Collimator settings for 2012 R. Bruce, R. Assmann for the collimation team 2012.03.09 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli With essential input from G. Arduini, R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Fitterer, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, aperture team.
Advertisements

Collimation with retracted TCSGs R. Bruce, R. Kwee, S. Redaelli.
Combined cleaning in IR3 - MD results and simulations Adriana Rossi R.W.Assmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, L. Lari, S. Redaelli, G. Valentino,
Simulation priorities for 2015 R. Bruce for task 5.2.
Critical beam losses during Commissioning & Initial Operation Guillaume Robert-Demolaize (CERN and Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble) with R. Assmann, S.
Collimation MDs LHC Study Working Group Daniel Wollmann for the Collimation-Team, BLM-Team, Impedance-Team, … LHC Study Working Group,
1 Analysis of MD on IR1 and IR5 aperture at 3.5 TeV – progress report C. Alabau Pons, R. Assmann, R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, G. Müller, S. Redaelli F. Schmidt,
Day ● 09:00-14:00: Collimation setup 3.5 TeV – Slowed down by losses induced by tune hump. – 48 collimators set up. – Beam dumped by ATLAS during.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The ATS MD part III (Achromatic Telescopic Squeezing scheme) Participants: Any (active) volunteers Goal: 1)MD1 (S. Fartoukh & R. Assmann  10h): “Pre-squeeze’’
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
External Review on LHC Machine Protection, CERN, Collimation of encountered losses D. Wollmann, R.W. Assmann, F. Burkart, R. Bruce, M. Cauchi,
Concept of a Collimation System with Enhanced Operational Stability and Performance.
LHC Studies Working Group – 03 July 2012 Beam Scraping and Diffusion + Asynchronous Dump MD G. Valentino, R. W. Assmann, F. Burkart, L. Lari, S. Redaelli,
LHC Machine Protection System Review LHC Machine Protection System Review Oliver Aberle13 April 2005 with input from R. Assmann and R. Losito Ensuring.
LSWG day: Impedance and beam induced heating Nicolas Mounet *, Daria Atapovych, Nicolò Biancacci, Elias Métral, Tatiana Pieloni, Stefano Redaelli, Benoit.
RA CPM 21/2/03 1 Present Approach and Status R. Assmann for the LHC Collimation Team Problem: Al/Cu system would not resist irregular dumps (pre-trigger.
B. Auchmann, O. Picha, Joint CWG/BLMTWG Meeting August
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
R. Bruce, Today’s meeting ATS optics proposed for use in 2015 (see LBOC, Evian) Several differences compared to nominal optics – Checks needed!
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Simulations of TCT beam impacts for different scenarios R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. RedaelliAcknowledgement: L. Lari, C. Bracco, B. Goddard.
Aperture in case of an asynchronous beam dump with ATS optics R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. Redaelli With valueable input from: A. Bertarelli, C. Bracco, F.
S. FartoukhLSWG Day, Monday 18th, ATS MDs for Run II S. Fartoukh for the ATS MD team  Reminder  Goal & overall strategy  Proposals for 2016/
S. FartoukhLSWG Day, Monday 18th, ATS MDs for Run II S. Fartoukh for the ATS MD team  Reminder  Goal & overall strategy  Proposals for 2016/
Improving Collimator Setup Efficiency LHC Beam Operation Committee, G. Valentino, R.W. Assmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, S.
Work in progress: Improved models of collimation margins with TCT damage limit R. Bruce, L. Lari 1 Input and discussions: R. Assmann, A. Bertarelli, C.
LHC off-momentum collimation simulation Hector Garcia Morales Royal Holloway University of London Roderik Bruce, Danielle Mirarchi, Belen Salvachua, Kyrre.
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
LHC Machine Operational Status and Plans LHCC, 22nd September 2010 Steve Myers (On behalf of the LHC team and international collaborators)
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Proposal for change of the reference emittance for the estimate of apertures, DA, etc. G. Arduini with input from: C. Bracco, R. Bruce, H. Burkhardt, R.
Summary Session 5 Chamonix 2011, 24. – Session 5: “High Intensity: Present and Future” R. Assmann & S. Redaelli Thanks to Frank Z. for his notes…
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
How low can we go? Getting below β*=3.5m R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann Acknowledgment: T. Baer, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard,W.
R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli With essential input from G. Arduini, R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Fitterer, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, aperture team.
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Mike Lamont for the LHC team
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
MD Planning Fri – Sat (26. – 27.8.)
Jan Uythoven For discussion
Update on multi-turn particle debris tracking
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Beam collimation for SPPC
Intensity Evolution Estimate for LHC
LHC commissioning Week 38
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
BLM changes HV software interlock (SIS)
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
Beam halo and beam losses in IR1 and IR5
Collimation after LS1: cleaning and β* reach
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Collimation margins and *
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
Introduction and Requirements
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
Machine protection and closed orbit
Monday morning 09:40 Dump fill 2838, integrated ~130 pb-1.
Collimation qualification during the first weeks of the 2011 run
MD Planning Fri – Sat (1. – 2.7.)
Fri :52 Stable beams fill #2536
Tuesday 6th April 8:00 Injection studies 16:00 RF studies
Saturday 29th October Friday during IP2 1 m squeeze test
Presentation transcript:

