1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Levels in ALICE Andreas Morsch Meeting on ALICE Radiation Tolerance 30/8/2004.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Tenth lecture Last lecture.
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
GAMOS tutorial Histogram and Scorers Exercises
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
Photon and Energy Fluence
17-19 Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan 2007 Geant4 Japan.
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2 V.Ivanchenko, BINP & CERN
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Validation and TestEm series Michel Maire for the Standard EM group LAPP (Annecy) July 2006.
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
SuperNEMO Simulations Darren Price University of Manchester July, 2005.
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin Presented by A.Litvinenko.
D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.
Pedro Arce Introducción a GEANT4 1 GAMOS tutorial Plug-in’s Exercises Pedro Arce Dubois CIEMAT
VALSIM status J. Apostolakis, V. Grichine, A. Howard, A. Ribon EUDET meeting, 11 th Sept 2006.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Hadronic Interaction Studies for LHCb Nigel Watson/Birmingham [Thanks to Silvia M., Jeroen v T.]
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
LIP & ESA 18121/04/NL/CH MarsREC An integrated tool for Mars Radiation Environment Characterization and Effects 5º longitude.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
1 Background radiation studies in LHCb with GAUSS/Geant4 Giuseppe G. Daquino PH/SFT.
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Notes About MARS background simulations for BTeV A Summary of how far we’ve come and how far we have to go. By DJ Wagner 9/12/98 Vanderbilt University.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Update on radiation estimates for the CLIC Main and Drive beams Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto CLIC OMPWG.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
Alex Howard PH-SFT LCG-PV 10 th May 2006 Neutron Benchmark for Geant4 using TARC – initial status 1)TARC – experimental set-up and aims 2)Geant4 Simulation.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
Study of the Differential Luminosity Spectrum Measurement using Bhabha Events in 350GeV WANG Sicheng 王 思丞 Supervisor: André Sailer.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
Pedro Brogueira 1, Patrícia Gonçalves 2, Ana Keating 2, Dalmiro Maia 3, Mário Pimenta 2, Bernardo Tomé 2 1 IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, 2 LIP, Laboratório.
A Short Course on Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Introduction
A Study of Reverse MC and Space Charge Effect Simulation with Geant4
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose
Validation of Geant4 against the TARC benchmark: Testing neutron production, transportation and interaction TARC – experimental set-up and aims Geant4.
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III
Physics Validation of LHC Simulations
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
A Short Course on Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Introduction
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
MAP 2014 Spring Workshop Fermilab May, 2014
GAMOS tutorial Plug-in’s Exercises
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4 in LHCb: first results

2  Introduction  Simulation conditions  Results  Future activities Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN

3  Knowledge of particle fluences 1, their energy spectra and absorbed doses 2 is necessary to estimate the damage probability of detectors and electronics Introduction  Possible background radiation effects are:  Gradual, such as total ionizing dose or displacement damage (during the whole lifetime of the device)  Local and acute, such as SEU (upset of a memory cell and revert individual triggers or switches) or SEL (permanent damage of the device). Ex: high energy hadrons interaction with the device.  Previous background radiation studies for LHCb have been performed using FLUKA. Additional calcs with MARS, GCALOR 1 Fluence (1/cm2) , where V is the voxel volume 2 Dose (Gy) , where M is the voxel mass Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN

4 Simulation conditions  Geant4 is being used in the GAUSS framework to do similar studies  Scoring planes have been added to the LHCb geometry to this purpose. These are voxelized planes, with a resolution 40 – 150 mm. The planes are defined according to the XML geometry description of the LHCb setup.  No tracking cuts for particles transport.  Production cuts: electron/positrons = 5 mm, gammas = 10 mm  Primary events are generated with Pythia 6.2 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN

5 Geometrical setup  Each voxelized plane is associated to several hit collections, having the same resolution as the user-defined voxelization. The association is done automatically, based on the XML geometry definition of the scoring plane. Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN

6 Simulation conditions  Using GAUSS properties, the user decides the tallies to be switched on. In other words, which particle should be tracked for fluence and dose calcs.  The output is shown in terms of particle energy spectra or 2D mappings. The user can switch them on (either both or separately)  2D histo: proton, elec./pos, gamma, charged hadr. dose, high energy (> 20 MeV) hadr. dose, total ion. dose (post processing)  2D histo: proton, neutrons, electrons/posistrons, gamma, charged hadrons fluence  1D histo: neutrons, electrons/positrons, protons, pions spectra, total charged hadrons spectra (post-processing) Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  Scored particles: neutrons, charged hadrons (pions, kaons, protons), electrons/positrons, gammas

7  First results using LHEP, QGSP, QGSP_HP, LHEP_HP, LHEP_BERT_HP physics lists, with 5000 primary events. Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  The events are generated in LHCb (min-bias), using the same run numbers for all the physics lists. Therefore, differences in the outcome are not connected to the primary events.

