Klein Paradox Contents An Overview Klein Paradox and Klein Gordon equation Klein Paradox and Dirac equation Further investigation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Quantum Mechanics to Lagrangian Densities
Advertisements

Linear Inequalities in 2 Variables
Lecture Outline Chapter 30 Physics, 4th Edition James S. Walker
Introduction to Quantum Theory
Dirac’s Positron By Arpan Saha, Engineering Physics with Nanoscience, IIT-Bombay Arpan Saha, Sophomore, IITB, Engineering Physics with Nanoscience Friday,
Jørgen Beck Hansen Particle Physics Basic concepts Particle Physics.
Unit 12: Part 3 Quantum Mechanics and Atomic Physics.
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields
Tunneling Phenomena Potential Barriers.
Quantum Chemistry Revisited Powerpoint Templates.
Fermions and the Dirac Equation In 1928 Dirac proposed the following form for the electron wave equation: The four  µ matrices form a Lorentz 4-vector,
CHAPTER 2 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
Finite Square Well Potential
Quantum Mechanics 102 Tunneling and its Applications.
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields  = charge density, J = current density.
P460 - barriers1 1D Barriers (Square) Start with simplest potential (same as square well) V 0 0.
Quantum Mechanics Classical – non relativistic Quantum Mechanical : Schrodinger eq.
Given the Uncertainty Principle, how do you write an equation of motion for a particle? First, remember that a particle is only a particle sort of, and.
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
} space where are positive and negative energy solutions to free KG equation time.
+ } Relativistic quantum mechanics. Special relativity Space time pointnot invariant under translations Space-time vector Invariant under translations.
Infinite Potential Well … bottom line
2. Solving Schrödinger’s Equation Superposition Given a few solutions of Schrödinger’s equation, we can make more of them Let  1 and  2 be two solutions.
The World Particle content. Interactions Schrodinger Wave Equation He started with the energy-momentum relation for a particle he made the quantum.
The World Particle content All the particles are spin ½ fermions!
ENE 311 Lecture 2. Diffusion Process The drift current is the transport of carriers when an electric field is applied. There is another important carrier.
Atomic Structure Preparing for Bonding Douglas J. Burks BIO231 Wilmington College.
QM Foundations of Particle Physics QM Foundations of Particle Physics Chris Parkes April/May 2003  Hydrogen atom Quantum numbers Electron intrinsic spin.
Fundamental principles of particle physics Our description of the fundamental interactions and particles rests on two fundamental structures :
مدرس المادة الدكتور :…………………………
For spin  ½ S =   ·p=H Helicity “ handedness ” For a moving particle state, its lab frame velocity defines an obvious direction for quantization mssmss.
Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #13 Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Local Gauge Invariance and Introduction.
Potential Step Quantum Physics 2002 Recommended Reading: Harris Chapter 5, Section 1.
Mr. A. Square Unbound Continuum States in 1-D Quantum Mechanics.
Quantum Tunnelling Quantum Physics 2002 Recommended Reading: R.Harris, Chapter 5 Sections 1, 2 and 3.
Free particle in 1D (1) 1D Unbound States
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #2.
Physical Chemistry III (728342) The Schrödinger Equation
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
Physics 213 General Physics Lecture Exam 3 Results Average = 141 points.
Quantization of free scalar fields scalar field  equation of motin Lagrangian density  (i) Lorentzian invariance (ii) invariance under  →  require.
Modern Physics lecture 4. The Schroedinger Equation As particles are described by a wave function, we need a wave equation for matter waves As particles.
Subharmonic gap Structures
Principles of Quantum Mechanics P1) Energy is quantized The photoelectric effect Energy quanta E = h  where h = J-s.
1924: de Broglie suggests particles are waves Mid-1925: Werner Heisenberg introduces Matrix Mechanics In 1927 he derives uncertainty principles Late 1925:
Compton Scattering When light encounters charged particles, the particles will interact with the light and cause some of the light to be scattered. incident.
Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #19 Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Symmetries Local gauge symmetry Gauge.
Fundamental principles of particle physics Our description of the fundamental interactions and particles rests on two fundamental structures :
Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
CHAPTER 5 The Schrodinger Eqn.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #23 Symmetries Why do we care about the symmetry?
and Quantum Mechanical Tunneling
Chapter III Dirac Field Lecture 2 Books Recommended:
Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Mechanics.
Unbound States A review about the discussions we have had so far on the Schrödinger equation. Topics in Unbound States: The potential step. Two steps:
Countries that signed the nuclear arms treaty with Iran
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 27 Modern Physics Quantum Physics
Chapter III Dirac Field Lecture 1 Books Recommended:
Matter vs. Antimatter The Question of Symmetry
2. Solving Schrödinger’s Equation
Developing Wave Equations
Quantum Two.
Free particle wavefunction
Quantum Mechanics.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #19 Symmetries Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu
Dirac and Antimatter In 1927 Paul Dirac was working on the problem of combining the theory of the very small (quantum mechanics) with Einstein’s special.
Square Barrier Barrier with E>V0
Particle in a box Potential problem.
The Schrödinger Equation
Presentation transcript:

Klein Paradox

Contents An Overview Klein Paradox and Klein Gordon equation Klein Paradox and Dirac equation Further investigation

An Overview

Assumptions We deal with a plane wave solution for KG, Dirac equation of a single particle The particles has an energy E (kinetic +rest energy) before and after the barrier A step-function potential Probability Current or charge current conserved No particle flux in Region II may come from the positive direction (causality requirement)

Klein Paradox from KG eqn point of view In case of a potential, V KG equation

Solutions in Region I: In region II:

From KG eqn, Weak potential P’ is real, Only positive value allowed Intermediate potential P’ is imaginary [Evanescent wave] Strong potential P’ is real A non-classical Behavior !!

What about charge current conservation?

To get the values of R,T apply continuity conditions of Φ and its derivative at z=0: Solving for R,T :

Conservation of Charge Current Charge current is defined by: This is interpreted as charge current not probability current since we have no positive definite conserved probability in KG equation

Transmission coefficient (T)= [ Logical result ] Reflection coefficient ( R )= In all cases T+R=1

For weak potential R=, T=, T+R=1 For an intermediate potential R=1, T=0, T+R=1 For a strong potential R=, T=, T+R=1 R>1, T is negative This is Klein paradox

 Reflected current is bigger than incident current !!!!!!  Transmitted current is opposite in charge to incident current !!!!!  Extra particles supplied by the potential ?  Another type of particle of opposite charge supplied by the potential ? Particle anti-particle pair production

Dirac Equation and Klein Paradox For z<0 : Incident wave: ( having spin up) For z>0 :

Reflected spinor: Transmitted spinor:

Consider the Case of a Strong Potential: By applying the continuity conditions of the spinors at the boundary: No spin flip

The Probability Currents:

Where r = = R= T= >1 Again reflected current is greater than incident current.

Hole Theory Explanation The potential energy raised a negative energy electron to a positive energy state creating a positive hole (positron) behind it. The hole is attracted towards the potential while the electron is repelled far from it !! This process is stimulated by the incoming electron

Question about this interpretation: How can energy conservation be guaranteed? Any experimental evidence !!!??? Should we reinterpret the probability current as charge current?

Further investigation To construct a wave packet of several momentum components and study its transmission and reflection behavior from a potential step. To use second quantization representation of dirac spinors

The End