Understanding Science 4. Pseudoscience © Colin Frayn, 2012 www.frayn.net.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Science or Bunk: How to Tell the Difference Why I care if You Waste Your Money.
Advertisements

Theory of knowledge Lesson 2
Certainty Of Things Believed Among Us Certainty - A Basic Need Of All Men – Before one is willing to make an "investment" in anything that costs Wants.
Critical/“Critiquing” Thinking Objective & Subjective Claims Fact & Opinion Issue & Argument Cogency Reasoning Premise & Conclusion Cognitive Biases Belief.
René Descartes ( ). The popular version of Descartes.
Bigquestions.co.uk1 meditation 3, the trademark argument perfection.
Understanding Science 6. Conspiracy Theories © Colin Frayn,
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
Persuasive Media.  Persuasive media includes any text that attempts to sell a product or a service to a consumer.  All persuasive media attempts influence.
Concept Summary Batesville High School Physics. Natural Philosophy  Socrates, Plato, Aristotle  Were the “authorities” in Western thought from about.
The Problems of Knowledge
Teaching Research Methods: Resources for HE Social Sciences Practitioners What is knowledge?
Rhetorical Appeals ETHOS, PATHOS, and LOGOS.
Michael Lacewing Idealism: objections Michael Lacewing
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
© Michael Lacewing Faith without reason? Michael Lacewing
© Colin Frayn, Leap Seconds Our time system approximates the Earth’s rotation –It’s not quite aligned –Sometimes we need to correct.
“The Problem of Knowledge” Chapter 1 – Theory of Knowledge.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE LESSON 1 The Problem of Knowledge 1.
Bellringer: The astronomer Carl Sagan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” What did he mean by this? Do you agree?
Understanding Science 2. Bayes’ Theorem © Colin Frayn,
What’s in the news right now related to science???? Flesh eating bacteria.
Knowledge and Belief Some fundamental problems. Knowledge: a problematic concept “Knowledge” is ambiguous in a number of ways; the term can mean variously:
5.02V Junk Science and Our Food U Junk Science.
Science and Creationism 25. Miscellaneous © Colin Frayn,
Based on the TED talk by Sam Harris Sanmit Narvekar CS 301.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
@ 2012 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning Chapter 1 What is Science What is 2012 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
ACT English When in Doubt, Take it out. The ACT English test includes: 10 punctuation questions 12 grammar and usage questions 18 sentence structure questions.
Understanding Science 1. Proof © Colin Frayn,
Logical Fallacies. A question to get us started… Tell me about what is logically wrong with this statement. Why isn’t it convincing? What other problems.
Science and Creationism 1. Overview © Colin Frayn,
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 12 Evaluating.
The Problem of Knowledge 1 Pages 3-9. Table of Contents Quotes p. 3 Quotes Introduction p. 4 Introduction Common sense p. 4-7 Common sense Certainty p.
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
L ECTURE 14: H UME ’ S R ADICAL E MPIRICISM. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Recap our investigation into empiricist theories of knowledge.
Lesson 2: Common Misconceptions. Misconception 1 “Christianity must be proven scientifically; I’ll accept Christianity when you prove it with the scientific.
Can you trust your senses?. WHAT DO YOU KNOW? AN INTRODUCTION TO SCEPTICISM.
Biology and “The Nature of Science ” What makes science different from other kinds of human activity? Chapter 1: The Science of Biology.
A tree falls in a forest but there is no one to hear it, does it make a sound?
4.02V Junk Science and Our Food V Junk Science.
Persuasive Writing What is it?. Definition: Persuasive writing is a type of writing where an author tries to convince the reader to do something or think.
© Colin Frayn, The Straw Man Setting up a weaker version of a theory, claiming (falsely) that this is the true theory, and then disproving.
Eliminative materialism
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
Science Words. Scientific Inquiry The ways scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on gathered evidence.
Understanding Science 9. Science and Scientists © Colin Frayn,
Understanding Science
Understanding Science 11. Special Pleading © Colin Frayn,
Understanding Science 3. The Scientific Method © Colin Frayn,
© Colin Frayn, What are we discussing? ‘Science’ is the process of discovering and testing knowledge through rigorous, evidence-based.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE The nature of knowledge. Knowledge  What is it?  A “Thick Concept”?  How is it different from belief?
Understanding Science 5. The Burden of Proof © Colin Frayn,
Understanding Science 14. Skepticism © Colin Frayn,
Critical Thinking  A key academic skill  Required for successful study.
Give definitions Give an opinion and justify that opinion Explain religious attitudes Respond to a statement – 2 sides.
Notes –  With the new idea of the universe having the sun at the center and not the Earth, people began to think and doubt the world around.
Absolute truth v evolving changing truth. There are 2 kinds of truth that cause conflict between Religion & Science 1. Absolute truth 2. Evolving changing.
Chapter 1: The Science of Biology Section 1: What is Science?
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
We’re Doing an Experiment
What is Scientific Literacy?
How do we know things? The Scientific Method
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Unit: Science & Technology
FCAT Science Standard Arianna Medina.
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Science 4. Pseudoscience © Colin Frayn,

What is Pseudoscience? Something that looks like science and pretends to be science … but isn’t! Proto-science Speculative science Pseudoscience relies on … –Scientific language –Appeal to authority –Forceful arguments –Appeal to intuition –Popular media © Colin Frayn,

Scientific Language Complex language is persuasive –Science is complex, therefore “complex” must imply “scientific” Mental heuristics –Short-cut rules –Make decisions quickly –Not entirely accurate –Inaccuracies can be exploited –E.g. optical illusions © Colin Frayn,

Appeal to Authority “You should believe me because says I’m right” Science is not a democracy –Truth is not decided by a majority vote Science is not a hierarchy –Truth is not decided by rank These heuristics are useful, but… –Experts can be wrong –Expertise rarely transfers between disciplines –Even certain theories often have dissenters © Colin Frayn,

Forceful Arguments Certainty is a red flag –Scientists usually appear cautious –Pseudoscientists appear confident “This is the way it is” –Subconsciously accept the idea “This is what the evidence shows” –(so far) –(but we might be wrong) –Subconsciously doubt the idea © Colin Frayn,

Appeal to Intuition “I mean, it’s obvious, right?” Intuition is an evolved sense –Good for working on “Human scales” –Useful on the whole –Employs heuristics –Highly susceptible to errors when applied to unfamiliar environments –Science is not (always) intuitive Don’t trust your gut –That’s why we have experiments! © Colin Frayn,

Popular Media Scientific accuracy is not a priority –Most science journalists are not scientists –Sensationalism sells! Peer review is vital –Beware of those taking shortcuts E.g. Pons & Fleischmann Truth is not related to volume –Only evidence counts © Colin Frayn,

Some Examples Homeopathy –Magic water pretending to be medicine “Energy” pseudoscience –New-age mumbo jumbo “Quantum” pseudoscience –Wave functions and Chopra Health Fads –Magical diets and cancer cures © Colin Frayn,

Summary Pseudoscience is not science –It’s nonsense pretending to be science Heuristics –Quick short-cuts –Can be exploited –Be aware of the tricks your brain plays! Do your own investigation –If it sounds to good to be true… © Colin Frayn,