Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th 2007 1 Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.
Advertisements

Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Leptoquark Searches at the Tevatron April 16th, 2004 XII th Deep Inelastic Scattering Workshop Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia For the CDF and DØ Collaborations.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
Eric TorrenceJanuary Oregon Tau Activities Tau Trigger Efficiency Z→ττ Dijet Fakes Tau Spin Analysis Tau Trigger Activities Validation HLT Monitoring.
Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
MET Slides Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona). MET Triggers  MET triggers can be important supplementary triggers for ATLAS physics L1 rate can be reduced by combining.
Higgs Detection Sensitivity from GGF H  WW Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ATLAS Higgs Meeting October 3, 2008.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
Samir Ferrag University of Glasgow UK Exotics meeting:
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
H IGGS T RIGGER M ENU Higgs Working Group Meeting – 9 th July 2010 Ricardo Gonçalo – Royal Holoway University of London.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Analysis Plans for Jets + EtMiss Signatures Pierre Savard ATLAS Toronto Group Meeting January
Trigger Menus Invisible Higgs input to trigger menus for initial running 4/9/2007 Invisible Higgs CSC Note meeting Ricardo Goncalo, RHUL.
1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS WG4 Group Meeting 01 June 2007.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
Preparation for the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs sub-group conveners meeting – 9 Jan.09.
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Questions to Physics Groups Information requested per analysis sub-groups For 5-10 representative analyses: – representing the core physics – providing.
January 10, 2007 Aspen Photon Searches at the Tevatron.
Questions to Signature & Performance Groups Possibilities for tightening/adding selection cuts: comparison of online and offline selection cuts: – cuts.
Plenary Physics Meeting, 17 June 05 Per Jonsson Imperial College London 1 Higgs Searches with 1 fb -1 Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of.
Trigger validation for Many thanks to Long Zhao, Chihiro Omachi, Julie Kirk, Giovanni Siragusa, Patricia Conde Muiño, Andreas Reinsch, Olya Igonkina,
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Lake Louise (February 2002) Ivo van Vulpen 1 Z boson pair production Ivo van Vulpen Outline: LEP and its operation between ZZ production & final.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
25 Apr 00jpg1 Games with Trigger Tables Sarah Eno.
James Frost May Atlas UK SUSY/Exotics Meeting. Introduction  Have been working in the Exotics group during the CSC analysis exercise, and will present.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) Higgs WG meeting – 17 th September, 2007 Trigger Menu Workshop Higgs group contribution.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.
L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
DPF Conf., Oct. 29, 2006, HawaiiViktor Veszpremi, Purdue U.1 Search for the SM Higgs Boson in the Missing E T + b-jets Final State at CDF V. Veszpremi.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Higgs to  at CDF Amit Lath Rutgers University Tev4LHC Workshop, Sep
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
1 Review BDT developments Migrate to version 12, AOD BDT for W , Z  AS group.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at the Tevatron Gavin Hesketh Northeastern University On behalf of the CDF and D ⊘ Collaborations Hadron Collider.
Multilepton production at HERA
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
Trigger commissioning and early running strategy
Investigation on Diboson Production
ZZ→llnn Analysis Thomas Barber University of Cambridge
ttbar + jets AOD analysis
SUSY particles searches with R-parity violation at DØ, Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Outline Feedback & Suggestions on trigger Menu for the Exotics Group –e/gamma Triggers –Muon –Jets –Jet, Sum Et, Met –Tau Triggers –Combined Triggers –Summary

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th e-gamma Triggers e5 e10 g10 e10i g10i e15 g15 e15i g15i e20 g20 e25 G35 Em40 E20i g20i e25i g30i e60 Exotics group generally interested in the higher pt trigger thresholds Combine with forward jet triggers for diboson searches

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th e-gamma Triggers e5 e10 g10 e10i g10i e15 g15 e15i g15i e20 g20 e25 G35 Em40 E20i G20i E25i G30i e60 Isolated triggers give poor efficiency for high pt electrons and photons L1L2 2e15i e25i e G(500 GeV)->ee Trigger eff in % after kine cuts of 2 electrons in |  |<2.5 Add plot Worse for 2e*i triggers than e*1 triggers Matthew Tamsett, Antonella DeSanto G(500 GeV)->ee: after kinematic cuts

