Key Moments in NADCP History A DULT D RUG C OURT A DULT D RUG C OURT B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II “D OING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javier Leung and Kassy Tyler University of West Florida Educational Statistics III Dr. Carla Thompson.
Advertisements

Developing the Learning Contract
Truancy Court Of Randolph County
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.
HONORABLE PEGGY DAVIS ROLES AND BOUNDARIES OF SPECIALTY COURT SUPERVISION.
Core Competencies. OBJECTIVES Recognize key core competencies Identify the relationship between core competencies and best practices.
Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts
Our Mission Community Outreach for Youth & Family Services, Inc. is dedicated to improving the quality of life for both the youth and adult population.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008 How Drug Court Practices Impact Recidivism and Costs Shannon Carey, Ph.D. August 2014.
1 How ready are you to change prevention? Preparing an agency for Prevention with Positives.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Chapter 15 Evaluation.
Evidence-Based Assessment Tool A Guide for Family Support Providers and Funders.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
The PD and the Prosecutor An unlikely couple Jack Zanerhaft, Chief Public Defender Tammy Westcott, Assistant DA, Director of Alternative Courts.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
THE COALITION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROVIDERS OF NEW JERSEY The Role of Community Resource Centers in Offender Re-entry.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
Key Moments in NADCP History A DULT D RUG C OURT A DULT D RUG C OURT B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS D OUGLAS B. M ARLOWE, J.D.,
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Mary Donaghy & Judith Lees Managers, Mental Health & Children Project, Health & Social Care Board, Northern Ireland Damien Kavanagh Workshop A: Putting.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Identifying, Treating and Providing Aftercare for Healthcare Students with Substance Abuse American College Health Association University of the Sciences.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
4380 SW Macadam Ave., Ste. 530 Portland, OR Informing policy, improving programs Implementation of the Ten Key Components: Variations.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Key Moments in NADCP History B EST P RACTICES IN J UVENILE D RUG C OURTS B EST P RACTICES IN J UVENILE D RUG C OURTS D OUGLAS B. M ARLOWE, J.D., P H.D.
Building Clinical Infrastructure and Expert Support Michael Steinberg, MD, FACR ULAAC Disparity Project Centinela/Freeman Health System.
8/21/2015 Scott Ronan Idaho Supreme Court Senior Manager, Problem-Solving Courts and Sentencing Alternatives.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
 Performance assessments can:  help identify potential problems in the program  help identify areas where streamlining the process could be useful.
Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Pertaining to Enforcement of all M/NM Mines. New ombudsman within the Office.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Practical and Ethical Issues. Practice and Ethics Precounseling Service Provision Termination Sperry, Len, John Carlson, & Diane Kjos. Becoming An Effective.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Key Moments in NADCP History A DULT D RUG C OURT A DULT D RUG C OURT B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME I N ATIONAL A SSOCIATION.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY (ACE) A program designed to increase the success of high risk offenders returning to the community from prison Western District.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
DUI and other Drug Treatment Dockets Facts and Figures.
Key Moments in NADCP History DUI AND O THER T REATMENT D OCKETS : DUI AND O THER T REATMENT D OCKETS : “B EST P RACTICES, B EST R ESULTS ” T ERRENCE D.
Navigating the Justice System. 4-1  Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process.  Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY United States District Court Western District of Michigan Robert Holmes Bell Chief Judge.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Key Moments in NADCP History J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES “A P REVIEW ” T ERRENCE D. W ALTON, MSW, CSAC C HIEF.
Communication in Problem Solving Courts: Consensus, Conflict, or Capitulation Terrence D. Walton, MSW, CSAC Chief of Standards National Association of.
H Department of Medical Assistance Services Substance Abuse Day Treatment 2013.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Roles in JDTC Discipline Specific Breakout Session.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
The Kansas City VA Medical Center And Kansas City, Missouri Municipal Court.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
PRINCIPLES OF DOCUMENTATION By Claire Ramsay. DOCUMENTATION IN THE HOME Within the realm of Nursing the health record is regarded as more than just a.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Multidisciplinary Intervention Team
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Treatment Court Dockets
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
BY: Honorable Robert S. Anchondo
Key Moments in NADCP History
Presentation transcript:

Key Moments in NADCP History A DULT D RUG C OURT A DULT D RUG C OURT B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II “D OING THE R IGHT T HINGS FOR T HE R IGHT P EOPLE IN THE R IGHT W AY ” Terrence D. Walton Chief Operating Officer National Association of Drug Court Professionals

Key Moments in NADCP History Why Standards?

