LIGO-G050333-00-ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug 20051 A Coherent Network Burst Analysis Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Advertisements

LIGO-G Z Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
Bayesian burst detection Antony Searle (ANU) with Patrick Sutton (Cardiff / LIGO Caltech), Massimo Tinto (JPL / LIGO Caltech), Shourov Chatterji (INFN.
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform Badri Krishnan AEI, Golm (for the pulsar group) LSC meeting, Hanford November 2003 LIGO-G Z.
Capabilities of a Gravitational Wave Network Bernard F Schutz Albert Einstein Institute (Potsdam, Germany) and School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff.
Coherent network searches for gravitational-wave bursts Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Observing the Bursting Universe with LIGO: Status and Prospects Erik Katsavounidis LSC Burst Working Group 8 th GWDAW - UWM Dec 17-20, 2003.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Silvia Poggi - GW burst detection strategy in non-homogeneus networks Detection strategies for bursts in networks of non-homogeneus gravitational waves.
A coherent null stream consistency test for gravitational wave bursts Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo.
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z A Coherent Network Burst Analysis Patrick Sutton on behalf of Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Antony Searle, Leo Stein, Massimo.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Solution of the Inverse Problem for Gravitational Wave Bursts Massimo Tinto JPL/CIT LIGO Seminar, October 12, 2004 Y. Gursel & M. Tinto, Phys. Rev. D,
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
Upper Limits from LIGO and TAMA on Gravitational-Wave Bursts on Gravitational-Wave Bursts Patrick Sutton (LIGO laboratory, Caltech), Masaki Ando (Department.
S.Klimenko, August 2005, LSC, G Z Constraint likelihood analysis with a network of GW detectors S.Klimenko University of Florida, in collaboration.
S.Klimenko, July 14, 2007, Amaldi7,Sydney, G Z Detection and reconstruction of burst signals with networks of gravitational wave detectors S.Klimenko,
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
Amaldi-7 meeting, Sydney, Australia, July 8-14, 2007 LIGO-G Z All-Sky Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts during the fifth LSC Science Run Igor.
A fully coherent analysis can be performed when data is available from three or more non-aligned detectors Generalization of collocated Hanford detector.
Searching for gravitational-wave bursts with the Q Pipeline Shourov K. Chatterji LIGO Science Seminar 2005 August 2.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Dec 16, 2005GWDAW-10, Brownsville Population Study of Gamma Ray Bursts S. D. Mohanty The University of Texas at Brownsville.
LIGO-G Z Results of the LIGO-TAMA S2/DT8 Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
A fully coherent analysis can be performed when data is available from three or more non-aligned detectors Generalization of collocated Hanford detector.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
S.Frasca on behalf of LSC-Virgo collaboration New York, June 23 rd, 2009.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Joint LIGO-Virgo data analysis Inspiral and Burst Summary of the first project results Overview of the future activities M.-A. Bizouard (LAL-Orsay) on.
LIGO- G Z Optimally Combining the Hanford Interferometer Strain Channels - II Albert Lazzarini LIGO Laboratory Caltech S. Bose, P. Fritschel,
S.Klimenko, G Z, March 20, 2006, LSC meeting First results from the likelihood pipeline S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), A.Mercer (UF),G.Mitselmakher.
Coherent network analysis technique for discriminating GW bursts from instrumental noise Patrick Sutton (CIT) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji,
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
Robust Bayesian detection of unmodeled bursts of gravitational waves Antony Searle (ANU, Visitor in Physics LIGO-Caltech) in collaboration with Shourov.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G Z 23 October 2002LIGO Laboratory NSF Review1 Searching for Gravitational Wave Bursts: An Overview Sam Finn, Erik Katsavounidis and Peter.
LIGO-G Z Searching for gravitational wave bursts with the new global detector network Shourov K. Chatterji INFN Sezioni di Roma / Caltech LIGO.
G08XXXX-00-Z S. Chatterji, Cascina, Italy, 2008 November 261 Gravitational-wave data analysis and supernovae Shourov K. Chatterji INFN Sezione di Roma.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
Searching for gravitational wave bursts with the new global detector network 2007 May 3 Searching for gravitational wave bursts with the new global detector.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
Maria Principe University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug A Coherent Network Burst Analysis Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo Stein, Patrick Sutton (Caltech), Massimo Tinto (Caltech/JPL)

