1 IBM Corporation An employee who is not represented by a union is not entitled to the presence of a co-worker at an interview that the employee reasonably.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Legal and Practical Primer on Development & Maintenance of Social Media Policies and Related Issues Richard I. Greenberg Jackson Lewis LLP 666 Third.
Advertisements

Learning Outcomes in the Workplace Law Curriculum Teaching Employment and Labor Law St. Louis University School of Law February 15, 2013.
A Model Bioevent Emergency Response and Recovery Plan for Employers Jeffrey Tanenbaum, Nixon Peabody LLP Allyce Kimerling, Staff Counsel, Cal/OSHA.
AFGE Education and Leadership Development Legal Rights of Union Reps  Fed’l Sector Labor Mgt Relations Act (FSLMRA)  “Weingarten Rights”  Mid-term.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
1 EFCA Employee Free Choice Act Prepared by H. Jacey Kaps & Brooke Guenot.
William G. Madsen, Madsen, Prestley & Parenteau LLC A. Robert Fischer, Jackson Lewis LLC CBIA’s Mid-Year HR Update Workplace Privacy.
Brought to you by: THE APHIS LABOR RELATIONS TEAM
Dana Corporation, 351 NLRB No. 28, 2007 Legal Issues – Should employees in a bargaining unit to be able to challenge an employer’s lawful voluntary recognition.
1 Weingarten Ee has Section 7 right to refuse to be interviewed without representative present where: –ee requests union representation –ee “reasonably.
1 LATEST DEVELOPMENTS FROM THE NLRB Brenton D. Soderstrum BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone: Facsimile:
Presented by Harry I. Johnson Arent Fox LLP Los Angeles, CA March 7, 2012 D.R. Horton & Class Action Waivers: Sea Change Or Flash In The Pan?
1 CWA v. Beck Issue –Today we must decide whether (Section 8(a)(3)) permits a union over the objections of dues-paying nonmember employees, to expend funds.
1 “The company raised no objection to the Board's order on the ground that the scope of information required was too broad or that disclosure would put.
Hospitals & Social Media. Laws Implicated Federal Trade Commission –Disclosure of employment status –False or misleading statements State & Federal Wiretap.
1 Allentown Mack Sales v. NLRB Bd’s “good faith, reasonable doubt” standard for (legal “Struksness”) polling and withdrawal of recognition is rational.
Social Media & The Workplace: recent NLRB developments Megan Erickson Moritz BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN Labor Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved  Section 7 of the National Labor Relations.
1 CWA v. Beck Issue –Today we must decide whether (Section 8(a)(3)) permits a union over the objections of dues-paying nonmember employees, to expend funds.
1 Epilepsy Foundation Does the Weingarten right extend to employees who are not covered by a collective agreement? May an employer discipline a non-exclusively.
1 HENDRICKS COUNTY Key Points Labor Nexus Test – Meaning - ees with a relationship to LR function not covered – Rationale - avoid conflicts of interest.
OS 352 4/15/08 I. Reminder for next time: Read and bring to class the Mohler article. II. Benefits (continued). III. Labor-management relations. IV. Next.
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS March 16, Difference between being an employer vs. a law enforcement officer Garrity – this case involves employees’
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS JULY 13, 2004 Professor Susan Carle.
Developed by Susan Carle under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with.
Ethics Dilemma Engineering as a Profession Situations Concerning Collective Bargaining, Unions, Strike, Picket Lines, etc..
Discipline and Termination - Employee Rights in the Public Sector PA 800 Presented by: Amihan Makayan December 12, 2012.
ARE YOUR AT-WILL AND SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES COMPLIANT?: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS FROM THE NLRB James H. Gilliam BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des.
CHAPTER 12 LABOR RELATIONS PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2002 South-Western. All rights reserved.
Workplace Legal Matters. Terms Affirmative action – a government plan to provide access to jobs for people who have suffered discrimination in the past.
Post ─ Northwestern University: What’s Next? Union Elections 101 1A Faculty Athletics Representatives Sunday, September 21, 2014.
Labor Law and Collective Bargaining Chapter 11. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Define –Collective bargaining –Bargaining in good.
Employment Law for BUSINESS sixth edition
CWA DISTRICT 7 CONFERENCE VANCOUVER WA. MAY 2011 SAFETY.
Employment Equity Act No 55 of 1998 (81). Purpose of EE Act (81) Redress past discrimination –Eliminate unfair discrimination [applies to all employers]
© 2001 by Prentice Hall 15-1 Why Do Employees Join Unions?  Employees in the United States seek union representation when they: u are dissatisfied with.
Trends at the National Labor Relations Board James N. Foster, Jr. McMahon Berger, P.C N. Ballas Rd., Suite 200 St. Louis, Missouri (314)
FEA BEING AN ADVOCATE Helping Members in Trouble.
Presented by Joan Craft Hawaii Nurses Association OPEIU Local 50 Center for Labor Education and Research University of Hawaii West Oahu.
1 REPUBLIC AVIATION Key Points Balancing of Ees’ rights of self-org with Er’s property rights to maintain discipline and an orderly worksite; a tension.
Tom Jones Employers Resource Group Facilitated by: Associated Industries of Massachusetts Employee Handbooks 2015/2016 South Coast Resource Council November.
NLRB v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation U. S. Supreme Court 1937.
© Copyright 2015, Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP. All Rights Reserved. NLRB Update: A Busy Year Presented By: Andrew M. Kaplan Vorys, Sater, Seymour.
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 23: Labor Law.
Legal Rights of Union Stewards Angel F. González University of Iowa Labor Center.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. CHAPTER EIGHT BARGAINING Once a union is organized by a group of employees.
By: John G. Kruchko, Esq. September 12, 2011 Kruchko & Fries © 2011 Privileged and Confidential 1.
0 Defining Discrimination and Harassment Dorothy Jones UAW International Representative Dan Fairbanks UAW International Representative 1.
1 1 POLITICS IN THE WORKPLACE Cynthia W. Kolb Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon & Galchus, P.C. 500 President Clinton Avenue, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR
Domestic and Family Violence - A workplace issue
8.2 Labor Unions.
The Federal Labor Relations Statute
SEXUAL HARASSMENT A FORM OF ABUSE AGAINST WOMEN
PROGRESS MADE REGARDING LEGISLATION PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LABOUR
Vaca v. Sipes Preemption Issue
Linden Lumber Does Sec. 9(c)(1)(B) of the NLRA obligate an employer who has committed no unfair labor practices to petition for a representation election.
Employee Representatives & City of Round Rock v. Rodriguez
Agenda Hoffman Plastic Chapter 3 question #9 “Interference” as ULP
BURNUP AND SIMS Key Points
Employee Discipline Chapter 12
Workplace Legal Matters
Burns Security Services 406 U.S. 272, 1972
Weingarten Rights PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DEPARTMENT.
Representation Primer
Chapter 13: Employee and Labor Relations
Borg-Warner Three Categories of Issues Rationale
Jasper Seating Co. (1988) ALJ held that walkout was protected concerted activity, discharge for such activity violated NLRA Judge found walkout was reasonable.
Key Areas of Organizational Training
Prill\Meyers Industries
Oakwood Care Center 343 N.L.R.B. No. 76 (2004)
Presentation transcript:

