MDE Office of Special Education Teri L. Chapman, Ed.S., Director February 17, 2016 MAASE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
Advertisements

Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Getting Ready at the Local Level Preparing for the Service Provider Self-Review.
Presented by Lawrence Dennis Education Consultant for the Office for Exceptional Children October 23, 2014 OCTA Fall Conference.
WIOA Timeline and Action Plan for States
Sue Zake, Ph.D. Director of OEC
Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
MTSS Maryland: Shift Happens Creating Positive Conditions for Learning through Coordinated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Maryland State Department of.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
2013 Office of Special Education (OSE) Fall Forum Tuesday, November 4, 2013  10:15 am – 11:45 am  Ballroom E Jayme Kraus Data Analyst, Performance Reporting.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education Welcome on behalf of Teri Chapman Director of Special Education Joanne Winkelman, Office.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Building State Capacity: Tools for Analyzing Transition- Related Policies Paula D. Kohler, Ph.D., Western Michigan University National Secondary Transition.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
SHAME FEAR I AM NOT SEEN ACCESS I AM SEEN SYSTEMS CHANGE I AM A SPECIAL CITIZEN ACCOUNTABILITY and BUILD CAPACITY I BELONG AND MEANINGFUL LIFE EFFECTIVENESS.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Forging New Partnerships and Employment Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities SPI and BARC SSA Projects Office Virginia Commonwealth University Beth.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
RESULTS-DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION Ann Moore, State Director Office of Special Education (OSE) January 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction An Informational Webinar with The California Department of.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Moving to Universally Accessible and Responsive Services – IOWA’s Experience Region V Disabilities Training March 3 & 4, 2004 Doug Keast, Iowa Workforce.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Using Individual Project and Program Evaluations to Improve the Part D Programs Dr. Herbert M. Baum.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Recognition that Education is the key to a better economy.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Preparing Youth for the 21 st Century Economy Gregg Weltz Director of Youth Services U.S. Department of Labor.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
An Update of One Aspect of Monitoring, Support and Technical Assistance Available Through the State Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
Transition Updates MARCH Denise Bear- Band Leader for Transition.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education Strengthening a Partnership: The OSE & ISD Monitors April 13, 2015.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Federal and state updates Maase membership meeting
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Secondary Transition Shannon McVoy, Bureau of Services for Blind Persons (BSBP) Larry Stemple, Transition Coordinator, Wayne Regional Educational Service.
CEEDAR Center Cross-State Convening
Office of Special Education
Federal and state updates Maase membership meeting
The state of the office of special education
Perfect Together: Aligning and Leveraging SEAs and Parent Centers in Shared Work Helen Post and Kim Fratto January 10, :30 pm – 3:45 pm ET (11:30-12:45.
Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities
Missouri Healthy Schools: A Comprehensive Approach to Student Success
MDE Office of Special Education MAASE Updates
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
MDE Office of Special Education MAASE Updates
Presentation transcript:

MDE Office of Special Education Teri L. Chapman, Ed.S., Director February 17, 2016 MAASE

MDE Goals and Strategies

CONTACT Shared Ideas and Information COOPERATION Shared Goals COORDINATION Shared Achievement of Goals COLLABORATION Shared Resources CONVERGENCE Systemic Infrastructure S TAGES OF C OLLABORATION

CONTACT Shared Ideas and Information COOPERATION Shared Goals COORDINATION Shared Achievement of Goals COLLABORATION Shared Resources CONVERGENCE Systemic Infrastructure S TAGES OF C OLLABORATION CONTACT Shared Ideas and Information INVESTMEN T RISK BENEFIT

CONTACT Shared Ideas and Information COOPERATION Shared Goals COORDINATION Shared Achievement of Goals COLLABORATION Shared Resources CONVERGENCE Systemic Infrastructure S TAGES OF C OLLABORATION COOPERATION Shared Goals INVESTMENT RISK BENEFIT

CONTACT Shared Ideas and Information COOPERATION Shared Goals COORDINATION Shared Achievement of Goals COLLABORATION Shared Resources CONVERGENCE Systemic Infrastructure S TAGES OF C OLLABORATION COORDINATION Shared Achievement of Goals INVESTMENT RISK BENEFIT

CONTACT Shared Ideas and Information COOPERATION Shared Goals COORDINATION Shared Achievement of Goals COLLABORATION Shared Resources CONVERGENCE Systemic Infrastructure S TAGES OF C OLLABORATION COLLABORATION Shared Resources INVESTMENT RISK BENEFIT

CONTACT Shared Ideas and Information COOPERATION Shared Goals COORDINATION Shared Achievement of Goals COLLABORATION Shared Resources CONVERGENCE Systemic Infrastructure S TAGES OF C OLLABORATION CONVERGENCE Systemic Infrastructure INVESTMENT RISK BENEFIT

