Operational and diagnostic evaluations of ozone forecasts by the Eta-CMAQ model suite during the 2002 new England air quality study (NEAQS) Shaocai Yu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of CMAQ Performance and Grid-to- grid Variability Over 12-km and 4-km Spacing Domains within the Houston airshed Daiwen Kang Computer Science.
Advertisements

A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.
Constraining Anthropogenic Emissions of Fugitive Dust with Dynamic Transportable Fraction and Measurements Chapel Hill, NC October 22, 2009 Daniel Tong.
Investigate possible causes Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation (ITCT) An International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) Program.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
Variability in Ozone Profiles at TexAQS within the Context of an US Ozone Climatology Mohammed Ayoub 1, Mike Newchurch 1 2, Brian Vasel 3 Bryan Johnson.
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
A Comparative Dynamic Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modeling Systems Steven Smyth a,b, Michael Moran c, Weimin Jiang a, Fuquan Yang a,
The impact of the thermal power industries from the Beijing- Tianjin-Hebei regions on Beijing haze studied by the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model (Preliminary.
Evaluating emissions from top-down observations T. Ryerson – NOAA Chemical Sciences Division Motivation Most inventories compiled from bottom-up estimates,
The Sensitivity of Aerosol Sulfate to Changes in Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds Ariel F. Stein Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
A Case Study Using the CMAQ Coupling with Global Dust Models Youhua Tang, Pius Lee, Marina Tsidulko, Ho-Chun Huang, Sarah Lu, Dongchul Kim Scientific Applications.
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
Five-year Progress in the Performance of Air Quality Forecast Models: Analysis on Categorical Statistics for the National Air Quality Forecast Capacity.
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Impacts of Biomass Burning Emissions on Air Quality and Public Health in the United States Daniel Tong $, Rohit Mathur +, George Pouliot +, Kenneth Schere.
UNCERTAINTIES INFLUENCING HEALTH-BASED PRIORITIZATION OF OZONE ABATEMENT OPTIONS UNCERTAINTIES INFLUENCING HEALTH-BASED PRIORITIZATION OF OZONE ABATEMENT.
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
Charmex workshop Trieste 1/Total Working sesssion « chemical processes » overview Relevant questions : -VOC reactivity, oxidized.
Air quality real-time forecast of PM 2.5 in Hangzhou metropolitan city with the WRF-CMAQ and WRF/Chem systems: model development and evaluation Shaocai.
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
Adaptation and Application of the CMAQ Modeling System for Real-time Air Quality Forecasting During the Summer of 2004 R. Mathur, J. Pleim, T. Otte, K.
Assimilating AIRNOW Ozone Observations into CMAQ Model to Improve Ozone Forecasts Tianfeng Chai 1, Rohit Mathur 2, David Wong 2, Daiwen Kang 1, Hsin-mu.
A detailed evaluation of the WRF-CMAQ forecast model performance for O 3, and PM 2.5 during the 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS study Shaocai Yu $, Rohit Mathur +,
Sensitivity of Air Quality Model Predictions to Various Parameterizations of Vertical Eddy Diffusivity Zhiwei Han and Meigen Zhang Institute of Atmospheric.
Deguillaume L., Beekmann M., Menut L., Derognat C.
Goal: “What are the sources and physical mechanisms that contribute to high ozone concentrations aloft that have been observed in Central and Southern.
NO 2 and SO 2 Over the eastern USA: Policy relevant science Presented at the OMI Science Team Meeting by Russell R. Dickerson T. Canty, J. Hains, H. He,
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Using combined Lagrangian and Eulerian modeling approaches to improve particulate matter estimations in the Eastern US. Ariel F. Stein 1, Rohit Mathur.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Cloud-mediated radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols simulated by newly developed two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ during 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS over the Gulf.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
AN EVALUATION OF THE ETA-CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL AS PART OF NOAA’S NATIONAL PROGRAM CMAQ AIRNOW AIRNOW Brian Eder* Daiwen Kang * Ken Schere* Ken.
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory Three-dimensional Model Studies of Exchange Processes in the Troposphere: Use of Potential.
The Impact of Lateral Boundary Conditions on CMAQ Predictions over the Continental US: a Sensitivity Study Compared to Ozonsonde Data Youhua Tang*, Pius.
Impact of Temporal Fluctuations in Power Plant Emissions on Air Quality Forecasts Prakash Doraiswamy 1, Christian Hogrefe 1,2, Eric Zalewsky 2, Winston.
Simulation of the indirect radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols by the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model over the continental United States: Preliminary.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Development and Initial Applications
Accuracy of multi-parameter response surfaces generated from sensitivity coefficients Daniel Cohan and Antara Digar CMAS Conference 2009 October 19, 2009.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
A study of process contributions to PM 2.5 formation during the 2004 ICARTT period using the Eta-CMAQ forecast model over the eastern U.S. Shaocai Yu $,
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, NERL AQMEII Phase 2: Overview and WRF/CMAQ Application over North America.
Ozone Budget From: Jacob. Ozone in the Atmosphere Lifetime: –~1 month –Highly variable – dependent on season, latitude, altitude, etc. Background concentrations:
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Preliminary Evaluation of the June 2002 Version of CMAQ Brian Eder Shaocai Yu Robin Dennis Jonathan Pleim Ken Schere Atmospheric Modeling Division* National.
15th Annual CMAS Conference
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
Statistical Methods for Model Evaluation – Moving Beyond the Comparison of Matched Observations and Output for Model Grid Cells Kristen M. Foley1, Jenise.
Modeling Ozone in the Eastern U. S
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Paul Kelley1,2, Winston Luke2, Xinrong Ren1,2
Simulation of primary and secondary (biogenic and anthropogenic) organic aerosols over the United States by US EPA Models-3/CMAQ: Evaluation and regional.
Predicting Future-Year Ozone Concentrations: Integrated Observational-Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Emission Control.
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Quantification of Lightning NOX and its Impact on Air Quality over the Contiguous United States Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, Gorge Pouliot, David.
Shaocai Yu*, Brian Eder*++, Robin Dennis*++,
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
Pius Lee, Youhua Tang, Jeff McQueen, Ho-Chun Huang,
Questions for consideration
Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 columns to infer trends in US NOx emissions: the importance of accounting for the NO2 background Rachel.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ Annual Simulation Brian Eder, Shaocai Yu, Robin Dennis, Alice Gilliland, Steve Howard,
Presentation transcript:

