Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Public School Choice. Federal/State Requirements Federal System No Child Left Behind (NCLB): Choice Supplemental Educational Services.
Advertisements

Title One Parent Involvement
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 28, 2008.
NCLB and Title I School Improvement
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
SANDBURG MIDDLE SCHOOL Report on Program Improvement Year 1 Parent Information Night Thanks for being here! February 13, 2014 Scott Bell, Principal 1.
Rules and Regulations.  Requirements (Title I and Title III)  Notices  Timeline  Schools on Improvement  Use of Funds.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Information Session Juliane Dow, Associate Commissioner Accountability & Targeted Assistance Massachusetts Department of.
Parents’ Right to Know Their Child’s and School’s Achievement.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona LEARNS: Overview of the Achievement Profiles.
School Improvement Grants (SIG) Overview Adapted from LACOE Intervention for for Persistently Lowest- Achieving Schools 1.
ELD Practicum Overview Local District 6 EL Coordinator’s Academy April 26, 2006.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.
2011 School Improvement Technical Assistance Meeting Dr. Reginald Eggleston Assistant Superintendent Division of Federal and Special Programs October 27,
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Elements School Improvement District.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
No Child Left Behind Title I Newport News Public Schools.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Ellie Gearhart August Campus Improvement Plan Revise plan Parents School staff LEA Outside experts.
School Report Card and Identification Progression
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Campus Improvement Planning
Presentation transcript:

Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005

Program Improvement Schools How does a Title I school become identified as a Program Improvement (PI) school? Once identified, what must a school do? How does a school exit the PI status?

How does a school become a Program Improvement School? The school has not made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for two consecutive years. AYP (meeting the annual measurable objectives) is: – % of students proficient or above in English Language Arts and Math – 95% participation rate – API for all schools – Graduation rate for High School

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES Elementary and Middle Schools: – 24.4% of the students are proficient or above in English Language Arts – 26.5% of the students are proficient or above in Math – 95% participation rate – Met API

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES High School: – 22.3% of the students are proficient or above in English Language Arts – 20.9% of the students are proficient or above in math – 95% participation rate – API met – Graduation rate

Program Improvement School What’s next? PI Year One Requirements: – Inform parents of PI status – Reason for identification – Explanation of what the school and district are doing to address the problem – Explanation of how parents can become involved – Explain the parents option to transfer their child to another school

PI Year 1 Requirements Revise School Plan to address required PI elements – Cover a 2 year period – Includes consultation with parents, school staff, the district and an outside expert – Peer review process – 10% of the schools Title I budget must be spent on professional development for school staff/administration

PI Year 1 Requirements Offer “choice” to parents to send their children to another school in the district that is not a PI school The district is responsible for identifying the “choice” school options and arranging for transportation, free of cost, to the parents

PI Year 1 Requirements District Responsibilities – Provide technical assistance during revision of school plan and throughout its implementation Data analysis Identification and implementation of instructional strategies Budget analysis

Local District 6 PI 1 Schools Corona Ave ES Odyssey High School (Appeal in process) San Antonio High School State Street ES

NCLB Year of Program Improvement (PI) Year 2 – Continue district technical assistance – Use 10% of funds for PD – School choice ADD: – Provide supplemental educational services to eligible students and notify parents

Local District 6 PI 2 Schools ELC Theresa Hughes ES Lillian Street ES (Safe harbor) Loma Vista ES Middleton ES Miles Es Stanford ES

PI 3 School Continue services from PI 2 school ADD one of the following: – Implement new curriculum – Extend school year or day – Appoint outside expert – Decrease management authority at school – Replace school staff – Restructure school

Local District 6 PI 3 Schools South Gate MS Nimitz MS South Gate HS

PI 4 School Continue PI 3 services ADD: – Develop a plan for alternative school governance – Provide notice to parents and teachers and allow comment

Local District 6 PI 4 Schools Independence ES

PI 5 School Continue PI 4 services Implement one of the following: – Reopen school as a charter – Replace all or most of the staff including principal – Contract with outside entity to manage school – Turn operation of school over to the State – Other restructuring of school governance

Local District 6 PI 5 Schools Bell SH Gage MS Holmes Ave. ES Huntington Park HS Park Ave. ES

How do you exit the PI status? A PI school that makes its AYP for one year is frozen in place for a year PI schools making AYP for two consecutive years exits the program improvement status

Questions?