SMAP OSWV Product Potential for the OSWV Gap Augmentation SMAP Ocean Surface Wind Vector CalVal Team Simon Yueh and Alex Fore (JPL) Don Boucher and Josh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hurricane Igor Tropical Storm Julia Severe Marine Weather Studies using SMOS L-band Sensor Nicolas Reul 1, J. Tenerelli 2, B.Chapron 1, Y. Quilfen 1, D.
Advertisements

Joint Typhoon Warning Center Forward, Ready, Responsive Decision Superiority UNCLASSIFIED An Overview of Joint Typhoon Warning Center Tropical Cyclone.
A Blended, Multi-Platform Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensification Index
All-Weather Wind Vector Measurements from Intercalibrated Active and Passive Microwave Satellite Sensors Thomas Meissner Lucrezia Ricciardulli Frank Wentz.
Maintaining and Improving the AMSR-E and WindSat Ocean Products Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa CA AMSR TIM Agenda 4-5 September 2013.
Microwave Imagery and Tropical Cyclones Satellite remote sensing important resource for monitoring TCs, especially in data sparse regions Passive microwave.
Passive Microwave Rain Rate Remote Sensing Christopher D. Elvidge, Ph.D. NOAA-NESDIS National Geophysical Data Center E/GC2 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado.
ATS 351 Lecture 8 Satellites
CORP Symposium Fort Collins, CO August 16, 2006 Session 3: NPOESS AND GOES-R Applications Tropical Cyclone Applications Ray Zehr, NESDIS / RAMM.
NRL Tropical Cyclone Satellite Web Resource
Use of TRMM for Analysis of Extreme Precipitation Events Largest Land Daily Rainfall (mm/day)
MWR Algorithms (Wentz): Provide and validate wind, rain and sea ice [TBD] retrieval algorithms for MWR data Between now and launch (April 2011) 1. In-orbit.
ATMS 373C.C. Hennon, UNC Asheville Observing the Tropics.
Satellite Application on Weather Services in Japan Yasushi SUZUKI Japan Weather Association 12nd. GPM Applications Workshop, June/9-10/2015.
Application of the Computer Vision Hough Transform for Automated Tropical Cyclone Center-Fixing from Satellite Data Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NCEP/NHC Robert.
SMOS STORM KO meeting 30/01/2012 ESRIN Ocean Surface Remote Sensing at High Winds with SMOS.
Current & Future Microwave Constellation
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZED CLOUD CLUSTERS ON WESTERN NORTH PACIFIC AND THEIR WARM CORE STRUCTURE KOTARO BESSHO* 1 Tetsuo Nakazawa 1 Shuji Nishimura.
SMOS+ STORM Evolution Kick-off Meeting, 2 April 2014 SOLab work description Zabolotskikh E., Kudryavtsev V.
Current status of AMSR-E data utilization in JMA/NWP Masahiro KAZUMORI Numerical Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency July 2008 Joint.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Potential June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Evaluation of Microwave Scatterometers and Radiometers as Satellite Anemometers Frank J. Wentz, Thomas Meissner, and Deborah Smith Presented at: NOAA/NASA.
AMSR3/DFS Joint Research and Operational Users Working Group Meeting Tokyo, Japan - 20 April 2009 Requirements for Mid and High Latitude Applications Joe.
© Crown copyright Met Office Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution James Cotton & Pete Francis, Satellite Applications, Met Office,
Also known as CMIS R. A. Brown 2005 LIDAR Sedona.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Climatology of Hurricane.
The National Hurricane Center and Geostationary Sounders: Needs and Issues NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER Jack Beven WHERE AMERICA’S CLIMATE AND WEATHER SERVICES.
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
Validation of HWRF forecasts with satellite observations Project team Tom Greenwald and James Davies CIMSS/UW Tomislava Vukicevic and Kathryn Sellwood.
The ARCHER automated TC center-fixing algorithm: Updates on real-time operations, accuracy and capabilities Anthony Wimmers and Christopher Velden Cooperative.
Applications of Satellite Derived
05/06/2016 Juma Al-Maskari, 1 Tropical Cyclones.
Downscaling tropical cyclones from global re-analysis and scenarios: Statistics of multi-decadal variability of TC activity in E Asia Hans von Storch,
National Polar-orbiting Operational Satellite System (NPOESS) Microwave Imager/Sounder (MIS) Capabilities Pacific METSAT Working Group Apr 09 Rebecca Hamilton,
NPOESS Conical Scanning Microwave Imager/ Sounder (CMIS) Overview
NPOESS, Modis and AMSR-E Paul Seymour National Ice Center.
Naval Oceanography Naval Oceanography: Enabling Decisions through Excellence in Tropical Cyclone Forecasting CAPT Michael Angove Commanding Officer, NMFC/JTWC.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Air Force Director of Weather 1 March 2010 USAF Tropical Cyclone.
Evaluation of Passive Microwave Rainfall Estimates Using TRMM PR and Ground Measurements as References Xin Lin and Arthur Y. Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Passive Microwave and Upcoming GPM Activities Science Advisory Committee Meeting 26 – 28 August, 2014 National Space Science and Technology Center, Huntsville,
1 Microwave Imager TC Applications Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 3 Science Applications Inc. International,
WindSat Vector Maps as Forecaster Products Naval Research Laboratory Monterey and Washington DC California Thomas F. Lee, Jeffrey D. Hawkins, Mike H. Bettenhausen.
Ocean Vector Wind Workshops and the Role of Cal/Val in Preparing for Future Satellite Wind Sensors Dudley Chelton Cooperative Institute for Oceanographic.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
LANCE AMSR-E Status Helen Conover, UAHuntsville, Kathryn Regner, UAHuntsville,
Enhancement of SHIPS RI Index Using Satellite 37 GHz Microwave Ring Pattern: A Year-2 Update 67 th IHC/Tropical Cyclone Research Forum March 5-7, 2013.
2015 HS3 Science Team Meeting Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
The Inter-Calibration of AMSR-E with WindSat, F13 SSM/I, and F17 SSM/IS Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems 1 Presented to the AMSR-E Science Team June.
Doppler Lidar Winds & Tropical Cyclones Frank D. Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 7 February 2007.
An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented.
COMPARING HRPP PRODUCTS OVER LARGE SPACE AND TIME SCALES Wesley Berg Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University.
The Potential Role of the GPM in Activities at the Naval Research Laboratory Joe Turk and Jeff Hawkins Naval Research Laboratory Marine Meteorology Division.
A step toward operational use of AMSR-E horizontal polarized radiance in JMA global data assimilation system Masahiro Kazumori Numerical Prediction Division.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
Satellite Derived Ocean Surface Vector Winds Joe Sienkiewicz, NOAA/NWS Ocean Prediction Center Zorana Jelenak, UCAR/NOAA NESDIS.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
Ocean Vector Wind Experience Joe Sienkiewicz NOAA Ocean Prediction Center.
NOAA, May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Activities toward Transitioning Mature R&D Missions to an Operational Status.
CGMS-43-NOAA-WP-25 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Use of Soil Moisture Products Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session,
“CMORPH” is a method that creates spatially & temporally complete information using existing precipitation products that are derived from passive microwave.
T. Meissner, F. Wentz, J. Scott, K. Hilburn Remote Sensing Systems 2014 Aquarius / SAC-D Science Team Meeting November , 2014.
NOAA use of Scatterometry Products Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 10 Author: Paul Chang.
Encast Global forecasting.
EXTREME WINDS AND PRECIPITATION FROM SPACE
SOLab work description
Summer 2014 Group Meeting August 14, 2014 Scott Sieron
Blending multiple-source wind data including SMOS, SMAP and AMSR-2 new products Joe TENERELLI, Fabrice COLLARD OceanDataLab, Brest, France.
Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution
Downscaling tropical cyclones from global re-analysis and scenarios: Statistics of multi-decadal variability of TC activity in E Asia Hans von Storch,
Validation of CYGNSS winds using microwave scatterometers/radiometers
Presentation transcript:

