Depth of Knowledge: Secondary Math Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Maria Gross.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.

Advertisements

Understanding Depth 0f knowledge

The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.

Little Red Riding Hood & Cognitive Rigor Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Structure of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Research-based learning progressions Internationally.

Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 6 – The Test Blueprint.

Bridging Assessment and Instruction

COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)

SBAC Alignment Study Los Angeles, March 2014 Paula Torres Leanne Leonard, Ed.D.

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.

Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge

Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference

INTRODUCTION AND IMPLICATIONS DELAWARE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PA Common Core Standards 1.

Common Core Elementary Symposium Transitioning to the Common Core

Identifying Mathematics Levels of Cognitive Rigor (DOK) Office of Curriculum, Instruction & Professional Development - Mathematics February 19, 2015 Module.

Introduction to Depth of Knowledge

The New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Alignment Study December 5, 2006.

Welcome to Common Core State Standards (CCSS) overview please sign in.

© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.

Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.

DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.

Common Core Update – Opening March 11, Common Core Standards  What are the Common Core Standards?  How do the Common Core Standards compare to.

The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.

Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.

NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.

Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.

Designing Common Core Assessment Questions for Educators Creating Type II and Type III Assessments.

Quality Instruction The ♥ of the matter is the depth of knowledge.

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER 1. Early Connections Planning Phase 2. District Strategic Plan.

Depth of Knowledge (DOK)

DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)

Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.

Kentucky’s Curriculum Documents A driving force behind education in Kentucky.

Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.

Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.

Wapato School District  Why is it challenging?  How do you support them?

Page 1 Teaching with Depth: An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge by Karen Taylor

Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.

PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.

Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:

Building Language Based Activities: Digging Below the Surface Cindy Shaffer, Stevie Kline, Michael Derman.

Standards-Based Instruction Implementation: Badge 4-Analyzing Standards.

DOK and 4th Grade Mathematics Smarter Balanced Assessment Questions

Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.

SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.

Shifting to a Standards-Based Mindset

Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.

Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.

Depth of Knowledge April 10, 2013.

Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,

The Constructed Response Assessment The Journey Continues.

What is RIGOR in the Math Classroom?. Presenter Introduction: Stephanie Darley East Valley RttT Math Coach Curriculum Coach at DHHS Been with TLG for.

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Professional Development Plain Local School Spring 2013 Cassandra Sponseller.

Planning for Assessment Blooms Taxonomy. TAXONOMIES A taxonomy may be defined as a system of classification.

New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.

Linking Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment in Mathematics March 10, 2016 CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

Ashley Pullen BLOOM’S TAXONOMY & DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)

Bridging Assessment and Instruction

Professor of Education

LKSD Science Curriculum Committee

Practical Tips for Increasing Student Thinking & Learning

Assessing the Common Core Standards

What is it with these two?

Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content. Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.

Preplanning Presentation

Spotlight on our VOCABULARY

Assessment and Higher-Order Thinking

Presentation transcript:

Depth of Knowledge: Secondary Math Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Maria Gross

Webb’s DOK or “How deep can your students go?” CCSS alone do not bring rigor to the classroom Webb’s DOK is one tool to analyze cognitive demand intended by the standards DOK1: Recall DOK2: Skill/Concept DOK3: Strategic Thinking DOK4: Extended Thinking

DOK Math Module Goals Define (DOK1) DOK Levels Categorize (DOK2) existing Smarter Balanced problems by DOK Level Cite evidence (DOK3) for DOK Levels in existing and developed problems Modify/revise (DOK3) existing Smarter Balanced materials to vary DOK level Create (DOK4) balanced assessment DOK1: Recall DOK2: Skill/Concept DOK3: Strategic Thinking DOK4: Extended Thinking

Match Webb’s DOK levels with Bloom’s Taxonomy

Examples of Activities and their DOK Level

Applying DOK to Lessons DOK coding helps scaffold lessons and balance assessments Students should be exposed to activities that represent all DOK levels Smarter Balanced practice problems may be modified to scaffold students to designated DOK Level DOK1: Recall DOK2: Skill/Concept DOK3: Strategic Thinking DOK4: Extended Thinking

Other LEVEL 4 Examples Performance Tasks Will cover in another module

Scaffolding Problems Provided DOK Level is top level for problem Scaffolding provides various points of entry for diverse student levels DOK1: Recall DOK2: Skill/Concept DOK3: Strategic Thinking DOK4: Extended Thinking

What are the DOK Levels? Work with partners Share after work 4 Justify answer using key words, activity examples and/or DOK descriptions For DOK2 and DOK3 Level problems, revise to DOK1 (or DOK2) Levels DOK1: Recall DOK2: Skill/Concept DOK3: Strategic Thinking DOK4: Extended Thinking

Share DOK Level with rationale Revisions for scaffolding DOK1: Recall DOK2: Skill/Concept DOK3: Strategic Thinking DOK4: Extended Thinking

Share DOK Level with rationale Revisions for scaffolding DOK1: Recall DOK2: Skill/Concept DOK3: Strategic Thinking DOK4: Extended Thinking

Share DOK Level with rationale Revisions for scaffolding DOK1: Recall DOK2: Skill/Concept DOK3: Strategic Thinking DOK4: Extended Thinking

In-Class Assignment With partner: Select one or two standards to assess Develop a 12 problem assessment 2 problems at DOK 3 4 problems at DOK 2 6 problems at DOK 1 State rationale for each problem’s DOK level Brainstorm a DOK Level 4 Activity

References Webb, N. L. (2002). Depth-of-knowledge levels for four content areas. Language Arts. Hess, K. (2013). A Guide for Using Webb’s Depth of Knowledge with Common Core State Standards. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Common Core Institute. Dekker, T. (2007). A Model for Constructing Higher-Level Classroom Assess.