MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancement of Satellite-based Precipitation Estimates using the Information from the Proposed Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Part II: Drizzle Detection.
Advertisements

Upgrades to the MODIS near-IR Water Vapor Algorithm and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithm For Collection 6 Bo-Cai Gao & Rong-Rong Li Remote Sensing Division,
MODIS/AIRS Workshop MODIS Level 2 Cloud Product 6 April 2006 Kathleen Strabala Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
MODATML2 in support of future infrastructure for custom aggregations Paul Hubanks, Steve Platnick, Steve Ackerman, Paul Menzel, Liam Gumley, Robert Pincus,
Data Quality Screening Service Christopher Lynnes, Bruce Vollmer, Richard Strub, Thomas Hearty Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Sciences Center.
Geoscience Australia Md Anisul Islam Geoscience Australia Evaluation of IMAPP Cloud Cover Mapping Algorithm for Local application. Australian Government.
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
MODIS Regional and Global Cloud Variability Brent C. Maddux 1,2 Steve Platnick 3, Steven A. Ackerman 1,2, Paul Menzel 1, Kathy Strabala 1, Richard Frey.
GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aerosol Optical Depth/Suspended Matter and Aerosol Particle Size Mi Zhou (IMSG) Pubu Ciren (DELL) Hongqing.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Spatial & Temporal Distribution of Clouds as Observed by MODIS onboard the Terra and Aqua Satellites  MODIS atmosphere products –Examples from Aqua Cloud.
Motivation Many GOES products are not directly used in NWP but may help in diagnosing problems in forecasted fields. One example is the GOES cloud classification.
Assimilation of GOES Hourly and Meteosat winds in the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) Assimilation of GOES Hourly and Meteosat winds in the NCEP Global.
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from MODIS Data
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
September 4 -5, 2013Dawn Conway, AMSR-E / AMSR2 TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E / AMSR2 Team Leader Science Computing Facility Current Science Software.
OpenDAP Server-side Functions for Multi-Instrument Aggregation ESIP Session: Advancing the Power and Utility of Server-side Aggregation Jon C. Currey (NASA),
New Products from combined MODIS/AIRS Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Allen Huang, Xuebao Wu, and Liam Gumley Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite.
25 June 2009 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E Team Leader Science Computing Facility.
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
Data Release Requirements, decisions and plans. What we need New machine Implement (and test) all proposed changes from current Provide data quality summary,
CloudSat/VIIRS CBH Validation Activities at CIRA Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller, Dan Lindsey 10 September 2012.
Cloud Top Properties Bryan A. Baum NASA Langley Research Center Paul Menzel NOAA Richard Frey, Hong Zhang CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison MODIS Science.
MODIS OCEAN QA Browse Imagery (MQABI Browse Tool) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Sept 4, 2003
11 Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI Presented by Yinghui Liu Presented by Yinghui Liu 1 Team Members: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey.
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
LDOPE QA Tools Sadashiva Devadiga (SSAI) MODIS LDOPE January 18, 2007.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
Facilitating Access to EOS Data at the NSIDC DAAC Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa ECS Science Coordinator for the National Snow and Ice Data Center, Distributed.
MODIS Snow and Sea Ice Data Products George Riggs SSAI Cryospheric Sciences Branch, NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, Md. Dorothy K.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
Ambiguity of Quality in Remote Sensing Data Christopher Lynnes, NASA/GSFC Greg Leptoukh, NASA/GSFC Funded by : NASA’s Advancing Collaborative Connections.
1 N. Christina Hsu, Deputy NPP Project Scientist Recent Update on MODIS C6 Deep Blue Aerosol Products and Beyond N. Christina Hsu, Corey Bettenhausen,
MODIS Level 3: Future Issues and Considerations Brent Maddux MODIS Level 3: Future Issues and Considerations Brent Maddux Cloud Fraction Mean.
Locally Optimized Precipitation Detection over Land Grant Petty Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Wisconsin - Madison.
ASAP In-Flight Icing Research at NCAR J. Haggerty, F. McDonough, J. Black, S. Landolt, C. Wolff, and S. Mueller In collaboration with: P. Minnis and W.
Ocean Dynamics Algorithm GOES-R AWG Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/SOCD, Igor Appel, STAR/IMSG, Andy Harris, CICS, Univ of Maryland AMS 92 nd Annual Meeting,
Initial Analysis of the Pixel-Level Uncertainties in Global MODIS Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Size Retrievals Steven Platnick 1, Robert.
0 0 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD GSFC Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Terrestrial Information System Branch (614.5) Carbon Cycle.
MODIS Cryosphere Science Data Product Metrics Prepared by the ESDIS SOO Metrics Team for the Cryosphere Science Data Review January 11-12, 2006.
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
S. Platnick 1, M. D. King 1, J. Riedi 2, T. Arnold 1,3, B. Wind 1,3, G. Wind 1,3, P. Hubanks 1,3 and S. Ackerman 4, R. Frey 4, B. Baum 4, P. Menzel 4,5,
Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center, NASA/GSFC, Code 902, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA INTRODUCTION  NASA Goddard Earth Sciences.
MODIS Near-IR Water Vapor and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithms & Recent Updates for Collection 5 Bo-Cai Gao Remote Sensing Division, Code 7232, Naval Research.
Data acquisition From satellites with the MODIS instrument.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
Barbuda Antigua MISR 250 m The Climatology of Small Tropical Oceanic Cumuli New Findings to Old Problems (Analysis of EOS-Terra data) Larry Di Girolamo,
May 15, 2002MURI Hyperspectral Workshop1 Cloud and Aerosol Products From GIFTS/IOMI Gary Jedlovec and Sundar Christopher NASA Global Hydrology and Climate.
SNPP VIIRS SRIP Provisional Maturity (DR 7344) 474-CCR Eric Vermote NASA-GSFC Sadashiva Devadiga, Land PEATE/NASA-GSFC.
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
SeaWiFS Highlights July 2002 SeaWiFS Celebrates 5th Anniversary with the Fourth Global Reprocessing The SeaWiFS Project has just completed the reprocessing.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
Spatial & Temporal Distribution of Cloud Properties observed by MODIS: Preliminary Level-3 Results from the Collection 5 Reprocessing Michael D. King,
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
MODIS Atmosphere Group Summary Summary of modifications and enhancements in collection 5 Summary of modifications and enhancements in collection 5 Impacts.
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
Winds in the Polar Regions from MODIS: Atmospheric Considerations
VIPLab QA Data Filtering Process
Remote Sensing of Cloud, Aerosol, and Land Properties from MODIS
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Front page of the realtime GOES-12 site, showing all of the latest Sounder spectral bands (18 infrared and 1 visible) over the central and Eastern US All.
Presentation transcript:

MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.

Presentation Outline: 1. Level-3 (L3) Primer -- High-level algorithm & product description 2. Web Site Review -- Web-based tools and key features 3. Case Studies -- Using web & interactive tools to diagnose algorithm issues 4. L3 Updates -- Collection 005 change summary

Topic 1. The L3 Algorithm

L3 Daily Algorithm: Characteristics Important Limitations:  Limited input - only L2 files  Fixed grid - equal-angle 1x1 degree  Subsampling - L2 pixels sampled at geolocation resolution  No valid range check - inconsistently defined and implemented at L2 - potential to mask L2 algorithm problems Statistical Computation:  Aggregation - using L2 QA flags (e.g: ice vs. water cloud phase)  QA-weighted Statistics - using L2 QA “confidence flags”  Comparison Statistics - joint histogram and/or regression statistics may be computed of one L2 parameter against another

Sub-sampling

L3 Sub-sampling Impact Product Family L2 Data Resolution L2 Geolocation Resolution L2 Input Pixels (Max) per 1° L3 Grid (Equator) Impact Aerosol 04 10km 121 out of 121No Water Vapor 05 1 km5 km484 out of 12,231Yes Cirrus Detection 06_CD 1 km5 km484 out of 12,231Yes Cloud Top Properties 06_CT 5 km 484 out of 484No Cloud Optical Properties 06_OD 1 km5 km484 out of 12,321Yes Atmosphere Profile 07 5 km 484 out of 484No

The meaning of “QA”

 QA or Quality Assurance is a loosely defined term that covers a myriad of ancillary information produced along with with many L2 parameters  QA is described in the QA Plan document (available on the modis-atmos web site -- being updated for Collection 005)  The “runtime” QA flags produced by Level 2 algorithms are typically stored as packed bit- strings in “Quality Assurance” SDS’s. These flags cover many aspects of L2 retrieval parameters including: Input (ancillary) data sources Approach (retrieval method) Various scene attributes Success or failure of various criteria Data quality or confidence estimate (QA confidence flags)

QA confidence flags, when computed, are set for every L2 pixel. The four categories (for non-fill L2 data) are:  0 = No Confidence → 0x weight  1 = Questionable or Marginal → 1x weight  2 = Good Confidence → 2x weight  3 = Very Good Confidence → 3x weight

Who is setting “meaningful” L2 QA? Product Family L2 QA Set?Detail Aerosol 04 YesDifferentiate experimental from non- experimental results Water Vapor 05 YesNegligible impact at L3 Cirrus Detection 06_CD NoNo QA bits reserved in QA Plan Cloud Top Properties 06_CT NoDropped in Summer 2002 Cloud Optical Properties 06_OD YesBased on joint distribution of Tau and Re Atmosphere Profile 07 No No impact visible at L3

Unique Characteristics of the L3 Multiday (8-Day and Monthly) Algorithm

L3 Multiday Algorithm: Characteristics 1. Only the L3 daily files used as input (highly efficient) 2. Identical Grid, SDS dimensions, and Histogram Bins 3. Three weighting schemes used to compute multiday statistics from daily statistics  Unweighted (time-averaged mean, meaningful for computing temperature averages)  Pixel count weighted (count-averaged mean, ensures computed means match means from histograms)  Pixels count weighted with pixel count screen

