W / Z / Drell Yan Physics in the first year of CMS Roberto Tenchini INFN – Pisa CTEQ Workshop "Physics at the LHC: Early Challenges“ W.K. Kellogg Biological.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMS reconstruction and identification Part II CMS reconstruction and identification Part II A. Nikitenko Tau jetsTau jets Missing E T (briefly)Missing.
Advertisements

Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Standard Model Physics in ATLAS Monika Wielers RAL.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
6/15/2004Michael Kirby, Duke University1 Tevatron W/Z/  Results Part II Attack of the DiBosons 15th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics Michael.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
4/10/12 Contribution in ATLAS Collaboration 1 Talk “Multi-jet balance for high pT jet calibration” presented on ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop 2011(SLAC.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
CLASHEP 2011 Angela Romano on behalf of Group A. Group Leader E. Fraga Argentina G. Sborlini Brazil C. Baesso E. Basso A. Custódio M. Griep M. Martins.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Early Electroweak Measurements in CMS and ATLAS J. Alcaraz (CIEMAT - Madrid) XLII Rencontres de Moriond (EW), La Thuile 11 March 2007.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
L. Bellagamba, Excited fermions and other searches at HERA 1 International Conference on High Energy Physics Amsterdam July 2002 Excited fermions.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Trigger & Analysis Avi Yagil UCSD. 14-June-2007HCPSS - Triggers & AnalysisAvi Yagil 2 Table of Contents Introduction –Rates & cross sections –Beam Crossings.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Standard Model Physics in ATLAS Monika Wielers RAL On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
María Cepeda (CIEMAT, Madrid) Valencia, II CPAN days 1.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
By Henry Brown Henry Brown, LHCb, IOP 10/04/13 1.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
W/Z+Jets production studies in ATLAS
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Randall- Sundrum Gravitons and Black Holes at the LHC Kevin Black Harvard University For the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
New Phenomena Searches at CDF Aron Soha (University of California at Davis) For the CDF Collaboration February 19, 2006 Lake Louise Winter Institute.
1 Diboson production with CMS Vuko Brigljevic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Physics at LHC Cracow, July
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
WZ and top physics at ATLAS and CMS Ellie Dobson With main focus on W/Z inclusive cross sections.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
DPF Conf., Oct. 29, 2006, HawaiiViktor Veszpremi, Purdue U.1 Search for the SM Higgs Boson in the Missing E T + b-jets Final State at CDF V. Veszpremi.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
W/Z/g + Jets at ATLAS Jimmy Proudfoot Argonne National Laboratory On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration LO -> NLO -> NNLO -> Experiment Standard Model.
Deep Inelastic Scattering 2006
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

W / Z / Drell Yan Physics in the first year of CMS Roberto Tenchini INFN – Pisa CTEQ Workshop "Physics at the LHC: Early Challenges“ W.K. Kellogg Biological Station 14 th May 2007

Boundary Conditions Assume that –Physics of the first year = Physics at 1 fb -1 –√s = 14 TeV for instantaneous luminosities of cm -2 s -1 This talks is focused on W/Z/Drell Yan Physics –Jet (and  ) Physics is of paramount importance at startup, see talk of Guenther Dissertori (this morning) Use many results from CMS PTDR and related CMS Notes

2008 Should look something like… Hardware commissioning to 7 TeV Machine Checkout  1 month Commissioning with beam  2 months Pilot Physics  1 month Provisional Reach Running at 75 ns L~ cm -2 s -1 ~ 3 months of running +some optimism ~ 1 fb -1

Cross sections and rates at cm -2 s -1 At Luminosity ( cm -2 s -1 ) SM Higgs (115 GeV/c 2 ):  Hz t t production:  0.1 Hz W   :  1 Hz bb production:  10 4 Hz Inelastic:  10 7 Hz PILEUP: at this luminosity not important Unless 75 ns running. Example: 7x10^32, 25 ns --> 2 PU 8x10^32, 75 ns --> 5 PU