Collimator settings for 2012 R. Bruce, R. Assmann for the collimation team

Primary Secondary Triplet Aperture Dump Protection Tertiary Absorbers 9.3 σ 15.0 σ beam 17.5 σ ?17.7 σ 8.5 σ 5.7 σ 8.5 σ17.7 σ9.3 σ 11.8 σ14.3 σ ? 6.0 σ7.0 σ10.0 σ 7.5 σ 8.3 σ 8.4 σ ? nominal nominal Collimation hierarchy Want to use as tight settings as possible for β* Collimation hierarchy has to be respected in order to achieve satisfactory protection and cleaning Some margins are more critical for machine protection (IR6-TCTs-aperture), others matter mainly for cleaning (IR7, IR7-IR6, IR3) σ always calculated with emittance = 3.5μm 2

Margins in IR7 and IR3 In IR7 and IR3, margins are not critical for machine protection In worst case, if margins are violated, and efficiency and lifetime drops, spurious dumps can occur In 2010 and 2011, margins in IR7 calculated by keeping the same retraction as at injection (intermediate collimation scheme) in order to provide room for machine imperfections In 2011, MDs were performed with tight collimator settings (moving TCP to 4σ) New smaller retraction to TCS and TCLA that preserves hierarchy determined empirically to 2σ Therefore, In 2012, we propose to reduce margins in IR7 Smaller margins were found that provide excellent long-term stability of hierarchy IR3 stays at the same settings (in σ) as last year – no need for change

Margins IR6-TCTs-aperture Critical margins: If margins IR6-TCTs-aperture are violated, sensitive equipment (TCTs or aperture) might be exposed during the unlikely case of an accident More care has to be taken when calculating these settings Critical margins calculated based on in-depth analysis of previous runs Components of margins: Orbit drifts β -beat: Positioning (reproducibility of collimator position between fills) Setup errors Lumi scans

Components of critical margins Orbit: margin calculated based on measured orbits in previous run. Assume upper jaw protects upper part of aperture (  0). Minimum margin over two sides with unperturbed orbit: Minimum margin with perturbed orbit: Reduction in margin is thus: Minus sign changing for opposite aperture with π phase advance x1x1 x r2 x2x2 collimator aperture reference orbit perturbed orbit s x A2A2 A1A1 Taking a 99% confidence interval on the reduction in margin, from 2011 run: 1.1 σ needed both between IR6- TCT and TCT-aperture

Components of critical margins β -beat: not measured continuously during the year. Assuming 10% larger β at TCT, 10% smaller β in IR6 Between TCT and triplet, only counting once due to phase advance and that β-beat is often included in aperture calculation. Also, cannot have both + and -10% at same place! Positioning (reproducibility of collimator setting between fills. Affected by e.g. power cuts). Assuming 40 μm Setup errors (precision of collimation setup): 10 μm steps used in setup Lumi scans: Assuming pessimistically 0.2 σ

Method for adding errors for critical margins So far: assuming that all errors could add up simultaneously in bad direction: New 2012 proposal: consider the errors as statistically independent random variables => adding errors in squares instead of linearly (except van der Meer scans!) In the unlikely case that errors would add linearly, count on detection of abnormal behaviour in loss maps and asynchronous dump tests We have to carefully monitor the losses from beam in the abort gap during regular dumps! If problems are detected, try to correct, and in worst case step back and increase margins Discussed in MPP last Friday (see talk R. Assmann)

Proposed settings Injection: No need for changes from last year, except possibly in IR8 (to be seen) New proposed settings of collimators at 4 TeV, using square sum: IR3 stays at the same settings in σ as in 2011 Note that an additional 0.4σ has been added ad-hoc to the margin between IR6 and TCTs to get margin to the orbit interlock in IR6. This adds extra safety! Margin TCSG IR6-TCT is goes from 2.5 σ in 2011 to 1.9 σ in 2012 Tolerated margin TCT-aperture goes from 2.5 σ in 2011 to 1.5 σ in 2012 However, note that predicted aperture is 10.8 σ, using pessimistic scaling (1.8 σ margin) Real aperture is likely to be larger, thus providing even more margin! IR6, expσ TCSG 67.1 TCDQ 67.6 TCT9.0 aperture10.5 TCL10.0 IR3σ TCP 312 TCSG TCLA IR7σ TCP 74.3 TCSG 76.3 TCLA 78.3