Drug abuse liability is associated with higher reward-sensitivity: An fMRI study using the Monetary Incentive Delay task C. Corbly, T. Kelly, Y. Jiang,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Romantic Love: An fMRI Study of a Neural Mechanism for Mate Choice Yan Lee (JoJo) Lilly Zhang Tin Poon (Tina)
Advertisements

Learning, Volatility and the ACC Tim Behrens FMRIB + Psychology, University of Oxford FIL - UCL.
Adolescent Relationships as Predictors of Neural Measures of Early Adulthood Emotional Reactivity Rachel K. Narr, Lauren Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Lane.
Individual Differences in Impulsive-like Behavior & Sensitivity to Money as a Function of Sensation Seeking Status LaBedz, S., Babalonis, S., & Kelly,
How Does Family Environment Affect Health Across the Lifespan? Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles May 2008.
Recognition memory amongst individuals varying in the personality dimensions of Reward Seeking and Impulsivity Chase Kluemper 1, Chelsea Black 1, Yang.
Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context Snedeker and Trueswell (2003) Psych 526 Eun-Kyung Lee.
© 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Huffman/Vernoy/Vernoy: Psychology in Action 5e Psychology in Action, Fifth Edition by Karen Huffman, Mark Vernoy, and Judith.
Review Session Thursday December 15 th at 3:00pm TH 173.
Methamphetamine and the Brain: A Problem of Inhibitory Control Edythe D. London, Ph.D. David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA.
Inhibition as a predictor of performance on an Old/New recognition memory task Chase Kluemper 1, Seth Kiser 1, Yang Jiang 1, Jane E. Joseph 2, & Thomas.
Participants: 21 smokers (13M, ages 18-45) and 21 age-, gender-, race-, and education-matched controls. Procedure: Stimuli were 100 photographs: 50 food.
Motivation and Emotion Chapter 10 Internal processes that: G A S uide ctivate ustain.
 Most drug use starts and peaks during adolescence  76.5% of all teens (
Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
Decision Making in Students Differing in Binge Drinking Patterns Anna E. Goudriaan, Emily R. Grekin, and Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri-Columbia.
DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION MESSAGES: IMPACT WITH SENSATION SEEKING YOUTH Lewis Donohew 1, Philip Palmgreen 1, Jane Joseph 2, Thomas Kelly 3 and Michael Bardo.
Relation between alcohol abuse and impulsivity - Jayandra Chiluwal.
Yale University School of Medicine An fMRI comparison of reading disabled adolescents with and without general cognitive difficulty Nicole Landi 1,2,3,
Study 1: 23 Ss viewed 265 pictures of food, attractive faces, symbols indicating monetary gains, and neutral objects. Stimuli were rated on 14 dimensions.
VOLUMETRIC DIFFERENCES IN GREY AND WHITE MATTER OF ALCOHOL ABUSERS Introduction Addiction has a multifactorial origin. Genetic load may predispose towards.
Briana Cassetta Kiehl, K. A., et al (2001). Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance.
When Uncertainty Matters: The Selection of Rapid Goal-Directed Movements Julia Trommershäuser, Laurence T. Maloney, Michael S. Landy Department of Psychology.
Introduction Impulsivity has been defined in various ways, and broadly “refers to factors that regulate the performance of inappropriate or maladaptive.
Training Phase Results The RT difference between gain and loss was numerically larger for the second half of the trials than the first half, as predicted,
INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF THE ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX IN THE SELECTION OF WILLED ACTIONS AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING Department of Experimental Psychology,
Chapter 50 The Prefrontal Cortex and Executive Brain Functions Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
Two factor models: Self-control & impulses 1 Psychology 415; Social Basis of Health Behavior Two factor models: Self-control & impulses 1 NYT. Cancer Society,
Deficient feedback processing during risky decision-making in adolescents with a parental history of Substance Use Disorders Anja Euser Erasmus University.
Adolescent Brain Development: Part 2
Chronic treatment with cannabinoid receptor agonist, CP 55,940, alters GLT1 expression in adolescent rats Introduction Methods Results Selected References.
Individual Differences in Alcohol Effects Among High- and Low- Impulsive Sensation Seekers Kelly, T.H., Robbins, G., Martin, C.A., Marczinski, C.A. and.
Orienting Attention to Semantic Categories T Cristescu, JT Devlin, AC Nobre Dept. Experimental Psychology and FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford,
Developmental Model To Explain Onset And Directionality Of Comorbid Disorders Monique Ernst, M.D., Ph.D. Emotional Development and Affective Neuroscience.
Learning. What is Learning? Acquisition of new knowledge, behavior, skills, values, preferences or understanding.
Interaction between chronic and acute pain: down- regulation of motivational value for relief from acute pain 589 OHBM 2009 INTRODUCTION Our recent fMRI.
Neural correlates of risk sensitivity An fMRI study of instrumental choice behavior Yael Niv, Jeffrey A. Edlund, Peter Dayan, and John O’Doherty Cohen.
Neural Activation for Emotional Induction: Differential Responses as a Function of Impulsivity and Reward-Sensitivity C.E.Benca 1, H.R. Collins 1, C.R.