Typical HLT Trigger tables at 2X10 33 cm -2 s -1 Thresholds will be much lower at startup… TRIGGER OBJECT THRESHOLD (GeV) RATE (Hz) ISOLATED MUONS1925 DI-MUONS7 (both)5 ISOLATED ELECTRONS2623 ISOLATED DI-ELECTRONS12 (both)1 ISOLATED PHOTONS80 4 ISOLATED DI-PHOTONS30, 20 2 SINGLE JET, 2 JET 3 JET, 4 JET400, 350, 195,80 20 JET + MISSING ENERGY180,803 TAU+ MISSING ENERGY86, 65 (MET)1 INCLUSIVE TAU JETno- DI-TAU JET59 (both)5 ELECTRON + TAU JET19, 451 MUON + TAU JET15,401 B JET + MULTIJETS350,150,5510 OTHERS (pre-scales, calib., etc.)19 TOTAL120

Just a few comments on calibrations with the first data

Momentum measurement with the Tracker : estimates for 100 pb -1 and a few fb -1 p T resolution integrated in  Z peak visible even with the first rough alignments

The plentiful production of W and Z bosons are main tools for Detector Commissioning Example: CMS Muon System alignment using real tracks Ten days at L=10 32 cm -2 s -1 is enough to show misalignment of the order of one fourth of mrad

Electrons and photons: initial intercalibration with jets The azimuthal symmetry can be exploited for a first intercalibration with inclusive jets Use the Z->ee to get eta calibration

Electrons and photons: calibration with tracks different regions in η ~ 1 fb -1 Important to select tracks with low bremsstrahlung

W / Z / Drell Yan Early Physics Inclusive W and Z cross section –with muons –with electrons –with taus Measuring W/Z+n-jets, Zbb, etc. Multibosons (WZ, ZZ, WW, W , Z  ) Leptonic DY

Inclusive production of W and Z Large W (Z) cross section: ~ 10 nb (1 nb) and clean leptonic signatures Compare to theo. prediction or assume prediction and use to measure luminosity New studies from CMS TDR: –Selection W and Z samples with decays into leptons of high purity –Simple criteria –Minimally dependent on calibration uncertainties and limited knowledge of the detector response (i.e. startup oriented). CMS Note-2006/124 CMS Note-2006/082

Z/W  muons Safe definitions of 'hard' muon or track –P t > 20 GeV for Z, 25 GeV for W (well above trigger thresholds) –|  | < 2.0 (trigger redundancy and efficiency) –Relaxed muon-tracker matching conditions for one of the muons in Z decays. No isolation criteria for muons: –Already applied at the High Level Trigger filtering step. –(and also isolation at HLT will be relaxed at startup) For W measure Transverse Missing Energy (MET), use for M T cut and to suppress top background (event with > 3 jets) (MET-muon angle) High efficiencies are obtained – About 52 % for the Z – About 40 % for the W CMS Note-2006/082

Minimizing uncertainties in Z   Enough lever arm to control and understand systematics CMS

Total systematics in    ● 600 events recorded/pb: size of statistical uncertainties ~ systematic uncertainties at L ~ 3 pb -1. ● Most of the sources assume a detector understood with L=1 fb -1 => systematics will be a bit larger at start-up, and decrease with time ● Theory uncertainties are an interesting field of study by themselves (see next slides). (CMS, for L ~ fb -1 )

Studies with ● LO -> NLO studies with used to determine systematic uncertainties on the acceptance (~ 2 %) and to calculate k-factors. W sample:  p t Z sample:  p t ● In the long term, once NLO effects are understood, and low pt shapes well reproduced, systematics can be assigned according to NLO vs. NNLO comparisons. CMS

PDF uncertainties (CMS) Z sampleW sample Z sampleW + sample

Z/W  Electrons Hard selection aimed to minimal sensitivity to calorimeter uncertainties at startup, useful for luminosity monitoring –E t > 20 GeV for Z, 29 GeV for W (well above trigger thresholds) –|  | < 1.4 (barrel), 1.6< |  | <2.4 (endcap) (avoid overlap) –Consistency with e.m. shower in |  | (low sensitivity on bremsstrahlung) –Low associated energy in HCAL (<0.5) –Good match with track from Silicon Tracker –Require electron isolation For W cut on MT, with MET computed from hard jets only to lower sensitivity to calorimeter noise CMS Note-2006/124

CMS PTDR: W and Z selections (electrons) High efficiencies are obtained About 57 % for the Z About 26 % for the W Comments: i) W selection requires cutting on the transverse mass: ii) Lepton isolation should be carefully studied with first data Sensitivity on the jet energy scale Understanding Jets is important Both comments apply to the muon channel, too !

