Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting – 21.02.2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC UPS Systems and Configurations: Changes during the LS1 V. Chareyre / EN-EL LHC Beam Operation Committee 11 February 2014 EDMS No /02/2014.
Advertisements

Electrical Distribution: How to Ensure Safe Powering and High Availability for LHC Machine Protection Systems? V. Chareyre / EN-EL Machine Protection Panel.
Failure mode impact studies and LV system commissioning tests
New HV test specification for the LHC N. Catalan for the EI section.
TE-MPE –TM, 16/05/2013, Mateusz Bednarek, TE/MPE-EE ELQA testing during and beyond LS1.
Point 5 - Cooling Network - Key Primary Water Chilled Water Mixed Water Eau Bruite Standard Power Diesel Backup Comp Air Primary Water at 20-25C – Produced.
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project CSCM Mini Review Powering Implementation H. Thiesen 30 November 2011.
Powering Group of Circuit Doubts and proposals of the procedure reviewing team (Gianluigi, Rob, Sandrine, Matteo, Boris) Ref document: LHC-MPP-HCP-071.
UPS network perturbations in SX2 Vincent Chareyre EN-EL-SN ALICE Technical Coordination Meeting 7 May 2010.
LHC ACCESS SYSTEM 1Authors: P, Ninin, S. Grau & LHC access team EDMS: Access System during the LHC Injection tests P. Ninin, S. Grau - TS/CSE Workshop.
Operational tools Laurette Ponce BE-OP 1. 2 Powering tests and Safety 23 July 2009  After the 19 th September, a re-enforcement of access control during.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
Chamonix Risks due to UPS malfunctioning Impact on the Superconducting Circuit Protection System Hugues Thiesen Acknowledgments:K. Dahlerup-Petersen,
LHC Access System August 2006 LHC Access System – Status and Planning August 2006 Elena Manola-Poggioli Eva Sanchez-Corral TS-CSE on behalf of the LHC.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
Consolidation and Upgrade of the SPS Electrical Networks Current Status JP. Sferruzza, on behalf of EN/EL.
1 Beam Dumping System MPP review 12/06/2015 Jan Uythoven for the ABT team.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
For more info:
K.Hanke – PS/SPS Days – 19/01/06 K.Hanke - PS/SPS Days 19/01/06 Recommissioning Linac2/PSB/ISOLDE from CCC  remote operation from CCC  upgrades & changes.
K. Foraz & Perrot A. L., EN/MEF - R2E Project LMC 25th May 2011 Thanks to EN/EL, EN/HE, EN/MEF, equipment owners the LHC integration team & the R2E team.
AT-MEI-PE, RD, LIUWG 31-JUL R. Denz AT-MEI-PE LHC Luminosity Upgrade Protection of the Inner Triplet, D1, Correctors and Superconducting Links/Leads.
First results from the study of the LHC cycle power consumption FCC I&O meeting 24 th June 2015 Davide Bozzini With the contribution of G. Burdet, B. Mouche,
M. POJER, ON BEHALF OF THE USUAL BUNCH OF SUSPECTS… S UPERCONDUCTING CIRCUITS RE - COMMISSIONING AFTER THE 2011 C HRISTMAS BREAK.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
Quench Detection System R. Denz TE-MPE-EP on behalf of the QPS team.
[R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] HWC Workshop ( ) Consolidation and major changes that have impact on the powering circuits.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
MPP Workshop Status of Powering Interlocks I. Romera on behalf of MPE-MS MPP Workshop, 12 June 2015, I. Romera (TE-MPE)1.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
An invitation to an open discussion We are team reviewing its performance globally We want to help each other to reach the objectives We know the other.
Cryogenics Fault Tree A. Niemi & E. Rogova. Contents 1.Introduction of the current tree structure 2.Failure rates observed in 2015 failure data 3.Unsure.
CSCM (Thermal Amplifier) Sequence and detailed planning 07/10/2011 M.Solfaroli Thanks to: K.Brodzinski, G.D’Angelo, M.Koratzinos, M.Pojer, R.Schmidt, J.Steckert,
LHC schedule status K. Foraz EN-MEF 12/04/2013LSC - K. Foraz1.
February 4 th, Quality assurance plan: production, installation and commissioning N.Vauthier TE-CRG Technical Review on Beam Screen Heater Electronics.
R2E relocation & shielding activities: status report Anne Laure Perrot EN/MEF- LE On behalf of the R2E coordination team LS1 Committee – meeting #48, 27.
Machine Protection Review, Markus Zerlauth, 12 th April Magnet powering system and beam dump requests Markus Zerlauth, AB-CO-IN.
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
Main MPE Activities during YETS/EYETS/LS2 and the Provision of Resources Andrzej Siemko Andrzej Siemko TE-MPE1.
Beam Interlock System SPS CIBU Connection Review
PSB Lock Out Test, Follow-Up AP. Bernardes-/EN-STI, K
EYETS Works EN-EL [ FC excluded ]
YETS & LS2 Works EN-El on LHC / Power distribution
Equipment simplified model SMR UR safety
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
LV Safe Powering from UPS to Clients
MPE main activities planned for LS2
SPS CC: Final plan for interlocking of crab cavities in SPS
SPS activities during LS2 TE-EPC (Power Converter Group)
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Overview & baseline of LS2 and roadmap for CRG
TE-MSC activities in SPS during YETS
LS1 TE/MPE/EE CABLE ACTIVITIES
Re-Commissioning (IST) of Electrical Systems: QPS, EE & PIC
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
PS Booster Report from: David HAY, Cyrille BEDEL 12-Jan-2018
V.Chareyre/H.Thiesen/I.Romera/M.Zerlauth
TEST PLANS for HL LHC IT STRING
Power cut 18kV cable for EMD404/E9 is heating
Collimator Control (SEUs & R2E Outlook)
Powering and Safety day Underground access during powering tests
Review of hardware commissioning
ECR on pole order of the HL-LHC IT circuit and resulting implications
Presentation transcript:

Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –

Outline  Motivation and areas affected by the tests  Sequence of tests and schedule  Preparation and impact on users  Conclusions 2

Motivation  Machine Protection Systems depend on UPS power to maintain protection and diagnostics functions during power outages and perturbations  UPS power was reconfigured after 2008 incident to guarantee truly redundant powering (F3/F4 lines in tunnel for e.g. QPS, additional power from other IP side in even points,…)  Separation came with degradation of availability and maintainability  LS1 campaign used by EN/EL to consolidate situation and restore dependable powering -> MPP presentation V.Chareyre May 2013 MPP presentation V.Chareyre May Courtesy V.Chareyre

Underground areas affected 4 Example in one alcove (RE): redundant UPS in 2oo3 configuration Example in one even LHC point: 2 UPS parallel-redundant systems in UA (left), US and UA (right) 32 zones for powering the LHC machine systems ( RE alcoves, LHC even points, LHC odd points) Backup time defined by the QPS systems: 10 min, strict minimum for continuing protecting the magnets after a fast power abort (energy extraction time constant) Courtesy V.Chareyre

Sequence of tests (per zone) 5  t= 00h00m => The switchboard feeding F4 line is switched off  Check of the equipment by the owners  t= 00h10m => The switchboard feeding F4 line is powered back on  t= 00h20m => The switchboard feeding F3 line is switched off  Check of the equipment by the owners  t= 00h30m => The switchboard feeding F3 line is powered back on  Following a request from LBDS team:  During type test => Both F3 and F4 lines will be switched off at the same time  IT star-point rack is transferred back to its initial power supply coming from the UPS F3 Note: -No operation on the UPS systems -PIC will not be triggered!

Proposed schedule 6 Tests to be performed after ELQA at cold and before starting the powering tests Type test to be validated in S67 before ELQA at warm

Type test before cool down  Validation of the UPS test procedure before cool down  Sector 67 (covering US65, UA67, RE68, RE72, UJ76)  Test foreseen in week 17 (mid-end April before cool down)  Test type during LBDS dry-run would have an impact on cool down  Impact on cryogenics equipment (redundant 24V powering for controls and instrumentation only in even points [US])  Several zones could be tested in parallel (2xEN-EL experts per zone) 7

Preparation for the test  IT star-points will be transferred to secured network  IT star-points per area: 1 per RE, 3 per UA, 1 per US  Up to 2 days for preparing/removing secondary power supplies before/after tests  Preparation works should be transparent for the users (of course they cannot count on the star-points during 2 days)  Could be done in parallel with ELQA activities 8

Impact on cryogenics  Cryogenics:  Cryogenic system in idle mode to minimize the impact of tests  Cryogenic conditions will be restored in 24h  Instrumentation and control system fed by redundant UPS in US (UPS machine and UPS cryo provide redundant 24V UPS after LS1)  Special care has to be taken in order to minimize the impact on cool/down of adjacent sectors 9

Impact on users  GSM:  They are on secured network and should not be affected by the tests  Useful for coordination with CCC  Powering Interlock System (PIC):  Hardwired interlocks between PIC and UPS will not be triggered!!  Tests should be compatible with powering tests on adjacent sectors  Quench Protection System (QPS):  Quench heater power supplies need to be powered  WorldFip repeaters on UPS F3 line will be off during power cut  Power converters (PC):  Check behaviour as the PIC will not trigger a Fast Power Abort 10

Safety measures  Access to areas concerned will be restricted to people involved in tests (EN-EL…)  Tests will not impact personnel safety equipment (ODH, fire detection, access, lifts…), they will remain operational  Tests will be integrated in the official LHC planning and announced in advance 11

Conclusions  Test proposal has been approved by the LS1 Committee (LSC)  Final dates for tests will be fixed in the official LHC planning  Test procedure will be released in EDMS for approval (mid March)  Test type to validate the test procedure and better understanding of system dependencies during test  ECR describing UPS consolidation works during LS1 (Action: V.Chareyre) 12

Thanks for your attention 13

New UPS configuration in alcoves and odd points  3 rd UPS (UPS backup) powering the bypass of both UPS F3 and UPS F4 = Stand-by redundancy  ‘Natural’ redundancy  No communication bus between the 3 UPS systems 06/12/2013 I.Romera14 Output UPS power protected Distribution Unchanged Courtesy V.Chareyre

UPS configuration in UA and US zones 15 Output UPS power protected  UPS configuration not changed  UPS system replacement one-to-one  In case of failure of one UPS system in a redundant UPS configuration:  Stop of the faulty UPS system  Automatic transfer of the full load to the remaining UPS system  F3 and F4 distribution lines fully protected Courtesy V.Chareyre