8 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Results  Attempt to use LHEP and QGSP for these studies spectra are binning-independent  As expected, these physics lists have not been designed to cover such studies range. Neutrons energy spectra show missing tracking at low energies. LHEP QGSP

9 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  Reasonable neutrons energy spectra in high energy region. LHEPQGSP

10 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  Proper tracking of the charged particles. Both physics lists show similar results, taking into account the statistics accuracy. LHEP QGSP Plane at 2280 mm 2D histograms per collision

11 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Plane at 7830 mm LHEP QGSP  Effect of the magnetic field

12 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  For example, protons are deviated according to the polarity of the magnet. Using LHEP:

13 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  Because low energy neutrons are not treated by LHEP/QGSP, it has been decided to use the same physics lists, but with the HP (high precision) extension  This time, the neutrons spectra come out as expected LHEP_HP QGSP_HP

14 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  An accurate evaluation of the 1 keV neutrons peak shows that most of these particles are generated in the calorimeters area (mainly by  + and  - interaction).  Then they travel back for ~ 10 m without interactions. This is justified by the low radiation length in LHCb between RICH1 and RICH2.  The accumulation of 1 keV neutrons is due to the modelling of the evaporation code.  Apart from this drawback, the HP physics lists show a reasonable response to the background radiation studies.  The charged particles are properly treated.  Next slides show the comparison between LHEP_HP and QGSP_HP in the 4 scoring planes for the total ionising dose, the total charged hadrons fluence and high energy hadrons fluence.

15 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Plane at 2280 mm Total ionising dose LHEP_HP QGSP_HP

16 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Plane at 2280 mm Total ionising dose LHEP QGSP  similar behaviour for LHEP and QGSP, as expected

17 Plane at 7830 mm Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Total ionising dose LHEP_HP QGSP_HP  similar behaviour for and planes. QGSP_HP shows more hot spots. QGSP and LHEP shows similar response.

18 Plane at 2280 mm Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Total charged hadrons fluence LHEP_HP QGSP_HP

19 Plane at 7830 mm Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN LHEP_HP QGSP_HP Total charged hadrons fluence

20 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Plane at 2280 mm High energy hadrons fluence (for comparison with the device sensitivity to SEU or SEL) LHEP_HP QGSP_HP

21 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Plane at 7830 mm High energy hadrons fluence LHEP_HP QGSP_HP  similar behaviour for and planes

22 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  Quantitative evaluation of the results obtained with different physics lists through the histograms ratio (LHEP/QGSP and LHEP_HP/QGSP_HP) Neutrons energy spectrum at 2280 mm (LHEP/QGSP)

23 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Neutrons energy spectrum at 2280 mm (LHEP_HP/QGSP_HP)

24 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Electrons energy spectrum at 2280 mm (LHEP_HP/QGSP_HP)

25 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Pions energy spectrum at 2280 mm (LHEP_HP/QGSP_HP)

26 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Charged hadrons energy spectrum at 2280 mm (LHEP_HP/QGSP_HP)

27 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  The displacement damage can be evaluated through the calculation of the 1MeV-neutrons equivalent fluence for silicon.  The displacement damage cross section for silicon for 1 MeV-neutrons is set as normalizing value: 95 MeV  mb. Damage efficiency of any particle is described by the hardness factor, defined as:  EDK is the energy spectrum averaged displacement KERMA

28  The hardness factor is used as multiplication factor for the fluence distribution  eq 1MeV = k·  p  1 MeV-neutrons equivalent fluence for silicon is calculated as sum of the weighted fluence contributions of each particle type.  1 MeV-neutrons eq. fluence calculations is performed assuming that the scoring planes are made by silicon Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN

29 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Plane at 2280 mm 1 MeV-neutrons equivalent fluence for silicon LHEP_HP QGSP_HP

30 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Plane at mm 1 MeV-neutrons equivalent fluence for silicon LHEP_HP QGSP_HP

31 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Plane at mm 1 MeV-neutrons equivalent fluence for silicon LHEP_HP QGSP_HP

32 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  LHEP_BERT_HP physics list has been used in order to evaluate the 1 keV peak in the neutron energy spectrum  The 1 keV neutrons accumulation in the 2280 mm plane is still present, although less evident

33 Conclusions  Reasonable agreement between LHEP and QGSP. By design, these physics lists are not suitable to such studies.  Obtained the 1MeV-neutrons equivalent fluence for Si for the estimation of the displacement damage of devices.  Obtained the high energy hadrons (>20 MeV) fluence for the evaluation of the acute effects. Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN  The use of the HP extension provides a proper treatment of the low energy neutrons.  Quantitative evaluation of the results obtained with LHEP_HP and QGSP_HP show a reasonable agreement, within the statistical accuracy. Only some doubts for low energy electrons.

34 Future activities   Presence of 1 keV neutrons accumulation due to the evaporation code.  Application of QGSP_BERT_HP for a better treatment of the primary particles generating the 1 keV neutrons peak at 2280 mm from the LHCb vertex  These results will be compared to the previous FLUKA results using the same scoring areas  Effect of the LHCb shielding and cavern to the present results. Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN