R. Assmann, June 2009 Operational Experience with the LHC Collimation System R. Assmann, CERN 8/6/2009 for the Collimation Project Team Visit TU Munich.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 House, Apr 25, 2004 Accelerator Physics from the Tevatron to the LHC Steve Peggs, BNL - How to increase the luminosity - Beam-Beam.
Advertisements

1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
Superconducting Cavities Development at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Dmitri Denisov DIET Federation Roundtable, Washington DC, April
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Future Accelerators at the energy frontier Peter Hansen february 2010 University of Copenhagen.
6/14/11 Collimation Upgrade Plan & Questions R. Assmann, CERN for the collimation team 14/6/2011 LHC Collimation Project Review.
RWA, EPAC06 The LHC Collimation System R. Assmann, CERN/AB for the LHC Collimation Team EPAC 2006 Edinburgh.
Research in Particle Beam Physics and Accelerator Technology of the Collaboration IKP Forschungszentrum Jülich & JINR A.N. Parfenov for the Collaboration.
Ralph Assmann What Do We Want To Measure (in 2009) R. Assmann S. Redaelli, V. Previtali CERN/BE discussed with W. Scandale CERN/EN26/3/2009CC09  See also.
Concept of a Collimation System with Enhanced Operational Stability and Performance.
ESGARD – OMIA 10 & 11/09/2007 JRA on Collimators and Materials for High Power Accelerators Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources R. Assmann.
Partikeldagarna, Göteborg 21 September 2007 LHC: Status and Plans Lyn Evans.
DESY Photon Science XFEL official start of project: 5 June 2007 FLASH upgrade to 1 GeV done, cool down started PETRA III construction started 2 July 2007.
Preparation of Review R. Assmann et al CWG, CWG R. Assmann.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
CERN Phase II Collimation Conceptual Review Summary 09 April 2009 LARP CM12 Napa, CA Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research.
RWA, GSI 11/07 Beam Loss and Collimation at the LHC R. Assmann, CERN/AB 15/11/2007 for the Collimation Team GSI Beschleunigerpalaver.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) Background  Proposed in 2003 to coordinate efforts at US labs related to the LHC accelerator (as opposed to.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Beam Loss and Collimation at the LHC
LHC collimation R. Bruce on behalf of the CERN LHC collimation team R. Bruce,
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Chamonix 2006, B.Dehning 1 Commissioning of Beam Loss Monitors B. Dehning CERN AB/BDI.
Eduardo Nebot del Busto (1) CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2) The University of Liverpool, Department of physics, Liverpool, U. K (3) The Cockcroft Institute,
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
Backgrounds at FP420 Henri Kowalski DESY 18 th of May 2006.
Collimation design considerations at CERN (with some applications to LHC) R. Bruce on behalf of the CERN LHC collimation project R. Bruce,
Summary Session Advanced Collimation CARE-HHH-APD BEAM'07 R. Assmann.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Lucio Rossi The High Luminosity LHC Project Distinguished Lecturer 2013.
Ralph Assmann Performance of LHC Collimation R. Assmann, CERN 13/09/2010 ColMat Meeting, GSI … for the LHC Collimation Project CERN and EuCARD/ColMat Collaboration.
R. Assmann Collimator Functionality, Performance and First View on Set-up and Optimization R. Assmann AB/ABP, CERN External Review of the LHC Collimation.
Status of the magnet studies in the ARCS (FLUKA)
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
CRYSTALS AS LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENT FOR LHC COLLIMATION
News and Introduction from CERN June 15th, 2005
Lattice for Collimation
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Joint Meeting SPS Upgrade Study Group and SPS Task Force
Progress in Collimation study
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?
Beam collimation for SPPC
Intensity Evolution Estimate for LHC
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland PAC 2003 – Portland, Oregon, USA
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
LHC Collimation Requirements
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Beam halo and beam losses in IR1 and IR5
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Draft of Conceptual Phase 2 Collimation System Design
Efficiency of Two-Stage Collimation System
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
Lecture II.
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
LHC External Collimation Review
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Collimator Efficiency Study
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Presentation transcript:

R. Assmann, June 2009 Operational Experience with the LHC Collimation System R. Assmann, CERN 8/6/2009 for the Collimation Project Team Visit TU Munich R. Assmann, CERN 8/6/2009 for the Collimation Project Team Visit TU Munich Operational Experience with the LHC Collimation System LHC Collimation Some personal info: At CERN since Senior Physicist in the CERN Beams Department. Project leader LHC collimation. Post-doc (1994) and physicist (1997) at SLAC, Stanford University. Dipl. Phys. (1991) and Dr. rer. nat. (1995) at LMU (MPI f. Physik). Some personal info: At CERN since Senior Physicist in the CERN Beams Department. Project leader LHC collimation. Post-doc (1994) and physicist (1997) at SLAC, Stanford University. Dipl. Phys. (1991) and Dr. rer. nat. (1995) at LMU (MPI f. Physik).

