Impact of 3D Clouds on Aerosol Retrievals Guoyong Wen 1,2 Alexander Marshak 1 Robert F. Cahalan 1 Lorraine Remer 1 Richard Kleidman 1,3 1 NASA/Goddard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
Advertisements

1 Do Polluted Clouds Have Sharper Cloud Edges? Christine Chiu, Julian Mann, Robin Hogan University of Reading Alexander Marshak, Warren Wiscombe NASA Goddard.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Summary of GEO-CAPE Aerosol Working Group Progress Members: Mian Chin, Pubu Ciren, Hiren Jethva, Joanna Joiner, Shobha Kondragunta, Alexei Lyapustin, Shana.
Upgrades to the MODIS near-IR Water Vapor Algorithm and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithm For Collection 6 Bo-Cai Gao & Rong-Rong Li Remote Sensing Division,
 nm)  nm) PurposeSpatial Resolution (km) Ozone, SO 2, UV8 3251Ozone8 3403Aerosols, UV, and Volcanic Ash8 3883Aerosols, Clouds, UV and Volcanic.
VIIRS LST Uncertainty Estimation And Quality Assessment of Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park;
3D Radiative Transfer in Cloudy Atmospheres: Diffusion Approximation and Monte Carlo Simulation for Thermal Emission K. N. Liou, Y. Chen, and Y. Gu Department.
Passive Measurements of Rain Rate in Hurricanes Ruba A.Amarin CFRSL December 10, 2005.
DIRECT TROPOSPHERIC OZONE RETRIEVALS FROM SATELLITE ULTRAVIOLET RADIANCES Alexander D. Frolov, University of Maryland Robert D. Hudson, University of.
Aerosol radiative effects from satellites Gareth Thomas Nicky Chalmers, Caroline Poulsen, Ellie Highwood, Don Grainger Gareth Thomas - NCEO/CEOI-ST Joint.
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
1 Cloud Droplet Size Retrievals from AERONET Cloud Mode Observations Christine Chiu Stefani Huang, Alexander Marshak, Tamas Várnai, Brent Holben, Warren.
Initial 3D isotropic fractal field An initial fractal cloud-like field can be generated by essentially performing an inverse 3D Fourier Transform on the.
Cloud Top Height Retrieval From MIPAS Jane Hurley, Anu Dudhia, Graham Ewen, Don Grainger Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford.
An Introduction to Using Angular Information in Aerosol Remote Sensing Richard Kleidman SSAI/NASA Goddard Lorraine Remer UMBC / JCET Robert C. Levy NASA.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
July 14, 2004Alexander Marshak 3D Error Assessment and Cloud Climatology from MODIS R.F. Cahalan, A. Marshak (GSFC) K.F. Evans (University of Colorado)
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Test simulation of Aerosol impact on solar radiation with WRF-CHEM DustDNI (w/o dust) – DNI (w/ dust) Positive value indicates the decreased DNI due to.
Xiong Liu, Mike Newchurch Department of Atmospheric Science University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
GSFC. Glaciation Level and Vertical Profile of Droplet Size Associated with Cloud-Aerosol Interactions (D. Rosenfeld) Clean Polluted.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
NOAA/NESDIS Cooperative Research Program Second Annual Science Symposium SATELLITE CALIBRATION & VALIDATION July Barry Gross (CCNY) Brian Cairns.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
GE0-CAPE Workshop University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill August 2008 Aerosols: What is measurable and by what remote sensing technique? Omar Torres.
Marc Schröder, FUB Tutorial, De Bilt, 10.´04 Photon path length distributions and detailed microphysical parameterisations Marc Schröder Institut für Weltraumwissenschaften,
Identifying 3D Radiative Cloud Effects Using MODIS Visible Reflectance Measurements Amanda Gumber Department of Atmospherics and Oceanic Sciences/CIMSS.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
Satellite group MPI Mainz Investigating Global Long-term Data Sets of the Atmospheric H 2 O VCD and of Cloud Properties.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
Synergy of MODIS Deep Blue and Operational Aerosol Products with MISR and SeaWiFS N. Christina Hsu and S.-C. Tsay, M. D. King, M.-J. Jeong NASA Goddard.
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
S5P cloud products Sebastián Gimeno García, Ronny Lutz, Diego Loyola German S5P Verification Meeting 1 Bremen, November Chart 1>
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Modelled & Observed Atmospheric Radiation Balance during the West African Dry Season. Sean Milton, Glenn Greed, Malcolm Brooks,
Zhibo (zippo) Zhang 03/29/2010 ESSIC
Comparisons of LER/MLER Cloud Pressures with a Model of Mie Scattering Plane-Parallel Cloud Alexander Vasilkov 1, Joanna Joiner 2, Pawan K. Bhartia 2,
3km 1.7 km 60 o 30 o With 1dg FOV, 3km from the cloud, the foot print perpendicular to the cloud will be about 50m. Cloud-Aerosol Scanner: Possible measurements.
Aerosol Characterization Using the SeaWiFS Sensor and Surface Data E. M. Robinson and R. B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Summary Issues SWS Observations It is difficult to distinguish between cloudy and cloud- free air in remote sensing observations. This transition zone.
Visible optical depth,  Optically thicker clouds correlate with colder tops Ship tracks Note, retrievals done on cloudy pixels which are spatially uniform.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Radar Bands Letters chosen during WWII. X-band so-named b/c it was kept secret during the war.
1 Information Content Tristan L’Ecuyer. 2 Degrees of Freedom Using the expression for the state vector that minimizes the cost function it is relatively.
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 2. In-cloud Multiple Scattering Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert.
Barbuda Antigua MISR 250 m The Climatology of Small Tropical Oceanic Cumuli New Findings to Old Problems (Analysis of EOS-Terra data) Larry Di Girolamo,
University of Oxford EUMETSAT Satellite Conference 2004 Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm for Meteosat Second Generation Sam Dean, Steven Marsh and Don Grainger.
The apparent bluing of aerosols near clouds Alexander Marshak (GSFC) Guoyong Wen and Tam á s V á rnai (UMBC/GSFC) Lorraine Remer and Bob Cahalan (GSFC)
SAGE III Aerosol Studies: Size Distribution Retrievals and Validation Mark Hervig GATS Inc.
Lorraine Remer, Yoram Kaufman, Didier Tanré Shana Mattoo, Richard Kleidman, Robert Levy Vanderlei Martins, Allen Chu, Charles Ichoku, Rong-Rong Li, Ilan.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
Bluing of Aerosols near Clouds: Results from a Simple Model and MODIS Observations Alexander Marshak (GSFC) Tam á s V á rnai and Guoyong Wen (UMBC/GSFC)
Motivation: Help satellite studies of aerosol-cloud interactions Aerosol remote sensing near clouds is challenging Excluding areas near-cloud risks biases.
Aerosol properties in a cloudy world (from MODIS and CALIOP) Alexander Marshak (GSFC) Bob Cahalan (GSFC), Tamas Varnai (UMBC), Guoyong Wen, Weidong Yang.
U.A. Dyudina, A.P. Ingersoll, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, Objectives We study lightning on Jupiter using spatially resolved.
Investigating Cloud Inhomogeneity using CRM simulations.
Seung-Hee Ham and B.J. Sohn Seoul National University, Korea
Need for TEMPO-ABI Synergy
Entrapment An important mechanism for shortwave 3D cloud radiative effects and its inclusion in the SPARTACUS radiative transfer model Robin Hogan, Mark.
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Presentation transcript:

Impact of 3D Clouds on Aerosol Retrievals Guoyong Wen 1,2 Alexander Marshak 1 Robert F. Cahalan 1 Lorraine Remer 1 Richard Kleidman 1,3 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 2 GEST/UMBC, 3 SSAI

Physical Mechanism r 1D additional diffuse radiation source scattered by clouds rr 3D impact  r= r 3D - r 1D

Monte-Carlo Simulation of Radiation Fields of a sub-image of a MODIS image about the size of ASTER image (60 km x 60 km) at 53 degrees west on the equator, acquired on Jan 25, km

Monte Carlo Simulation of Radiation Field Inputs: MODIS cloud OPD Cloud top height derived from the Tb at 11 microns Cloud bottom at 1 km Effective radius of 10  m Log-normal distribution of aerosols with r e =0.13  m, and  =0.7. Surface albedo of SZA of 32 degrees SAM of 129 degrees Simulate 3D radiaiton field in 90m resolution using ASTER Exam: 3D cloud impacts Analyze MODIS aerosol retrievals Detailed analysis

MODIS Cloud Optical Depth And Brightness Temperature

Simulated 3D cloud effects defined as  r = r 3D -r 1D at 1km resolution AOT = 0.1 Monte Carlo Simulation of 3D Cloud Effects

The distribution shows the shadowing reduction and diffuse enhancement.  r~0.004 or  ~0.04 for  =0.1 Statistics of 3D Cloud Effects

MODIS Selected Pixels for Aerosol Retrievals And Retrieved Aerosol Optical Thickness

It appears more open the smaller reflectance the closer the pixels to bright clouds, the larger reflectance occurs the selected clear pixels are quite homogeneous. the reflectance of those pixels show slightly dependence on clear-cloud distance

Intercomparison of Observed and MC Simulated Selected Clear Pixel Reflectance

Observed Reflectance is linear correlated with Modeled reflectance with correlation coefficient of Intercomparison of Observed and MC Simulated Reflectance for Selected Clear Pixels

Some Details

More Details with ASTER

3D Cloud Effects from ASTER

Derived Cloud Optical Depth Field and Cloud Top Height at 90 m Resolution

MC Simulated 3D Cloud Effects

3D Cloud Enhancement and Distribution As A Function of Nearest Cloud Distance  r ~ 0.02 or  ~  m (AOT=0.4)0.67  m (AOT = 0.2)  r ~ or  ~ 0.15 Assume  is a linear function of  i.e.,  we estimate AOT=0.27 and AOT ~0.11

Summary MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithm does a good job to select homogeneous targets. 3D clouds strongly enhance clear sky reflectance nearby. This effect can be seen from ASTER images. Estimated error in 1D AOT is large. Aerosol optical thickness is about 0.11 and 0.27 at 0.67  m and 0.47  m respectively rather than 0.2 and 0.4 in an open area of Cu.