February, 2014.  2002 – CalSWEC, RTAs/IUC began development of CC training  Part of an overall strategic plan for child welfare training evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The San Francisco Parent Training Institute Triple P Program December 7, 2011 Stephanie Romney, PhD Danijela Zlatevski, PhD
Advertisements

Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.
CPS Recidivism Associated with a Home Visiting Program: A Quasi Experimental Analysis Ed Byrnes, Ph.D. Eastern Washington University Michael Lawson, M.S.
Strengthening Diversity in the Mental Health Workforce: A Driver for System Change 7 th International Conference on Social Work Los Angeles June 24, 2013.
ASSURING THAT TRAINING HAS IMPACT: EVALUATING A LARGE AND COMPLEX TRAINING SYSTEM Child Welfare Evaluation Summit Washington, D.C. | August 30 th, 2011.
The Catalyst Group, LLC Adolescent Residential Treatment Initiative I Mua Mau Ohana Project Preliminary Findings Richard Kim, Ph.D. 03/03/2005 Funded by.
Assessment Policies 1 Implementation and Monitoring American Institutes for Research February 2005.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
Reunification – Old and New Information Diana J. English PhD Child Welfare League of America May 30, 2007.
ASU Involvement in Child Welfare Workforce Development and Research: Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities Testimony to the Arizona Child Safety Task.
AN EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT GROUP PROGRAM FOR FOSTER PARENTS DESIGNED TO PREVENT PLACEMENT DISRUPTION: A GRANT PROPOSAL Miriam Vitela California State University,
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Student report cards Presentation for Primary School Staff 2007.
Proposed Conceptual Model to Guide Workforce Development Efforts in Child Welfare Feb 2014.
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Service Planning Block Stakeholder feedback. Agenda Welcome Orientation Acknowledgements Overview of Common Core 3.0 Overview of Service Planning Block.
Common Core 3.0 Learning Objectives for Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter.
Evaluating Grandparent (And Other Relatives) Raising Grandchildren Programs Brookdale Foundation Web Chat, May 2007 Presenter: Kevin Brabazon
Proposed Conceptual Model to Guide Workforce Development Efforts in Child Welfare Feb 2014.
A major shift in Alabama’s curriculum to better prepare our students for post-secondary life (i.e. life after school). 1.Beginning this school year ( )
CSU Dominguez Hills Years of Implementation: Model components: - Mutual Partnership Activities - Field Curriculum - Field Placement Selection.
Division of Emergency Medicine Cincinnati Children’s Hospital
Eta Tools for Case Managers and Supervisors Participants Development Activities Skilled Workers Employment and Training Administration Tracking the Service.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of NAMI’s In Our Own Voice (IOOV) Education Program Amy L. Wood, Ph.D. George Mason University NAMI Convention Presentation.
Evaluation of Behavior-Focused Training for Chemically Dependent Parents Mary E. Lutz, DSW, MPH, Roberta Shafter, PhD, Joyce Park, BA, Katherine Barbacci,
Student report cards Presentation for Secondary School Staff 2007.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
2012 Readiness Area Points Possible Points Earned Growth of English Language Learners Special Education Students in General Education.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.
Community Planning Training 5- Community Planning Training 5-1.
Child Welfare Title IV-E Waivers. Parental Substance Abuse and Child Maltreatment: Evaluation Results from the NH IV-E Waiver Project Glenda Kaufman Kantor,
2 nd Annual FFT Symposium, April 23 & 24, 2009 Cricket Mitchell, PhD Research Associate, Child and Families Team, CIMH California FFT Outcome Evaluation.
Secondary Analysis of Child Welfare In-Service Training Data Comparing Title IV-E and non-Title IV-E Graduates 1.
Effects of IV-E Education on MSW Student’s Attitudes and Professional Commitment Susan Jacquet & Fangfang Yao California Social Work Education Center UC.
© 2011 Commonwealth Corporation 1 Review of Pilot 1 (2011) Assessment Navjeet Singh, Vice President of Applied Research & Evaluation
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Domain-Based Outcome Measures. In order to assess the effectiveness of DAS-funded prevention programming and its influence on certain specified risk and.
“A half-century of research demonstrates convincingly that children’s well-being builds upon meeting first their primary needs for a stable and lasting.
 Background on CalSWEC and data sources  Review of Key Findings from analysis of CalSWEC data on the child welfare workforce: ◦ Latino/a ethnicity ◦
2012 National Human Services Training Evaluation Symposium: 2012 National Human Services Training Evaluation Symposium: An Investigation of Stereotype.
Child Welfare Training Evaluation in California Update on the Strategic Planning Process RTA All Staff SPS | March
Robert Franco, Ph.D. Director, Office for Institutional Effectiveness Professor of Anthropology
Gender Disproportionality among Social Workers: What are the Implications for Training? Susan Jacquet & Amy Benton CalSWEC With assistance from Cindy Parry.
 Identification of Child Maltreatment: Public Child Welfare Worker Training Evaluation Outcomes Chris Lee, M.S.W. Maria Hernandez, M.S.W. California Social.
 1) To examine the prevalence of animal abuse among youth placed in foster care because of maltreatment.  2) To determine which types of maltreatment.
Delivering and Sustaining Evidence Based Interventions: Triple P in San Francisco January 28, 2014.
Commit to Agency Mission and Values
Brotherson, S., Kranzler, B., & Zehnacker, G.
Chapter 11: Bivariate Statistics and Statistical Inference
Child Protective Services Update
Measure Description Standard Frequency of Measurement
May 1, 2014 Rose Greene and Ellen Unruh
School Board Finance Committee Presentation 6/20/16
Florida’s Child Welfare Practice Model
First 5 Sonoma County Triple P Implementation & Evaluation
Creating a Multidisciplinary Team to Develop and Implement Interprofessional Education (IPE) Simulations Preparing Students for Collaborative Practice.
UNH Graduate Research Conference 2016
Classroom Skill Building
Engaging Migrant Parents in Meaningful Parent Involvement
Arely M. Hurtado1,2, Phillip D. Akutsu2, & Deanna L. Stammer1
Predicting School Difficulties for Culturally Diverse Adolescents Referred to Mental Health Treatment Deanna L. Stammer1, Phillip D. Akutsu2, & Arely.
Presentation transcript:

