Integrating Cyberinfrastructure Technologies Mark C. Sheehan, Ph.D. ECAR Fellow EDUCAUSE Live! December 18, 2008 © 2008 EDUCAUSE. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation Peace and prosperity through science collaboration 1 Cathleen Campbell U.S. Civilian Research & Development.
Advertisements

Intel Transforming Education through Technology Name of Presenter.
Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
CSHE & LH Martin Institute Seminar PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING IN AUSTRALIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Contributing.
Supporting Research on Campus - Using Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Public research use of ICT has rapidly increased in the past decade, requiring high performance.
1 US activities and strategy :NSF Ron Perrott. 2 TeraGrid An instrument that delivers high-end IT resources/services –a computational facility – over.
Security Education and Awareness Workshop January 15-16, 2004 Baltimore, MD.
Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.
The Changing Face of Higher Ed and the Role of IT as a Strategic Enabler Dave Wallace Chief Information Officer University of Waterloo December 4, 2012.
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
00 Innovative Citizen-Centred Services Through Collaboration Institute for Citizen-Centred Service.
Listening to the Future Presented by Larry Johnson and Kristi Nelson Transforming Lives, Education, and Knowledge.
June 6, 2007 TeraGrid07 CI-TEAM Advances in the MSI Community and the MSI Cyber Infrastructure Empowerment Coalition MSI-CIEC Richard A. Aló, Presenter,
Research CU Boulder Cyberinfrastructure & Data management Thomas Hauser Director Research Computing CU-Boulder
1 Intellectual Architecture Leverage existing domain research strengths and organize around multidisciplinary challenges Institute for Computational Research.
Is 'Designing' Cyberinfrastructure - or, Even, Defining It - Possible? Peter A. Freeman National Science Foundation January 29, 2007 The views expressed.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Overview of the “120-day Study” on the WSU Research Enterprise
Cyberinfrastructure: Framing the Issues on Your Campus What is it? Why do we care? What do we do about it now? 11 Peter M. Siegel CIO and Vice Provost,
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
What Researchers Want from IT Sandra Braman Professor University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee ECAR Fellow.
© The Trustees of Indiana University Centralize Research Computing to Drive Innovation…Really Thomas J. Hacker Research & Academic Computing University.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
1 Provost’s Report to the Board of Trustees The Pennsylvania State University Strategic Plan: through PRESENTED BY Nicholas P. Jones,
Science of Learning Centers Soo-Siang Lim Ph.D Director and Chair of Coordinating Committee Science of Learning Centers Program National Science Foundation.
Server and Short to Mid Term Storage Funding Research Computing Funding Issues.
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
Computing in Atmospheric Sciences Workshop: 2003 Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure Alan Blatecky Executive Director San Diego Supercomputer Center.
1 Higher Education Engagement with K-12: Partnerships, Possibilities, and Pitfalls Nancy S. Shapiro Office of Academic Affairs University System of Maryland.
UIUC Strategic Plan Melanie Loots Ruth Watkins August 18, 2006.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Research Cyberinfrastructure Alliance Working in partnership to enable computationally intensive, innovative, interdisciplinary research for the 21 st.
Open Science Grid For CI-Days Internet2: Fall Member Meeting, 2007 John McGee – OSG Engagement Manager Renaissance Computing Institute.
ORGANISATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES A JCU Experience Eric Wainwright
University of Louisville Faculty Discussion on Research Ho! Ho! Ho! Happy Holidays! 1 December 10,2009.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Session Chair: Peter Doorn Director, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), The Netherlands.
IST programme Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society FUTURE PLANS FP6 Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society FUTURE PLANS FP6 RRRESE.
Open Science Grid For CI-Days Elizabeth City State University Jan-2008 John McGee – OSG Engagement Manager Manager, Cyberinfrastructure.
National Science Foundation DMR ITR Computational Review and Workshop: ITR and beyond Daryl Hess, NSF Bruce Taggart, NSF June 17-19, 2004 Urbana, IL.
What is Cyberinfrastructure? Russ Hobby, Internet2 Clemson University CI Days 20 May 2008.
Karen T. Carey AVP for Arts and Sciences.  The purpose of the Committee is to engage appropriate offices and stakeholders on campus and in the community.
CyberInfrastructure workshop CSG May Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Introduction GeoData 2014 Workshop #geodata2014 June 17-19, 2014,NCAR, Boulder, CO Peter Fox (RPI)
Enhancing Networking Expertise Across the Great Plains Greg Monaco, Ph.D. Director for Research & Cyberinfrastructure Initiatives Great Plains Network.
PSCIC Working Group: Parag Chitnis Chris Greer Susan Lolle Sam Scheiner Jane Silverthorne Bill Zamer Manfred Zorn.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
The Swiss Grid Initiative Context and Initiation Work by CSCS Peter Kunszt, CSCS.
What Can Campus Leaders Do About Cyberinfrastructure? Sally Jackson For the workshop on Campus Leadership Engagement in Building a Coherent Campus Cyberinfrastructure.
08/05/06 Slide # -1 CCI Workshop Snowmass, CO CCI Roadmap Discussion Jim Bottum and Patrick Dreher Building the Campus Cyberinfrastructure Roadmap Campus.
What is CDR? – A Few Examples Water Resources in a Changing Climate – Idaho Climate Change Large CD consortia — not the case that everyone works on everything.
Cyberinfrastructure What is it? Russ Hobby Internet2 Joint Techs, 18 July 2007.
Mark Luker, Vice President, EDUCAUSE EDUCAUSE Cyberinfrastructure.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Funding: Staffing for Research Computing What staffing models does your institution use for research computing? How does your institution pay for the staffing.
High Performance Computing - Starting out Small EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Workshop Snowmass, CO August 5, 2006 Bonnie Neas Interim Deputy CIO.
Cyberinfrastructure Overview Russ Hobby, Internet2 ECSU CI Days 4 January 2008.
Internet2 Applications Group: Renater Group Presentation T. Charles Yun Internet2 Program Manager, Applications Group 30 October 2001.
Digital Data Collections ARL, CNI, CLIR, and DLF Forum October 28, 2005 Washington DC Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.
Preliminary Findings Baseline Assessment of Scientists’ Data Sharing Practices Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee
High Risk 1. Ensure productive use of GRID computing through participation of biologists to shape the development of the GRID. 2. Develop user-friendly.
Garnet.edu.gh  Ghana Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Benjamin A. Eshun Ghanaian Academic and Research Network (GARNET) Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence.
Black and White Introduction to Cyberinfrastructure Eric Shook Department of Geography Kent State University.
The Minority-Serving Institutions (MSI) Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Institute [MSI C(I) 2 ] Providing a scalable mechanism for developing a CI-enabled science.
EPSCoR means “Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
EOSC MODEL Pasquale Pagano CNR - ISTI
Integrating Cyberinfrastructure Technologies Mark Sheehan ECAR Fellow EDUCAUSE 2008 Orlando, FL October 30, 2008 © 2008 EDUCAUSE. All rights reserved.
Cognitus: A Science Case for HPC in the Nordic Region
Brian Voss, Chief Information Officer April 5, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Integrating Cyberinfrastructure Technologies Mark C. Sheehan, Ph.D. ECAR Fellow EDUCAUSE Live! December 18, 2008 © 2008 EDUCAUSE. All rights reserved.

