Role of Geochemical Interactions in Assuring Permanence of Storage of CO 2 in Geologic Environments Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School of Earth and Environment Geochemical reaction rates following porewater acidification Murray Allan Alison Turner Bruce Yardley
Advertisements

Phase Diagram for Water
Introduction to Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The.
Geologic Storage of CO 2 : Leakage Pathways and Environmental Risks Michael A. Celia, Catherine A. Peters, and Stefan Bachu Princeton University and Alberta.
CO 2 Sequestration Catherine Peters Princeton University Deep Carbon Cycle Workshop May 15-17, 2008 Carnegie Institution Geophysical Laboratory.
Safety and Security for CO 2 Geological Storage while CO 2 /H 2 O/Rock Reaction Bo Peng Enhanced Oil Recovery Research Center, China University of Petroleum,
Dissolution and Precipitation
Qatar Carbonates and Carbon Storage Research Centre 1 Dynamic Imaging of Reaction at Reservoir Conditions, Considering the Influence of Chemical Heterogeneity.
Experimental investigation of supercritical CO2 reactivity
Stuart F Simmons EGI, U Utah Penrose Conference, Oct, 2013, Park City, Utah A Geochemical Perspective on Assessing/Sustaining Well Productivity.
A Geochemical Survey of the Telese Hypothermal Spring, Southern Italy: Sulfate Anomalies Induced by Crustal Deformation (Harabaglia, et. al. 2002) Additional.
© NERC All rights reserved CCS main geological issues Storage capacity Injectivity Containment.
POTENTIAL NEW USES FOR OLD GAS FIELDS: SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE Paul R. Knox Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences.
Measurement of Carbonate Minerals in Aerosol Samples- A Preliminary Study Johann Engelbrecht Desert Research Institute.
Diagenesis Process of turning sediments into sedimentary rocks  water-rock interactions precipitating minerals Water is pores of sediments –‘fresh’ muds.
1 Carbon Capture and Storage Martin Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London.
Stefan Iglauer, Saleh K Al-Mansoori, Christopher H Pentland, Branko Bijeljic, Martin J Blunt 2 Phase Measurement of Non-Wetting Phase Trapping.
Co 2 sequestration and AJAX. atmospheric CO 2 - increase roughly matches amount, rate and isotopic ratio ( 13 C, 12 C) expected from burning “fossil”
Water quality issues – ‘natural’ controls Acidity – low pH due to infiltration of acidified precipitation; acids from mine drainage; pyrite oxidation.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Carbon Sequestration: Super Critical CO 2 ’s effect on subsurface brines in the Illinois Basin Daniel.
DETERMINATION OF CO 2 AND H 2 S INFLUENCE ON MINERALOGICAL COMPOSITION AND PETROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS OF AQUIFER AND CAP ROCKS Krzysztof Labus 1),
Chemical Weathering. I. Introduction Chemical Weathering I. Introduction II. Process of Decomposition A. Overview: Decomposition alters minerals into.
CHAPTER 20: GROUNDWATER. Groundwater It is estimated that there is 3000 times more water stored as groundwater in the upper 800 meters of continental.
Case Study: Monitoring an EOR Project to Document Sequestration Value Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School.
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
Carbon Capture & Storage(CCS)
Application of Numerical Models to Development of the Frio Brine Storage Experiment Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School Of Geosciences.
Chapter 16 Mineral genesis. Mineral genesis and genetic mineralogy Genesis = origin Genesis = origin –Primary crystallization –Subsequent history: transitions,
Martin J Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London Two hundred barrels left: an analysis of population growth, oil reserves.
Groundwater Main topics: Location of groundwater
Update of Carbon Storage Field Projects Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Presentation.
Gulf Coast Carbon Center Industry-Academic Research Partnership Assessment of options for carbon capture and sequestration in an area of large sources.
1:1 scale wellbore experiment for a better understanding of well integrity in the context of CO 2 geological storage, Mont Terri underground rock laboratory.
Gulf Coast Stacked Storage SECARB Phase II Test #1 Susan Hovorka, Tip Meckel, F. Wang, H. Zeng, J. Paine, JP Nicot Gulf Coast Carbon Center Bureau of Economic.
Interactions between concrete and claystone in unsaturated conditions during ventilation phase in deep geological ILLW repository P. Thouvenot (1), O.
RCS Partnerships Annual Meeting Pittsburg December 2007 Gulf Coast Stacked Storage SECARB Phase II Test #1 Susan Hovorka, Tip Meckel, JP Nicot, Fred Wang,
Adaptations to the Physical Environment: I.Water and Nutrients A. Properties and Adaptations 1. High Specific Heat Property: Takes a large change in E.
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
Is there really enough space to “put it back”
Ran Qi, Valcir T Beraldo, Tara C LaForce, Martin J Blunt Design of CO 2 storage in aquifers 17 th Jan Imperial College Consortium on Pore-Scale Modelling.
Susan Hovorka * Christine Doughty** and Mark Holtz* *Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences University of Texas at Austin ** Lawrence.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
LM-01L Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Larry R. Myer Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Physics of Sustainable Energy March.
Fig 5.12 WHERE DO SEDIMENTS ORIGINATE? WEATHERING OF PRE-EXISTING ROCKS.
Physical Chemistry of CO2 (Reid Grigg) Aqueous Carbonate Chemistry Mineral Dissolution and Precipitation.
Energy and the Environment: Tapping the Potential for Large Volume Storage of Carbon in the Gulf Coast Susan Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson.
Numerical simulation of industrial scale CO 2 -H 2 S injection into basalts at Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland David Stevens 1,2*, Edda S.P. Aradóttir 1 Introduction.
At the Forefront of Energy Innovation, Discovery & Collaboration.
A. Open-system degassing CO 2 source is degassing during dedolomitization. Green lines = model output for constant pCO 2. Isotopic trends for low-pCO 2.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Recent progress and big ideas on CCS US/international perspective.
New Developments – Solved and Unsolved Questions Regarding Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 as a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Method Susan Hovorka, Gulf Coast.
Carbon Capture and Storage In Texas Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The University.
Geologic Sequestration: the Big Picture Estimation of Storage Capacity or How Big is Big Enough Susan Hovorka, Srivatsan Lakshminarasimhan, JP Nicot Gulf.
1 David DiCarlo 2, Roy Wung 2, Sid Senthilnathan 2, Chang Da 2, Prasanna Krishnamurthy 2, Keith Johnston 2, Chun Huh 2, Tip Meckel 2, and Hongkyu Yoon.
1 Shale-brine-CO 2 interactions and the long-term stability of shale caprock Anastasia Ilgen 1 T. Stewart 1, J. Feldman 1, J. Major 2, P. Eichhubl 2, M.
Petroleum System – Source Rock
Methods  Two codes were coupled together to establish a robust simulator for thermo-hydro-mechanic-chemical coupling issue raised in CCS projects, as.
What to do with CO 2 – the knowns and unknowns of geologic sequestration and CO 2 EOR in greenhouse gas context Susan Hovorka, Gulf Coast Carbon Center,
Long term behaviour of glass and steel in interaction with argillite in deep geological conditions O. Bildstein (1), V. Devallois (1), V. Pointeau (1),
Experimental study on drilling core samples from the Pannonian Basin to model reaction occurring at CO2 capture and storage Berta Márton1, Lévai György2,
TOUGHREACT: A Reactive Transport Simulator
Risk Assessment Framework for Geologic Carbon Sequestration Sites
Dissolution and Precipitation Reactions Between the Madison Limestone and Supercritical CO₂: Implications for Carbon Capture and Storage in Southwest.
Recent Advances in Well-Based Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration
Formation Evaluation Fundamentals
Impact of Flowing Formation Water on Residual CO2 Saturations
OVERVIEW OF SEDIMENTARY AQUIFERS
POTENTIAL NEW USES FOR OLD GAS FIELDS: SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE Paul R. Knox Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences.
Presentation transcript:

