Changing competitors and dynamics in a desert rodent community Glenda M. Yenni, Department of Biology, Utah State University Abstract: Recently, attempts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LTER Planning Process Science Task Force (STF) Report to NSF September 2005.
Advertisements

Community Ecology Chapter 47 Mader: Biology 8th Ed.
Mechanisms of Species Coexistence involving stochasticity We have examined models with stochastic elements before:  population models with random parameter.
Chapter 53 Reading Quiz 1.A bunch of populations living close together and possibly interacting is called a ____. 2.Which type of interspecific interaction.
Interspecific Competition Chapter 6. Interspecific Competition Individuals of one species suffer reduction in fecundity, survivorship, or growth as a.
Development of a diagnostic question cluster and post-assessment of college student understanding about population dynamics Miranda A. Kearney and Nancy.
Competition – Chapter 12. Competition Resource competition – occurs when a number of organisms utilize common resources that are in short supply. Interference.
Levels of Ecological Organization in Freshwater Systems Population Community Ecosystem.
- Population: individuals of same species in same general area. Has geographic boundaries and population size. Key traits: density (individuals per unit.
“Soft” Approaches to Regional Species Pools for Plots Tom Wentworth, Jason Fridley, Joel Gramling, Todd Jobe Ecoinformatics Working Group November 25,
Community Diversity dynamics of community species composition.
Chapter #16 – Community Structure
Acknowledgments Research Mentor: Mary Bricker Funding: Project IBS-CORE Undergraduate Research Fellowship, provided by a grant from the Howard Hughes Medical.
20 Energy Flow and Food Webs. 20 Energy Flow and Food Webs Case Study: Toxins in Remote Places Feeding Relationships Energy Flow among Trophic Levels.
Two gerbils in the Negev Desert of Israel:. Gerbillus pyramidum (ca. 40 g) Gerbillus allenbyi (ca. 26 g) The two gerbils differ mostly in size: solitary.
Species Abundance and Diversity
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Ch 20 Community Ecology: Species Abundance + Diversity.
18 Species Diversity in Communities. 18 Species Diversity in Communities Resource Partitioning Nonequilibrium Theories The Consequences of Diversity Case.
Community  Collection of species populations  Members from most kingdoms  Linked in a web  Mainly predator/prey  Environment & habitat / Dominant.
Coexistence patterns in a desert rodent community The relative importance of stabilizing mechanisms of coexistence Glenda Yenni Department of Biology,
California Science Content Standards Today's lecture and activity will cover the following content standards: 5d) Students know different kinds of organisms.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Pin-point plant cover data Christian Damgaard Bioscience Aarhus University.
BIOTIC RESPONSES TO SHIFTING ECOLOGICAL DRIVERS IN A DESERT COMMUNITY S.K. Morgan Ernest Dept of Biology & Ecology Center, Utah State
Tuesday 11:00 – 1:50 Thursday 11:00 – 1:50 Instructor: Nancy Wheat Ecology Bio 47 Spring 2015.
Species Abundance and Diversity
Community Ecology Chapter 54. Community An assemblage of populations of various species living close enough for potential interactions.
POPULATION ECOLOGY. ECOLOGY Study of living organisms as groups Interactions between living organisms (predator-prey, parasitism etc) Interactions between.
Evaluating a Research Report
Mechanisms driving nonnative plant-mediated change in small mammal populations and communities Dan Bachen.
1 Species Abundance and Diversity. 2 Introduction Community: Association of interacting species inhabiting some defined area.  Community Structure includes.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring plant abundance and ecological processes with the pin-point method Christian Damgaard Department of Bioscience.
Chapter 13 Competition. Modes of Competition Interference vs. exploitation: –Direct aggressive interaction between individuals –Using up resource Intraspecific:
Community Ecology Chapter 20 Table of Contents Section 1 Species Interactions Section 2 Patterns in Communities.
Community Ecology Chapter 20 Table of Contents Section 1 Species Interactions Section 2 Patterns in Communities.
COMPETITION (Chapter 13). COMPETITION: INTRASPECIFIC versus INTERSPECIFIC.
Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology.
Criterion 1: Conservation of Biological Diversity Indicator Refinement: What is the state of Indicator Science? 1. Overview of the Criterion 2. Review.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
Indirect Effects of Current Velocity on Algal Abundance Through Interactions with Ceratopsyche Larvae Sarina Rutter with faculty mentor Todd Wellnitz Department.
Ten paired plots were established on horizontal rock faces near the Ben Lily Memorial in the Gila National Forest NM in All 10 cm x 10 cm plots were.
Interspecific spatial patterns support indirect facilitation of harvester ants by kangaroo rats Andrew J. Edelman Dept. of Biology, University of New Mexico,
Population Parameters – Chapter 9. Population – a group of organisms of the same species occupying a particular space at a particular time. Demes – groups.
Ecosystem Functioning. Richness Abundance Body mass Ecosystem Functioning.
Relationships among Populations. Before watching the video, take time to read over all the questions in the activity page Before watching the video, take.
Populations.  A population consists of interbreeding members of one species living in a specific area, more or less isolated from other members of their.
Results I) Regional Survey Rarefaction curves leveled off across sites, suggesting that the sample effort was sufficient to capture differences between.
Models pretend that nature is simple, predictable and unchanging:
Chapter 4: Evolution, Biological Communities, and Species Interactions Advanced Environmental Science.
Species Abundance and Diversity
Small Mammal Responses to the Reintroduction of Gunnison’s Prairie Dog Betsy Black, Amherst College Andrew Veselka, Dickinson College Stephanie Baker Photo:
Ecology 8310 Population (and Community) Ecology Communities in Space (Metacommunities) Island Biogeography (an early view) Evolving views Similarity in.
Bob Schooley, University of Illinois, Jornada LTER Brandon Bestelmeyer, USDA-ARS, Jornada LTER Andrea Campanella, Sierra Nevada Research Institute John.
Diets. Why are diets important? What information do they tell us? What questions do they answer? Fish’s view –Source of energy (bioen) Managers view –Stocking.
Plant functional trait expression in the Rengen Grassland Experiment (RGE) Jürgen Schellberg 1, Katharina Brüne 1 and Michal Hejcman 2 1 University of.
Lecture # 5 SCIENCE 1 ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN EDUCATION POPULATIONS AND ECOSYSTEMS Continue…..
ECOSYSTEMS Mr. Harper 8 th Grade Science. WHAT’S AN ECOSYSTEM? Ecosystems are complex, interactive systems that include both biological communities (biotic)
Functional Traits and Niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian Forest Kraft et al
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Fall 2008 IB Workshop Series sponsored by IB academic advisors Study Abroad for IB Majors Thursday, October 30 4:00-5:00PM.
A) Review of Hypotheses for maintenance of diversity
Impacts of habitat fragmentation on plant and insect communities: beyond species richness!
Morphological Variation and Trophic Partitioning Among Central Mexican Lake Silversides Daniel L. Powell and Kyle R. Piller Southeastern Louisiana University,
Combining pin-point and Braun-Blanquet plant cover data
Chapter #16 – Community Structure
Romain Richard André de Roos
Scales of Ecological Organization
Aerial lakes photo.
Chapter 20 Table of Contents Section 1 Species Interactions
Ecology Unit 2 Day 1.
Biodiversity: Diversity among and within plant and animal species in an environment. Note: The preservation of biodiversity is considered by environmentalists.
Ecology.