The LHC LHC is a storage ring and collider at the technical frontier of accelerator science: –Two counter-rotating beams with each 3 × protons stored into the 27 km long ring and accelerated to 7 TeV/c particle momentum. –Protons circulate with light velocity, 11,000 times per second, for up to 24 h through the rings. –Protons of one beam collide with protons of the other beam at 4 collision points in the rings: collision products are measured by particle physics experiments. Key technical accelerator systems (not complete): –Powerful super-conducting magnets to bend and focus beams. Very sensitive to heat load. –Radio-frequency systems for beam acceleration. –Collimators to handle unavoidable power losses. A 1% system (1% of length, 1% of overall cost) which can drive overall performance. R. Assmann, June 2009

The LHC Goals: 7 TeV and 360 MJ The 360 MJ is a linear function of number of protons per beam 80 kg TNT factor ~200 above world record in sc storage rings factor ~7 above world record

Performance for Particle Physics Beam momentum or energy: Center-of-mass energy in collision is twice the particle energy, namely 14 TeV. –Determines discovery reach for particle physics. –Limited by maximum field in sc bending magnets. Event rate (luminosity): Number of useful events per time determines the time required to make a discovery. –Is optimized by “squeezing” protons into small cross-sections at interaction points (limited by field strength of sc quadrupoles). –Is optimized by storing ever higher number of protons per beam, gaining with the square or linearly with number of protons. Practical limit for number of protons that can be stored: –Unavoidable losses from stored beam, e.g. a dust particle falling through the beam, accelerator shaking with distant earth quakes, beam resonances, … –Efficiency in intercepting (cleaning) these losses  collimation R. Assmann, June 2009

Collimators: Preventing Quenches Shock beam impact: 2 MJ/mm 2 in 200 ns (0.5 kg TNT) Maximum beam loss at 7 TeV: 0.1% of beam (360 MJ) per second (assumed better than achieved in Tevatron/HERA) 360 kW 360 kW Quench limit of SC LHC magnet: 5 mW/cm 3 ~ 5 mW/cm 3  proportional to stored energy

R. Assmann, June 2009 LHC Collimators: Dilute and Stop Jaw 2 Jaw 1 Incoming: up to ~ 50 MJ/mm 2 (primary collimator) Quench limit: ~ 5 mJ/mm 2 (any SC magnet) Required “filter” factor: 1 × = Leakage / Dilution Leakage factor (inefficiency): Dilution factor: 10 6 Cannot be achieved with single collimator  therefore multi-stage collimation for betatron cleaning (x, y, skew) and momentum cleaning.

Multi-Stage Cleaning & Protection 3-4 Stages Secondary halo p p e  Primary collimator Core Unavoidable losses Shower Beam propagation Impact parameter ≤ 1  m Primary halo (p) e  Shower p Tertiary halo Secondary collimator High Z coll CFC W/Cu High Z coll Super- conducting magnets SC magnets and particle physics exp. CFC collimator R. Assmann, June 2009

System Design Momentum Cleaning Betatron Cleaning “Phase I” 108 collimators and absorbers in phase I (only movable shown in sketch)

The LHC Collimation System The by far largest and most precise system of its kind that has been built to this date: –130 phase I collimators and absorbers produced with specifications and control at 10  m level (including spares). –Phase I: In total 108 devices installed (~210 m length occupied). 97 movable collimators with a total of 194 jaws and > 450 degrees of freedom for positioning. Performance only OK for first years. All ready now. –Phase II: In total 158 devices installed (~ 310 m length occupied). 147 movable collimators. Planned up to 2014  R&D topic. –Maximum possible: In total 168 devices installed (~ 330 m length occupied). Only space reservations at this time. Investment (cost & manpower) comparable to a small accelerator. Design, R&D, prototyping, series production, installation and commissioning has been managed since late 2002 through the CERN LHC collimation project. Strong German part. R. Assmann, June 2009

Tunnel: Side View Phase I Collimator R. Assmann, June 2009

Tunnel: Cleaning Insertion IR7 R. Assmann, June 2009 BEAM PIPES COLLIMATOR TRANSPORT ZONE COLLIMATOR CABLE TRAYS RADIATION-HARD CABLE PATH WATER FEEDS PHASE I/II WATER DISTRIBUTION PHASE I/II WATER DISTRIBUTION

Tunnel: 3 Primary Collimators in IR7 R. Assmann, June 2009

168 position sensors on 28 collimators: Repeating the same settings for 10 days, without feedback from position sensors! Example of Phase I Performance

Collimation-Related R&D Issues Advanced materials under extreme conditions: –New, robust materials that can survive the LHC beam while having excellent absorption and good electrical properties (composites, e.g. copper-diamond). –Efficient thermal conductivity in sandwich structures with powerful cooling. –Measurement and modeling of intense thermo-mechanical shock waves  CERN is putting up unique beam test facility. –Measurement and modeling of radiation damage. Massively parallel simulation of complex halo and collimation (Grid): –Simulating up to 30 million protons over 5,400 km beam line (200 turns) with 10 cm resolution. –Modeling leakage and dilution at the level. –Innovative collimation solutions: e-beam lens, crystal, plasma, … Advanced controls: Remote precision control, remote handling. –Control and monitor collimators over 27 km with precision of 10  m. –Automatic, precise and safe setup routines for ~500 degree of freedoms. R. Assmann, June 2009

The Phase II of LHC Collimation R. Assmann, June 2009 EMPTY PHASE II SLOT (38 IN TOTAL) OCCUPIED PHASE I SLOT Challenge: What kind of collimators do we best put into the prepared phase II positions up to 2014? Conditions in the LHC will be extreme and unique: new territory for accelerator science and technology! Innovation and new technology required and possible! Universities push the frontier in many aspects: Is there helpful expertise at TUM? Collaborating with 11 universities and institutes through FP7. 7 PhD studies. Some PhD opportunities for TUM? Good ideas can directly advance the LHC performance reach and help to make new fundamental discoveries! Challenge: What kind of collimators do we best put into the prepared phase II positions up to 2014? Conditions in the LHC will be extreme and unique: new territory for accelerator science and technology! Innovation and new technology required and possible! Universities push the frontier in many aspects: Is there helpful expertise at TUM? Collaborating with 11 universities and institutes through FP7. 7 PhD studies. Some PhD opportunities for TUM? Good ideas can directly advance the LHC performance reach and help to make new fundamental discoveries!