Operational and diagnostic evaluations of ozone forecasts by the Eta-CMAQ model suite during the 2002 new England air quality study (NEAQS) Shaocai Yu $, Rohit Mathur +, Daiwen Kang $,Kenneth Schere +, Shaocai Yu $, Rohit Mathur +, Daiwen Kang $, Kenneth Schere +, Brian Eder +,Jonathan Pleim +, Brian Eder +, Jonathan Pleim +, Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division NERL, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC $ On assignment from $ On assignment from Science and Technology Corporation + On assignment from Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA

Introduction

CMAQC ommunity M ultiscale A ir Q uality M odel Community Model Multiscale – consistent model structures for interaction of urban through Continental scales Multi-pollutant – ozone, speciated particulate matter, visibility, acid deposition and air toxics

NE Model domain and site locations AIRMAP sites

ëParrish et al., 1991: Mobile source: CO, NOx Point source (power plants): SO 2, NOx SO2/NOy<1:mobile source SO2/NOy>1:point source ëSites were significantly influenced by polluted plume after 8/11:  mobile and point sources SO2 (CS) SO2 (TF) CO (CS) CO (TF) 8/11

 Results 1. O3 episode (8/6-8/17/2002) Modeled and observed (diamond) O 3 (ppb) (b) NMB=(model-obs)/obs ~45 ppbv O 3 ~110 ppbv O 3

Max 8hr Max 1hr AQS O 3 (ppb) Model O 3 NMB (max 8-hr)

 Results 3. Time-series eval. O3O3 NO NO 2 PAN CO NOy Harvard Forest 8/11

ëHanna et al. (2001): 50% uncertainty in JNO2 40 ppbv (or 20%) uncertainty in max O 3 Model reproduces 64-77% of observed JNO2 within a factor of 1.5  Priority: more accurate determination of JNO2 in model  Results 3. Time-series at AIRMAP sites

 Results 3. O 3 Lidar vertical profiles Obs Model  Extremely tough test: Temporal and 3-D field correctly Model reproduced obs at low altitude and more uniform Over predictions increase with altitude Ship Track

 Results (diagnostic evaluation) ë NO x -sensitive regimes: [O3]/[NOx], Photochemical age: [NOz]/[NOy], O3 production efficiency: [NOz]/[O3] ëArnold et al., 2003: [O3]/[NOx]<14: VOC-sensitive >46: NOx-sensitive ëBoth model and obs: three sites are mainly under strongly NOx- sensitive conditions (>53%)  NOx-sensitive regimes: [O3]/[NOx]

 Results Photochemical age: [NOz]/[NOy] ëArnold et al., 2003: [NO z ]/[NO y ]>0.6: aged NOx plume ëFor daytime (6 to 18 EST) hours: NOz/NOy>0.6CSTFHF Obs82%72%82% Model96%56%87% ëModel and Obs: accumulating O 3 aging the NOx in the similar way. CS TF HF

 Results O 3 production efficiency ë : O 3 -NO z slope ëParrish et al., 1993 : O 3 -NO z slope: ëupper limit of ë : Obs: 8.3 to 10.0 Model: 4.2 to 5.1 NOzëAt rural sites in E US ( Olszyna et al., 1994) : : 5 to 10 NOz O3O3 CS TF HF

Contacts: Brian K. Eder