NPRM-2 Lessons Learned. 2 NPRM-2 Stated Goals Methodological Goals: –Simplicity –Face Validity –Science Based –Minimize Unnecessary Disruption –Acceptable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Advertisements

Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
The complex evaluation framework. 2 Simple projects, complicated programs and complex development interventions Complicated programs Simple projects blue.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Goal: Select the most promising model for geographic HPSA designation to fully test July 20,
Rural Health in Ohio: Issues and Trends Heather Reed, Administrator Primary Care and Rural Health Program Ohio Department of Health.
Pre-Impact Test of Low-Income MUP and Pop-HPSA Assessment of Population-Specific Scoring of Barriers and ATP.
1 Rates of Change During Public and Private Reporting Cycles of Hospital Performance: Implications for Mechanisms Driving Quality Improvement Cathy E.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
PALLIATIVE CARE WAIVER STAKEHOLDER MEETING California Department of Health Services Medi-Cal Policy Division 11/29/06.
Gathering Performance Information: Overview
ASSESSMENT IN HIAs Elizabeth J. Fuller, DrPH, MSPH Georgia Health Policy Center.
Review of Barrier Free Approach and Additional Analysis of MEPS Data Related to ‘Potential’ vs. ‘Experienced’ Barriers.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
National Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy 1. What is the Cohesive Strategy? A national, collaborative approach to addressing wildland fire across all lands.
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
HPSA/MUA Negotiated Rule Making Committee August 16, 2011 HPSA Designations Overview.
Drug Medi-Cal (DMC) Organized Delivery System Wavier November 3,
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
1 Shortage Designation Update State Office of Rural Health Orientation Meeting Rockville, Maryland September 10, 2014.
Survey Designs EDUC 640- Dr. William M. Bauer
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Sustaining Local Public Health and Built Environment Programs Fit Nation NYC November 3, 2011 Annaliese Calhoun.
Introductions Jim Enzinna, Chief, Licensing Division Mark DiNapoli, Assistant Chief, Licensing Division Tracie Coleman, Head, Information Section Vince.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
DELAWARE HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES Division of Public Health Public Health and PCMH Karyl Rattay, MD, MS Director Delaware Division of Public Health.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Concepts for Approaching Population Group Designations.
Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.
MULTI-YEAR GRANT INFORMATION SESSION Blue Hills Community Health Alliance (CHNA 20)
Approaches for Reporting Vendor Performance in Vocational Rehabilitation: A Benchmarking Study by Florida VR Webinar November 21, :30-3:30 Eastern.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Health Status Adjustment to Initial Barrier-Free Demand Estimate.
Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
Steps in Preparing a Business Plan. Preliminary Step Must have a decision making apparatus in place –Governing Board –Viable committee structure Operations.
Applying Business Process Re-engineering
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
U.S. Census Bureau’s Population Estimates Program Victoria Velkoff Population Division U.S. Census Bureau APDU 2010 Annual Conference Public Data 2010:
Access to Medicine Index Problem Statement Long-standing debate about: What is the role of the pharmaceutical industry in access to medicines? Where are.
1 Developing a Framework for an Early Intervention System of Care NECTAC/ ITCA Finance Seminar May 22, 2006.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
CHEVRON PIPE LINE COMPANY Risk Based Prioritization Process.
1 NPRM2 OVERVIEW Review of Proposed Methodology for Historical Context.
1 Measuring Quality Using Experience Surveys 2005 Center for Policy and Innovation Quality Assurance and Improvement January 26, 2006.
Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 12 Planning and Developing Community Programs and Services.
Hitting the Leadership Target Through Leadership and Accountability.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
Overview of Impact Testing Plan. 2 Purpose and Concept Goal: Model the likely result of a revised rule and examine the implications for the population.
Medicaid/SCHIP Technical Assistance for Health IT/HIE 2008 AHRQ Annual Conference Presented by: Linda Dimitropoulos, RTI International.
11 HPSA and MUA/P NEGOTIATED RULEMAKING A DRAFT ROAD MAP HOW DO WE GET FROM HERE TO WHERE WE NEED TO BE? November 17, 2010 Edward Salsberg, HHS Representative.
Implementation & Transition Work Group Charles Owens - Convener Daniel Diaz Roy Brooks Dan Hawkins Steve Holloway Alice Rarig Ron Nelson *Andy Jordan *Dick.
1 Formulate Alternatives Planning Step 5. 2 Social Science Activities in Land Use Planning Planning Steps Social Science Activities Steps 1 & 2: Identify.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
Table 1. Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research (MORE) – observational studies of incidence or prevalence of chronic diseases Tatyana Shamliyan.
Stages of Research and Development
TELEHEALTH: IDENTIFYING GEOGRAPHIES WITH GREATEST POTENTIAL IMPACT
Abstract # An innovative model for prioritizing health care needs for women, infants and children in Texas: Lessons from a Texas-wide.
Module 9 Designing and using EFGR-responsive evaluation indicators
Webinar November 21, :30-3:30 Eastern Standard Time
Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
NR 443 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
NR 443Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
NR 443 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
NR 443 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Presentation transcript:

NPRM-2 Lessons Learned

2 NPRM-2 Stated Goals Methodological Goals: –Simplicity –Face Validity –Science Based –Minimize Unnecessary Disruption –Acceptable Performance Process Goals –Consolidation & Simplification –Proactivity –Automation –Increased State Role

3 Comments: Development and Implementation Concerns Process/Input –Stakeholder Input –Collaboration with other federal agencies (CMS) –Time/Data needed to review at local level Cost/Effort/Implementation –Complexity of applying rule –Data Availability –Phase In / Appeals process Impact on existing system –Understanding of impact analysis & issues with inputs –Varying assessments of loss of designations / grantees –Perception of imposed limits on program allocation of resources (Tier 1, 2) –Meaning of facility designations in terms of eligibility for resources

4 Comments: Technical Concerns Logic/Validity –Decision to express all components of underservice in the units of a population-to-provider ratio –Ambiguous denominator in division of Barrier Free rates –Positive high need adjustments awarded to all communities, even those with the most favorable indicators –Reliance on the same factor for multiple overlapping components –Applying scales built on total population characteristics to designation of sub-groups with highly correlated demographics –Treating negative/reversible community characteristics, such as poor health outcomes, in the same way as characteristics such as percent minorities or elderly which are not targets for change. Arbitrary/non-scientific factors –Relative weighting of non-physician providers, interns vs. physicians –Use of 3000:1 cutoff as level of underservice –Relative contribution of different factors to final scoring

5 Comments: Technical Concerns (cont.) Specificity –Geographic – reliance on counties for statistical model and default service areas –Sub-population designation – stated intent that high need indicators could be used in place of sub- population methods Policy/Judgment Calls –Ob/Gyns, Interns, ‘Mid levels’ in states with limited scope of practice –Eligible sub populations for designation –Eligible facility types under safety net designation option –RHCs as back-out location for federal providers –SCHIP as safety net provider factor –Combination of HPSA and MUP into a single entitiy

6 Potential Lessons Learned Broad based input is key –Largely addressed through NRM process Must be purposeful in both selection of factors and methods for integrating them Consider that accommodations for one group may be considered biased against others Maintain clear lines between designation and program resource allocation decisions Impact testing methods must be clear and limitations acknowledged Minimize local technical effort but assure a process for local involvement Need clarity on implementation plan and process to obtain and maintain designations