By Bundhun Amit Varma HMOA 5403
Define Online Discussion Recognise models of online discussions ◦ Synchronous ◦ Asynchronous Distinguish three characteristics of ◦ synchronous discussion ◦ asynchronous discussion Explain three major processes in online discussions Relate to the Productive online discussion model Identify six successful factors for online discussion
Interaction method ◦ among Students ◦ between Student and online facilitator Demonstrate students' competencies through activities Brainstorming and Web field trips Problem Solving and case analysis Cooperative Debate and Collaborative writing Online assessment method ◦ through active and effective participation Uses technology ◦ Internet, Computers, Web Cam, Speakers
Web conferencing (Synchronous) Virtual meeting Virtual classes Web seminar/ Webinar Discussion Forums (Asynchronous) ◦ Discussion threads ◦ Blog comments
Combination of audio and video interaction Real time broadcast of workshop Synchronous discussion Viewing of office applications and resources
Allows discussion on topics Conversation are organised in a main thread and responses Asynchronous Facilitates group work and collaboration
Collaborative work Instant Feedback Simulate face to face discussions for remote students
Development of critical thinking on discussion topics ◦ More time to think on topic discussed ◦ More meaningful analysis from other participant comments. (Meyer,2007) ◦ Extra research before commenting (Du, Zhang, Olinzock, & Adams, 2008 ) Equal opportunity for participation Formation of social ties ◦ Increase student to student discussion ◦ Collaboration
Cognitive ProcessArgumentationSocial Knowledge Construction
Cognitive ◦ elementary clarification, ◦ in-depth clarification ◦ inference ◦ judgment ◦ Strategies ◦ Linking ideas ◦ Critical assessment (Newman, Johnson, Cochrane, and Webb,1995)
Argumentation 1.Triggering event 2.Searching for clarification and attempting to orient one’s attention 3.Integrating the information and knowledge into a coherent idea or concept 4.the resolution of the issue or problem (Garrison, Anderson, and Archer’s,2000) Events concept
Social knowledge Construction ◦ sharing/comparing of information ◦ discovery and exploration of dissonance or inconsistency among ideas, concepts or statements ◦ negotiation of meaning/co-construction of knowledge ◦ testing and modification of proposed synthesis or co-construction ◦ agreement statement(s)/application of newly constructed meaning (Gunawardena et al.,1997)
Productive Online Discussion Model ( Gao, F., Wang, C., & Sun, Y, 2009)
Clear Instruction Feedback Motivation Expectations Structure of discussion Dialogue strategies
Clear Instructions ◦ Simple ◦ Exact ◦ Eliminate confusion I know what to do
Feedback ◦ Provide clarification when needed ◦ Guide students to have in depth discussion ◦ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) to learners FAQ
Motivation ◦ Make discussion relevant to learner ◦ Include online discussion participation in the course grade ◦ Make participation requirement explicit Grading Rubrics ◦ Interactive learning environment Can I do this task? Why I am doing this task? How can I do this task ?
Expectations ◦ set of guidelines for appropriateness ◦ specific about the quality and level of posts Length of message Level of formality Criteria for acceptable response Resources to be consulted
Structure of discussion ◦ Encourage a good level of socialization ◦ connect the discussions to the course objectives. ◦ Model types of discussions ◦ Set deadlines for participation
Effective Dialogue Strategies University of Oregon Teaching Effectiveness Program
Online discussion ◦ Important learning means in distance learning ◦ Promote High Order Thinking ◦ Need much planning and design ◦ Knowledge creation tool ◦ Learners’ Participation is mandatory Facilitated through motivation and relevancy ◦ Encompasses the three major theories of learning Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism
Al- Shalchi, O. N. (2009). The effectiveness and development of online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1), Du, J., Zhang, K., Olinzock, A., & Adams, J. (2008). Graduate students’ perspectives on the meaningful nature of online discussions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(1), Gao, F., Wang, C., & Sun, Y, (2009). A new model of productive online discussion and its implications for research and instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global on-line debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), Generating and Facilitating Engaging and Effective Online Discussions by University of Oregon Teaching Effectiveness Program Meyer, K. A. (2007). Student perceptions of face-to-face and online discussions: The advantage goes to … Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(4), Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Cochrane, C., & Webb, B. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3(2), Zorfass, J., Remz, A., Gold, J., Ethier, D. & Corley, P. (1998).Strategies to ensure that online facilitators are successful
practices/page/2/ ng share-new-dream-act-policy-faq/attachment/faq-icon find-the-best-diabetes-forums-blogs-or-discussion-boards find-the-best-diabetes-forums-blogs-or-discussion-boards discussion-forum-questions-that-promote-interaction/ discussion-forum-questions-that-promote-interaction/ sources-to-gain-credibility.html sources-to-gain-credibility.html Discussion-Forums-Active-Online-Community-Tips