On My Way To L.A. Actually „our“ way!. Four suggested areas of preparation 1. Let’s have a comparison chart 2. Double-check requirements list 3. Identify.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ICANN Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency.

Advertisements

April 4, 2006 Restructuring NACCHO Advisory Committees An Update Restructuring NACCHO Advisory Committees An Update.

What is ISO 9000:2000 ? Three new standards to be published in Q4 ‘00 –ISO9000:2000, ISO9001:2000, ISO9004:2000 Nearly all standards in current ISO9000.

Text CCWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Charter.

ICANN Preliminary Budget Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 26, 2003 Stuart Lynn.

President/President-Elect/VP UNLV Alumni Association Leadership Development Day March 3, 2012.

IAAEA’s New Policy Manual A presentation to the IAAEA Board of Directors April 10, 2014 West Des Moines Marriott Troyce Fisher, Ed. D.

Draft compilation of major trends in the CWG Public Consultation 25 May 2015.

10 Tactics for Building Online Community. Empowering Online Community Since 2001 © 2007 GoLightly, Inc. Introduction - Presenters Heather McKeon Miller.

Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.

Policy & Implementation WG Initial Recommendations Report.

Why does it matter to us?.  You have a question in front of you.  Read the question.  Decide (in your head) if it is DOK 1,2,3. Don’t tell anyone.

Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Accountability 2nd Draft Proposal for Public Comment Visual Summary Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Accountability.

Successful Board Management Building and Leading the Team Deb Fritz, NSR National PTA.

Glen A. Jones Ontario Research Chair in Postsecondary Education Policy and Measurement Trends in Academic Governance in Canada.

Draft compilation of trends in the GAC comments from Buenos Aires for the Paris meeting of the CCWG 15 July 2015.

WP3 Emerging Issues Paris | 2 Emerging Issues  SO/AC accountability  ICANN Staff accountability  Diversity Public Comment Period.

Presentation to the Oversight Board Santa Clara County Auditor-Controller 1.

STRATEGIC PLANNING Board of Health Update January 16, 2014.

Enhancing ICANN Accountability. | 2 CCWG-Accountability Scope  During discussions around the IANA functions stewardship transition the community raised.

Proposed 2014 RTF Work Plan and 3-year Look Back October 31,

CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.

Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.

School Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of School Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73 slides.

Table 1Table 2Table 3 Table 4Table 5Table 6. Ambassador Design Team meeting #9 April 22, 2015.

A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.

Facilitation Principles and Techniques. 2 The Inside Facilitator Authorized by the Project Champion Invites project team members Announces the facilitator.

Taking stock and next steps CCWG F2F, 23 March 2015.

PACS 3700/ COMM 3700 ADR – Alternative Dispute Resolution (Third Party Approaches to Conflict)

WP2 Issues for Dublin Briefing - Principles – 2 nd Draft Report Paragraph 187 : Enumerated powers and prohibition on regulation to be clarified to ensurethat.

CREATING A CLASS COMMUNITY What does it take to create a respectful class community? Our goal today is to draft a class contract that will reinforce our.

When we develop our School Council and understand its purposes we will:- help everyone in our school feel responsible for what goes on here build children’s.

Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Accountability Update 8 October 2015.

SCORECARD Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Accountability 15 October 2015.

Investigating service user ethical priorities in psychological research Rachael Carrick.

Text #ICANN51. Text #ICANN51 GNSO Briefing on Key Strategic Initiatives 12 October 2014.

Requirements 1 NTIA Support and enhance the multistakeholder model Maintain the security, stability and resiliency of the Internet DNS Meet the needs.

Meeting #2 Superintendent Torlakson’s Advisory Task Force on Accountability and Continuous Improvement 1 11/10/2015.

Review of CCWG-Acct 3 rd Proposal and ALAC Issues Alan Greenberg 04 December 2015.

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.

Kickoff Discussion with ICANN’s Community Leaders on the Development of the FY12 Operating Plan and Budget November

IANA Stewardship Transition: High-Level Project Plans 3 December 2015 DRAFT for Discussion.

Requirements 1 NTIA Support and enhance the multistakeholder model Maintain the security, stability and resiliency of the Internet DNS Meet the needs.

