Tutorial 1 Dr. Oscar Lin School of Computing and Information Systems Faculty of Science and Technology Athabasca University January 18, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Poster & Project Presentations The Robert Gordon University
The Robert Gordon University School of Engineering Dr. Mohamed Amish
RESEARCH CLINIC SESSION 1 Committed Officials Pursuing Excellence in Research 27 June 2013.
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
CSE594 Fall 2009 Jennifer Wong Oct. 14, 2009
Writing a Literature Review and Proposal
Scientific Research Dr. Noura Al-dayan.
Research Literature and Literature Reviews
DECO3008 Design Computing Preparatory Honours Research KCDCC Mike Rosenman Rm 279
Announcements ●Exam II range ; mean 72
CSCD 555 Research Methods for Computer Science
Research Proposal and Dissertation Daing Nasir Ibrahim.
PPA 501 – Analytical Methods in Administration Lecture 2c – The Research Proposal.
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 3: Research Processes-Writing.
Student Research Conference 2011 Submitting a Research Conference Proposal.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Writing a Literature Review
AAA 3102 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Lecture 2 The Research Process & Literature Review.
Research Questions and Introduction to the Master’s Project
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
“Knowing Revisited” And that’s how we can move toward really knowing something: Richard Feynman on the Scientific Method.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Science Fair Projects.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
Software Engineering Experimentation Rules for Reviewing Papers Jeff Offutt See my editorials 17(3) and 17(4) in STVR
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem.
FOR 500 PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH: PROPOSAL WRITING PROCESS
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
How to read a scientific paper
Science Fair How To Get Started… (
THE MASTER’S RESEARCH STUDY Fall EdAd 221 & 253  Institutional Review Board (IRB) application to be submitted  EdAd 221 guides and supports students.
Dr Jamal Roudaki Faculty of Commerce Lincoln University New Zealand.
Scientific Processes Mrs. Parnell. What is Science? The goal of science is to investigate and understand the natural world, to explain events in the natural.
Literature Search – How to Make Hard Work Easier? Prof. Haiying Huang Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University.
Outlining the Average Journal Article: A Quick Look at the Sections Taken from Cantor A Guide to Academic Writing with additions Jennifer L. Bowie.
Unit 1 Lesson 3 Scientific Investigations Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
How to Satisfy Reviewer B and Other Thoughts on the Publication Process: Reviewers’ Perspectives Don Roy Past Editor, Marketing Management Journal.
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 任維廉 William. 出處 2  Creswell, J. W., Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 3rd ed., 2009, Sage Publications.
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 蘇怡今 指導教授:任維廉教授 1.
The Scientific Method: A flipbook of the inquiry process! the steps you follow to do an experiment.
From description to analysis
Writing Describe a problem in education. What is the significance of this issue? What would you like to know about this problem? Who else is interested.
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
Doing Your Own Research. Topic: A Focus for the Study F Is the topic likely researchable, given time, resources, and availability of data? F Is there.
Le parc japonais est beau et calme La fille japonaise est belle mais bavarde Ritsurin Park, Takamatsu.
Developing Research Proposal Writing a Literature Review.
1. Literature Review Hart (1998) defined the literature review as “the use of ideas in the literature to justify the particular approach to the topic,
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
CHAPTER 2 LITERATION REVIEW 1-1. LEARNING OUTCOMES 1.The reasons for a literature review being an essential part of every project. 2.The purpose of a.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 28: Disseminating Evidence: Reporting Research Findings.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
Overview of the Research Process. Research  Definition  A procedure by which we attempt to find systematically and with the support of demonstrable.
Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.
How to write a review of literature
Research Methods for Computer Science
Developing Problem Statement for Dissertation
CMNS 110: Term paper research
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem
Writing for Academic Journals
CMNS 110: Term paper research
Writing a Literature Review
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
CMNS 110: Term paper research
Chapter Two: Review of the Literature
8th Grade Science Content Standard
Chapter Two: Review of the Literature
BUILT ENVIRONMENT FACING CLIMATE CHANGE
8th Grade Science Content Standard
Presentation transcript:

