Strategic Planning: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Strategic Planning Committee Open Forum.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.

Advertisements

WMO Monitoring & Evaluation System (Measuring our Performance/Success)

360 Degrees: Conducting a Comprehensive Evaluation of Your Integrated Planning Processes Bri Hays Jill Baker San Diego Mesa College RP Conference April.

Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.

SHELLY POTTS, PH.D. UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF EVALUATION AND EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Quality Assurance Mechanisms.

Strategic Planning: Moving Toward Implementation Strategic Planning Committee Open Forum.

Grantee Program Plan. Components of the Program Plan Goals  Objectives  Activities  Techniques & Tools  Outcomes/Change.

AACVPR 2007 Affiliate Leadership Forum Strategic Planning Marie Bass Bryan Finn.

Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment

 Bridge Builders Creating Collaborations Between Student Affairs and Fundraising Emilie Cravens Dr. April Heiselt Mississippi State University 2012 SACSA.

Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.

Staff Compensation Program Update

Strategic Management Process Lecture 2 COMT 492/592.

KPIs, Work flow & evaluating performances

What is a Balanced Scorecard? 1 The balanced scorecard is a tool that aligns an organization’s activities to its vision and strategy Used to monitor performance.

Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.

Accreditation and Proficiency Testing. APT Subcommittee MembershipMeeting Activities 21 members, 15 non- Commissioners Representation: Accreditation bodies.

School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.

A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.

11 Reporting Outcomes Results and Improvements II Produced by Non-Instructional Subcommittee of Assessment Committee.

Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.

Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.

UBC Department of Finance Campus Community Customer Service Survey Forum Presentation March 1, 2004.

Overview of Performance Review Process

THE OECD APPROACH TO ASSESSING ORGANISATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Frank van Tongeren Head of Division, Policies in Trade and Agriculture (OECD) ICAE pre-conference.

MLC-2 New Hampshire October 12, Quality Improvement Activities for MLC-2 1.Articulate measures to monitor improvement for New Hampshire’s performance.

System Establishing Your Management Reporting System.

December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.

Evaluating a Research Report

Strategic Planning Key Performance Indicators Henrico County Public Schools September, 2010.

National Geospatial Advisory Committee NGAC Communications Subcommittee Chair: Kass Green Members: Michael Byrne, Bull Bennett, Chris Tucker, Jack Dangermond.

County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. Next Steps Meeting Purpose: The Next Steps Meeting is designed to be a starting point for the county’s efforts to.

STUDENT SERVICES REVIEW January 8, Context – Administrative Unit Reviews Objectives Roles Unit Self-Study Internal Review Committee External Reviewers.

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.

PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.

European Clearing House for Open Robotics Development Plus Plus Overview of Key Performance Indicators – A joint effort Federica Pepponi CEA Saclay – January.

Ann Campion Riley University of Missouri

- Documenting the Self-Study (I) Preparation for Georgian Accreditation (with internationally acceptable standards) Amy Kirle Lezberg GEDA Staff NEA Staff.

Monitoring at the Household Level Methods, Problems, and Use of Critical Information.

CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.

Supporting SCUSD Students with the Local Control & Accountability Plan (LCAP) 1 School Site Meetings May 2015.

 After completing this session, you will be able to: 1. Indicate where to find your local legislators and their committee responsibilities. 2. Name an.

Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.

Casualty Actuarial Society ERM for the CAS. Centennial Goal The CAS will be recognized globally as a leading resource in educating casualty actuaries.

Alaska CCCP Vision & Mission Vision: A Cancer Free Alaska Mission: Working Together for a Cancer Free Alaska A CANCER FREE ALASKA.

Monitoring & Evaluation

JANUARY 13 TH  TO REVIEW THE CURRENT MISSION STATEMENT  TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW STRATEGIC PLAN  TO CONSULT WITH.

Aligning Forces for Quality Learning from Effective Ambulatory Practices (LEAP): Opportunities for Collaboration with AF4Q January 23, 2014.

Strategic Planning “ STEPS FOR SUCCESS” Soror Kendra Gillespie Chapter Retreat August 28, 2010.

Field Review Accountability Today: What is working well? What could work better?

Helping Students Focus on Learning, Not Grades

1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.

Eight Schools Information Security Policies: The Process at Hotchkiss.

Aim: How do sociologists do research?

North End Campus Coalition Springfield, Massachusetts 2009 Strategic Plan Agency focus groups: 5/18 noon-2PM 5/26 noon-2PM 5/26 3-5PM Facilitator: Aron.

Quantitative research Meeting 7. Research method is the most concrete and specific part of the proposal.

EPE 619: Survey Research Dr. Kelly Bradley. Welcome Syllabus and course overview Let’s say Hello A little group work Introduction Presentation.

Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.

The Essentials of Strategic Enrollment Planning James Mager Associate Vice President.

The Diversity Funds Prepared by: Myisha Washington Development Coordinator Annual Programs

County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. Next Steps Meeting Purpose: The Next Steps Meeting is designed to be a starting point for the county’s efforts to.

Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,

Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.

Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.

Director of Policy Analysis and Research

Corporate and Foundation Relations

TECHjOSH.COM TechJosh.com.

On the Horizon: Excellence in Governance

Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training

Presentation transcript:

Strategic Planning: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Strategic Planning Committee Open Forum

Definitions: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) During the Strategic Planning Committee’s Open Forum in January, the following definitions were presented: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) KPIs are measures that are monitored to determine the health, effectiveness and efficiency of an organization. KPIs help the organization think strategically about itself and its environment. KPIs are specific, objective measures that tell an organization if it is accomplishing its goals. Quantitative KPIs reflect the results of a large, statistically significant sample Qualitative KPIs provide in-depth information on a small sample of a larger population Based on the work of Michael Dolence

Background: How KPIs were developed The KPIs were developed by sub-committees consisting of members of the Strategic Planning Committee and representatives from the campus community. The presentation of KPIs on the web and in packets that were mailed include a description of the KPI a ranking of the KPI to indicate its level of importance and the amount of effort required to track it the type and/or location of data that will be used to track it the offices responsible for tracking and/or reporting the data and a timeline for reporting

Example of information included with KPIs

Forum Purpose: Response to KPIs We are happy to present to you the first draft of these KPIs for your review and feedback. The committee recognizes that the number of KPIs is large and that some will need to be eliminated in order to facilitate accurate tracking and analysis as we strive to achieve our strategic priority goals. Which KPIs are the most critical to our future success? Which KPIs could be eliminated? Are any essential KPIs missing? Are KPIs ranked appropriately (in terms of effort and impact)?

Questions or Comments Thank you for attending today’s forum. For more information, to provide your comments, or to take an anonymous survey on which KPIs should be included or omitted from the Strategic Plan, visit the SCSU Strategic Planning Web site at: