IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013-2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Short-Term Objectives and Benchmarks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
Changes to Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner.
Measurable Annual IEP Goals
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP) Be an advocate Be involved Be knowledgeable.
Standard Based IEP’s/MCA-M. Overview Why Standards Based IEPs? Eligibility for MCA-M MCA-M Decision Making PLAAFP Standards Goals Objectives.
March 2009Oregon Department of Education1 Indicator B13: Secondary Transition Services.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
IEPs for Dads A Non Emotional Outcome Based Approach To Collaborative Business.
Transition 101 I-13 Compliance: Transition Activities for Before, During and After the IEP Meeting.
Accessibility for All Students Required Training Module 3.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
1 Alignment of Alternate Assessments to Grade-level Content Standards Brian Gong National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Claudia.
MCAS-Alt: Alternate Assessment in Massachusetts Technical Challenges and Approaches to Validity Daniel J. Wiener, Administrator of Inclusive Assessment.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
Developing Short-Term Instructional Objectives For Effective Implementation of Common Core State Standards.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
Section 4: Goals and Objectives/Benchmarks Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Module 5 - Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D.1 IEP Training: Module 5 Developing Goals Aligned to State Standards.
STANDARDS BASED GOALS and OBJECTIVES
Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
PRESENT LEVELS OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE PLAAFP.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Disability Support Setting Goals and Making Plans According to Your IEP.
Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D. IEP Training Module One Overview & Introduction to Data Collection.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Present Levels of Academic Achievement.
Gifted IEP IEP Training for Kansas Schools Kansas State Department of Education TASN - Technical Assistance System Network Rev. August 2015 IEPs for Gifted.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
Sally Simich, Keith Ozols, and Peter FitzGerald Hood River, Oregon February 2013.
Secondary Transition Services YTP Statewide Conference Hood River, Oregon February 18, 2010 February 2010Oregon Department of Education1.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Sally Simich. IDEA 2004 Requires a SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE: “a local educational agency shall provide the child with a summary of the child's academic.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools Kansas State Department of Education TASN - Technical Assistance System Network Spring, 2014 Standards-Based IEPs for Students.
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
IEP Training for Kansas Schools Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Measurable Annual Goals 1.
Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)
Presented By: Teresa Newsome August 4, Increase understanding of IEP development and implementation.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Overview of the IEP as a tool in order to access, participate, and make progress in the general curriculum 1.
Secondary Transition Overview Douglas County ESD Jackie Burr Secondary Transition Specialist November 15, 2007.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
Measurable Goals December 13, 2012 Crystal Cutler
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Teaching Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities: Research-Based Practices Second Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
American Institutes for Research
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Module 5 HAIL Research This module provides an overview of how researchers will collect data with both Independent Living Specialist(ILS) and consumers.
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP)
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student Progress SBIEP Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student.
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Assistive Technology Devices & Assistive Technology Services
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

IEP Training for Kansas Schools Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Short-Term Objectives and Benchmarks 1

IEP Process Referral Measurable Annual Goals Short-Term Objectives and Benchmarks Prioritize Needs and How Needs Will be Addressed Evaluation (and Eligibility) Present Levels of Academic Achievement & Functional Performance Services Progress Reporting Post Secondary Goals Exit 2

Consider and document on the IEP which state assessment the student will take Student participation in the alternate assessment is determined by the IEP team A student who takes the alternate assessment must take the alternate assessment in all content areas Alternate Assessment participation criteria: The student has a significant cognitive disability The student is learning content linked to (derived from) the KCCRS The student requires extensive direct individualized instruction and substantial supports to achieve measurable gains in the grade-and age-appropriate curriculum 3

Short-Term Objectives and Benchmarks Required only for those students taking the Kansas Alternate Assessment and DLM ALL goals on an IEP for a student taking the Kansas Alternate Assessment must include benchmarks or short term objectives 4

Short-Term Objectives and Benchmarks Specify intermediate progress toward the goal that allows you to determine whether progress is sufficient to meet the goal. 5

Short-Term Objective Characteristic #1 Is a sequential, progressive, intermediate measure of progress toward the annual goal 6

Short-Term Objective Characteristic #2 Is a restatement of the goal with a different criterion 7

Benchmark Characteristic #1 Are milestones that describe content to be learned or skills to be performed 8

Benchmark Characteristic #2 Are used when progress is not easily quantified and is based on task analysis 9

Benchmark Characteristic #3 Are distinct skills that are often independent of each other but must be combined to meet the measurable annual goal 10

Writing Short-Term Objectives and Benchmarks 11

12

13