1 IBM Corporation An employee who is not represented by a union is not entitled to the presence of a co-worker at an interview that the employee reasonably believes will result in discipline –Employer may decline employee’s request and continue to interview employee –Weingarten rights do not apply in a nonunion workplace –Reverses Epilepsy Foundation (2000) and reverts to Dupont (1988) –Either Dupont or Epilepsy Foundation are permissible constructions of the NLRA Board may choose either

2 Previous Decisions Materials Research (’82) – Sec. 7 basis makes right applicable when ees not represented Sears (’85) – Act does not permit Weingarten rights for nonunion ees –variation in scope of Sec. 7 rights depending on rep.. –Infringement on right of er to deal with ees individually in absence of representation Dupont (’88) – Act permits Weingarten rights for nonunion ees; NLRB has discretion; decided against Weingarten rights for nonunion ees –Redressing of power imbalance less important if no rep –No bargaining unit interests which need be protected –Questions skills of a co-worker who is not a union rep

3 Previous Decisions (cont.) Epilepsy Foundation (’00) – revert to Materials Research –Weingarten rights are applicable to nonunion ees Section 7 basis Enhances right to act in concert with other employees to prevent unjust discipline Reinforces principle that Sec. 7 rights not dependent on union representation Employer right to deal individually with non exc. repped ees does not outweigh Sec. 7 rights of ees to act in concert –No er obligation to bargain with co-worker –Weingarten co-worker is dealing, not bargaining –No labor org present and no er obligation to “deal,” er may investigate without interviewing ee

4 Rationale to Reconsider Epilepsy Foundation “Changing Patterns of Industrial Life” –Increased need for investigatory interviews New statutes –Discrimination –Sexual Harassment Security Concerns –Terrorism –Workplace Violence

5 Rationale for Distinction Between Unionized and Nonunion Workplaces Co-worker does not represent interests of entire bargaining unit – no bargaining unit No redress of power or concern of consistency of practice Lack of co-worker skills Co-worker under no legal obligation not to divulge confidential information

6 Concurrence NLRB has recognized common law right of management to deal with employees on an individual basis when employees not represented by a union

7 Dissent No reason to reconsider Epilepsy Foundation –no connection between right of co-worker representation and workplace violence or terrorism –Evolving norm of fairness Rationale for granting nonrepresented workers a right to co-worker representation –Section 7 basis of Weingarten right Right to engage in concerted activity for mutual aid and protection Interests of unit, lack of skills, bargaining power matters for employees to consider when making the request; existence of a right not the same as efficacy of the right Problems can be addressed on a case-by-case basis