1 Mid Day Meal Scheme Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – NCT OF DELHI On
Review of Implementation of MDMS in NCT of Delhi (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to ) Part-I Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions? What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children- wise, in terms of No. of meal served? What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on as well as ? How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains? What is the level of lifting? How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level? How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost? How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served? …… contd Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions? How much MME was utilized? Under what activities? What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices? Part –II What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008? How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data? Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served) Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%) Lifting of foodgrains [ to ]: 80% (+ or – 10%) Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 71% (+ or – 10%) Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed. Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous. State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines. Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Plan Vs Performance (No. of Meal i n Q1+Q2+Q3) No. of Meal (in Crore) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 3% Less (Primary )
Plan Vs Performance (No. of Children i n Q1+Q2+Q3) No. of Meal (in Lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 2% Less (Primary )
Plan Vs Performance (No. of Working Days i n Q1+Q2+Q3) No. of Working days Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (2% Less)
Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Analysis: Foodgrains Availability ( to ) Foodgrains (in MTs) 100% 55% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dept. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Benchmark : 80% 10,849 MTs 1,333 MTs 112 MTs Foodgrains (in MTs)
Foodgrains Utilisation ( to ) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Benchmark : 71% 19,721 MTs 10,849 MTs
Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation ( to ) Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.) Benchmark :71% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Rs Cr. Rs Cr. Rs Cr.
Cooking Cost (Utilisation) – Dept. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Benchmark : 71% Rs Cr. Rs Cr.Rs Cr. Foodgrains (in MTs)
Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise) % Utilisation Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India State average: 55%(FG) & 48%(CC)
Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Food Grains Sl. No District No. of Meals served Expected consumption of Cooking cost Actual Consumption of Cooking cost Deficit in % Deficit Consumption 1 GNCT 1,71,47,200 1, , % 2 MCD 12,03,51,450 12, , % 3 NDMC 19,64, % ( In MTs)
Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Cooking Cost Sl. No District No. of Meals served Expected consumption of Cooking cost Actual Consumption of Cooking cost Deficit in % Deficit Consumption 1 GNCT 1,71,47, % 2 MCD 12,03,51,450 2, % 3 NDMC 19,64, % (Rs. In Lakhs)
MME Utilisation ( to ) (Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 1%
Transport Assistance Utilisation ( to ) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (100%)
Performance Score card – A Summary Sl. No. ComponentAchievementBenchmark 1. Foodgrains Availability 55%80% 2. Foodgrains Utilisation 55%71% 3. Cooking Cost Utilisation 48%71% 4. MME Utilisation 1%100% 5 QPRs received 3 nos. (Only Pry)3 nos. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Major Issues The requisite information on the loss of food grains due to wastage, foreign particles, dust, etc. is not submitted. ( D. O. No. 9-7/2008-MDM 2-1 dated 22/12/08, and subsequent reminder dated16/02/09, and 19/03/2009.) The govt. of NCT of Delhi has not furnished the information on the following assurances: i) Rajya Sabha unstarred Question No. 197 dated raised by Shri N K Singh regarding wasted foodgrains meant for primary schools in Delhi. ii) Lok Sabha unstarred Question No. 550 dated raised by Shri Rewti Raman Singh regarding wastage under mid day meal scheme
Analysis of State’s Proposal for Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) (13% Less) (19% less) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Enrollment Availing MDM
Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (7% More)(13% More)
Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (Proposed) Q-1Q-2Q
Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during (UPPER PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *:SSA= Govt+LB+GA (Proposed)
No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Sl. No YearAs per DISE Data As per MDM Sanctions Not available210 (State’s claim for )
Thank You Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India