2 ECAR Research Study Higher Education IT and Cyberinfrastructure: Integrating Technologies for Scholarship

3 What is Cyberinfrastructure? “Enabling hardware, algorithms, software, communications, institutions, and personnel. [It] should provide an effective and efficient platform for the empowerment of specific communities of researchers to innovate and eventually revolutionize what they do, how they do it, and who participates.” Daniel E. Atkins, et al., Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure (Washington, D. C.: National Science Foundation, 2003).

4 ECAR Study Objectives Determine “state of the practice” regarding cyberinfrastructure (CI) technologies –Usage –Sourcing/Funding –Importance –CI Knowledge (CIO, other exec) –Collaborative practices –Effective integration of CI resources

5 Cyberinfrastructure Technologies High-performance computing resources Cyberinfrastructure applications and tools Data storage and management resources Advanced network infrastructure Resources for collaboration within virtual communities

6 Principal Outcome Variable: Central IT’s Effectiveness at Integrating CI Resources Survey Question Rate your central IT organization’s effectiveness at integrating the resources we have explored in this survey to provide seamless support for research.

7 Principal Outcome Variable: Central IT’s Effectiveness at Integrating CI Resources Survey Question Rate your central IT organization’s effectiveness at integrating the resources we have explored in this survey to provide seamless support for research. Annotation “Integrating” means bringing together into a seamless whole a wide variety of human, software, and hardware systems to form a platform for enabling activities in research and in teaching and learning. It involves coordination, synthesis, and teamwork. — After Fran Berman, 2004

8 Effectiveness at Integrating CI Resources

9 Sourcing of CI Technologies Campus central IT resources Researcher's or lab's resources Other higher-education resources Other campus resources Government or private resources Scale: 1=none, 2=small extent, 3=moderate extent, 4=large extent, 5=very large extent

10 Sourcing of CI Technologies Campus central IT resources Researcher's or lab's resources Other higher-education resources Other campus resources Government or private resources Scale: 1=none, 2=small extent, 3=moderate extent, 4=large extent, 5=very large extent

11 Sourcing of CI Technologies Campus central IT resources Researcher's or lab's resources Other higher-education resources Other campus resources Government or private resources Scale: 1=none, 2=small extent, 3=moderate extent, 4=large extent, 5=very large extent

