1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
Advertisements

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
IMPLEMENTING THE SIG REQUIREMENTS 1.  Students who attend a State’s persistently lowest- achieving schools deserve better options and can’t afford to.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September 1, 2009 Webinar Fred Balcom, Director, District.
1 MERA May 17, 2011 Mike Radke, Director, Office of Field Services, Michigan Department of Education.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Supporting the Improvement of Washington Districts and Schools.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
School Improvement Planning and Reporting for Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 Schools June 8, 2015June 8, 2015.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
ELL Data Collection and Reporting Update
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
Developing State Systems To Support School Improvement And Restructuring Lauren Morando Rhim Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Title I Updates Donna Brown, Director North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Federal Program Monitoring and Support September 29,
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number:
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Major Changes to Title I Regulations Public School Choice & Supplemental Educational Services Presented by: Karen Davies, Title I School Improvement Coordinator.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Focus Schools 1. How are Focus Schools identified?  Title I schools with in-school gaps between the highest- achieving.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
S CHOOL I MPROVEMENT G RANTS An Overview of Fiscal Year (FY) DRAFT.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Presentation transcript:

1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary Education United States Department of Education January 12 & 29, 2009

2 Perspectives on Restructuring Policies and Practices School improvement and restructuring plans reviewed on recent monitoring visits are, for the most part, more detailed, focused and based on data Plans are reviewed at the district and state- level, with feedback provided to strengthen these plans What has SASA’s monitoring told us?

3 Perspectives on Restructuring Policies and Practices Some States are limiting restructuring options districts can implement States are monitoring restructuring plans and options more consistently What has SASA’s monitoring told us?

4 Perspectives on Restructuring Policies and Practices Districts and schools are involving outsiders in planning and implementing restructuring – e.g., Comprehensive Centers or universities Increased amounts of school improvement funds are available to provide assistance to schools in improvement, including schools implementing restructuring What has SASA’s monitoring told us?

5 Perspectives on Restructuring Policies and Practices Continuing Issues: Sustaining improvement over time District central office support and leadership Schools in restructuring based on a single subgroup or based on the other indicator (e.g., attendance or graduation rate) – what to do with them

6 Perspectives on Restructuring Policies and Practices Continuing Issues: State capacity Restructuring plans that include an array of strategies but really don’t represent a true change in governance

7 Sustaining Support for School Improvement SASA Monitoring – focuses more on LEAs with schools in corrective action or restructuring while visiting States SASA collects and analyzes data on the use of school improvement funds and their impact (see later slides for details) SASA reviews and approves SEA plans and amendments for allocating and using school improvement funds

8 Sustaining Support for School Improvement Presentations by SASA staff at national and regional conferences Review and update guidance documents as needed Updating monitoring protocols to reflect previous experience, new regulations and new directions

9 Sustaining Support for School Improvement Proposed Webinars Designing and Evaluating School Improvement Efforts Case study of what a State is doing with its school improvement funds Maximizing federal dollars for best results around 1003(g) and other school improvement funds

10 Sustaining Support for School Improvement - Data Collection Annually States will report data on uses of their school improvement funds through the Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR): Total number and percentage of students who are proficient in reading/language arts and mathematics in schools that received technical assistance through the statewide system of support and whether the number and percentages increased from the prior year as measured by State assessments

11 Sustaining Support for School Improvement - Data Collection Total number and percentage of students who are proficient in reading/language arts and mathematics in schools that received School Improvement funds and whether the number and percentages increased from the prior year as measured by State assessments Number of schools that received technical assistance through the statewide system of support that made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and exited improvement status

12 Sustaining Support for School Improvement - Data Collection Number of schools that received School Improvement funds that made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and exited improvement status Evidence that SEAs, LEAs, and schools used data to make decisions about the use of School Improvement funds and created a system of continuous feedback and improvement

13 Sustaining Support for School Improvement - Data Collection Evidence indicating those school improvement strategies that were effective in contributing to increased student achievement and schools making Adequate Yearly Progress and exiting improvement status Amount of funds allocated under section 1003( g) and 1003(a) to each LEA and school

14 Sustaining Support for School Improvement - New Regulations The recently released Title I regulations clarified several issues related to restructuring: Interventions must be significantly more rigorous and comprehensive than the corrective action that the school implemented, unless the school began to implement one of the restructuring options as a corrective action Interventions must address the reasons why the school is in restructuring

15 Sustaining Support for School Improvement - New Regulations The option of replacing all or most of the school staff may include replacing the principal; however replacing the principal alone is not sufficient to constitute restructuring The “other” option to restructure a school’s governance may include replacing the principal so long as this change is part of a broader reform effort

16 Restructuring Resource LEA and School Improvement Non-regulatory Guidance, Revised July Zollie Stevenson