Tutorial 1 Dr. Oscar Lin School of Computing and Information Systems Faculty of Science and Technology Athabasca University January 18, 2011

What Does Research Mean?  The author or authors pose a question or hypothesis, collect data, and try to answer the question or hypothesis.  Qualitative research is a means for exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human problem.  Quantitative research is a means for testing objective theories by examining the relationship among variables. These variables, in turn, can be measured, typically on instruments, so that numbered data can be analyzed using statistical procedures.  Mixed methods research is an approach to inquiry that combines or associates both qualitative and quantitative forms.

1. Work on a Good Problem  Problem Finding  Try to find a problem that will still be a problem in a few years (to prevent you from being scooped).  Find a problem that others would be interested in the solution.  Goal identification  to effectively and systematically state the problem and partially solve it.  Trials  Try all of the existing solutions. Know whether they work and why.  Don't just try to be different for the sake of being different.

A Priority for Selecting Literature Material  1. If you are examining a topic for the first time and unaware of the research on it, start with broad syntheses of the literature such as overviews, summaries of the literature on your topic presented in journal articles or abstract series.  2. turn to journal articles in respected, national journals  3. turn to books related to the topic. Begin with research monographs that summarize the scholarly literature.  4. follow this research by recent conference papers  (from Creswell, 2009, Research Design, 3 rd edition, SAGE)

A Priority for Selecting Literature Material (con’t)  5. if time permits, scan the entries in Dissertation Abstract.  6. The Web also provides helpful materials for a literature review.  East to access and capture  Screen these articles carefully for quality  Be cautious about whether they represent rigorous, thoughtful, and systematic research suitable for use in a literature review. You might check to see if the journal has a refereed editorial board that reviews manuscripts and has published standards for accepting manuscripts in an editorial statement.  (from Creswell, 2009, Research Design, 3 rd edition, SAGE)

Be Strong on Methodology  Hypothesis and Experiment  Design a hypothesis about what would make demonstrable progress. Make it clear.  Design an experiment to critically test the hypothesis.  If the experiment is well designed, you should not have a stake in the success or the failure.  If you can do something better, that is good. If not, then it is even better, as you may be able to generalize why.

2. Timing: Start writing the paper early  You should have all of your results ready, and be able to give a "poster overview" of you paper two months before the submission deadline.  You should have a complete first draft one month before the submission deadline.

3. Preparation: Are You Confident ?  Make sure there is a reason for them to accept it.  There should be demonstrable results that show that it is an improvement over existing proposals or can do something that others can't.  Be very clear about what the result is. After the reviewer reads it, they should be able to explain what the result is and why it is important to publish.  It should be clear what the evidence for your results is.

4. Paper-Writing: Organization and Formatting  Introduction  Motivate before you explain!  Tell a story in plain language not use technical words.  Contribution  Build the foundations needed to explain the contribution, and evaluate the contribution.  Make sure that everything needed to understand your contribution is well defined !!!

4. Paper-Writing: Organization and Formatting (con’t)  Formalism: Introduce only enough formalism that is needed to understand the result. Only introduce formalism if it makes the explanation clearer.  Results: Make the result reproducible. Someone should be able to reproduce what you do, based on your writing.  Review: Stand on the shoulders of giants.  Newton said: "If I have seen further it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants." Build on other's work, and give them credit for what they have done.  Assume the people who have worked on this before are your reviewers. Don't denigrate their work. Give credit where credit is due.  Notation: Don't assume readers will understand your notation. Explain it.

Future and Recommendation  Let people know what the limitations of the results are so that people could use the results properly and improve them when possible.  Critique the findings in a meaningful way.  Recommend people about what can to done in the future to make your paper more valuable, providing:  Connection to your contribution in the research done;  Evidence to support your recommendations. References: