Doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 1 Enhancement of the Compressed steering matrix performance with power.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /1645r2 Submission January 2005 C. Hansen, BroadcomSlide 1 Preambles, Beamforming, and the WWiSE Proposal Notice: This document has.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /1528r0 Submission 22 September 2006 Naveen Kakani, Nokia, IncSlide 1 TGn PSMP adhoc Group September Closing Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1006r0 Submission September 2005 Andrew McDonald, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Initial Network Selection Concept Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE WG Status Report – July 2005
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
London TGu Motions Authors: January 2007 Date: Month Year
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
Preambles, Beamforming, and the WWiSE Proposal
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
November Opening Report
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Descriptive Language Usage in TGv
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
TGn PSMP ad hoc Agenda – September 14 ‘06
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
Scaling and Quantization for CSI Matrices Feedback
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
PHY CID 3242 Date: Authors: September 2007 September 2007
PHY Ad Hoc September Opening Report
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Preambles, Beamforming, and the WWiSE Proposal
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
[Preamble Design for IEEE b Segmentation]
PHY CID 3242 Date: Authors: September 2007 September 2007
Beam Ad Hoc Agenda Date: Authors: March 2007 March 2007
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
STC with CSI feedback IEEE P Wireless LANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions for LB 84 Comment Resolutions
Explicit feedback with sounding packet
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 1 Enhancement of the Compressed steering matrix performance with power control feedback. Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 2 Abstract The document attempts to partially address CIDs 7418 and 8141, which are seeking comments to simplify beamforming. Currently clauses relating to the compressed steering matrix, and in the draft standard D1.03, allow for the feedback of steering matrices with orthonormal columns only. This is unduly restrictive as beamforming matrices need not have orthonormal columns. Including power control in the form of a column scaling of the matrix allows for additional performance gains. Note: That power control is possible with both full channel matrix CSI and uncompressed steering matrix feedback techniques

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 3 Technical Argument Consider the usual MIMO channel model Q is an optional steering matrix Q is square when the number of transmit streams equals the number of transmit antennas

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 4 Channel Capacity Channel capacity is determined by the eigenvalues of HH’ Inserting a unitary steering matrix Q results in the matrix (HQ)(HQ)’=HQQ’H’=HH’ There is no change to HH’ and thus no change in the capacity.

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 5 Least squares error covariance The least squares error vector has covariance The channel matrix may be expressed in diagonal form as The squared Frobenius norm of the covariance matrix is Adding a unitary steering matrix Q results in Since Q’V is unitary, the squared Frobenius norm is still

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 6 Power control is necessary When the number of transmit streams equals the number of transmit antennas, all unitary steering matrices give the same performance. Feeding back a unitary matrix is useless, since it will perform no better than a fixed steering matrix such as a Walsh or Fourier matrix. Power control in the form of a column scaling is necessary to achieve performance improvements from beamforming in this case.

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 7 Simulation Results Little difference in performance between the unitary eigenvector matrix and the Walsh steering matrix. Power control (subcarrier grouping = 1) delivers an improvement of about 3dB at a PER of 10% in this case.

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 8 Simulation Results An asymmetric MCS, MCS 35 (64QAM & 16QAM R1/2). It shows that the eigenvector matrix is slightly better than the Walsh matrix in this case, by about 1.5dB at 10% PER. Power control offers a further improvement of about 1dB.

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 9 Enhanced Compressed Steering Matrix Proposal In modify the format of the feedback matrix to the following:

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 10 Enhanced Compressed Steering Matrix Proposal V(f) # of param The order of angles and amplitudes to be feedback 2x12  21,  21 2x24 a   a   21,  21 3x14  21,  31  21,  31, 3x28 a   a   21,  31,  21,  31,  32,  32 3x39 a   a   a   21,  31,  21,  31,  32,  32 4x16  21,  31,  41,  21,  31,  41 4x212 a   a   21,  31,  41,  21,  31,  41,  32,  42,  32,  42 4x315 a   a   a   21,  31,  41,  21,  31,  41,  32,  42,  32,  42,  43,  43 4x416 a   a   a   a   21,  31,  41,  21,  31,  41,  32,  42,  32,  42,  43,  43 Note ba (=b  ) is the number of bits used to quantize a.

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 11 Feedback Information length (bytes) Examples 2x2 configuration the amount of feedback information slightly more than doubles with the newly proposed compressed steering feedback mechanism, BUT still a factor of 4 less than H or Uncompressed steering Matrix CSI feedback 4x4 configuration the amount of information only increases by 50%. 2x24x4 Comments No Group 4 Group No Group 4 Group H Matrix (also approx. Uncompressed Steering Nb = 8bits Compressed Steering bits Newly Proposed Compressed Steering bits, 5 bits for amplitude

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 12 Conclusion With regard to CIDs 7418 and 8141, we feel that compressed steering matrix feedback should either be –omitted as suggested in these CIDs or –changed as outlined here. Welcome further discussion and consideration from the n working body.

doc.: IEEE /1499r0 Submission September 2006 Andrew Storm, BandspeedSlide 13 References n-compressed-steering-matrix- feedback-enhancement.doc