February, 2014

 2002 – CalSWEC, RTAs/IUC began development of CC training  Part of an overall strategic plan for child welfare training evaluation  Purpose: to develop rigorous methods to assess and report effectiveness of training so that the findings can be used to improve training & training-related services.

 Common Core test modules include Family Engagement in Case Planning & Case Management, Permanency & Placement, and Child and Youth Development.  Since FY11 – FY13, there were between 589 & 682 pretest- posttest pairs of CalSWEC MSW-IV-E graduates, non-IV-E MSWs, and non-IV-E trainees ◦ All participants made significant gains from pre- to post-test.  MSWs and MSW-IV-E graduates scored higher on some pre- tests (e.g., Permanency & Placement and Family Engagement and Case Planning).  On the Child Forensic Attitude Scale (CFAS), IV-E graduates showed significant gains in the areas of sensitivity, specificity and less skepticism toward reports of child abuse. Gains were significantly greater than those of non-IV-Es in sensitivity.

Typical IV-E graduates:  Identify themselves as Hispanic / Latino or Caucasian  Have English as a first language  In current position for less than 6 months at the time of training  Have not worked in CW prior to their current position  Do not carry a caseload  Have discussed their training needs with a supervisor prior to attending training  Know clients with whom they could apply what they have learned *Since FY06-07 Compared with non-IV-Es, they are more likely to:  Have 6 months or more of previous CW experience  Be younger  Know clients with whom they could apply what they had learned  Expect to find Core less worthwhile than non-Title IV-E trainees.

 More MSW-IVE graduates: ◦ Identify themselves as Hispanic/Latino ◦ Have English as a Second Language ◦ Have worked in child welfare prior to their current position ◦ Carry a caseload ◦ Report behavior associated with transfer of learning (e.g. discussing their training needs with their supervisors, having clients in mind with whom they can apply what they’ve learned).