Development of Novel Si Stripixel Detectors for For Nuclear and High Energy Physics Experiments* Z. Li and the Si Detector Development and Processing group:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
of Single-Type-Column 3D silicon detectors
Advertisements

Silicon Technical Specifications Review General Properties Geometrical Specifications Technology Specifications –Mask –Test Structures –Mechanical –Electrical.
TCAD simulations for pixel detectors Summary: 1)Geometry layout: doping profiles for 3D geometry; 2) Results: electrostatic potential, electric field distribution;
Modeling and simulation of charge collection properties for 3D-Trench electrode detector Hao Ding a, Jianwei Chen a, Zheng Li a,b,c, *, Shaoan Yan a a.
Belle-II Meeting Nov Nov Thomas Bergauer (HEPHY Vienna) Status of DSSD Sensors.
128 September, 2005 Silicon Sensor for the CMS Tracker The Silicon Sensors for the Inner Tracker of CMS CMS Tracker and it‘s Silicon Strip Sensors Radiation.
Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations.
A Silicon Disk Tracker in forward direction for STAR News since November 2000 Physics Capabilities capabilities Requirements / Potential Technologies Possible.
PHENIX Vertex Tracker Atsushi Taketani for PHENIX collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Over view of Vertex detector 2.Physics.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
Embedded Pitch Adapters a high-yield interconnection solution for strip sensors M. Ullán, C. Fleta, X. Fernández-Tejero, V. Benítez CNM (Barcelona)
Silicon Stripixel Detector Junji Tojo RIKEN Vertex2005 Lake Chuzenji, Nikko, Japan November 7-11, 2005.
Drift Chambers Drift Chambers are MWPCs where the time it takes for the ions to reach the sense wire is recorded. This time info gives position info:
Semiconductor detectors
Bump Bonding and Thinning of Hybrid Pixel Detectors Kiyoshi Tanida (RIKEN) Johann M. Heuser (RIKEN) PHENIX upgrade workshop, Aug 2002 Contents Bump bonding.
Fabrication of Active Matrix (STEM) Detectors
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK.
Silicon Sensor with Readout ASICs for EXAFS Spectroscopy Gianluigi De Geronimo, Paul O’Connor Microelectronics Group, Instrumentation Division, Brookhaven.
Novel Stripixel Detectors on High Resistivity p-type Magnetic Czochralski Silicon for Experiments at Super LHC Zheng Li, D. Lissauer, D. Lynn, P. O’Connor,
1 SiLC sensors for the LP-TPC Thomas Bergauer Institute for High Energy Physics (HEPHY) Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna for the SiLC Collaboration.
Medipix sensors included in MP wafers 2 To achieve good spatial resolution through efficient charge collection: Produced by Micron Semiconductor on n-in-p.
Silicon Microstrip detector Single sided and double sided K.Kameswara rao, Tariq Aziz, Chendvankar, M.R.Patil Tata institute of fundamental research, Mumbai,
Study of a Silica Aerogel for a Cherenkov Radiator Ichiro Adachi KEK representing for the Belle Aerogel RICH R&D group 2007 October RICH2007, Trieste,
Chevron / Zigzag Pad Designs for Gas Trackers
Silicon Sensors for Collider Physics from Physics Requirements to Vertex Tracking Detectors Marco Battaglia Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Fine Pixel CCD for ILC Vertex Detector ‘08 7/31 Y. Takubo (Tohoku U.) for ILC-FPCCD vertex group ILC vertex detector Fine Pixel CCD (FPCCD) Test-sample.
Development of CCDs for the SXI We have developed 2 different types of CCDs for the SXI in parallel.. *Advantage =>They are successfully employed for current.
8 July 1999A. Peisert, N. Zamiatin1 Silicon Detectors Status Anna Peisert, Cern Nikolai Zamiatin, JINR Plan Design R&D results Specifications Status of.
News on microstrip detector R&D —Quality assurance tests— Anton Lymanets, Johann Heuser 12 th CBM collaboration meeting Dubna, October