National Center for Civic Involvement (NCCI) Grant Advisory Council on Citizen-Friendly Reporting Last Meeting! August 30, 2005.

Taking stock and next steps CCWG F2F, 23 March 2015.

Draft Trends in CCWG-Accountability 2 nd Draft Proposal public comment input 15 September 2015.

Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.

Transition Implementation Status Reporting 21 January 2016.

CCWG-Accountability Update APRICOT 2016 Auckland, February 2016 Jordan Carter 1.

Survey Activity Hdev 342. Research Question(s)  What is it we want to know about CSUMB students and technology use?  Use of different forms of technologies?

IANA Stewardship Transition Process 09 March 2016.

MASON ITSM, WHERE ARE WE NOW?. GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY AGENDA Background – 2013/2014 Organizational Changes ITSM Tool Process Mapping Tool ITIL Framework.

Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force Review, Update and Recommendation Subgroup 5/14/2015.

4 March 2016 CCWG-Accountability Marrakesh Face to Face 1.

Practical IT Research that Drives Measurable Results Establish an Effective IT Steering Committee.

Goal Setting and Action Planning June Goals for Module Through a reflection on the current or anticipated Board math plan, participants will: consider.

How to resolve the pending issues? Three categories of input: ★ Issues for discussion ★ “uncontested” comments ★ Questions from our group 1.

The VCS PAC meets on the second Thursday of each month from 6:30 pm to 8:30 pm in Room 15. Childcare is provided Refreshments are provided.

Review of CCWG-Acct 3 rd Proposal and ALAC Issues Alan Greenberg 11 December 2015.

Transition Implementation Status Reporting 04 February 2016.

How to resolve the pending issues? Three categories of input: ★ Issues for discussion ★ “uncontested” comments ★ Questions from our group 1.

Cross Community Working Group

IANA Functions Contract Expires

The Empowered Community: What it means…

قانون المنافسة ومنع الاحتكار

Preparation for Meeting with the Board

Updates and Next Steps on Enhancing ICANN Accountability

CCWG Accountability Recommendations

CCWG-Accountability ICANN56 26 June 2016

Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Certification Process

Presentation transcript:

On My Way To L.A. Actually „our“ way!

Four suggested areas of preparation 1. Let’s have a comparison chart 2. Double-check requirements list 3. Identify your priorities 4. Help draft an agenda

Ad 1: Comparison Chart 1.Our lawyers should prepare an extended comparison chart adding MEM and Single Designator Model based on what we have d%20SO_AC%20Membership%20and%20Designator....pdf?version=1&modificationDate= &api=v2 1.Let’s agree in L.A. if the comparison chart accurately reflects the pros and cons of the models.

Ad 2: Requirements List 1.Let’s review our list of requirements for completeness and areas of improvement. 2.Send your suggestions to the list asap. 3.These following points are just discussion starters.

My impression is the group talks a lot about 1....how easily an enhanced accountability structure can be explained to the outside world 2....whether we decrease / increase our chances at the political level if we go for one or the other model 3....the budget community power (not so much about strategic plan and operating plan - why not separate the three) 4....enforceability, but meaning different concepts? How can we refine what is needed?

Ad 3: Identify your priorities 1.Give all requirements between points 2.No vote / survey / poll intended, don‘t even share your personal results 3.This is just to help all of us focus on what is important

Ad 4: Agenda drafting 1.Consensus points 2.Disagreement 3.Other issues

Consensus Points??? - existence of Fundamental Bylaws - - Principles of binding IRP, and standing panel and exclusions for ccTLDs - Principle of 5 community powers - AoC reviews and their 5 year frequency - Jurisdiction in WS2 and not focused on Icann HQs - Standard Bylaw change... in principle - existence of a community forum - Request for reconsideration enhancements (add staff to Ombudsman)

Disagreement??? - the model (CMSM vs MEM) - voting - budget veto - stress test 18 bylaw change

Other Points??? - Human rights - Contract enforcement capabilities in the M/C/V - scope / standard of review / timeline / cost for IRP - Support of AoC reviews by consensus ? (seems to me it would fundamentally change the nature of the Reviews) - process for Fundamental Bylaw change - Board removal / recall "for cause" only or based on "strategic differences" ? - WS2 or ATRT3 ?