Practical Suggestions. what to evaluate how to evaluate in what form of presentation who/how! the use of the report Ask yourself 4 questions: how to collect,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

SUCCESSION PLANNING ~ DELAWARE STYLE Appoquinimink, Capital and Indian River
How the Flemish Inspectorate stimulates innovative schools Flemish Inspectorate of Education Ingrid Ocket & Frans De Bie, inspectors.
Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
1 Mystery Shopping SHIP Directors’ Conference June 11, 2007 Julie Leonard & Erika Melman BearingPoint, Inc.
Topic 5 Facility Assessments and Environmental Audits Chapter 33.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
UWE Bristol External Examiner Annual Reporting Rebecca Smith, Curriculum Enhancement Manager
Continuous School Improvement Final Presentation School Name Date.
Kick-off meeting Ayamonte, 17th and 18th October 2013.
An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.
MED  Problem of the Day: SEND +MORE MONEY.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
External Quality Assessments
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Quality Assurance Workshop ACUCA Management Conference 27 October2007.
Supplemental Salaries. History School Board ask Personnel Policy Committee to look into supplemental pay Personnel Policy Committee formed a Supplemental.
Quality Assurance at the University St. Kliment Ohridski Elizabeta Bahtovska National Bologna promoter TEMPUS SCM C-032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters.
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
Rogaška Slatina 30. november- 1. december 2007 ESTABLISHING EXTERNAL QA SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Franci Čuš Marinka Drobnič Košorok.
If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.
Heather L. B. Smith. 1.Define the scope of the Entry Plan and initiate the process by identifying stakeholders, entry plan goals, documents for review,
How does the ECA assess Member States’ internal control systems? Workshop on Audit/Evaluation of Public Internal Financial Control Systems (PIFC) Ankara,
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
INTITUTIONAL AUDIT & (SELF)-ACCREDITATION Ton Vroeijenstijn.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
National House of Social Insurance Performance Appraisal of Civil Servants in National House of Social Insurance Angela BOTNARIUC Head, HR Section Performance.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Process Assessment Method
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Standards 1,6, & 9 Bill Bonaudi Big Bend Community College.
ADVANCE Institutional Indicators Janet E. Malley University of Michigan.
 Definition of a quality Audit  Types of audit  Qualifications of quality auditors  The audit process.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION Project Outcomes and Activities.
Pharmacy School Self Study Prof. Abdalla Elkhawad UMST.
THE SELF-STUDY “OUR EXPERIENCE” MAJAN COLLEGE (UNIVERSITY COLLEGE )
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Evaluation Assistant Research Projects EAs are required to lead an evaluation research project for the academic year.
Quality assurance is defined as : “ All those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a product or service will satisfy.
Quality Assurance Systems Somboonwan Satyarakwit, D.B.A. Vice President for Academic Affairs Dhurakij Pundit University 1.
Dr. Harini Methuku Scientific College of Design 1.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Presenter Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, University of the Punjab, Lahore,
Outline of Quality assurance and accreditation
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Group evaluation There is need to assess the degree to which a group is achieving or has achieved its set goals. The process of assessing this constitutes.
The British Accreditation Council: ensuring standards
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
External Quality Assurance 2017 – New Approach and New Opportunities
Programme Review: Staff Orientation Directorate of Quality Promotion
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Version 0.1Assessment Method Overview - 1 Process Assessment Method An objective model-independent method to assess the capability of an organization to.
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
IS4550 Security Policies and Implementation
A Level PE Coursework.
Human resource and Work flow of the Research Office, RUPP
EVALUATION IN CD PROGRAM
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

Practical Suggestions

what to evaluate how to evaluate in what form of presentation who/how! the use of the report Ask yourself 4 questions: how to collect, analyze data

Purpose of QA Accountability Improvement Development

Roles of the Lead Auditors a) Pre-audit Select team members Organize a meeting b) Auditing Session Interview Check documents Discuss the findings

Write the report - strengths and weakness - what to improve Comment on the KPIs, auditing process, and other forms of auditing & Assessment Post-Auditing

Framework for Evaluation 1. Evaluation of academic year Evaluate different aspects of the Faculty Faculty evaluation Evaluation according to its vision/mission

Using KPIs: - the quality of the graduates - the learning of students - supporting facilities for learning - research and innovations - academic services - Thai art and culture - management & administration - Internal Quality Assurance System

Strengths and opportunities for academic development Problems, obstacles, and suggestions for improvement and development Suggestions in terms of policies

3. Study of the documents 7. Duration: One Month 6. Evaluation should done participatively 5. The analyses: quantitatively & qualitatively 4. Evaluation report is in line with the national standard

1. Submission of the list of team members (June 20) 6. Written reportto the unit to CFE 5. Verbal report to the unit 4. Evaluation can resume 3. Each unit submits SAR 2. Head of the unit will be informed of the evaluation Procedures (July-August 2003)