1 DETERMINING FUTILE TREATMENTS SEEKING THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE PATIENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I.Why Behavioral Medicine A.Its a response to changes in healthcare. 1.Acute infectious diseases are no longer the major killer or cripplers. 2.The profile.
Advertisements

Guidelines toward an ethical though of quality Pr. VENTURA Manfredi Centre de traumatologie et de Réadaptation Bruxelles Belgique.
DECISIONAL CAPACITY FEATURES STANDARDS TESTS AND CRITERIA.
For consent to be valid: The patient must be competent – Mental capacity is decision-specific – Ability to understand, retain and weigh in the balance.
PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE
“It’s Medically Indicated” vs. “It’s the Patient’s Choice” Dan O’Brien, PhD, Senior Vice President Ethics, Discernment and Church Relations September 21,
REFUSAL OF TREATMENT – ADOLESCENT WITH CANCER Rabbi Prof. Avraham Steinberg.
EPECEPECEPECEPEC EPECEPECEPECEPEC Medical Futility Medical Futility Module 9 The Project to Educate Physicians on End-of-life Care Supported by the.
Scope of Nursing Lecturer/ Hanaa Eisa Rawhia Salah
Cordotomy in mesothelioma- related pain: a systematic review CASP Analysis Emma Lowe.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Chapter 17 Nursing Diagnosis
REQUESTING AND REFUSING END OF LIFE CARE Sammy Case
Definitions: Health, Disability, Quality of Life These are abstract concepts, so there is no single and permanent way to define, and hence to measure,
Practical Ethics Stuart Sprague, PhD. Practical Ethics Some see this as an oxymoron Some see this as an oxymoron Ethical realists think ethics stands.
NORTH AMERICAN HEALTHCARE INFORMED CONSENT. RESIDENT RIGHTS Make decisions Accept or refuse treatment Be free from any physical/chemical restraints Receive.
SCHEN SCC-CSI MUSC Walter Limehouse MD MA MUSC Emergency Medicine.
Talking to Your Patients about Advance Directives Stephanie Reynolds, ACHPN Dawn Kilkenny, LCSW Palliative Care Department (Pager)
Medical Ethics By Shauna O’Sullivan.
END-OF-LIFE BASIC CONCEPTS “THOU OWEST GOD A DEATH”
Who should make resus decisions? Dr Regina Mc Quillan Palliative Medicine Consultant.
Ethics and End-of-Life Care Part 2: Autonomy and Futility Michael Wassenaar, PhD February 9, 2012.
SOC Medical Futility James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Ethical issues in old age medical care. The Four-Principles Approach developed in the early 1980’s by well-known American bioethicists Tom Beauchamp and.
LEGALITIES IN HEALTH CARE.  First adopted by the American Hospital Association in 1973  Revised in 1992 PATIENTS’ BILL OF RIGHTS.
Physiotherapy in Palliative Care
Sample Size In Clinical Trials In The Name Of God Sample size in clinical trials.
Risk Assessment Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. Session Objectives 1.Discuss the role of risk assessment in the TQM process. 2.Describe the five severity indices.
Dr. Shahram Yazdani Responsiveness in Health System.
Are There Limits to Patient Autonomy? Elizabeth Heitman, PhD Vanderbilt University Medical Center Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society Challenges in.
1 AN INSTITUTIONAL POLICY ON “FUTILE” CARE ELEMENTS FOR SUCCESS.
Module 4: Ethical/Legal Issues in Pediatric Palliative Care End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium Pediatric Palliative Care C C E E N N L L E E C C.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved. Extended RAS Gene Mutation Testing in Metastatic.
