Cookies and Nuggets. AGEP 2008 Data Collection Just add 07-08 data, including 07/08 PhD recipients (No other changes). Data due October 30, 2008 (Sorry.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.

Advertisements

Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.

Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.

Sunflower blank National Science Foundation Dan Maki Kathleen Bergin Math and Science Partnership Education and Human Resources Directorate Division of.

Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.

Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research RII Track-3: Building Diverse Communities May 21, 2013 Jeanne Small & Uma Venkateswaran 1.

Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.

An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.

NSF East Asia and Pacific Summer Institutes (EAPSI) Shelley Hawthorne Smith UA Graduate College Office of Fellowships and Community Engagement

NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.

Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.

The Proposal Review Process Matt Germonprez Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor ISQA College of IS&T.

DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU

Research-teaching linkages initially (2006): scoping work on questions of institutional STRUCTURE and CULTURE.

The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.

Addressing the Challenges of Graduate and Post-graduate Training in the Geosciences Margaret Leinen Assistant Director for Geosciences National Science.

Workshop NSF Major Research Instrumentation grants program NSF approach to research in undergraduate institutions Supporting students on grants Introduction.

1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.

National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)

Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.

Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Operations Center.

NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,

Evaluating NSF Programs

NSF-EHR Framework for Improving Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education R & D Ferdie Rivera Program Director (Part time; Intermittent.

Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.

Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.

FY Division of Human Resources Development Combined COV COV PRESENTATION TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 7, 2014.

A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.

Evaluation of Efforts to Broaden STEM Participation: Results from A Two-Day Workshop Planning Committee: Bernice Anderson Elmima Johnson Beatriz Chu Clewell.

A New Collaborative to Improve Broader Impacts Kevin Niemi, U. Wisconsin-Madison Kemi Jona, Northwestern U. Jane Horwitz, U. Penn

National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.

Program Overview (NSF ) Jessie DeAro, Ph.D. AGEP Program Officer National Science Foundation Questions:

Developed by Yolanda S. George, AAAS Education & Human Resources Programs and Patricia Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc. With input from the AGEP.

Differential Effects of Participatory Evaluation in a National Multi-site Program Evaluation Frances Lawrenz University of Minnesota.

Performance Assessment Assessment of Organizational Excellence NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 5-6, 2005.

Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.

 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.

Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.

An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.

Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal

Susanne Hambrusch Department of Computer Science Department Head Increase diversity of faculty, students, and staff Division Director in CISE at NSF The.

AGEP Evaluation Capacity Meeting 2008 Yolanda George, Deputy Director, Education & Human Resources Programs.

Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Professor of Civil and Environmental.

GEO-AGEP webinar, August 2, 2012 Jessie DeAro, Ph.D. AGEP Program Officer National Science Foundation Questions:

Session B – Broader Impacts: What’s the big idea? J. Britt HolbrookSharon Franks Center for the Study of InterdisciplinarityResearch Proposal Development.

ELIZABETH WARDLE DIRECTOR OF WRITING OUTREACH PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OF WRITING & RHETORIC UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA President’s Class Size Initiative—Composition.

1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.

Analysis of Overall Impact Scoring Trends within AHRQ Peer Review Study Sections Gabrielle Quiggle, MPH; Rebecca Trocki, MSHAI; Kishena Wadhwani, PhD,

AGEP Evaluation Capacity Meeting 2008 Yolanda George, Deputy Director, Education & Human Resources Programs.

Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.

NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.

New Framework for Strategic Goal Assessment NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 8-9, 2006 Tom Cooley, Director, BFA.

Images: Images are extremely important to publicize the results of NSF investments. In general, graphs, spectra, and reaction diagrams are not compelling.

1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.

Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016

Understanding ABET.

NTNU’s quality system for education

NSF Graduate Research Fellowship

NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi

New STEP PI Workshop.

NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi

NSF Graduate Research Fellowship

NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program

FISH 521 Further proceedings Peer review

Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018

PREM Annual Reporting “These guidelines were developed to provide a uniform reporting structure for the Partnerships in Research and Education in Materials.

Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017

Gulf States Math Alliance 2019 Conference

S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.

Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019

Presentation transcript:

Cookies and Nuggets

AGEP 2008 Data Collection Just add data, including 07/08 PhD recipients (No other changes). Data due October 30, 2008 (Sorry no exceptions) Cookie Winners: Northwestern and Purdue.

Report Of The Advisory Committee For GPRA Performance Assessment Why AGEP Institutions Should Care: The Advisory Committee for GPRA Performance Assessment (AC/GPA) was established in June 2002 to provide advice and recommendations to the NSF Director regarding the Foundation's performance under the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993.

Report Conclusion “The [NSF] portfolio has many examples of programs aimed at populations of students currently underrepresented in STEM disciplines (Highlight IDs 14876, 15287, 15299, 15304, 15345, 15350, and 15389). However insufficient data are provided to assess fully the outcomes and broader impacts of these initiatives. “

Report Conclusion “Regarding broadening participation, the Chair was of the opinion that the initiatives in place were already quite substantial and over time should result in substantial outcomes and improvements.” Report Recommendation “Track Future Outcomes from “People” Trained and Supported by the Foundation.”

From Sausages to Skateboards Original included: 1. Student ratings of applications as contributing to their understanding of concepts 2. Student interest 3. Quantitative relationships between 1 and Student ratings of their learning of concepts covered by the applications (with a comparison group) 5. Student grades (with a comparison group).

NSF Excerpt From Sausages to Skateboards measured the impact of teaching real-life applications in undergraduate mechanical engineering courses. The research demonstrated that the use of applications had a positive impact on final course grades only when the whole course was applications based. Students in the application-based course had significantly higher final course grades than comparison students matched by instructor and course who did not receive application-based teaching or when only two or three applications were used during a course.

Writing A FY 2009 Highlight Why is this outcome notable and/or important: in terms of intellectual merit in terms of broader impacts Does this highlight represent transformative or potentially transformative research? Why? Does this highlight represent Broadening Participation? Why? Are there existing or potential societal benefits of this research? It is important for NSF to be able to provide examples of NSF-supported research that have societal benefits, including benefits to the U.S. economy.

Writing A FY 2009 Highlight Have an interesting picture. Have a title that is distinctive and descriptive. Include some academic results. Include comparison results/answer the question “Compared to what?”. Make it one page, including the picture.