Proposal 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames Ting Wall Façade Green Roof INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASHA National Office Building 2011 AE Senior Thesis Ryan Dalrymple 5 th year Structural Option BAE/MAE Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby Photo Courtesy of Boggs.
Advertisements

Carl Hubben – Structural Option Ae senior thesis Office Building-G EASTERN UNITED STATES.
The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Dr. Andres Lepage Steven Stein ROOSEVELT ISLAND SOUTHTOWN BUILDING.
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Biomedical Research Building Joshua Zolko, Structural Option.
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Thesis 2005 Cira Centre – Philadelphia Structural Redesign of Lateral Force Resisting System Andrew Kauffman Structural Option.
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
3711 Market Street 3711 Market Street Philadelphia, PA Zachary Yarnall l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Professor.
Hershey Academic Support Center Structural Option Shawn Jones Building Analysis of the Hershey Academic Support Center Hershey, PA Shawn Jones Structural.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural April 14, 2008 American Eagle Outfitters Quantum III: South Side Works.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
UNC Imaging Research Building UNC Imaging Research Building Chapel Hill, NC Daniel R. Hesington, LEED AP l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring.
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option Office Building Washington, DC Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS Quantum II Corporate Headquarters Michael Sandretto Spring – 2007 Structural Option.
Southeast View of IRMC West View of IRMC. Presentation Outline Introduction Existing Structure Thesis Goals Structural Depth Lighting Breadth Conclusion.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Structural System Redesign Existing Conditions Proposal Gravity Design Lateral Design Cost Comparison Schedule Impact Conclusions.
Final Thesis Presentation Washingtonian Center Lee ResslerApril 15, 2008 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Memari.
Duquesne University Forbes Expansion
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
Lancaster, PA Courtyard by Marriott Danielle Shetler - Structural Option Senior Thesis - Spring 2005.
Helios Plaza Houston, TX Advisor - Dr. Hanagan Kevin Zinsmeister Structural Option.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Lexington II at Market Square North, Washington D.C. Alexis Pacella – Structural Option.
Third Avenue NY, New York Michelle L. Mentzer Structural Option.
Dan Donecker BAE/MAE – Structural Option Senior Thesis Project 35 West 21 st Street New York, New York.
Reinsurance Group of America (RGA) Global Headquarters Natasha Beck Structural Option Faculty Advisor: Heather Sustersic Images courtesy of Gensler & Tom.
Robert M. Arnold Building Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Nicholas Reed Structural Option Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition AE Senior Thesis 2013 Courtesy of Jim Boje, PE.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
Rensselaer, NY Meral Kanik Structural Option Advisor: A.M. Memari April 14, 2008.
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
SteelStacks Performing Arts Center Sarah Bednarcik | Structural BAE/MAE Faculty Advisors: Dr. Linda Hanagan & Dr. Ali Memari Spring Thesis 2013Bethlehem,
Chagrin Highlands Building One Beechwood, Ohio Branden J. Ellenberger - Structural Option Senior Thesis 2004.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio Michelle Benoit Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2007 Structural Option.
ANTONIO DESANTIS VERNE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. PARFITT APRIL 14, 2008 BRIDGESIDE POINT II PITTSBURGH, PA “BUILDING SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
Structural Systems Design of the Lincoln Fire Department Headquarters Michelle Burback Structural Engineering Capstone and Senior Honors Project.
R. Bryan Peiffer– Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Three PNC Plaza, Pittsburgh Pa.
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center
JAKE POLLACK NEW YORK POLICE ACADEMY STRUCTURAL OPTION
TOWERS CRESCENT BUILDING B Mike Synnott Structural.
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Project: 250 West Street, Columbus, Ohio
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
Presentation transcript:

Proposal Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames Ting Wall Façade Green Roof INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH PRESENTATION OUTLINE 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames 148,000 sq. ft. Size 8 total Stories not public information Cost July 2009 – August 2011 Construction school and faculty offices Functions BUILDING STATISTICS East Harlem Site

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames “The entrance lobby, conceived as an interior street, is glazed from floor to ceiling along 119th Street to provide a transparent and welcoming appearance from the exterior and to link the interior of the building to its neighborhood surroundings.” -Cooper Robertson & Associates

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE FACADE Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames Bottom band : two-aided curtain wall with both transparent panels and spandrel shadow boxes Middle: architectural precast concrete and brick-faced precast panel in stack bond pattern Top: four-sided structurally glazed curtain wall and 1”stucco on cmu substrate Similarly the South elevation has this same pattern of horizontal bands of varying material

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE GREEN ROOFS Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames The School of Social Work building will be LEED certified Green roofs located on the first and second floors These roofs vary from intensive to extensive green roofs

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE EXISTING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames GRAVITY SYSTEM Bay sizes vary from 30’x28’, 30’x 28’2”, 30’x31’5” and 30’x36’ from north to south respectively All columns in the superstructure are W14s There are non-composite beams as well as composite beams Non-composite beams are found where beam to beam, and beam to column connections are designed to transfer the reaction for a simply supported, uniformly loaded beam

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE EXISTING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames LATERAL LOAD RESISTING SYSTEM The lateral system is made up of braced frames and moment frames Column splices at four feet above floor level Vertical members attached using moment connections

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE PROPOSAL Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames REASONS AND GOALS Disadvantages of existing lateral system Design building facade for energy efficiency Design gravity system for New Facade Energy efficiency Reduction in labor cost Reduction in erection time Overall cost savings