Governor’s Task Force to Reform Special Education…Highlights More transparent rulemaking process Board established minimum requirements Specialized mediators Cohort of 4-5 Mandate for the Emergency Use of Seclusion and Restraint Incentives for the implementation of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Improved access for information and parent resources Increased emphasis on parent involvement Ongoing task force role to continue…

Multi-Year Effort: Plan Components Improve education infrastructure with initial focus on MDE Support implementation of evidence-informed practices at the local level Evaluate SSIP implementation and impact on improving results

USED ONSITE VISIT FEBRUARY 10 & 11, 2016 Federal Technical Assistance

System Change for Improved Student Outcomes USED Team included: Office of Special Education Programs Part B Part C Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Title 1, 2, 3 Special Populations Office of School Support Emphasis on program collaboration State Systemic Improvement Plan as a framework Infrastructure (Capacity) Plan Implementation Plan (National TA Support) Evaluation Plan

“Sometimes shifting your perspective is more powerful than being smart.” ~Astro Teller COMPLIANCE & IMPROVED STUDENT OUTCOMES

Responsibilities of the OSE

Creating a New System Infrastructure Compliance Improved Outcomes Technical Assistance & PD Meaningful Coordination Student Performance AccountabilityMonitoring

OSE Internal Process Redesign Redefining the state complaint process as part of General Supervision Investigation Outcome Pingora Consulting conducted onsite stakeholder meetings January 25 AM: OSE staff PM: ISD directors & monitors, LEA director/supervisors January 26 AM: Michigan Protection & Advocacy Services, Michigan Alliance for Special Education and Special Education Advocacy & Development PM: Michigan Special Education Mediation Programs and Michigan Alliance for Families February 29 & March 1 Recommendations Improvement planning

Coordination Support Intervention Change Michigan Department of Education Intermediate School District Local Educational Agencies Schools Overarching Improvement Strategy

OSE Funded Grant Support Current Structure Moving Forward Monitoring Transition Technical Assistance & PD Transition Monitoring

Enhancing Opportunities for Students with Disabilities (EOSD) Grant funding remains with each ISD Redefine ROLE & FUNCTION Compliance in the context of system improvement No monitoring or complaint investigation work Redefine STRUCTURE Technical assistance informed by OSE monitoring team Collaborative work with ALL MDE funded technical assistance support at ISD level Directed & Coordinated by OSE Redefine ROLE & FUNCTION Monitoring (no compliant investigation work) Written guidance development Data ANALYSIS SPP Performance Monitoring Findings Determinations Complaints/ DPH/ Mediation Other Inform technical assistance Collaborative work with ALL MDE funded technical assistance support at ISD level Redefine STURCTURE Neutral process for ISD and District SYSTEM improvement Technical Assistance (ISD) Monitoring & Accountability (OSE)

Transition Grant Funding with the ISD Redefine ROLE & FUNCTION Compliance in the context of both system alignment and improved student outcome Coordinated data analysis pertaining to secondary SPP indicators New Competency Expectations Personal Curriculum provisions for increased graduation and reduced dropout Increased knowledge of CTE and the Carl Perkins grant requirements Routine use of student EDP information Redefine STRUCTURE Collaborative work with ALL MDE funded technical assistance support at ISD level Funding to support the activities related to Role and Function of the ISD Transition Coordinator Including but not limited to: Training and technical assistance to design a MEANINGFUL transition planning process at the LEA level Collaboration with state and local agencies as part of the Office of Disabilities Employment Programs federal technical assistance process 2020 Youth Transition Plan Department of Labor Social Security Administration Department of Health & Human Services CoordinatorServices

Stakeholder Groups to be identified Technical Assistance Grant (EOSD) Transition Grant Participants will be determined based on the PERSPECTIVES needed to build out the ROLE/FUNCTION for each grant Individuals with multiple perspectives will be given priority for selection Stakeholder input will be complete by April-May of 2016 New grant requirements will be reflected in the Spring 2016 applications New structure to be implemented Fall 2016

Decisions. We can think about things, turn them over in our minds a million times, play out possible scenarios, but really when it comes down to it, you have to go with your heart and move forward. Maybe things will go well. Maybe they’ll turn out poorly. Every decision brings with it some good, some bad, some lessons, and some luck. The only thing that’s for sure is that indecision steals many years from many people who wind up wishing they’d just had the courage to leap. ~Doe Zantamata

MDE Office of Special Education Information Help Desk Monday-Friday 9:00-4:00 Teri Chapman, Director Jan Weckstein, Assistant Director Contact us!Administration