© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

1 HL7 Educational Session – eHealth Week Budapest 2011 © Health Level Seven International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
The Standards Rule and the NPRM for Meaningful Use John D. Halamka MD.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
© 2008 Health Level Seven ®, Inc. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven, Inc. Reg. U.S. Pat &
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
6.07 General Enhancements. Why are we upgrading the Meditech software? Patient Quality and Safety Meaningful Use Requirements Health Care Reform Act Reimbursement.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Presenters: Keith W. Boone, John Donnelly, Larry McKnight, Dan Russler IHE Patient Care Coordination.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Transitions of Care Initiative Companion Guide to Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use.
© 2012 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Meaningful Use Core and Menu Objectives.
March 27, 2012 Standards and Interoperability Framework update.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments March 1, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
© 2010 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.
HealthBridge is one of the nation’s largest and most successful health information exchange organizations. An Overview of the IT Strategies for Transitions.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care. Agenda Confirm Community Work Streams Use Case and Policy Whitepaper Approach Recommendation for Use Case scoping.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Referral Request and Referral Report Connie Sixta, PhD.
© 2012 HL7 ® International. Licensed under Creative Commons. HL7 & Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg.
HL7 SDWG Topic October 29, 2015 David Tao.  HL7 Success! C-CDA 2.1 is cited, and Care Plan is in 2015 Edition Certification Final Rule  Common Clinical.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6a EHR Functional Model Standards.
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments July 22, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
Clinical Quality Workgroup April 10, 2014 Commenting on the ONC Voluntary 2015 Edition Proposed Rule Marjorie Rallins– co-chair Danny Rosenthal –co-chair.
360Exchange (360X) Project 12/06/12. Reminders / announcements 360X Update CEHRT 2014 / MU2 Transition of Care Requirements 1 Agenda.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care Use Case Scoping Discussion 3/19/2011.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Electronic Health Records Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,
 Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 11/03/2015Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services11/03/2015  Revises the discharge.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
Referral Request and Referral Report
How does TIME ONC (ARRA) Stage II Certification Benefit You?
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Relevant and Pertinent Short Survey Results
Relevant and Pertinent Short Survey Results
Relevant and Pertinent Findings and Recommendations
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. Keith Boone, GE Healthcare Relevant and Pertinent Project 1 09/25/2013

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. What would you do with a 69 page C-CDA? Nothing? Throw it away? Refuse to accept? – OR – Incorporate it into your EHR? 09/25/ Image By Niklas Bildhauer [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Wikimedia CommonsCC BY-SA 2.0

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. Too much data is almost as bad as none (or possibly worse, from the medicolegal perspective). Cognitive Overload  How could I possibly tell what is the most important?  How can I find what I care about?  What is my liability if I miss something? 09/25/ © Copyright Maigheach-gheal and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence.Maigheach-ghealreuseCreative Commons Licence

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. Relevant and Pertinent Defined Relevant adjective 1. bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent: a relevant remark. Pertinent adjective 1. pertaining or relating directly and significantly to the matter at hand; relevant: pertinent details. Source: Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. (accessed: May 27, 2015). 09/25/2013 4

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. These words define the CCD use case. The CCD is a core data set of the most relevant administrative, demographic, and clinical information facts about a patient's healthcare, covering one or more healthcare encounters. It provides a means for one healthcare practitioner, system, or setting to aggregate all of the pertinent data about a patient and forward it to another practitioner, system, or setting to support the continuity of care. Page 84, HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA R2: IHE Health Story Consolidation, DSTU R1.1 09/25/2013 5

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. They also appear in other document types and sections The Discharge Summary is a document that is a synopsis of a patient's admission to a hospital; it provides pertinent information for the continuation of care following discharge. The Problems section lists and describes all relevant clinical problems at the time the document is generated. At a minimum, all pertinent current and historical problems should be listed. The Medications section defines a patient's current medications and pertinent medication history. At a minimum, it should list currently active and any relevant historical allergies and adverse reactions. 09/25/2013 6

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. ONC rule does allow flexibility (b)(2) Transitions of care—create and transmit transition of care/referral summaries. (i) Create. Enable a user to electronically create a transition of care/referral summary formatted according to the standard adopted at § (a)(3) that includes, at a minimum, the Common MU Data Set and the following data expressed, where applicable, according to the specified standard(s): (A) Encounter diagnoses. The standard specified in § (i) or, at a minimum, the version of the standard specified § (a)(3); (B) Immunizations. The standard specified in § (e)(2); (C) Cognitive status; (D) Functional status; and (E) Ambulatory setting only. The reason for referral; and referring or transitioning provider's name and office contact information. (F) Inpatient setting only. Discharge instructions. 09/25/ When is a Data Element Applicable?

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. Especially in the Ambulatory Setting (e)(2) Ambulatory setting only—clinical summary. (i) Create. Enable a user to create a clinical summary for a patient in human readable format and formatted according to the standards adopted at § (a)(3). (ii) Customization. Enable a user to customize the data included in the clinical summary. (iii) Minimum data from which to select. EHR technology must permit a user to select, at a minimum, the following data when creating a clinical summary: (A) Common MU Data Set (which, for the human readable version, should be in their English representation if they associate with a vocabulary/code set) (B) The provider's name and office contact information; date and location of visit; reason for visit; immunizations and/or medications administered during the visit; diagnostic tests pending; clinical instructions; future appointments; referrals to other providers; future scheduled tests; and recommended patient decision aids. 09/25/2013 8

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. CMS uses Relevant and Pertinent in the EHR Incentive Rule For summary of care documents at transitions of care, we encourage providers to send a list of items that he or she believes to be pertinent and relevant to the patient's care, rather than a list of all problems, whether they are active or resolved, that have ever populated the problem list. While a current problem list should always be included, the provider can use his or her judgment in deciding which items historically present on the problem list, PMHx list (if it exists in CEHRT), or surgical history list are included given the clinical circumstances. This same principle presumably applies to other data. 09/25/2013 9

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. Real-world Experience with C-CDA Despite the flexibility referenced in the rules, sites and providers report high variability in the method of selecting content to transmit Many files contain literally every piece of data recorded that pertains to the patient (hundreds of pages) Some sites filter and others don’t Some sites reject files due to size or medicolegal concerns Some sites print out C-CDA files and deliver on paper 09/25/

© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. What’s “relevant and pertinent”? Providers should provide the guidance to improve and streamline the specification, its guidance, and use HL7 and HHS agencies want to reduce complexity and improve successful exchange We need your help to determine what the requirements are for ideal summaries of care 09/25/