Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special Education Learners Strengthening Content Knowledge and Collaboration of General and Special Education Teachers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Advertisements

1 Strengthening Teaching and Learning: Educational Leadership and Professional Standards SABES Directors’ Institute July 2011.
Resource Binder Project Part C: Tracing the Big Idea in Your Textbook Program Meeting the Needs of All Learners December 6, 2010 Melissa Hedges Judy Winn.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDRESSING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS January 11, 2012.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) WMC State Mathematics Conference Green Lake, Wisconsin Leadership Pre-conference April 30, 2008 Beth Schefelker,
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special Education Learners Strengthening Content Knowledge and Collaboration of General and Special Education Teachers.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Accommodations for Students with Special Needs in Mathematics: Are They Really Helping to Improve Mathematics Understanding Wisconsin Mathematics Council.
Building Collegiality Between Regular Education and Special Education Teachers to Meet the Needs of Struggling Students National Council of Supervisors.
Beginning the Journey into Algebra & Algebraic Thinking Dr. DeAnn Huinker, Dr. Kevin McLeod, Dr. Henry Kepner University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
DeAnn Huinker & Judy Winn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Leah Schlichtholz, Frelesha LeFlore, & Jennifer O’Neil, Milwaukee Public Schools Interventions.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Sharing in Leadership for Student Success Lead Partner:University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) Core Partners:Milwaukee.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Presentation by D. McDonald. A Dose of Magic This resource for general education teachers describes 60 strategies for helping learners with special needs.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Charting the Course for Mathematics Leadership Continuum of Professional Work in a Large Urban District DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Write all group member names and numbers on ½ paper and bring to front table.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Distributed Leadership for Mathematics Bringing Together District, School, & University Leadership to Support Highly Qualified Teachers University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 JUDY WINN, BETH SCHEFELKER, & MELISSA HEDGES Teaching Math to All Learners with Differentiation for Students with Special Need.
Strategies for School-wide Achievement
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Supporting Special Education Teachers: Exploring Alternate Algorithm Strategies to Expand Student Experiences with Mathematics National Council of Supervisors.
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership High School Labs Kevin McLeod and DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional.
The MCEA Math Minor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Mathematical Preparation for.
Mathematical Preparation and Development of Teachers at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DeAnn Huinker, Mathematics Education Kevin McLeod, Mathematics.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Spring Principal’s Breakfast Sharonda HarrisDeAnn Huinker Daniel Lotesto Kevin McLeod Pandora BedfordAstrid Fossum Melissa.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
New Pathways to Academic Achievement for K-12 English Learners TESOL March 26, 2009 Anna Uhl Chamot The George Washington University.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
Charting a Course for the Future: A Wisconsin Perspective Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical Sciences MSP STEM Summit.
+ Revisiting Collaboration and RtI October 11, 2011 Math Alliance Teaching All Learners Judy Winn Beth Schefelker Mary Ann Fitzgerald.
Moon Area School District.  tml tml 
Briar Hill School Data Summary Fall Student Diversity: ESL, Special Education Based on 194 students % of Population Gifted 5% Other Mild/moderate.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
CHAPTER 3 Strategy Cards for: Communication with Colleagues, Students, & Families.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Links Between Teacher Leader Roles and Student Achievement Carl Hanssen.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Beth Schefelker Melissa Hedges Judy Winn.  Working in groups of 3. Select one topic rigid motion or congruency to discuss. ◦ Share the CABS you gave.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Mathematical Literacy Roland O’Daniel, Jo Ann Mosier KCTM October 2007.
School Committee Presentation November 1,  Piloted on a limited basis in  Expansion to 13 class sections in  9 th and 10 th grade.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS WITH MULTIPLE LEARNING DIFFICULTIES AND THE IMPACT UPON TEACHER TRAINING Ulla Alexandersson Lena Thorsson Sweden.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
The Work of the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod UW-Milwaukee Ningbo University (China) Delegation Higher Education Workshop.
Walters Middle School Conversion STEAM Magnet Proposal
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Collaborative Practices of General & Special Education Teachers:
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics
Planning Professional Development
REPORTING.
Revisiting Differentiation
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Presentation transcript:

Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special Education Learners Strengthening Content Knowledge and Collaboration of General and Special Education Teachers Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Math and Science Partnership Meeting Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 27 October 2009

Milwaukee Public Schools Mathematics Grades 3-8 & 10 WKCE WKCE Nov 2008 N = 7948 students with Disabilities

Vision Improve mathematics performance for students in grades 4–9, particularly for students with special needs and for students who struggle, and Support a school culture for collaboration of general and special education teachers on improving math learning for all students.

Goals to strengthen the mathematics content knowledge of general and special education teachers; to enhance mathematics instructional and assessment practices, focusing on appropriate accommodations and modifications for special education students; to increase collaboration on math instruction between general and special education teachers.

Project Staff UWM Mathematics Kevin McLeod UWM Mathematics Education DeAnn Huinker UWM Special Education Judy Winn MPS Teachers and Specialists Mary Spidell, Supervisor, Special Education Beth Schefelker, Math Teaching Specialist Chris Guthrie, Teacher, Special Education, MS-HS Math

Planning and Implementing Instruction Students who need accommodations to succeed in the general education classroom instruction Students who need small group instruction to supplement and support general education classroom instruction Students who need specialized interventions

Accounting for Potential Barriers to Accessing Mathematics Expressive and receptive language difficulties Difficulties with abstract concepts Need for verbal mediation Short term memory

Addressing Issues Assessing understanding even in those who have difficulty expressing it Being explicit in a way that leads to conceptual rather than only procedural understanding Developing structures and routines to support conceptual understanding “Breaking down” tasks in ways that focus on conceptual understanding Prioritizing

Schedule

Evaluation Evaluation 1. Content Knowledge What is the impact on teachers' math knowledge for teaching? Are there differential effects on general education versus special education teachers? Evaluation 2. Practice What is the impact on teachers' perspectives on teaching math? What is the impact of the project on teachers' classroom practice? Evaluation 3. Collaboration What changes are observed in collaborative practices of general and special education teachers as a result of project participation? Student Achievement What is the impact on student achievement in math, both overall and for student subgroups, specifically special education students?