Dynamics of Reward Bias Effects in Perceptual Decision Making Jay McClelland & Juan Gao Building on: Newsome and Rorie Holmes and Feng Usher and McClelland.
Date of download: 7/6/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Disrupted Ventromedial Prefrontal Function, Alcohol.
References & Acknowledgments
Professor Greg Murray, PhD, FAPS
Meghan E. Martz, PhD, Robert A. Zucker, PhD, Mary M. Heitzeg, PhD
Physiological Approaches to Personality
Adolescents and Substance Abuse
Facets of Impulsivity as Unique Predictors of Substance Use and Abuse
Luke Clark, Andrew J. Lawrence, Frances Astley-Jones, Nicola Gray 
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Alan N. Hampton, Ralph Adolphs, J. Michael Tyszka, John P. O'Doherty 
Nils Kolling, Marco Wittmann, Matthew F.S. Rushworth  Neuron 
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Neural Activation for Emotional Induction: Differential Responses as a Function of Impulsivity and Reward-Sensitivity  C.E.Benca1, H.R. Collins1, C.R.
Wallis, JD Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute UC, Berkeley
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Memory: Enduring Traces of Perceptual and Reflective Attention
Subliminal Instrumental Conditioning Demonstrated in the Human Brain
Hugo D Critchley, Christopher J Mathias, Raymond J Dolan  Neuron 
Megan E. Speer, Jamil P. Bhanji, Mauricio R. Delgado  Neuron 
Predictive Neural Coding of Reward Preference Involves Dissociable Responses in Human Ventral Midbrain and Ventral Striatum  John P. O'Doherty, Tony W.
Casey et al. (2011) Neural correlates of delay and gratification
Selection, Integration, and Conflict Monitoring
Amphetamine Modulates Human Incentive Processing
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
An Upside to Reward Sensitivity: The Hippocampus Supports Enhanced Reinforcement Learning in Adolescence  Juliet Y. Davidow, Karin Foerde, Adriana Galván,
Under-Recruitment and Nonselective Recruitment
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
SPM of brain activity for cue presentation.
Presentation transcript:

Drug abuse liability is associated with higher reward-sensitivity: An fMRI study using the Monetary Incentive Delay task C. Corbly, T. Kelly, Y. Jiang, D. Lee, S. Kiser and J. Joseph Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY USA METHOD Monetary Incentive Delay Task (Bjork et al. 2004) involves responding to a target within a limited time window in order to receive monetary rewards or avoid monetary losses RESULTSOBJECTIVES Sensation seeking (SS) is a biologically based personality trait marked by a tendency to seek out and engage in novel and varied experiences to maintain an optimal level of arousal -- even if those experiences involve significant risk (Zuckerman, 1994; 2005) High sensation seekers are vulnerable to drug abuse and other risky behaviors Our goal is to examine the contribution of reward seeking and impulsivity dimensions of the SS scale to differences in behavior and brain activation using the MID task and fMRI 16 Subjects : 9 Low Risk 7 High Risk bottom or top quartile of the SS scale respectively CONCLUSIONS High-risk individuals were more motivated to respond within the allotted time window to receive rewards or avoid losses than were low-risk individuals The Ventral Striatum is associated with reward behaviors however this region seems to be unaffected by personality type and more by High Reward R Ant Cingulate is associated with anticipation of tasks & motivation. It is also strongly associated with rewards & losses. The High-risk individuals show more motivation for the High Value items behaviorally. This may be driven by the R Ant Cingulate region. REFERENCES Bjork, J. M., Knutson, B., Fong, G., Caggiano, D., Bennett, S., & Hommer, D. W. (2004). Incentive-elicited brain activation in adolescents: Similarities and differences from young adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press. Zuckerman, M. (2005). The neurobiology of impulsive sensation seeking: Genetics, brain physiology, biochemistry, and neurology. In C. Stough (Ed.), Neurobiology of exceptionality (pp ). New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S This research was supported by NICHD R01 HD052724, COBRE P20 RR CDART P50 DA00312 Performance on the MID task for individuals classified as high-risk versus low-risk for drug abuse vulnerability Brain activation (p <.0005) in the right anterior cingulate cortex and the bilateral ventral striatum that was associated with greater activation for high positive or negative incentive values The parameter estimate reflects fMRI signal greater for each incentive value relative to visual fixation. fMRI signal is plotted as a function of risk status Time Cue Win $.50 or $5 Lose $.50 or $5 Neutral $0 1500ms Target (Subject Response) Acc constrained to 66% 200 – 360ms Feedback  Correct  Incorrect Total 1500ms filler Variable Trial Length  Total $4.50 Positive Cue Reward  +  Total $  +  Total $0 Negative Cue Loss Avoidance Neutral Cue Neutral Outcome Low risk High risk Incentive value ($) R ventral striatum Low risk High risk Incentive value ($) L ventral. striatum Low risk High risk Incentive value ($) Low risk High risk Incentive value ($) R ant. cingulate Behavioral Results Three Trial Types Reward Loss Avoidance Neutral