I.Target Population II.Historically DisadvantagedGroups III.Roles & Responsibilities of the Judge IV.Incentives, Sanctions, & Therapeutic Adjustments V.Substance Abuse Treatment Key Moments in NADCP History Volume I

VI.Complementary Treatment & Social Services VII.Drug and Alcohol Testing VIII.Multidisciplinary Team IX.Census and Caseloads X.Monitoring and Evaluation Key Moments in NADCP History Volume II

Key Moments in NADCP History Complementary Treatment Participants receive complementary treatment and social services for conditions that co-occur with substance abuse and are likely to interfere with their compliance in Drug Court, increase criminal recidivism, or diminish treatment gains.

Key Moments in NADCP History Complementary Treatment N = 21 reviewers low high

Key Moments in NADCP History Complementary Treatment A.Scope of Services B.Sequence and Timing of Services C.Clinical Case Management D.Housing Assistance E.Mental Health Treatment F.Trauma-Informed Services

Key Moments in NADCP History Complementary Treatment G.Criminal Thinking Interventions H.Family & Interpersonal Counseling I.Vocational & Educational Services J.Medical and Dental Treatment K.Prevention of High-Risk Behaviors L.Overdose Prevention & Reversal

Complementary Treatment 1)Do not begin criminal thinking interventions during Phase 1. 2)Enlist at least one reliable prosocial family member, friend, or daily acquaintance to provide feedback to staff and assist participant.

Key Moments in NADCP History Timing Matters

Key Moments in NADCP History Drug & Alcohol Testing Drug and alcohol testing provides an accurate, timely, and comprehensive assessment of unauthorized substance use throughout participants’ enrollment in the Drug Court.

Key Moments in NADCP History Drug & Alcohol Testing N = 36 reviewers low high

Key Moments in NADCP History Drug & Alcohol Testing A.Frequent Testing B.Random Testing C.Duration of Testing D.Breadth of Testing E.Witnessed Collection

Key Moments in NADCP History Drug & Alcohol Testing F.Valid specimens G.Accurate & Reliable Testing Procedures H.Rapid Results I.Participant Contract

Drug and Alcohol Testing 1)Randomly test at least twice per week, including weekends and holidays and require participants to report within 8 hours of notification. 2)Continue testing randomly at least twice per week until participant is preparing for graduation in the final phase.

Key Moments in NADCP History A participant should have an equal chance of being called on any day of the week. Avoid randomizing in weekly blocks. Test routinely for all drugs commonly used by population. Avoid Respites from Detection

Key Moments in NADCP History Multidisciplinary Team A dedicated multidisciplinary team of professionals manages the day-to-day operations of the Drug Court, including reviewing participant progress during pre-court staff meetings and status hearings, contributing observations and recommendations within team members’ respective areas of expertise, and delivering or overseeing the delivery of legal, treatment and supervision services.

Key Moments in NADCP History Multidisciplinary Team N = 21 reviewers low high

Key Moments in NADCP History Multidisciplinary Team

1)Judge considers perspectives of all team member before making decisions that impact participants’ welfare or liberty interests. 2)Defense attorneys inform participants and team members whether they will share confidential information concerning participants with other team members.

Key Moments in NADCP History Census and Caseloads The Drug Court serves as many eligible individuals as practicable while maintaining continuous fidelity to best practice standards.

Key Moments in NADCP History Census and Caseloads N = 26 reviewers low high

Key Moments in NADCP History Census and Caseloads

1)Program census, as well as supervision and treatment caseloads are small enough to permit both reliable detection of behavior and effective responses. 2)Caseload sizes relate to the risk and need levels of participants.

Census and Caseloads 1)Program census, as well as supervision and treatment caseloads are small enough to permit both reliable detection of behavior and effective responses. 2)Caseload sizes relate to the risk and need levels of participants. High RiskLow Risk High Need 30 to 1 (or less) Probation: 50 to 1 Treatment: 30: 1 Low Need Probation: 30 to 1 Treatment: 50: 1 200:1 Don’t Belong in Drug Court

Key Moments in NADCP History Monitoring & Evaluation The Drug Court routinely monitors its adherence to best practice standards and employs scientifically valid and reliable procedures to evaluate its effectiveness.

Key Moments in NADCP History Monitoring & Evaluation N = 32 reviewers low high

Key Moments in NADCP History Monitoring & Evaluation A.Adherence to Best Practices B.In-Program Outcomes C.Criminal Recidivism D.Independent Evaluations E.Historically Disadvantaged Groups

Key Moments in NADCP History Monitoring & Evaluation F.Electronic Database G.Timely & Reliable Data Entry H.Intent-to-Treat Analyses I.Comparison Groups J.Time at Risk

Monitoring and Evaluation 1)Analyze outcomes for all participants, including those who withdrew or were terminated early. 2)Staff members are required to record information regarding service provision within 48 hours.

Key Moments in NADCP History A DULT D RUG C OURT A DULT D RUG C OURT B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II “D OING THE R IGHT T HINGS FOR T HE R IGHT P EOPLE IN THE R IGHT W AY ”