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
CERN, November 2005 Claudio Piemonte RD50 workshop Claudio Piemonte a, Maurizio Boscardin a, Alberto Pozza a, Sabina Ronchin a, Nicola Zorzi a, Gian-Franco.
Update on Simulation and Sensor procurement for CLICPix prototypes Mathieu Benoit.
RD50 funding request Fabrication and testing of new AC coupled 3D stripixel detectors G. Pellegrini - CNM Barcelona Z. Li – BNL C. Garcia – IFIC R. Bates.
Fig. 1: Cross section of a circular DEPMOS- FET pixel cell. Charges collected in the “in- ternal gate’ modulate the transistor current. DEPMOSFET team,
1 J.M. Heuser − STS Development Microstrip detector GSI-CIS Johann M. Heuser, GSI Li Long, CIS CBM Collaboration Meeting, GSI, Update on.
Solid State Detectors for Upgraded PHENIX Detector at RHIC.
TCT measurements with SCP slim edge strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko.
Paul Dolejschi Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs SVD.
Silicon strip tests Silicon upgrade workshop in Nashville June 9, 2003 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)
Status of Stripixel Sensor + SVX4 Test Junji Tojo RIKEN VTX Meeting June 1 st, 2004.
Spectra distortion by the interstrip gap in spectrometric silicon strip detectors Vladimir Eremin and.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
Claudio Piemonte Firenze, oct RESMDD 04 Simulation, design, and manufacturing tests of single-type column 3D silicon detectors Claudio Piemonte.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
A novel two-dimensional microstrip sensor for charge division readout D. Bassignana, M. Lozano, G. Pellegrini CNM-IMB (CSIC) M. Fernández, R. Jaramillo,
A novel two-dimensional microstrip sensor with charge division readout M. Fernández, R. Jaramillo, F.J. Muñoz, I. Vila IFCA (CSIC-UC) D. Bassignana, M.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
Giulio Pellegrini Actividades 3D G. Pellegrini, C. Fleta, D. Quirion, JP Balbuena, D. Bassignana.
ADC values Number of hits Silicon detectors1196  6.2 × 6.2 cm  4.2 × 6.2 cm  2.2 × 6.2 cm 2 52 sectors/modules896 ladders~100 r/o channels1.835.
MICRO-STRIP METAL DETECTOR FOR BEAM DIAGNOSTICS PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION Passing through metal strips a beam of charged particles or synchrotron radiation.
QA Tests Tests for each sensor Tests for each strip Tests for structures Process stability tests Irradiation tests Bonding & Module assembly Si detectors1272.
Development of Novel On-Chip, Customer-Design Spiral Biasing Adaptor for Si Drift Detectors and Detector Arrays for X-ray and Nuclear Physics Experiments.
TCT measurements with strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko Mikuž 1,2, Marko.
Page 1 Liverpool January 11th, 2012 LHCb Upgrade Meeting Planar Silicon Detectors I. Tsurin Generic sensor R&D ATLAS-oriented commitments LHCb-oriented.
3D Simulation Studies of Irradiated BNL One-Sided Dual-column 3D Silicon Detector up to 1x1016 neq/cm2 Zheng Li1 and Tanja Palviainen2 1Brookhaven National.
Tracking Upgrade R&D Meeting. Columbia University A. Seiden September 22, 2003.
 Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the Belle II Experiment
Position Sensitive TCT Measurements with 3D-stc detectors
A. Zhang, S. Colafranceschi, M. Hohlmann
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Sensor Wafer: Final Layout
Design and fabrication of Endcap prototype sensors (petalet)
Silicon tracker and sensor R&D for sPHENIX
Pradeep Ghosh for the CBM Collaboration Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
A. Zhang, S. Colafranceschi, M. Hohlmann
Enhanced Lateral Drift (ELAD) sensors
3D sensors: status and plans for the ACTIVE project
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