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Overview Eyes open search –Capable of detecting unknown and unanticipated waveforms Innately distinguishes between gravitational waves and glitches –Networks of three or more detectors over-determine the two strain polarizations for an assumed gravitational wave direction Can construct N – 2 null streams exactly orthogonal to the strain without any knowledge of the waveform –Anything affecting a null stream is not the postulated gravitational wave A very powerful veto Needs 3+ instruments –Each with different locations and orientations –Such as H1, L1 and one of Virgo, GEO or TAMA

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Null streams The whitened output d i of N detectors can be modelled by –Antenna patterns F i –Strain h –Amplitude spectrum σ i –White noise n i The N – 2 linear combinations (Zd) j are orthogonal to strain and each other

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug F1F1 d1d1 d2d2 F2F2 F Z Null stream visualization Consider analogy with one fewer dimension –Detectors d 1, d 2 –One polarization –Sensitivity F 1, F 2 –Large strain h Null stream Z is orthogonal to F –Zd is white –Fd estimates signal Zd Fd

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Directions Every direction Ω on the sky has different –Null stream coefficients Z –Delays Δt i for detector at x i cΔt i = –x i · Ω Sample the sky with some limited mismatch –Template placement problem –Affected by network geometry Mollweide plot of 0.6 ms resolution map for HLV –Near-optimal –Low density on plane of HLV baselines

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Null stream test “Is the data consistent with noise plus a gravitational wave from some direction?” is equivalent to “Are the null streams for that direction consistent with noise?” Use a χ 2 test –Test that the total energy E null of the null streams is consistent with white noise

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Signal injection 8.5 kpc DFM Inject a gravitational wave Null stream energy consistent with noise at correct direction –Signal cancels out Injection HL HV LV HV LV

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug ‘Glitch’ injection Inject three different waveforms (a ‘glitch’) –Consistent times, energies Nowhere consistent with noise DFM SG Lazarus HL HV LV HV LV

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Components Null stream energy E null may be split into two parts Available energy E available –“Diagonal” terms –Weighted sum of detector energies –Broad features on sky map Correlation energy E correlation –“Off-diagonal” terms –Weighted sum of pair-wise detector correlations –Fringes on sky map

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Available and correlation energies Energy in the detectors boosts up the plot Correlation in the detectors broadens across the plot Cancellation when –Consistent with gravitational wave –Right direction on sky Available energy Correlation energy right direction injection tested at wrong directions glitch noise Consistent

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Characterization How does it compare to existing methods? –Will reject energetic and even correlated glitches –Won’t reject a gravitational wave –Won’t reject background noise and small glitches –Complementary to existing tests To form a search, must combine it with some other test(s) –What is the population of small glitches that pass the null test, and how can we eliminate them?

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug A possible search strategy correlation null stream excess energy Use excess energy to trigger Require correlation Use the null stream to identify gravitational wave candidate events Correlation energy Available energy

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Real world problems Nonstationarity, Calibration errors and Direction mismatch –Null stream will not exactly cancel signal, so there will be residual excess energy Computational cost –May be practical as triggered search only Duty cycle –Requires at least three different sites taking data Glitch population –How correlated?

LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug Future directions Performing large scale Monte-Carlo simulations –M ATLAB pipeline lsc-soft/matapps/src/searches/burst/coherent-network –Test against real glitches –Compare with other tests Preferentially detect “physical” waveforms? –Maximum entropy methods? More work on statistics –Bayesian interpretation? –Pattern recognition on sky maps?