NCLB: The Trojan Horse of the 21 st Century: Will It Be Put to Pasture? History, Opinions and Updates of Robert C. McCracken.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Implementation of NCLBs Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements November 2003.
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
The Evolution of the Virginia School Report Card Board of Education School & Division Accountability Committee February 25, 2015.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
Pershing Pershing Annual Meeting Title I AYP/School Improvement.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
By Meredith Hawkins Deborah Fajuyigbe Robert McArdle.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
Djole Hinic Danielle Stokes Achievement and Behavior Data for Elementary Schools.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
SLAM! CHARTER MIDDLE/HIGH 604 NORTHWEST 12 AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA MR. ALFONSO J. OTERO Title I Annual Parent Meeting.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Welcome to LIB5080 The School Library Media Program.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Reedy Creek Elementary September 22, 2010 Diane Crook-Nichols Principal.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
NCLB: Known as No Child Left Behind Opinions and Thoughts of Robert C. McCracken.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Bob Mattila.  No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is an act that was passed in 2002 with the goal of - "An act to close the achievement gap with accountability,
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
NCLB: The Trojan Horse of the 21 st Century Opinions and Thoughts of Robert C. McCracken.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Department of Accountability: “Anyone can measure the rain; we build arks.” Assessment Update: Preliminary Results Department of Accountability.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
No Child Left Behind Passed by Congress in 2001 A reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
ESSA = OPPORTUNITY!  After nearly 14 years of asking for less federal intrusion into the teaching and learning process, it is.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
What is Title 1? Title 1 is the largest federal assistance program for our nation’s schools. The goal of Title 1 is a higher quality of education for every.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
January 2010 Marilyn Peterson Data and Federal Programs
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
No Child Left Behind.
NCLB and Title I Schools
Annual Parent Meeting October 10, 2018 Lamar Elementary
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
EDN Fall 2002.
Lamar Elementary Library
Presentation transcript:

NCLB: The Trojan Horse of the 21 st Century: Will It Be Put to Pasture? History, Opinions and Updates of Robert C. McCracken

Presentation Goals  Present History of NCLB  Present Thoughts and Opinions  Present Update Status

NCLB and Teaching First here are some mandatory lessons about teaching!

Pre-Assessment  What do the letters NCLB stand for in respect to a federal program?  Is NCLB a new program?  Who is in control of education, states or the federal government?  NCLB has the ability to declare a school as a failed school? True or False

Pre- Assessment  What is the term and measurement of a school success under NCLB?  What are penalties if a school does not meet the expectations of NCLB?  Can a teacher lose their job as a result of NCLB expectations?  Can the state take over a school that does not meet the expectations of NCLB?

Pre- Assessment  Will AYP be determined the same at the end of this current school year?  Who can change or amend the current law and regulations contained in NCLB?  T/F: We are sure of what Schools will be required to meet AYP?  What is the biggest “concern” of schools for making AYP this year in Virginia

Some History  History: Title I, Chapter I and ESEA  Trojan Horse Example  First Benchmark: Highly Qualified Paraprofessionals  Next Benchmark: First set of data regarding schools failing to make Adequate Yearly Progress

Some History  State Accountablility: AKA as “Workbooks”  Virginia’s “Workbook”; timeline issues  First Set of Data release: Virginia’s Issues  Data Sets: Disaggregated Data What does that mean?

Required Pass Rates (percent)  Language Arts/Reading Passrates %  Mathematics %

Some History  In Virginia: SOL test results Beginning in Grades 3, 5, 8 and End of Course (English and Math - Guess what else use to be included?) At the end of ; 4 and 7 Addition of mathematics to middle school grades Science in middle school and high school Attendance Graduation Rates

Some History  the Nation: All the same subgroups  In Implementation Goals of NCLB 100% All Subgroups by 2014 Virginia first goals: 58 Math and 61 English Failure of ANY subgroup at any time MEANS “Failure to Make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)”

Some History  Highly Qualified Professional  Staff Development: High Quality Staff Development  School Improvement  VaDOE Requirements and Funding  Penalities: Failure to make AYP  “Title I” and Non-Title I

Some History  Supplemental Services  School Choice  Removal of Staff “responsible for the failure”  Reconstitution of the school  Reopen as a Charter School  Virginia’s Requirement for Charter Schools

Some Opinion  Relationship to Special Education i.e. “Highly Qualified”  IF adjustments are not made, public schools as currently defined and as we know them, will begin to disappear in 2014  What is the intent of the political agenda to implement Charter Schools and or Vouchers?  What is the outcome of implementation of Charter Schools and Vouchers?

Some Opinion  IF adjustments are not made, public schools as currently defined and as we know them, will begin to disappear in 2014  What is the intent of the political agenda to implement Charter Schools and or Vouchers?  What is the outcome of implementation of Charter Schools and Vouchers?

NCLB and Testing TESTING????

Currents Status/Update  What happened this year that is changing how NCLB will work with this year’s data?  What happened last week that is changing how NCLB will work with this year’s data?  Who changed the AYP data measures?

Currents Status/Update  Who also can change the entire law?  Is Virginia going to change?  What does that change do to earning AYP?  What “new” test is Virginia concerned about regarding SOL test data? Why?  Virginia’s Request for Change Virginia’s Request for Change

Additional Discussion  If you would like to have discussion about NCLB, a blog has been established for you to share your thoughts. 

Questions / Comments  Remember the importance of data! Remember the importance of data!  Questions  Comments  Thoughts  Action Plans?