University of Illinois Contribution Amr S. Elnashai Sung Jig Kim Curtis Holub Narutoshi Nakata Oh Sung Kwon Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic Design of Buried Structures
Advertisements

Codes and Standards Future Work
1 Dynamic/Seismic analysis of RC Element including shear effect.
1 UH-Contribution Ravi Mullapudi Parnak Charkhchi Ashraf Ayoub NEES - Jan 23, 2008.
Rigid-Frame Structures
Current NEESR Projects and Potential Applications at MUST-SIM Jerry Hajjar University of Illinois.
Experimental Assessment of Coastal Infrastructure Vulnerability Brian M. Phillips Assistant Professor University of Maryland Mpact Week: Disaster Resilience.
Example Effects of NEES Research on Structural Design Practice Bill Holmes Rutherford + Chekene San Francisco March 3, NEES Governance Board Workshop.
PCI/NSF/CPF PART 2: 1 of 30 NEES/EERI Webinar April Outline Introduce PCI/NSF/CPF DSDM Research Effort Review Key Behaviors of Precast Diaphragms.
Beams and Frames.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
University of Illinois Contribution on Analytical Investigation Amr S. Elnashai Sung Jig Kim Curtis Holub Narutoshi Nakata Oh Sung Kwon.
Bridge Vulnerabilities Oct What puts bridges at risk? Ability to withstand seismic forces and displacements.
IRENG07 1 Seismic Consideration Discussion for The Interaction Region Fred Asiri-SLAC.
Level (m-1 ) Level m h (1-c)h ch Rigid Beam x1x1 x k1k1 k2k2 knkn kHkH RC AND SRC SHEAR WALL MACRO-MODELING l Multiple Vertical Line.
Analysis of UCS by OpenSees GSR Tae-Hyung Lee PI Khalid M. Mosalam May 23 rd, 2002 Meeting at RFS.
Colorado State University
Literature Review on Compatible Soil Structure Yielding by Weian Liu
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Studying Earthquakes. Seismology: the study of earthquakes and seismic waves.
ITW Structural and Strength of Materials Teaching Laboratory Civil & Materials Engineering UIC November 2009.
1 Quake Summit /08/2010 Coupled Axial-Shear-Flexure Interaction Hysteretic Model for Seismic Response Assessment of Bridges Shi-Yu Xu, Ph.D. Student.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Hybrid Testing 2.0 Quake Summit 2012 Thomas Frankie Michael Bletzinger
University of Palestine
Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
NEESR: Near-Collapse Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures Presented by Justin Murray Graduate Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Static Pushover Analysis
Jennifer Soderstrom University of Washington
MAE CENTER RESEARCH SUCCESS WITH DOTs Past and Future Neil M. Hawkins - Professor Emeritus University of Illinois MAE Center Annual Meeting With.
NEES Facilities Used: University of Nevada, Reno University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana INTRODUCTION Bridge columns are subjected to combinations of.
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
85M102006D. Seismic Analysis for a Turbine Building with Spring Supported Turbine / Generator Deck Feifei Lu, PE Shaw Power Group, Charlotte, NC June.
Current Activities at the MUST-SIM Facility NEEShub Site Visit to UIUC July 23, 2010 Dan Kuchma, Greg Pluta, Thomas Frankie, and Aditya Bhagath Illinois.
Site Operations Manager’s Workshop – September 26 th -28 th, 2006 Data Curation at NEES Claude Trottier Data Curator Site Operations Managers Workshop.
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
NEESR-SG-2005 Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns under Combined Actions, and Implications on System Response University of Nevada, Reno University.
Weian Liu 3. Research Interest Soil Structure Interaction Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridge Structures Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.
NEESR-SG-2005 Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns under Combined Actions, and Implications on System Response University of Nevada, Reno University.
University of Palestine
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Multi-Site Soil-Structure-Foundation Interaction Test (MISST) PI: Bill Spencer, Illinois Co-PIs: Amr Elnashai, Dan Kuchma, Illinois Jim Ricles, Richard.
Seismic of Older Concentrically Braced Frames Charles Roeder (PI) Dawn Lehman, Jeffery Berman (co-PI) Stephen Mahin (co-PI Po-Chien Hsiao.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
IMPACT OF FOUNDATION MODELING ON THE ACCURACY OF RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS OF A TALL BUILDING Part II - Implementation F. Naeim, S. Tileylioglu, A. Alimoradi.
Learning Module: ASSESSMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN CAPACITY Nestor Castaneda, Zach Feinstein and Shirley J. Dyke Washington University in St. Louis.
6/25/20081 Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Composite Structure on a Backfill Hilltop WSRC-STI Rev 0 Lisa Anderson, Bechtel National,
Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Alex Pena,
U.S. – Taiwan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction November 4, 2003 Physical and Numerical Modeling Breakout Session.
CABER Project Update February 22, 2008
Practical Design of PT Buildings
Davide Forcellini, Univ. of San Marino Prof. Ahmed Elgamal, Dr. Jinchi Lu, UC San Diego Prof. Kevin Mackie, Univ. of Central Florida SEISMIC ASSESSMENT.
Kenneth O’Neill Experimental Investigation of Circular Concrete Filled Steel Tube Geometry on Seismic Performance.
DESIGN OF AIRPORT TERMINAL AND CONTROL TOWER
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
Seismic Design Impact to
NUMERICAL SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF RC BRIDGES WITH HOLLOW PIERS
CFHT Pier Building Evaluation
ANDRÉS ALONSO-RODRIGUEZ Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Earthquake resistant buildings
End-Users Needs in Seismic Hazard Analysis
a Bang-Bang Type Controller
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
CALTRANS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Version 1.7 November 2012
Presentation transcript:

