Learn. Perform. Succeed. LOG 201 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics, Part B Terry Johnson, Product Support Integration PLD 23 January 2015
Course Description Throughput / Demographics Metrics That Matter (MtM) Structure & Format PLD Assessment –Course Changes and plans 2 Discussion Topics
LOG 201 Course Overview 3 TopicDiscussion Course Description (iCatalog Concept Card) LOG 201 is the second part in a two-course series designed for intermediate acquisition logistics professionals. The course provides a dynamic, group-based, facilitated learning environment oriented toward further developing logistics competencies required by the life cycle logistician during weapons and equipment systems development. It challenges the professional to think critically, differentiate support alternatives, and provide solutions to ensure the early integration of operational supportability into the system development process. These skills are refined by instructor-facilitated group exercises and discussions. Special emphasis is placed on developing and delivering the required logistics inputs that ensure supportability is designed into a system. Certification CourseCertification requirement for Life Cycle Logistics, Level II Delivery Method/LengthClassroom—4.5 days Target AttendeesLife Cycle Logisticians seeking Level II certification; Systems Engineers, Configuration Managers, Program Managers, others involved in development of systems and Life Cycle Support. Prerequisites LOG 200, Intermediate Acquisition Logistics, Part A Other background information Current version fielded July, 2014
LOG 201 Monthly Learning Effectiveness Trend Dec FY13 through Dec FY15 < 5.2 = Red = Yellow = Green Assessment Solid Course Faculty key in “connecting the dots” 4
LOG 201 Monthly Job Impact Trend FY13 through Dec FY15 < 5.2 = Red = Yellow = Green Assessment Consistent comments: “Great course but doesn’t have anything to do with my job.” 5
LOG 201 Graduates by Service LOG 201FY 10FY 11FY 12FY 13FY 14 FY 15 FYTD* Graduates1,5452,2822,5872,6862, Army6791,2201,2951, Air Force USN/USMC Industry Other DoD All Others COMMENTS: Enrollments continue to decline…most Regions report class cancellations due to low fill * DATA AS OF December 31, 2014
LOG 201 Monthly Overall Trend FY13 through Aug FY14 < 5.25 = Red = Yellow = Green Assessment Reflects new exercises and improved delivery
Question/ Categories FY10FY11FY12FY13FY14 FY15 FYTD* Instructorn=1,407n=2,149n=2,430n=2,488n=1,974n=469 Courseware n =1,407 n =2,150 n =2,428 n =2,485n=1,970n=466 Environmentn=1,391n=2,118n=2,391n=2,437n=1,936n=459 Job Impact n =1,406 n =2,150 n =2,428 n =2,484n=1,968n=468 Learning Effectiveness n =1,404 n =2,145 n =2,424 n =2,480n=1,966n=467 * Data (from Data Mart) period Dec LOG 201 Metrics That Matter (MTM) Other Instructor
Course Updates and Timeline 9 No major updates planned…latest version deployed last summer Continuous QA and “tweaking” of course materials Ongoing effort to “homogenize” instructors regarding new LCSP exercises
10 LOG 201 PLD Assessment CategoryPLD Assessment Course Effectiveness / Achievement of Learning Objectives TLOs and coverage depth seem appropriate. Greatly expanded emphasis on LCSP as product support strategy planning tool Improvements Improved LCSP exercises and electronic program documents deployed last summer Student Feedback Overwhelming positive regarding instructors 91% recommend to others “Overall Satisfaction” remains solid green for all career fields Long Term Considerations Continue to refine to re-enforce critical thinking Course name will change in FY16 to “Product Support Strategy Development, Part B” Service Considerations Course is not Service specific ODASD MR Considerations Course is current, and supports LCL competencies Recommendations Work with faculty to improve exercise facilitation
11 Questions…?
12 LOG 201 Student Demographics Throughput: 79+% civilian, 20% military (most in sustainment), <1% Industry 11% ACDU are commissioned, Civs overwhelmingly in GS 9-13 range 67% LCLs satisfying DAWIA certification requirements 23% alternate career field cert or general interest. 38% said that 50% or more of their work required the skills presented in this training 91% would recommend the course to their colleagues
The Good A job well done! The material was extremely relevant to my position Instructors were great! The Bad - My job has me at FOC and very little before.. - My job is sustainment, which is not discussed at all in this class. - The course was great…however, doesn’t apply to my job The Ugly -Class did not have access to a shared drive -Classroom poorly set up. Limited visibility -2 hour DAU infomercial was a waste of time 13 Verbatim LOG 201 Student Comments
LOG 201 Monthly Courseware Trend FY13 through Dec FY15 < 5.2 = Red = Yellow = Green 14
LOG 201 Monthly Instructor Trend Dec FY13 through Dec FY15 < 5.2 = Red = Yellow = Green Assessment Solid performance by faculty 15
LOG 201 Monthly Environment Trend Dec FY13 through Dec FY15 < 5.2 = Red = Yellow = Green Assessment Improvements in classroom facilities starting to take effect 16