Role of Geochemical Interactions in Assuring Permanence of Storage of CO 2 in Geologic Environments Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin Yousif K Kharaka US Geological Survey Kevin G Knauss Lawrence Livermore National Labs Dave Cole Oakridge National Labs Corrine Wong Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin Presented to AIChE, April 23, 2007, Houston Texas

Geologic Sequestration Emplaces Dense-Phase CO 2 in Brine-filled Pore Systems in Rock To reduce CO 2 emissions to air from point sources.. Carbon extracted from a coal or other fossil fuel… is currently burned and emitted to air CO 2 is captured as concentrated high pressure fluid by one of several methods.. CO 2 is shipped as dense-phase fluid via pipeline to a selected, permitted injection site CO 2 injected at pressure into pore space at depths below and isolated (sequestered) from potable water. CO 2 stored in pore space over geologically significant time frames.

Trapping Mechanisms Assuring Permanence of Storage CO 2 at typical injection depth temperature and pressure is dense phase (supercritical) Density 0.6 to 0.7 = CO 2 is buoyant in brine, low viscosity = Mobile Trapping: assure that CO 2 will be retained in injection zone and prevent escape into drinking water and atmosphere over year time frames –Physical Trapping Seal and capillary effects –Chemical trapping Dissolution into water Dissolution and sorbtion into organics (oil and coal) Mineral dissolution and buffering Mineral precipitation

Capillary-Pressure Seal Trapping Mechanism Capture Land surface > 800 m Underground Sources of Drinking Water Injection Zone Seal = capillary or pressure barrier to flow CO 2 Seal limits CO 2 rise under buoyancy

Frio Brine Pilot Field Test Injection intervals: mineralogically complex Oligocene fluvial and reworked fluvial sandstones, porosity 24%, permeability 4.4 to 2.5 Darcys Steeply dipping 11 to 16 degrees Seals  numerous thick shales, small fault block Depth 1,500 and 1657 m Brine-rock system, no hydrocarbons 150 and 165 bar, degrees C, supercritical CO 2 Oil production Fresh water (USDW) zone protected by surface casing Injection zones: First experiment 2004: Frio “C” Second experiment 2006 Frio “Blue” Houston