Development of Novel Si Stripixel Detectors for For Nuclear and High Energy Physics Experiments* Z. Li and the Si Detector Development and Processing group: Rolf Beuttenmuller, Wei Chen, Don Elliott Instrumentation Division Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York 11973, USA September 10, 2003 *This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy: Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886.

n Introduction Double-sided strip detectors Pixel detectors n Novel Stripixel Concept Alternatingstripixeldetectors (ASD) Some photos and test results on 1 st prototype batch Interleavedstripixeldetectors (ISD) n Prototype ISD for PHENIX Upgrade n Summary

Double-sided strip detectors: Introduction Two dimensional position sensitivity Minimum channel number (2N) Minimum radiation length But: Two-sided process about 3-4 times more complicated/expensive than single-sided process Radiation soft due to the the complicated structure on the n-side Two-hit ambiguity n strips p strips p+ channel stoppers Two polarity of readout electronics

Pixel detectors: Two dimensional position sensitivity No two-hit ambiguity Minimum radiation length But: Maximum channel number N 2 Complicated and difficult bumper bonding technology limited position resolution by the size of bumper bonding pads  10  m Single-sided process

Novel Stripixel Detector Concept In June 2000, BNL Instrumentation Division developed a novel stripixel detector concept that ( Z. Li, BNL #67527, June 10, 2000, accepted for NIMA publication, 2003 ): has many advantages for both strip detectors and pixel detectors is without many disadvantages for strip and pixel detectors: is with some unique advantages: Two dimensional position sensitivity Minimum channel number (2N) Minimum radiation length Single-sided process no bumper bonding technology needed single polarity of readout electronics as radiation hard as single-sided strip detectors Sub-micron position resolution in 2 dimensions (ISD mode) No two-hit ambiguity (ISD and ASD modes)

Alternating stripixel detectors (ASD) Individual pixels are alternately connected by X and Y readout lines (strips) Two dimensional position sensitivity is achieved by charge sharing between X and Y pixels In principle, the pixel pitch should not be larger than the size of charge cloud caused by diffusion process

Alternating stripixel detectors (ASD) Unique advantages of ASD: Both pixels and strips can be made small to get very small pitches in both directions With pitches in the order of a few  m’s, it is possible to obtain sub-micron position sensitivities in two dimensions with charge sharing and interpretation small current and capacitance/strip The choices for pixel shape and X and Y readout schemes can be almost infinity Disadvantages of ASD: Can not be made in large pitches (  20  m) Y X

Interleaved stripixel detectors (ISD) Each pixel is divided into two halves: X-cell and Y-cell, and connected by X and Y readout lines (strips) respectively X-cell and Y-cell are interleaved (coupled) Unique advantages of ISD: pixels and strip pitches can be made large in both directions The choices for pixel shape and interleaving schemes can be almost infinity The choice for X and Y strip readout schemes can also be almost infinity Disadvantages of ISD: large capacitance/strip due to interleaving scheme

Some typical pixels shape for both ASD and ISD Some typical interleaving schemes for ISD  = FWHM for charge diffusion or combs

X-cell (1 st Al) Schematic of a spiral interleaving scheme for ISD Contact to 2 nd Al on X-pixel Line connecting Y-pixels (1 st Al) FWHM for charge diffusion X-strip readouts (2 nd Al) Y-strip readouts Y-cell (1 st Al) The gaps between pixels are enlarged for clear illustrations

 The stereo angle of connecting X and Y strips can be made from a few degrees to 90º same as double-sided strip detector, partial improvement Good for both ASD and ISD  A third strip, Z, can be introduced unique for ASD, total improvement To solve two-hit ambiguity problem: X Y X Y Z  Uneven partitions of X and Y pixels: different X and/or Y strip widths (uneven X and/or Y signal according to different positions unique for ISD, total improvement Signals on Z strips can be used to resolve ambiguity

One alternative scheme for ISD to solve multi-hit ambiguity problem: Adding a 3 rd set of strips (X, Y,  ) X strips  strips Y strips FWHM for charge diffusion

Choices for stereo angle  between X and Y strips (ISD): P x : pixel pitch in X; P y : pixel pitch in Y; N x : pixel array # in X; N y : pixel array # in Y  : stereo angle 0 <   90 , by changing P x, P x, or k (1  k  N y ),    = 90  PxPx PyPy  = tan -1 (P y / P x )  = tan -1 (2P y / P x )  = tan -1 (kP y / P x ) (1  k  N y- -1) 1 2 k X strip Y strip

 X strip One alternative connection scheme for ISD: The same stereo angle  Shorter X strip line (by a factor of sin  ) good for small 

Choices for stereo angle  between X and Y strips (ASD): P x : pixel pitch in X; P y : pixel pitch in Y;  : shift of pixels in X  : stereo angle 0 <   90 , by changing P x, P x, or  (0    P x )  = tan -1 [ P y /( P x +  )] + tan -1 | P y /( P x -  )| = 2 tan -1 ( P y / P x ) (  = 0) = 90  ( P y = P x, and  = 0) The shape of pixels can be arbitrary, and X and Y pixels may be different  PxPx PyPy  Y stripX strip 

An example of uneven partitions of X and Y pixels: different Y strip widths (uneven Y signal according to different positions unique for ISD, total improvement --- no two-hit ambiguity X1 X2 Y1 Y2 If the hits are (X1,Y1) and (X2,Y2) Signal on strip X2 > X1 If the hits are (X1,Y2) and (X2,Y1) Signal on strip X1 > X2 Signal on Y strips do not change for Both cases Cell partition X:Y 2:8 3:7 4:6 5:5 6:4 7:3 8:2

X Y A design layout of a spiral ISD

A design layout of a X and Y ASD (8.5  m pitch) X Y

A design layout of a X, Y, Z ASD (8.5  m pitch) X Y Z

A design layout of ASD with square pixels (20  m pitch) Y X

Simulation of the 8.5  m pitch ASD d = 200  m V = 23 V Fully depleted Linear E-field under the pixel