University of Illinois Contribution Amr S. Elnashai Sung Jig Kim Curtis Holub Narutoshi Nakata Oh Sung Kwon Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns under Combined Actions, and Implications on System Response

Vertical Motion Torsion Bidirectional loading Analysis tools Existing methodologies Research Focus  Performance assessment of bridge system using PSD tests  Determination of the impact of varying vertical force on behavior of reinforced concrete bridge columns –Evaluation of the effect of shear-axial-flexure interaction –Consideration of soil-structure interaction –Investigation of the effect of early arrival of vertical motion on the periods of flexural vibrations under horizontal motion for RC bridge structures –Derivation of design guidance for reduced shear capacity in the presence of high vertical motion Vertical Motion UIUC Performance assessment of the bridge columns under complex loading NEES-R

Analysis and Design  Analysis of a series of bridge structures subject to different levels of earthquake excitations –OpenSees, Zeus-NL- the MAE Center advanced analysis platform –This process will be conducted using UI-SIMCOR as a simulation coordinator –Analytical work will provide the modeling of PSD conditions to zoom on parameters resulting in high levels of simultaneous transverse and vertical accelerations.  Study the seismic response of the bridge systems, including foundations and surrounding soils –Appropriate multidirectional loading and boundary conditions for columns can be obtained  Determination of the appropriate input loading for the specimens tested in the subsequent phases of the project

Experiment  MISST test (previous multi-site test at UIUC) will provide the test bed for the loading protocols  Tests of 3 large scale and 4 small scale bridge columns with different aspect ratios and seismic design details using MUST-SIM Facility  Column test with UMR under different loading conditions  Verify local and global analytical part of the hybrid simulation  Provide an opportunity for researchers outside of a NEES facility  Detailed design of UIUC and UNR experiments will be guided by bridge system analysis Test at UIUC Small Scale Test Large Scale Test Test with UMR NEES-R

Select Records Start Choose Model Structure and Parameters Dynamic Time History Analysis Ms >5.5, D <25 km V/H > 0.6 Bridge Zeus-NL Evaluate Resuts Calculate Shear Demand and Capacity Estimate the effect of VGM End Complex Structure V/H ratio, Time Interval Parametric Study Span length, ratio and column height Dx, Fy, Mz and strains Parametric Study for Effect of Vertical Motion on Bridge Pier

Summary of Parametric Study  Axial force is mainly affected by vertical ground motion –Especially, as span ratio increase, the effect of vertical seismic motion to axial force increase significantly only when vertical record is considered  Shear capacity is reduced by vertical ground motion –Span length is longer –Span ratio is close to 1 –Column height is shorter –In case of seismic assessment for the structure with above geometric configurations, vertical ground motion should be considered  Future parameter study –Various connection type between deck and piers, Number of spans, Various deck stiffness, Type of abutment, Curved bridge Axial force Axial force variation HGM VGM Increasing ratio of V due to VGM V due to VGM

Small-Scale Testing  Current testing –Several 1/16 scaled piers are currently being tested –Used to evaluate system and material/pier design Test Setup After Test

Multi-Site Soil-Structure-Foundation Interaction Test (MISST) – Pre-NEESR Project Three Site Distributed Hybrid Bridge System Test Setup - UIUC After Test - UIUC