Requirements projected by Operators’ sub group of Broadband Wireless Consortium of India (BWCI) and Impacts on Uplink Multiple Access Choice IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08_254 Date Submitted: Source: Kiran Kuchi, J Klutto Milleth CEWiT India Venue: Orlando, USA The presentation accompanies a selected items from the base contribution, IEEE C802.16m-07_178 Purpose: To facilitate the choice of uplink multiple access during the IEEE meeting in Orlando, USA Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: and. Further information is located at and.

Requirements projected by Operators’ sub group of Broadband Wireless Consortium of India (BWCI) and Impacts to Uplink Multiple Access Presented by Kiran Kuchi CEWiT

Indian Scenario Based on the unified views expressed by the various operators of India Broadband Wireless Consortium of India (BWCI) a strategic initiative of Centre of Excellence in Wireless Technology (CEWiT), India Requirements arrived based on the operators’ previous experience in providing cellular telephone services in India. The operators in India are expected to serve about of 900 subscribers/cell that covers different market segments the cell radius varying between 100m and 20 Km At least 85% of the subscribers will be nomadic and indoors Basic service must support voice BWA at the right price point can lead to explosive growth

Market Segmentation and user density Dense Urban (Case: Mumbai) 70% of 16M people In area of 600 sq Km ~3733 households per sq km Assuming 5 per household ~ 50% wireless internet subscribers ~ 1866 wireless internet/sq km cell radius = 0.75 km ~ 3300 subscribers/cell Assuming 5 competitive operators in each area => 660 subscribers/operator/cell Rural villages cell radius ~ 15 km => 150 villages each village has ~ 5 households who would take internet and ~5 public access/kiosks ~ 1500 subscribers/cell 2 or 3 operators ~ subscribers/operator/cell

For TGm consideration IEEE m should support larger cell sizes with radius as high as 20 Km, or even more, and should be able to provide consistent throughput in low SNR conditions. IEEE m systems should have good indoor penetration. Gain obtained through low PAPR especially important for rural case for enhancing the cell coverage We propose separate zones for OFDMA (mandatory) and SC-FDMA (optional) for uplink multiple access The operator should be able to configure the uplink multiple access scheme depending on the deployment scenario We are afraid that IEEE m will be at the risk of not meeting the above requirements in the absence of SC-FDMA option and may lose out to other competing standards, at least in the Indian context