12 Campus central IT funds Award to researcher or lab Other campus funding Award to the institution Funds from higher-ed collaboration Funding of CI Technologies Scale: 1=none, 2=small extent, 3=moderate extent, 4=large extent, 5=very large extent

13 Campus Executives’ Knowledge Scale: 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent Chief Academic Officer CIO Science & Engineering Deans Chief Research Officer Deans in Other Disciplines

14 Campus Executives’ Knowledge Scale: 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent Chief Academic Officer CIO Science & Engineering Deans Chief Research Officer Deans in Other Disciplines

15 Campus Executives’ Knowledge Scale: 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent Chief Academic Officer CIO Science & Engineering Deans Chief Research Officer Deans in Other Disciplines

16 Campus Executives’ Knowledge Scale: 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent Chief Academic Officer CIO Science & Engineering Deans Chief Research Officer Deans in Other Disciplines

17 Knowledge and Integration of CI Resources  Collaboration within Virtual Communities  Advanced Network Infrastructure  Data Storage and Management  Cyberinfrastructure Applications and Tools  High-Performance Computing Other Deans Science and Engineering Deans Chief Research Officer Chief Academic Officer Chief Information Officer CI Technology

18 Knowledge and Integration of CI Resources  Collaboration within Virtual Communities  Advanced Network Infrastructure  Data Storage and Management  Cyberinfrastructure Applications and Tools  High-Performance Computing Other Deans Science and Engineering Deans Chief Research Officer Chief Academic Officer Chief Information Officer CI Technology

19 Knowledge and Integration of CI Resources  Collaboration within Virtual Communities  Advanced Network Infrastructure  Data Storage and Management  Cyberinfrastructure Applications and Tools  High-Performance Computing Other Deans Science and Engineering Deans Chief Research Officer Chief Academic Officer Chief Information Officer CI Technology

20 Knowledge and Integration of CI Resources  Collaboration within Virtual Communities  Advanced Network Infrastructure  Data Storage and Management  Cyberinfrastructure Applications and Tools  High-Performance Computing Other Deans Science and Engineering Deans Chief Research Officer Chief Academic Officer Chief Information Officer CI Technology

21 Details of CIO’s Knowledge For each technology: –What CI resources are available –Who provides them –Who funds them –Who is using them –What they are being used for

22 Details of CIO’s Knowledge CIO’s knowledge of all five aspects for all five technologies (almost) is positively associated with effectiveness of integration of CI resources.

23 Details of CIO’s Knowledge CIO’s knowledge of all five aspects for all five technologies (almost) is positively associated with effectiveness of integration of CI resources. Exception: For advanced network infrastructure, what resources are available, who provides them, and who funds them are not significantly associated with effectiveness of integration.

24 Roman Proverb “The Footsteps of the Gardener Are the Best Fertilizer.”

25 Researchers generally collaborate in the use of CI resources Institution realizes economies of scale in the use of CI resources Incentives exist for researchers to share CI resources with other campus researchers Incentives exist for researchers to partner with central IT for economies of scale Agreement About Collaborative Practices

26 Agreement About Collaborative Practices StatementN Mean Agreement Std. Deviation Researchers generally collaborate in the use of CI resources Institution realizes economies of scale in the use of CI resources Incentives exist for researchers to share CI resources with other campus researchers Incentives exist for researchers to partner with central IT for economies of scale Scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree

27 Effectiveness of Integration of CI Resources, by Agreement About Collaborative Practices Scale: 1=not effective, 2=slightly effective, 3=moderately effective, 4=very effective, 5=extremely effective

28 Another Proverb “It takes a village to raise a child.”

29 Key Positive Associations with Effective Integration Existence of a research-specific IT governance/advisory body and a central IT research support unit CIO’s knowledge about all CI technologies (except advanced network infrastructure) CAO’s knowledge about all CI technologies Agreement that resources and authority are sufficient An atmosphere of collaboration, resource sharing, and the active pursuit of economies of scale

30 Recommendations

31 Recommendations

32 Engage campus leaders in CI support. –Science & engineering deans and CRO are most knowledgeable –CAO may be most influential –Direct CIO engagement Source, funds, knowledge, inventory, collaboration Recommendations …continued

33 Recommendations Encourage open sharing of information about CI resources. –Build CIO’s own knowledge –Build other executives’ knowledge –Build partnerships between central IT and researchers –Encourage collaboration among researchers …continued

34 Recommendations Increase central IT involvement in research grants and contracts budgeting. –Gain buy-in of CIO for support of distributed resources (“gentle” enterprization) –Ensure sufficient fund base for support activities –Expand CIO’s detailed knowledge of CI technology use –Optimize equipment selection to facilitate sharing and economies of scale

35 Mark Sheehan educause.edu