Injection well Observation well Injection WellObservation Well 30 m U-tubes RST logs Frio “Blue” Sandstone 15m thick Tubing hung seismic source and hydrophones Downhole P and T

Predicting Evolution of the CO 2 Plume

TOUGH2, Christine Doughty LBNL Predicting the Movement of CO 2 after Injection

Non-wetting Residual Phase Trapping Mechanism Capture Land surface > 800 m Injection Zone Seal = capillary or pressure barrier to flow CO 2

Day 4Day 10 Day 29 Day 142 Day 471 Non-Wetting Phase Trapping test 1 Observation well InjectionTrapping Injection Sandstone Perforation Jeff Kane, BEG Non-Wetting Phase Trapping test 1 Observation well

Dissolution into Brine Trapping Mechanism Capture Land surface > 800 m Injection Zone Seal = capillary or pressure barrier to flow CO 2 CO 2 (dense phase) + H 2 O  H 2 CO 3 o H 2 CO 3 o  HCO3 - + H + Well known effect of Temperature, Pressure, Common ion effects, activity of water on solubility Important control – CO 2 / brine contact area – related to small to large-scale hydrologic processes

Measured Dissolution of CO 2 in Brine Y Kharaka, USGS Gas produced pH fall in front of plume

Rock – Water Reactions- Pre-injection Composition 5mm Quartz Feldspars – Plagioclase, K-spar Calcite Clays – montmorilinite, illite, chlorite Muscovite, biotite Volcanic rock fragments Carbonaceous material Pyrite Glauconite Carbonaceous materials Saturated with CH4

Major Mineral-Water-Gas Interactions in Rock CO 2 dissolves into brine CO 2 (gas) + H 2 O  H 2 CO 3 o H 2 CO 3 o  HCO H + CO 2 Dissolves calcite CO 2 (gas) + H 2 O + CaCO 3  Ca HCO 3 - H + + CaCO 3  Ca ++ + HCO 3 - CO2 dissolves feldspar – precipitate minerals (dawsonite 0.4H + + Ca.2 Na.8 Al 1.2 Si 2.8 O CO H 2 O .2Ca++ +.8NaAlCO 3 (OH) Al(OH) SiO 2 -- (10)

Measured Change in Key Chemical Constituents with Time During and after Injection Observation Well, Second Test Breakthrough End Injection Post Injection

Laboratory Rock-Water Analysis K. Knauss, LLNL

Rapid Transient Rock – Water Reaction Fe Mn OH Grain coatings 5mm

Fe-Releasing Mineral-Water-Gas Interactions CO 2 (gas) + H 2 O  H 2 CO 3 o CO 2 dissolves into brine H 2 CO 3 o  HCO H + CO 2 (gas) + H 2 O + CaCO 3  Ca HCO 3 - CO 2 Dissolves calcite H + + CaCO 3  Ca ++ + HCO 3 - H + + FeCO 3  Fe ++ + HCO 3 CO 2 dissolves siderite 4Fe(OH) H 2 CO 3  4Fe HCO H 2 O + O 2 CO2 dissolves 2Fe(OH) 3 + 4H 2 CO 3 + H 2  2Fe HCO H 2 O limonite Fe o + 2H 2 CO 3  Fe HCO H 2 CO 2 dissolves steel 2H + + CaMg(CO 3 ) 2  Ca ++ + Mg HCO 3 - CO 2 dissolves dolomite 0.4H + + Ca.2 Na.8 Al 1.2 Si 2.8 O CO H 2 O  CO 2 dissolves feldspar.2Ca++ +.8NaAlCO 3 (OH) Al(OH) SiO 2 -- (10)

Other trace metals - Contamination from Casing and Tubing?

Risk to Underground Sources of Drinking Water Capture Land surface > 800 m Underground Sources of Drinking Water Injection Zone CO 2 Hypothesized Brine leak path Hypothesized CO 2 leak path

Risk to Potable Water Brine + reactants introduced into fresh water –Controlled by pressure –Main risk is NaCl damage CO 2 moves to shallow water & dissolves –New results from typical aquifers – fresh water & gas phase CO 2 –Cations liberated from typical aquifer rocks include Ca, Fe, K, Sr, U, As – potential degradation of drinking water, scaling and process dependent –May be transient and self limiting – new study by Corrine Wong

Preliminary Results of Geochemical Risk to Aquifers from CO 2 leakage Corrine Wong, Jackson School UT Austin ppb Elapsed hours 42 96

Conclusions Physical and capillary barriers to flow play the lead role in assuring permanence of storage Geochemical interactions play a secondary but significant role in assuring permanence of storage –Dissolution and buffering –Mineral precipitation in the long term Rock-water reactions provide risk factors that require assessment under current permitting regulations –Mineral dissolution in low pH brines –Corrodibility of natural and engineered systems –Controlled by characterization during site assessment and managed by well engineering