SMAP OSWV Product Potential for the OSWV Gap Augmentation SMAP Ocean Surface Wind Vector CalVal Team Simon Yueh and Alex Fore (JPL) Don Boucher and Josh Park (Aerospace), Steve Swadley, Tanya Maurer, Kim Richardson (NRL) Gene Poe, Al Uliana (NRL/SAIC)

The DoD Ocean Surface Wind Vector Gap Significant near-term capability gap with respect to the collection of ocean surface vector winds (OSVW) data (Ref. JROCM , 15 June 2012) Operational gap is driven by the fact that WindSat is 3 times beyond design life No US based near-term operational material solutions are planned for fielding an OSWV capable solution in time to avoid a gap (FY15- FY18) Compact Ocean Wind Vector Radiometer (COWVR) is currently being designed and built by JPL as a Technology Demonstration Recently launched SMAP has the potential to provide OSWVs in near real-time DoD is extremely interested in this capability and is investigating feasibility

Applications of Near Real-time OSWVs DoD considered OSWVs and Tropical Cyclone Intensity (TCI) as CAT A high priority GAPS that require a materiel solution for the Weather Satellite Follow-On (WSF) Space-based OSWVs provide nearly all of the winds used by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) Space-based OSWVs provide a valuable input data source for Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Models Timeliness of the OSWV is critical for DoD applications Typical Data Latency requirements are 1-3 hours after initial time of observation for Operational users in support of DoD and NOAA NHC SMAP OSWV have the potential of providing winds in the higher wind speed regimes and are less subject to rain contamination suffered by other space based sensor systems using higher MW frequencies SMAP OSWVs could also help better delineate the various TC Wind Radii due to the lesser rain contamination effects

