D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK ``Physics Tables’’ for Commissioning Run -- TDWG l TDWG collected information from detector groups during CDFWEEK äHow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
Advertisements

B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
The trigger1 The Trigger YETI 7th January 2008 Emily Nurse Outline: Why do we need a Trigger? The trigger system at CDF Rate control at CDF Triggering.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
07/16/2002 p. 1 Muon Fake RatesPetra Merkel Muon Fake Rates Concept: determine rate of fake muons due to pion/kaon punch-through (PT) muons out of pion/kaon.
SPD commissioning Ricci, Míriam, Daniel, Edu, Hugo et al. from 1.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Early Electroweak Measurements in CMS and ATLAS J. Alcaraz (CIEMAT - Madrid) XLII Rencontres de Moriond (EW), La Thuile 11 March 2007.
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
Trigger Offline DQ Monitoring DQ Meeting – 27 Oct 2009 Ricardo Goncalo for Trigger Offline Monitoring.
27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review1 Status & Plans of the TDWG Mission Statement What Do We have to Guide Us ? Caveats & Concerns Current & Anticipated.
Tampa - April 19, 2005APS April Meeting – M.Rossi1 DILEPTON TRIGGER for SUSY CDF Melisa Rossi - Udine University APS April Meeting Tampa, Florida.
Trigger & Analysis Avi Yagil UCSD. 14-June-2007HCPSS - Triggers & AnalysisAvi Yagil 2 Table of Contents Introduction –Rates & cross sections –Beam Crossings.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
FNAL Users’ Meeting, 06/02/03, p. 1 Top and Electroweak Results from CDF Igor Volobouev LBNL for the CDF Collaboration.
Jet Calibration Experience in CDF Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool -CDF calorimeter -Relative Calibrations -Absolute Calibration -Multiple Interactions.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Calo preparation for 2015 Goals: -Trigger stability -Good calibration for HLT2 processing -Improved calibration ( timing, e/gamma response) for all calo.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
CMS Week Sept '07Leonard Apanasevich (UIC) Pedrame Bargassa (Rice) 1 Physics Priorities for Trigger Development Leonard Apanasevich (UIC) Pedrame Bargessa.
M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004.
Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:
Electron/Photon Related Projects Yuri Gershtein. 2/8/2007Yuri Gershtein FIU CHEPREO Workshop2 Disclaimer / Introduction PRS EGamma split into DPG and.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
Top quarks at the LHC: the early days Detector commissioning and first results T. Wengler Standard Model workshop UCL, London, 31 March 09.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Dijet Mass and Calibration1 H C A L Z(700) Data and Calibration Dan Green Fermilab June, 2001.
Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Study of missing Level-1 triggers using data10 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Trigger E/Gamma Signature Group Meeting 20/05/2010.
QCD Trigger Report Charge: 1)Plans for future and which triggers should never be prescaled? 2)Which triggers are currently used: purity and trigger studies.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
SUSY DILEPTON TRIGGER MONITORING
Need for HI/LO PS Thresholds
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
The ALICE Cosmic Ray Physics Program
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Jet Studies 1. Changes in seed finding for cone jets reconstruction
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Muon pairs in HPS with m+ trigger
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
EGAMMA HLT Marco Pieri UCSD Meeting 12 June 2007.
Presentation transcript:

D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK ``Physics Tables’’ for Commissioning Run -- TDWG l TDWG collected information from detector groups during CDFWEEK äHow much zero-bias data do you need? äDo you want any specially triggered datasets? äDo you want an special runs? l Thanks to participating groups: äMuons, Muon-trig, Calo, Calo-trig,COT, CLC, XFT, XTRP,FE elec.,SVX, Alignment, L2 Trig, Trig supervisor, DAQ, L3, Trigsim, QCD, other ideas

D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK Typical Requests l Not a huge amount of zero-bias requested äToo sparse to calibrate/check detectors äPreferred single towers, stubs, tracks to make sure there is some useful energy in event l We have put together three tables based on requests l Tables can also be used with little or no modifications for special running conditions (e.g. 36x1, no B field etc., high rate) Young-Kee will summarize those requests in her talk. l Read out all Trigger diagnostic banks

D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK Table 1 -- zero bias only l Summary ä Hz zero-bias äPossibly add a L3 stream based on CLC E*W coincidence l We will probably soon get bored of this table because either: äluminosity is too low (no interactions); need some minimal bias äluminosity is too high; would prefer to select those events with more particle production l Will be useful for checking CALO timing before going to table #2 (expect to be OK from cosmic run)

D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK Table 2 -- Minimal bias l Summary äL1: - 5 Hz zero bias -- stream Hz minimum bias (CLC E*W coincidence) -- stream GeV (HAD+EM) tower anywhere (N.B. If single PMT spikes are a problem -- we will know soon -- then we will change this to two towers) -- stream 3 - Loose CMU, CMP, CMX IMU -- stream 4 äL2: tagging but auto-accept äL3: auto-accept, but split into streams as above l This table is fine at L~10 29

D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK Table 3 -- More advanced l Summary -- works through (Mariner Max) äL1: - 1 Hz zero bias -- stream Hz minimum bias (CLC E*W) --- stream 2 - X GeV (HAD+EM) CALO as previous --- stream 3 (threshold determined by luminosity) - Tight CMU-CMP, CMX, IMU --- stream GeV EM tower --- stream 5 ***** and the following using XTRP: **** - 4 GeV “electron” (4 GeV EM tower matched to 1.5 GeV XFT) - muons with phi match to 1.5 GeV XFT track - single track trigger --- all above stream 6 - Trigger group will add to this table to test triggers: â MET-25,SUMET-120,L2 cutting, L2 prescaling w/L1 full-bore... äL2, L3 tag as in #2

D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK A “physics goal” from comm. run l 1/16” well-known aluminum plate mounted on SVX4 - - Carter Hall l Collect  ee conversions with EM tower trigger l Can calibrate the X 0 of the COT inner wall -- was a 30 MeV systematic on Run-Ib W Mass l (Also calo triggers (jets & photons) could be used by QCD/EWK groups to understand energy scales.)

D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK Summary l Have three basic trigger tables ready. Expect to use mostly #2 for start of commissioning run. l Simple tables l L2 will tag l L3 will be used to stream datasets l Thresholds and rates limits can be modified easily to suit conditions l YKK will talk about special runs l Should calibrate COT material if all goes well.