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th e/gamma trigger Summary We need a NEVER-TO-BE-PRESCALED single e and photon trigger If there is an e60 – does it mean that the e25 rate is expected to be such that a prescale will be necessary? –If so we also need a g60 (or g40 – whatever will have a rate allowing it to run unprescaled for the lifetime of the trigger list)

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th object e/gamma Triggers 2e5 e5_e10 2e10 2g10 2e10i 2g10i 2e15 2e15i 2e20 2e20i – Z’/G->ee poor efficiency due to isolation constraint – even worse requiring 2 isolated electrons than for single object trigger e20_XE15 Probably use single e/g triggers rather than double for most exotics searches e25i trigger 2e15i trigger trigger efficiency G*  ee Keith Baker Combine with forward jet triggers for diboson searches

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Muons Triggers MU4 MU6 MU10 MU15 MU20 MU40 – good for Z’/G,  T ->mm, leptoquark searches 2MU4 2MU6 2MU10 2MU15 2MU20 Combine with forward jet triggers for diboson searches

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Jets Triggers PS J J J J J35500 J4250 J705 J1001 3J J1030 3J181 4J181 4J231 JFa, b, c, d to be defined! Good for black hole searches – can combine with high pt leptons, SumET or MET Combine jet triggers with lepton triggers for diboson searches e.g. with e25i, e60, xe52, xe72, mu20, 2mu20…

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Jets/Sum Jet ET/MET L1_TE100 L1_TE200 L1_TE304 L1_TE L1_JE20 L1_JE80 L1_JE172 L1_JE256 - unprescaled L1_XE12 L1_XE20 L1_XE24 L1_XE32 L1_XE36 L1_XE44 L1_XE52 L1_XE72 Prescaled so not so good for black holes Not prescaled so good for black holes in combination with/OR’ed with other high pt lepton triggers and MET -> good for Monojet search: combine Jet+MET Prescaled so not so good for leptons+MEt searches Not prescaled: so good for leptons+MEt searches: signal 50 GeV lepton+ 50 GeV MET. Typical trigger combined: lepton+MET (e60 and mu20 or mu40) Or jet +MET (MET only triggers require too high thresholds) Jet triggers useful for background studies

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Single Tau Triggers PS Tau10 - Tau10i- Tau15150? Tau15i60 Tau15itau15i_PT 7000 Tau20i- Tau25i- Tau35i2 Tau451 Tau45i- Tau60- Prescaled triggers not useful for searches For Z’  tau tau

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Double Tau Triggers 2tau10i 2tau15i 2tau15i_PT 2tau20i Tau10i_tau25i Tau10i_tau35i Tau10i_MET40 Tau15i_MET32 Tau15i_MET20 Tau25i_MET20 Tau35i_MET20 Tau35i_MET40 Tau10i_e10i Tau15i_e10i Tau10i_e15i Tau10i_mu6 Tau10i_mu10 Tau15i_mu6 Tau15i_mu10 Tau10i_jetXX Tau15i_jetXX Tau15i_bjetXX Are these triggers useful to us? – they are not prescaled Would we use these for Z->tautau Or any leptoquark searches – if so which ones?

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Combined Triggers Leptoquarks Why is there a mu-jet and no e-jet? - also wanted for leptoquarks e.g. MU20_J40 and e20_J40 ?

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Combined Triggers Any of these of interest to us? Black holes? Is there an e-mu trigger? Would e10_mu6 have too high rate?