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames DESIGN GOALS AND ASSUMPTIONS Design Goals Obtain initial sizes using relative stiffness method Use chevron braces for frame at grid 3 and diagonal member for frame at grid H to maintain symmetry Confirm that strength and drift criteria has been satisfied Design and detail the typical braced frame connection

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames DESIGN GOALS AND ASSUMPTIONS Design Assumptions P-delta effects considered Girders sizes were kept the same Rigid diaphragm action as a result of the metal deck with concrete topping Diaphragms modeled with added mass value in accordance with loading diagrams Wind and seismic loads were determined according to ASCE 7-05

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames METHODOLOGY 1.Apply a looo kip load to an ETABS model to get relative stiffness since the redesigned frame is expected to resist the same amount of force as it did previously 2.The percentage of the force experienced by each level is then applied to a non-defined member structure on SAP

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames METHODOLOGY 3. The axial forces are then found on the bracing members and are sized accordingly 4. The new lateral system is modeled in ETABS. Drift limits are checked for the previous controlling wind case; which was 100 percent of the wind in the North/South or East/West direction. Seismic limits are also checked.

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames METHODOLOGY 3. The axial forces are then found on the bracing members and are sized accordingly 4. The new lateral system is modeled in ETABS. Drift limits are checked for the previous controlling wind case; which was 100 percent of the wind in the North/South or East/West direction. Seismic limits are also checked.

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames METHODOLOGY Drift values were found to be most significant in the East/West loading direction of the building None of the Ө-values exceeded 0.10 P-delta effects are small enough to be negligible

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames METHODOLOGY 5. Redesigned members are checked for strength capacity.

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames FINAL DESIGN

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE DESIGN OF CHEVRON AND DIAGONAL BRACED FRAMES Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames CONNECTION DESIGN Uniform Force Method: Special Case 3

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE TINGWALL FACADE Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames Ting Wall Sustainability points toward LEED Sustainable site : 14pts Water efficiency: 5pts Energy and atmosphere: 17 pts Materials and resources: 13 pts Indoor environmental quality: 15 pts Innovation and Design Process : 5pt

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE TINGWALL FACADE Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames PERIMETER STRUCTURAL FRAMING ADJUSTMENT Wind load forces are transferred into the mullion by mechanical inter-lock Tolerance for inter-floor spandrel beam deflection is up to ¾” deflection Each Ting Wall panel is structurally isolated allowing it to use panel drifts to absorb the story drift Slotted casement allows vertical and horizontal movement independent of each other

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE GREEN ROOF Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE GREEN ROOF Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames Green Roof Area = 3833 sq ft Location of extensive green roof

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE GREEN ROOF Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames STORMWATER DETENTION TANK CAPACITY Volume of the tank is equal to 16, 000 gallons Regional 10-year, 24-hour rainfall, for New York City, this value is 5 inches Required storm water capacity before the redesign was gallons The new design calls for a gallon storm water tank Assuming that the current tank can handle the remaining 3000 gallons, the structural integrity of the dunnage platform will be checked to insure that it had handle the extra storm water load

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE GREEN ROOF Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames STORMWATER DETENTION TANK CAPACITY Gallon Tank Gallon Tank Member SizeΦMn (ft-k)Mu (ft-k) W8x W12x W10x W8x Member SizeΦPn (k)Pu (k) W8x

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE COST ANALYSIS Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames ENERGY SAVINGS

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE COST ANALYSIS Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames COST New Gravity Frame DesignOriginal Gravity Frame Design Adjusted for Location $ 2, 309, 608$ 2, 689, 200 Design Contingency (1.5%) $ 34, 600$ 40, 300 Escalation Contingency (3.5%) $ 80, 800$, 94, 100 Insurance (3%) $ 69, 300$ 80, 700 Bonds (10%) $ 46, 200$ 53, 800 Overhead and Profit ( 10%) $ 221, 000$ 268, 921 Total Structural Steel Cost $ 2, 771, 500$ 3, 227, 100 Lateral System: $222,800 vs. $299,900 Ting Wall: : $2,771,500 vs. $3,227,100 Green Roof: $119,100 vs. $119,400 Green Roof ( New Design)Green Roof + IRMA Roof (Original) Material Cost $164,770$119,380 Tax Deduction $4.50/sq ft = $ 45,698.n/a (50% or more of roof needs to be green) Total Cost$119, 072$119, 380 Green roof savings = $300 Lateral System Savings = $77, 100 Ting Wall Savings = $455, 600 Total Building Savings = $533,000 COST AND SCHEDULE SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE CONCLUSIONS Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames Changes done to the gravity and lateral system, the green roofs, and the façade seem to have paid off with a savings of $533,000 The green roof system payback period is in the order of a few hundred years Avoid moment frames whenever possible, using them only if necessary by the architect’s design For moment frames it is better to go with heavier members to reduce to detailing of connections Columns were optimized for the gravity load, it is better to instead size the columns at 75% capacity as opposed to near 100% By designing at 75% capacity, the need for doubler plates is minimized

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE PROJECT TEAM Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames Owner CM Architects Structural MEP Lighting City University of New York Turner Construction Company Cooper, Robertson & Partners Ysrael A. Seinuk, P.C. WSP Flack + Kurtz SBLD Studio SLCE Architects

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames AE Faculty Matthew Niskanen Professor Ali Memari Professor Robert Holland Turner Construction Company Professor M. Kevin Parfitt AE Colleagues

INTRODUCTION, BUILDING STATS, + OVERALL CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, + QUESTIONS PRESENTATION OUTLINE Proposal Ting Wall Façade Green Roof STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II ENERGY SAVINGS BREATH 5 5 Cost Analysis CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREATH Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames questions ?