Typhoon Wind Radii Multi-Platform TC Surface Wind Analysis 35, 50 and 65 kt Wind Radii, 0.1° Res20, 35, 50 and 65 kt Wind Radii, 0.5° Res These wind radii plots are generated using the following input data

Summary: Potential Benefits of Near Real-time SMAP OSWVs SMAP OSWVs are currently being developed, tested and validated Initial results show great promise for the high wind speed regimes with rain contamination effects small at L-band This capability can provide enhanced benefit for the DoD CAT A GAPs: OSWV and Tropical Cyclone Intensity (TCI) Key for Operational DoD and NOAA users is to provide the SMAP OSWVs in near real-time

Preliminary SMAP OSWV Image provided by Simon Yueh and Alex Fore (JPL)

Backup slides

Importance of Spaceborne MW Sensors in Nowcasting Applications MW Imagery Provides Invaluable Assets to Nowcasting Applications Small, intense eye with secondary eyewall developing. Small inner eye just visible, while secondary eyewall the main feature as reduced resolution. JDH Inner eye not viewable, secondary eyewall difficult to full identify. JDH TMI SSM/I AMSU-B

Importance of Spaceborne MW Sensors in Nowcasting Applications MW Imagery Provides Invaluable Assets to Nowcasting Applications 39 Hr Eyewall Evolution (Nuri): IR (MTSAT) vs Passive Microwave Z Z Z Z F-14 TMIF Z Z Z Z MTSAT MW Detects eye formation 24 hours earlier Eyewall in MW Imagery Eyewall in IR Imagery

Importance of Spaceborne MW Sensors in Nowcasting Applications MW Imagery Resolution Advancement Providing Better Tools for Nowcasting Applications AMSR GHz H-pol Typhoon Krosa 02 Nov 2013

Importance of Spaceborne MW Sensors in Nowcasting Applications MW Imagery Resolution Advancement Providing Better Tools for Nowcasting Applications AMSR GHz H-pol Typhoon Krosa 02 Nov 2013

Importance of Spaceborne MW Sensors in Nowcasting Applications MW Imagery Resolution Advancement Providing Better Tools for Nowcasting Applications AMSR GHz H-pol AMSR GHz H-pol Typhoon Krosa 01 Nov 2013

Preliminary SSMIS OSWV Results and The Importance of Quality Control Wind Direction Scatter Density Plots In order to overcome the weaknesses and limitations of the current OSWV Algorithm, Quality Control (QC) procedures need to be developed and implemented. Limit the Direction Departure to |∆ Dir| < 90° Limit β < 2, < sqrt(2) or < 1 F18 All Wind Speeds

Preliminary SSMIS OSWV Results and The Importance of Quality Control Wind Direction Scatter Density Plots Typically, OSWV performance studies limit the wind speeds to greater than an arbitrary chosen threshold value (Wentz, 2005), as well as excluding large direction departures: |∆ Dir| < 90° (see RSS backup slide) WS > 1 WS > 3 WS > 5WS > 7 F18

Preliminary SSMIS OSWV Results and The Importance of Quality Control Sample Wind Vector Plot No QC

Preliminary SSMIS OSWV Results and The Importance of Quality Control Sample Wind Vector Plot with QC

Preliminary Performance Comparisons with ECMWF and other OSWV Sensors NAVGEM vs. SSMIS OSWSECMWF vs. SSMIS OSWS DTG: SSMIS Ocean Surface Winds Speed vs. NWP

Preliminary Performance Comparisons with ECMWF and other OSWV Sensors NAVGEM vs. SSMIS OSW DirectionECMWF vs. SSMIS OSW Direction DTG: SSMIS OSWV QC Parameters: β < 1 and Wind Speed Thresholds

ECMWF vs. OSCAT OSWS and OSWV ECMWF 10 m Wind Directions Bilinear Interpolation to OSCAT Scene Locations ECMWF vs. OSCAT OSWS ECMWF vs. OSCAT OSWD

ECMWF vs. WindSat 6.8 GHz OSWS and OSWV ECMWF vs. WindSat OSWS at 6.8 GHz Scene Locations ECMWF 10 m Wind Directions Bilinear Interpolation to WindSat 6.8 GHz Scene Locations |∆ Dir| < 90° WindSat produces an OSWV product at 6.8, 18 and 37 GHz scene locations

ECMWF vs. WindSat 37 GHz OSWS and OSWV ECMWF vs. WindSat OSWS at 37 GHz Scene Locations ECMWF 10 m Wind Directions Bilinear Interpolation to WindSat 37 GHz Scene Locations |∆ Dir| < 90°

ECMWF vs. WindSat 6.8 GHz OSW Direction Wind Speed Effects on the Wind Direction Accuracy ECMWF 10 m vs. WindSat 6.8 GHz Direction, QC: No Rain and |∆ Dir| < 90° WS > 3 WS > 5 WS > 7

ESA/SMOS Brightness Temperatures

NRL SMOS/Experimental Rain Accumulations