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Summary We NEED a NEVER-TO-BE-PRESCALED single e and photon trigger

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th BACKUP

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th e-gamma Triggers: g60? e5 e10 g10 e10i g10i e15 g15 e15i g15i e20 g20 e25 g35 em40 e20i g20i e25i g30i e60 Is there going to be a g60 trigger? This is the most efficient trigger for the Z’ and G searches in ee and gg channel?! Z’(1000)  ee (DS 5605) in % after kine cuts (2 electrons in |  |<2.5) Very similar performance as for G  ee triggerEF*triggerL2 2e15i88.72g20i12.9 e25i52.1g e triggerEF 2g20i41.7 g From Monika Wieler’s talk 21/3/07 G(500)  event with two gamma in |  |<2.5 (DS 5623) Change table to one from Matthew’s talks g60 trigger more efficient than e60 for high mass (500 GeV) Z’/G samples

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th e-gamma Triggers: loose e60/e120? e20 g20 e25 g35 Em40 e20i g20i e25i g30i e60 Prehaps in future also would like a loose e60 trigger and or a non-prescaled e120 (just ET plus track in front of calo) and/or g120 trigger (for Z’/G searches) with no isolation g60 trigger more efficient than e60 even for high mass ee samples: The EF cuts for e60 may be somewhat tight for high Pt e Prehaps could drop the track requirement for electrons. e60 - e60 and g60 trigger for G/Z’/  T- > ee/ gg and most Exotics searches involving a high pt lepton

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Example for tau trigger Example: Z’(600)  Efficiency for selecting events with two taus in |  |<2.5 To get to the trigger efficiency I didn’t do the ‘correct’ thing. I combined tau25i+L1_XE30 instead of tau25i+met40 Might need high p T unisolated tau threshold as for e/  for the very high p T taus? triggerEF* Tau25i+XE e25i16.7 e Mu20i20.2 J j j Needs investigating?

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th More on electrons: Eff for e60 after L2 ~80% for E T >66- 68GeV, should be ~90% for this trigger Loose IsEM has  =88.1% trigger looses (L1+L2) w.r.t. IsEM for E T =60GeV electrons –Loose: 85.8% (losses mainly due to E T threshold cut) Warning: e25i uses isolation at L1, it becomes inefficient for very high p T electrons, so look at e60 instead Last year we proposed a loose e60 trigger or/and a very loose e120 trigger (just E T plus track in front of calo) and asked for feedback –You should have a look at these issues and tell us what you prefer! E T (gen) (GeV Eff for e25i after EF (%) Eff for e60 after L2 (%) n/a W  e, e in |  | 25GeV) e25i From Monika Wieler’s talk 21/3/07 Has this been done?

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th DiBosons WZ -> jj ll 2e15i, e25i, e60, mu20, 2j120, j160 Possible combined triggers: 2e20i + 2j40 + 2fj15 : 2mu20 + 2j40 + 2fj15 WZ, WW -> lv jj e25i, e60, mu20, 2j120, j160, j45+xE50 combined e20i + 2j40 + xe40 + 2fj15 : mu20i + 2j40 + xe40 + 2fj15 WZ -> lv ll 2e15i, e25i, e60, mu20 combined 3e20i + xe40 + 2fj15 : 3mu20i + xe40 + 2fj15 : 2e15i + mu15i + xe40 + 2fj15 : 2mu15i + e15i + xe40 + 2fj15 ZZ, WW -> 2 l + 2 v's 2e15i, e25i, e60, mu20 combined: 2e20i + 2fj15 : e20i + mu20 + 2fj15 : 2mu20 + 2fj15 Are investigating different topologies of VB scattering. In every case, we have forward jets. We include combined triggers very specific to these analyses, in case we can add them. * Issues: For the signals with W->jj, the combined triggers always rely on the presence of 2 jets. We might also end up with one single jet. * The use of 2fj15: requires investigation - we might have significant model-dependent systematics, if we are not careful. * Should we have 2 different combined triggers, one for very high mass and one for lower mass?

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th James Frost – Cambridge ATLAS CSC BH Note Meeting Triggers for Black Holes  Prevailing wisdom is the Black Holes easily pass triggers, esp. jet ones  A preliminary look at trigger efficiencies for BH: L1L2EF Jet jet jet jet e60100 (EM 60) g60100 (EM 60) mu20i met99.55 (XE 50) 100 (met10)  Black Holes do pass jet triggers – could “AND” all the jet triggers  Electron/muon/gamma triggers less efficient – search for these at analysis level  Do we need a dedicated/higher energy jet trigger?