Presentation transcript:

Changing competitors and dynamics in a desert rodent community Glenda M. Yenni, Department of Biology, Utah State University Abstract: Recently, attempts have been made to reconcile and synthesize neutral and niche-based models to describe the universal processes behind coexistence. The importance of niche or neutral processes may be a gradient and depend in part on the stabilizing mechanisms working in a system. One stabilizing mechanism is resource partitioning. Avoidance of competition through resource partitioning is well documented in desert heteromyid rodents. At a long-term study site near Portal, Arizona, the rodent community has been altered by the local extinction of a major competitor (Dipodomys spectabilis) and colonization of another (Chaetodipus baileyi). This site also has experimental plots removing a subset of the rodent community. I used the natural and experimental manipulations on the rodent community to examine how changes in the dominant competitors affected Chaetodipus penicillatus, a small granivore at the site. For this species, I examined relative abundance, survival selective dispersal, and frequency-dependant growth. I found that relative abundance of C. penicillatus changed significantly after the extinction and colonization events and differed between controls and manipulations. However, there was no significant effect on survival and only a small percentage of individuals disperse between plots. Frequency-dependant growth on the treatment plots indicates strong stabilization. Thus, the majority of population changes must be due to within-plot dynamics. In the future, I intend to determine on what level(s) heteromyids at Portal are partitioning resources to achieve these dynamics. Microhabitat selection and nutrient ratio preferences will be explored first as possible mechanisms of stabilizing coexistence. Relative abundance shifts on treatment types following the change in community composition Survival shows no pattern of response to experimental or natural perturbations Negative frequency-dependant growth is a sign of strong stabilizing mechanisms Dispersing individuals show no clear preference for plot type Redundancy analysis confirms that abundance patterns in the community have shifted Conclusions: Results from a redundancy analysis suggest that the change in community composition has resulted in a reorganizing of species interactions. The significant change in community dynamics in the second period of this analysis would indicate that C. baileyi is, in fact, a significant driver in this system. The sign of strong stabilization in the relationship between abundance and growth rate is a likely confirmation of resource partitioning. Further analysis is required, however, to determine what aspects of life history are affected in each of the community members to translate into a change in abundance on the experimental plots. Within-plot dynamics other than survival, such as fecundity, must be examined for their sensitivity to abundance of major competitors. Also of interest is the identification of what niches these species occupy to allow direct measurement of niche overlapping. Among these closely related species, resource partitioning may be occurring on one (or more) of many levels, and several candidates will be considered. Microhabitat selection and nutrient ratio preferences will be explored first as possible mechanisms of stabilizing coexistence. To describe microhabitat selection, GIS work on aerial photographs, supplemented by vegetation sampling, will be used to map microhabitats at trapping locations to quantify trapping frequency in each microhabitat type. If an indication of microhabitat preference is found, direct measurements such as radio telemetry can then be used for confirmation. Some ecological stoichiometry solutions will be explored by measuring differences in nutrient ratios in diet items. Again, a more direct measurement, such as giving up density trials, may then be required for confirmation. Quantifying levels of resource partitioning in this way should develop a good picture of what subtle shift in interspecific relationships allows coexistence of the major species to continue. ○ Dipodomys spp ∆ Dipodomys spectabilis + Chaetodipus penicillatus x C. baileyi Proportion of individuals caught once (1 catch), caught multiple times on the same plot (1 plot), and caught on more than one plot (disp) for three species of kangaroo rat (DM, DO, DS) or two species of pocket mouse (PB, PP) and the time period (88) or (95). Proportion of dispersing individuals (‘disp’) dispersing to other plots of the same type (1 type) or plots of a different type (btw type). And proportion of dispersing individuals (‘disp’) representing each dispersal type : CO-within controls, EX-within kangaroo-rat exclosures, CO-EX-from control to exclosure, CO-RE-from control to total exclosure, EX-CO-from exclosure to control, EX-RE-from exclosure to total exclosure. This method focuses on the amount of variation in a species abundances matrix that is explained by an environmental/experimental matrix (Palmer 2007). Note the change in species score for C. penicillatus (PP). Dipodomys abundance PBAbundancePBAbundance Literature Cited Adler et al A Niche for Neutrality. Ecology Letters. Palmer, Michael The Ordination Web Page. Acknowledgments S. K. Morgan Ernest for advising and support Katherine Thibault for work on C. baileyi Diversity Fellowship, Utah State University The Portal project is currently supported by NSF grant DEB C. Penicillatus relative abundance Estimated survival Year After the introduction of C. baileyi, it and C. penicillatus both show a negative relationship between their relative energy use in the community and their population growth rates, indicating stabilizing mechanisms at work in the relationship between these species. An aerial photograph of the site shows the 24 treatment plots. Note differences in vegetation on different plot types.