EPECEPECEPECEPEC EPECEPECEPECEPEC Medical Futility Module 9 The Education in Palliative and End-of-life Care program at Northwestern University Feinberg.
EPECEPECEPECEPEC American Osteopathic Association D.O.s: Physicians Treating People, Not Just Symptoms Osteopathic EPEC Osteopathic EPEC Education for.
1 INFORMED CONSENT PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN HEALTH CARE.
Social Values and Health Priority Setting Sarah Clark and Albert Weale University College London NICE International Health Priority Setting Conference.
Nursing Process: The Foundation for Safe and Effective Care Chapter 5.
Legal and Ethical Responsibilities HTR Unit F. Ethics Definition- A set of principles relating to what is morally right or wrong. Provides a code of conduct.
Withholding and refusing optional treatment. Cases Withholding treatment Karen Ann Quinlan -Right to die controversy in US -Valium and alcohol  unconscious.
RESOURCE ALLOCATION EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION AND JUSTICE.
1 ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS IN DETERMINING FUTILE CARE HOW MUCH CAN WE AFFORD?
INFORMED CONSENT ADVANTAGES FEATURES STYLES. ADVANTAGES OF INFORMED CONSENT CREATES A BOND OF MUTUAL TRUST BETWEEN PATEINT AND PHYSICIAN BY OPENING IMPORTANT.
CPR/DNR THE ETHICAL ISSUES. FEATURES TO BE CONSIDERED REALISTIC ASSESSMENT OF BENEFITS –RESTORATION OF HEARTBEAT –SURVIVAL TO LEAVE HOSPITAL –RETURN TO.
EPE C for VE T E R A N S EPE C for VE T E R A N S Education in Palliative and End-of-life Care for Veterans is a collaborative effort between the Department.
TNEEL-NE Stuart J. Farber, MD. Slide 2 Connections: Patient Centered Decision Making TNEEL-NE Facilitating patient-centered decision making requires nurses.
Medical Ethics. Medical Ethics [vs. Professional ethics]  Principals to guide physicians in their relationships with others  Ethical dilemma is a predicament.
4/2000COPYRIGHT SCOTT HAINZ, D.C, DABQAURP DEFINITIONS.
Sarah E. Shannon, PhD, RN To the Instructor:
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :蕭皓天 Date : 2005/10/17.
Medical Ethics  A set of guidelines concerned with questions of right & wrong, of duty & obligation, of moral responsibility.  Ethical dilemma is a.
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES PLANNING FOR DYING PREPARING FOR THE ONSET OF INCAPACITY DEFINITION AND TASK INCAPACITY OCCURS WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL IS UNABLE TO RECEIVE.
Medical Necessity Criteria An Overview of Key Components Presented by BHM Healthcare Solutions.
Living Wills & Estate Planning
What is Nursing? N116.
Death and Decisions Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment
MULTI DISPLINARY CARE.. . PATIENT PHYSICIANNURSESOTHERSDIETITIANPHYSIOTHERAPIST.
DETERMINING FUTILITY AT THE END OF LIFE
Patient’s Bill of Rights
Ethics in Critical Care Medicine: Withdrawal and withholding treatment
Do-Not- Resuscitate order
PALLIATIVE CARE T. Renaldi.
BENEFICENCE SEEKING THE GOOD FOR OTHERS AND AVOIDING HARM TO THEM.
A Patient has the Right to…..
DETERMINING FUTILE TREATMENTS
CASES FINDING THE KEY.
Right to Die and Suicide Prevention in Older Populations
THE FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP
Right to Die and Suicide Prevention in Older Populations
Presentation transcript:

1 DETERMINING FUTILE TREATMENTS SEEKING THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE PATIENT

2 DEFINITIONS: FUTILITY FUTILITY. –THE INABILITY TO ACCOMPLISH AN INTENDED GOAL. -SETTING GOALS IN PRACTICE. -PROFESSIONAL PARTICIPANTS. -CONSIDERATIONS. -STRATEGIES.

3 DEFINITIONS: MEDICAL FUTILITY MEDICAL FUTILITY. –A–ANY CLINICAL INTERVENTION WHICH A PHYSICIAN, RELYING ON THE MEDICAL LITERATURE AND HIS/HER CLINICAL JUDGMENT (WEIGHING RELEVANT PROBABILITIES], DETERMINES WILL BE UNABLE TO ACCOMPLISH A PHYSIOLOGICAL GOAL WHICH WILL BENEFIT THE PATIENT. –P–PERMANENT DEPENDENCE ON INTENSIVE CARE INTERVENTIONS. –N–NO REALIZATION OF GOALS IN PREVIOUS 100 CASES.

4 DEFINITIONS: CLINICAL JUDGMENT THE JUDGMENT MADE BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, WHICH TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE OBJECTIVE FINDINGS, WHICH SUPPORT A DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS AND WEIGHS THEM IN LIGHT OF THE PROFESSIONAL’S EXPERTISE AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE TOGETHER WITH THE PECULIAR CIRCUMSTANCE OF AN INDIVIDUAL PATIENT. SUCH JUDGMENTS ARE MADE WITH DUE REGARD FOR A REASONABLE DEGREE OF MEDICAL CERTAINTY AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REASONABLE MEDICAL STANDARDS.

5 DEFINITIONS : PERSONALLY-DETERMINED FUTILITY PERSONALLY-DETERMINED FUTILITY. –ANY EFFORT TO ACHIEVE A RESULT, WHICH MAY BE POSSIBLE BUT WHICH DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE PERSONALLY-DETERMINED GOALS OF THE PATIENT (OR SURROGATES WHO CAN LEGITIMATELY SPEAK FOR PATIENTS).

6 DEFINITIONS: CLINICAL FUTILITY CLINICAL FUTILITY. –A–A JUDGEMENT, WHICH INTEGRATES CONSIDERATIONS OF MEDICAL FUTILITY AND PERSONALLY- DETERMINED FUTILITY INTO A UNIFIED WHOLE AND WHICH REFLECTS THE INTERESTS OF THE TOTAL PATIENT AND THE OTHER INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE LEGITIMATE PARTICIPANTS IN THE DECISIONAL PROCESS.

7 DEFINITIONS: INADVISABLE TREATMENTS COMPARE WITH FUTILE TREATMENTS. EXTREMELY UNLIKELY TO BE BENEFICIAL. BENEFICIAL EFFECTS BUT EXTREMELY COSTLY. UNCERTAIN OR CONTROVERSIAL BENEFIT. FUTILE TREATMENTS HAVE NO PHYSIOLOGICAL BENEFIT.

8 BENEFITS THE POSITIVE RESULT FOR A FUNCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT IN THE QUALITY OF LIFE OR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF A PARTICULARLY DESIREABLE GOAL WHICH AN INDIVIDUAL WILL EXPERIENCE AS THE RESULT OF A HEALTHCARE INTERVENTION. COMPLETE RECOVERY. REMISSION OF DISEASE PROCESS. IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE. –COMFORT. –RESTORATION OF CONSCIOUSNESS. –IMPROVED PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY. RETURN TO A PREVIOUS LEVEL OF FUNCTIONING. MAINTENANCE OF A MINIMALLY DECENT QUALTIY. OF LIFE FIGHTING A DISEASE. EXPERIENCING A LESS DISTRESSING DYING. COST/RESOURCE SAVINGS. [CONTINUED BIOLOGICAL EXISTENCE].

9 PROCESSING FUTILITY I CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE GOAL OF THE INTERVENTION. –PHYSIOLOGICAL/METABOLIC. –FUNCTIONAL. –VALUE.

10 PROCESSING FUTILITY II CALCULATE AND INTERPRET PROBABILITIES. CLARIFY VALUES.

11 PROCESSING FUTILITY III SET PARAMETERS FOR REASONABLE GOALS. –SPECIFIC TIME-LIMITED GOAL. –WITNESS A PARTICULAR EVENT.

12 PROCESSING FUTILITY IV REALISTIC ASSESSMENT OF BENEFITS. DISTINGUISH BETWEEN BENEFIT AND EFFECT.

13 PROCESSING FUTILITY V LIMITATIONS ON AUTONOMY –THE SCOPE OF THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT IS GREATER THAN THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE/DEMAND TREATMENT. –CHOICES ONLY AMONG MEDICALLY INDICATED TREATMENTS. –INFORM PATIENTS BUT DO NOT OFFER TREATMENT --- INFORMATION WITHOUT CONSENT.

14 CLINICAL SITUATIONS BRAIN DEATH. PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE. PERMANENT BRAIN DAMAGE. –S–STROKE. –A–ACCIDENT. MULTIPLE SYSTEM FAILURE. AGE.