1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Illumination, resolution, and incidence-angle in PSDM: A tutorial
Advertisements

Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Processing and Binning Overview From chapter 14 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
3-D Fault Visualization with Fracture Swarms
Processing: zero-offset gathers
AVO responses as modelled with a finite- difference program Peter Manning and Gary Margrave Introduction: classic AVO cases Surface seismic records F-D.
1 Xuyao Zheng Institute of Geophysics of CEA. 2 Outline 1.Motivation 2.Model and synthetic data 3.Calculation of Green functions 4.Pre-stack depth migration.
Mathias Alerini Gemini kollokvium
Reverse-Time Migration
Specular-Ray Parameter Extraction and Stationary Phase Migration Jing Chen University of Utah.
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Reflection Field Methods
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Arbitrary Parameter Extraction, Stationary Phase Migration, and Tomographic Velocity Analysis Jing Chen University of Utah.
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Earth Study 360 Technology overview
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Demonstration of Super-Resolution and Super-Stacking Properties of Time Reversal Mirrors in Locating Seismic Sources Weiping Cao, Gerard T. Schuster, Ge.
Elastic Inversion Using Partial Stack Seismic Data: Case Histories in China.
2015 Workplan for “VVAz” Analysis of Prestack Migrated Data
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
V.2 Wavepath Migration Overview Overview Kirchhoff migration smears a reflection along a fat ellipsoid, so that most of the reflection energy is placed.
The ray parameter and the travel-time curves P flat and P radial are the slopes of the travel time curves T-versus-X and T-versus- , respectively. While.
Deconvolution Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma Objectives: -Understand the difference between exponential and surface consistent gain -Identify power line.
Weighted Stacking of 3-D Converted-wave Data for Birefringent Media Richard Bale.
Attribute- Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation 3D CONSTRAINED LEAST-SQUARES KIRCHHOFF PRESTACK TIME MIGRATION Alejandro.
Kui Zhang* and Kurt J. Marfurt 2008 AASPI Consortium annual meeting Migration-driven velocity analysis for anisotropy/stress analysis.
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Migration Velocity Analysis 01. Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic migration velocity analysis 02.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis Biondo Biondi Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University Paul Sava.
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Reflection seismograms
Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging References: J.M. Reynolds, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons,
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Shot-profile migration of GPR data Jeff Shragge, James Irving, and Brad Artman Geophysics Department Stanford University.
A cross-equalization processing flow for off-the-shelf 4-D seismic data James Rickett Stanford University David E. Lumley Chevron Petroleum Technology.
Raanan Dafni,  PhD in Geophysics (Tel-Aviv University)  Paradigm R&D ( )  Post-Doc (Rice University) Current Interest: “Wave-equation based.
1.1 Seismic Interferometry Optical interferometry.
. Lakeside Drive and Manzanita Lane to the north corner of Jasper Lane and Manzanita Lane.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Efficient modeling and imaging of pegleg multiples Morgan Brown and Antoine Guitton Stanford University, Department of Geophysics Multiples can be bad…
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
John C. Bancroft and grad students
Fang Liu and Arthur Weglein Houston, Texas May 12th, 2006
ABSTRACT –Basic Principles and applications
Migration-driven azimuthal velocity analysis
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Imaging (and characterisation) of diffractors
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
Vladimir Grechka Shell International E&P
Compensating for attenuation by inverse Q filtering
High Resolution AVO NMO
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Direct horizontal image gathers without velocity or “ironing”
Depth imaging using slowness-averaged Kirchoff extrapolators
“Exploring” spherical-wave reflection coefficients
Processing and Binning Overview
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Velocity and anisotropy parameter scan
Presentation transcript:

1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001

2 EOM Basics: Scatterpoint, RMS, Cheops Specular reflections Reflection angles Anisotropy: estimation modelling

3 Scatterpoint T 0, z Scatterpoint CSP

4

5

6 Scatterpoint reflection T 0, z Scatterpoint TrTr TsTs x h h CSP R CMP S

7 DSR

8

9 Pseudo depth

10 DSR

11

12

13

14 Prestack volume

15 Scatterpoint reflection T 0, z Scatterpoint TrTr TsTs x h h CSP R CMP S DSR

16 Cheops pyramid P-P h x t Scatter- point

17 Flat reflector - Cheops pyramid h t x

18 Dipping reflector-Cheops pyramid h t x

19 Shuang Sun Prestack migration aperture Fresnel zone AVO

20 Prestack incidence angle

21 Fresnel zone – zero-offset

22 Fresnel zone – offset

23 h t x

24 Migration amplitude vs aperture Twice Fresnel zone

25 Pavan Elapavuluri Estimate anisotropic parameters Seismic vs well-log velocities CMP gathers vs CSP gathers

26 Anisotropy estimation Thompsen parameters (1986) Haase (1998) Half offset less than depth

27 CMP Super gather

28 CSP gather

 Actual  CMP  CSP

30 CMP Super gather

31 CSP gather

32

33 Marco Perez Gridded anisotropic traveltimes Tomographic velocity estimation

34   Isotropic   Anisotropic Phase velocity Group velocity Anisotropic velocities

35 h t 2 t 0 t 1 (t 2 -t 0 )  h t 2 t 0 t 1 2 -t 0 )  Three point projection

36  1  3 t 0 t 1 t 2 t 3 Interpolated points  1  3 t 0 t 1 t 2 t 3 Linear projection

37 Anisotropic traveltimes Anisotropic Isotropic

38 Jeff Beckett Matched filters Prestack converted wave migration Maximize SNR of image

39 Matched filters Signal detection in noise Cross-correlate with wavelet Event defined by zero-phase wavelet Maximize signal Band-limited noise

40 “Cheops pyramid”??? Converted wave

41 Prestack incidence angle

42 “Zoeppritz” P-S amplitudes

43 Time (s) 1 0 Example Shot Record Noisy P-S source record

44 Matched filter Conventional EOM stacks

45 Inversion and transpose Inversion Transpose Matched filtering

46

47 1D convolution

48 Matrix convolution

49 Multiple cross-correlations

50 Cross-correlations

51 Auto-correlations: Identity matrix

52

53 w n,m T s n T rmrm = Matched filter

54 Many inverse processes are transposes Transpose is equivalent to a matched filter Kirchhoff migration tends to a transpose process

55 That’s all folks Thanks to all the sponsoring companies

56