Measure the PDFs with W and Z: to be done in CMS Example W charge asymmetry measurement and PDF sensitivity

CMS: Tau Tagging from Ecal isolation CMS get a signal efficiency of about 80% with a bkg rejection of 5 for QCD jets with pT>80 GeV/c

CMS: Tau reconstruction from Tracker isolation Isolation based on the number of tracks inside the isolation cone (R I ) is applied. Only good tracks are considered: –Associated to the Primary Vertex –P T of the Leading Track (i.e. highest p T track) must exceed a few GeV/c –Leading Track must be found inside the Matching cone R M : calo jet - leading track matching cone p T LT : cut on pT of the leading track in matching cone R S : signal cone around leading track R I : isolation cone (around jet axis or leading track) p T i : cut on pT of tracks in the isolation cone Dz : cut on the distance between z ip of the leading track and z ip of other tracks considered by algorithm (association with pxl primary vertex at HLT; see later)

CMS Tracker Isolation: tau jets and QCD jets efficiency Cuts used: 8 hits per track, Norm. Chi 2 < 10 P t LT > 6 GeV/c, R M = 0.1, R I = , P T I > 1 GeV, |Dz| < 2mm Single Tau (30<E T <150 GeV) QCD jets 50<E T <170 GeV In the order of decreasing efficiency symbols correspond to decreasing MC E T intervals

Tau production from W and Z decays at CMS CMS Note-2006/074 Important benchmark for tau reco Interesting to check again BR( W -> tau nu )

pp->W/Z + n-jets  Jet must be identified and the QCD background must be eliminated via very stringent lepton isolation cuts Initial study using ALPGEN (E T (jet) > 50 GeV) Number of W+jets events for L = 1 fb -1 sizeable top background in W+jet channels Z + 4 jets already observable with L ~ 100 pb -1 Number of Z+jets events for L = 1 fb -1

pp->W/Z + n-jets visible cross sections [pb] (= #events seen / pb) This channel is relevant for: ● Physics: QCD studies ● Reduce jet energy scale uncertainties (via Z + jet) ● It is an important background for many new particles searches (looking for leptons and jets)

PTDR : Zbb production Zbb is clearly seen at 30 fb-1, need to design an analysis to detect at 1 fb-1 Interesting also to measure Zcc, Wbb, etc. Important bkg for searches, check btag, etc. CMS Note-2006/099

Multiboson Production at 1 fb-1 Important test of background to searches Check Triple Gauge Couplings CMS Note-2006/108 # events for 1 fb-1

Above the Z peak : Drell Yan events CMS Systematic error ~ 10% Drell-Yan production Example from the  +  - channel

Additional Heavy Neutral Gauge Bosons (Z’) At 100 pb-1, 1 TeV Z’ with initial alignment

Conclusions Inclusive W and Z events are major handles –to understand the apparatus at startup –monitor luminosity –tune MC and backgrounds to New Physics Interesting studies of W/Z+n-jets, Zbb, Multibosons, High mass DY, already in the first year CMS developing a program to improve understanding as the luminosity increases

A few subjects for Discussion 1)CMS preparing effort for PDF measurements. Suggestions for interesting observables most welcome. 2) Luminosity measurement. Would be useful to have agreed recipe for phase space cuts where PDF rock solid from other experiments. 3) Electroweak corrections for high p t W,Z and for high mass DY very relevant. Ideas to test them separately from QCD effects. 4)Any measurement on W/Z+njet, Zbb, beyond cross section ?

Backup Slides

Measuring the W mass at 1 fb-1 CMS Note-2006/061 The crucial point is to control systematic uncertainties: Use the Z to mimic the W !

Measuring the W mass at 1 fb-1 CMS Note-2006/061

B inclusive production Selection of inclusive jet+muon Compute muon Pt vs jet axis Measurement limited by syst uncertainties already at 1 fb-1 (jet energy scale). Expect ~ 20% precision Check agreement between pQCD and experiments Pt vs the closest b tagged jet b-jets c-jets uds-jets CMS Note-2006/077

Additional Heavy Neutral Gauge Bosons (Z’) CMS Note-2006/062