L3 Multiday Weighting Scheme Specification Product Family Multiday Weighting Scheme * Detail Aerosol 04 Pixel Count Weighted with Pixel Count Screen Each daily grid weighted by the pixel count & daily grids with counts < 6 are excluded Water Vapor 05 Pixel Count WeightedEach daily grid weighted by the pixel count Cirrus Detection 06_CD UnweightedEach daily grid given the same weight Cloud Top Properties 06_CT UnweightedEach daily grid given the same weight Cloud Optical Properties 06_OD Pixel Count WeightedEach daily grid weighted by the pixel count (categorical, by phase) Atmosphere Profile 07 Pixel Count WeightedEach daily grid weighted by the pixel count * Weighting is applied to all non-count based statistics (mean, std); but not applied to histograms

Example of “Pixel Count Weighted with Pixel Count Screen” (Multiday Weighting Scheme Update - before and after images) Implemented in L3 on 1 January 2004

Topic 2. The MODIS-Atmosphere Web Site modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov

New Product Sections

Data Product Processing and Availability Calendar

New Tools Section

The Images Section

LL vs. HA Images: Data Detail Comparison  Equal Angle Grid 1x1° Lat-Lon Native L3 Grid  Equal Area Grid Hammer-Aitoff Computed in IDL from Lat-Lon Image

Web Site Usage Statistics

March 2002 – March 2003  Unique visitors = 63,000  Total downloads = 137 Terrabytes July 2003 – July 2004  Unique visitors = 148,000  Total downloads = 742 Terrabytes Usage Statistics – Comparisons from 1 year ago

Topic 3. Using web & interactive tools to diagnose L2 algorithm issues 3 Case Studies

Case 1. The “Sahara Streak” (Aerosol)

Computation of Geolocation in L2 Atmosphere Products 5-km resolution  5-km geolocation is copied from center (3,3) 1-km L1B input pixel in each 5x5- km area 10-km resolution  10-km geolocation is computed by averaging the 4 central (5,5), (5,6), (6,5), (6,6) 1-km L1B input pixels in each 10x10-km area

Case 2. Anomalous Water Vapor scans  (Water Vapor Near Infrared Clear) Clear = bright land and ocean sunglint  Similar anomalous property found in Cirrus Detection Parameters

Dec03 Monthly L3 - Water Vapor (NIR) Image (”Clear” = bright land and ocean sunglint only)

03Dec03 Daily L3 - Water Vapor (NIR) Image (”Clear” = bright land and ocean sunglint only)

L1B (Alaska) vs. Daily Water Vapor (NIR) 03 Dec 03

L1B image vs. L2 Water Vapor (NIR) 7.5 cm 0.0 cm

L1B image vs. L2 Surface Type Flag (NIR) Sunglint Cloudy Ocean Bright Land

Case 3. Unphysical results from Cirrus Fraction (IR) (Cloud Top Properties)

Two “CO 2 Slicing Algorithm” Cloud Flags set in 06_L2 Quality_Assurance_5km array Parameter Definitions: Cirrus Cloud: CTP ≤ 700mb and CEE ≤ 0.95 High Cloud: CTP < 400mb → →

Cirrus Cloud: CTP ≤ 700mb and CEE ≤ 0.95 → High Cloud: CTP < 400mb →

CO 2 Slicing Algorithm Old Cloud Top Properties CO 2 slicing subroutine:  High Cloud Flags initialized using “window retrieval” CTP’s. High Cloud Flags overwritten with valid “CO 2 retrieval” CTP’s.  Cirrus Flags were not initialized. Cirrus Flags overwritten with valid “CO 2 retrieval” CTP’s and CEE’s. Bug Fix Implemented for Collection 005  Cirrus Flags initialized using “window retrieval” values.

Cirrus Cloud: CTP ≤ 700mb and CEE ≤ 0.95 → High Cloud: CTP < 400mb →

Topic 4. Level-3 Collection 005 Change Summary

Daily Global (08_D3) statistics derived from Aerosol (04_L2) Combined Land & Ocean Land only L2 Aerosol algorithm improvements: - reduced snow contamination in land retrievals at the snow/ice edge Collection 005 Updates

Daily Global (08_D3) statistics derived from Aerosol (04_L2) Ocean only Collection 005 Updates

Daily Global (08_D3) statistics derived from Atm. Profile (07_L2) Collection 005 Updates

Daily Global (08_D3) statistics derived from Water Vapor (05_L2) & Cloud (06_L2) Cirrus detection Cloud Top properties Collection 005 Updates

Daily Global (08_D3) statistics derived from Cloud (06_L2) Cloud Optical properties Collection 005 Updates File Size Change Est. C004 D3 = 440 mb C005 D3 = 550 mb