5: 3-year clock starts on date of of first plan/TIP determination and regional emissions analysis, even if DOT’s determination done during PM2.5 grace period l “First” determination = what is in place at end of grace period

When does 3-year conformity clock start for new standards? l 8-hour ozone: 3-year clock starts on date of either: »DOT’s first conformity determination, based on a new regional emissions analysis for 8-hour ozone, even if DOT’s determination done during grace period, or »DOT’s last 1-hour conformity determination, based on a new analysis, in the case where an 8-hour area relies on a previous 1-hour analysis for all or a portion of the first 8-hour determination

Can an 8-hour area rely on a previous 1-hour analysis? l Yes, if the requirements of (g) are met: »Analysis must apply to the plan and TIP; »Be applicable to the 8-hour boundary; and »Meet all of the requirements of or –e.g., The previous analysis for the budget test must include a regional analysis for the 8-hour attainment year.

Examples: 3-year clock in 8- hour ozone areas l Example 1: DOT makes a plan/TIP conformity determination based on a new regional emissions analysis: »DOT determination made on June 1, 2005 »3-year clock starts on June 1, 2005

Examples: 3-year clock in 8- hour ozone areas l Example 2: DOT makes a plan/TIP conformity determination based on the previous regional emissions analysis: »Previous DOT determination made on September 1, 2004 »DOT determination made on June 1, 2005 »3-year clock starts on September 1, 2004