First Prototype Stripixel Detector: ASD FWHM for charge diffusion X pixels and Y strips, mixed, 20  m pitch X and Y pixels 8.5  m pitch

First Prototype Stripixel Detector, ISD Circular spiral 85  m pitch FWHM for charge diffusion Floating pixels In the spaces between Each 4 pixels

Stripixel Test Structures (560  m pitch, even X and Y): ISD with Square spirals Laser test (red laser) X1 Y1 Laser 0.5 mm spot

Some Test Results on Test Structures (560  m pitch, even X and Y): ISD with Square spirals ( Laser induced current pulse shapes, TCT ) TCT signals on strip X1 TCT signals on strip Y1 V = 10 V V = 200 V

Some Test Results on Test Structures (560  m pitch, even X and Y): ISD with Square spirals ( EBIC: electron beam induced current ) SEM picture of the detector EBIC signal of the detector EBIC signal of all X strips EBIC signal of all Y strips

EBIC signal of 2 X and 2 Y strips EBIC signal of 1 X and 1 Y strips

Micron Resolution Detector (“Stripixel”) Prototype Chip size: 4x4 mm

EBIC signal of a 8.5  m pitch Stripixel detector EBIC signal of a 20  m pitch Stripixel detector

First Prototype Stripixel Detector PHENIX Upgrade 80  m X and Y pitches 4.6  stereo angle 2x384 X strips 2x384 Y strips 3 cm x 6 cm chip size 5-mask step, 2-metal process

Schematic of the Prototype Stripixel Detector PHENIX Upgrade

Y X FWHM for charge diffusion

Preliminary Test Results on 1 st Batch Prototype I-V Data on Strip detector (Wafer 1234) Y-strip 1nA Strip Detector 1234-BY1, 400 um, cm2/strip, 10 cm long

First beta source test at RIKEN and beam test at KEK in late 2002 have shown X and Y position resolution of 25  m.

Schematic of the an AC coupled Stripixel Detector No increase in line capacitance --- no interleaving necessary (Top view) Al-1 (X) Al-1 (Y) Al-2 Poly opening X-strip (Al-1) p+ implant covered by SiO2 Y-strip (Al-2) A test AC coupled stripixel structure with 3x3 pixels A single pixel Cut line (for cross section view, not part of design)

Al-1 (X) Al-1 (Y) Al-2 X-strip (Al-1) p+ implant covered by SiO2 Y-strip (Al-2) A test AC coupled stripixel structure with 3x3 pixels A single pixel Poly via Cut line (for cross section view, not part of design)

Schematic of an AC coupled Stripixel Detector (Cross section view) Connected by Y strip Connected by X strip Connected to the bias (0V) (punch-through line) Connected to the bias (+V)

Simulation of an AC coupled Stripixel Detector processing (Cross section view) Front side: p + implant in Areas of punch through Bias lines and pixels Back side: uniform n + Implant Detector: 300  m thick Pitch: 250  m Pixel size: 230  mx230  m X and Y cell: 110 x230  m Punch through line width: 10  m, gap 10  m Back side n+/n Front side p+/n XYYYXX Punch through Bias lines AC coupled X and Y cells Front side boron (p + ) profile under the X-Y cells Back side phosphorus (n + ) profile (1/cm 3 )

Simulation of an AC coupled Stripixel Detector Electric behavior (Cross section view) Fully depleted at 80 V Uniform potential distribution In bulk and under the pixel (AC coupled X and Y cells) 2D Potential profile 2D Electron concentration profile 1-D potential profile under the pixel (X and Y cell) 1-D electron concentration profile under the pixel (X and Y cell) Punch through Bias lines AC coupled X and Y cells

Novel stripixel detector concept combines many advantages of strip detector and pixel detectors: oSingle-sided process oTwo dimensional position sensitivity oMinimum channel numbers Stripixel detectors also exhibit some unique capabilities: oTwo dimensional sub-micron position sensitivities (ASD) oSchemes to eliminate of two-hit ambiguity (ASD and ISD) Preliminary test results on test structures are promising First prototypes for PHENIX upgrades have been made and source and beam test results shows position resolution of 25  m in both X and Y coordination's SUMMARY

Special thanks to Instrumentation Division head Veljko Radeka for his support and helpful discussions, and to Chengji Li of Beijing Institute of Semiconductors for his work on EBIC images, and to our PHENIX Upgrade collaborators H. En'yo,Y. Goto, T. Kawabata, M. Togawa, N. Saito, V. Rykov, K. Tanida, and J. Tojo from RIKEN- BNL Research Center, RIKEN, and Kyoto University. Acknowledgement