Academic Standards Review Committee Fall 2014 Team members: Dillon Carr, Daniel Gendler, Pamela Laureto, Harold Lee, Thomas Street, Fred Zomer.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.

Advertisements

Code of Student Conduct (CSC) Tutorial Lesson 4 Adopting and Implementing Your CSC – The Rewards of Long-Term Investment This tutorial has been prepared.

+ UEC Orientation Fall Agenda Undergraduate Course and Program Approval Policy (#21) and approval procedures Calendar deadlines Minimum timelines.

Policy Revision GradingProcedures 7.10 Steve Abid Patrick Kamau Paula Sullivan Bryan Vliem.

JOSEPH BIELANSKI, BERKELEY CITY COLLEGE KEVIN BONTENBAL, CUESTA COLLEGE PETER WHITE, SAN DIEGO CITY COLLEGE Working Together – CSSOs and Faculty Fall ASCCC.

Changes in Academic Policies from the Academic Policy Committee and Related Administrative Policy Presented October 24, 2012 by Kay Reed, Assistant Dean,

Internal Audit Awareness

Margaretville Central Superintendent’s Goals.

Eligibility for Accommodations & Required Disability Documentation Revisions to Section Catalog.

Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.

Standard 4 Faculty. Committee Membership Marta Meana Carryn Bellomo Andrew Bell Skip Swerdlow.

AGC TEXTBOOK POLICY COMMITTEE 9 April, Purpose: The purpose of the AGC Textbook Policy Committee is to review the existing GRCC Textbook Policy.

Bylaws, Rules, and Periodic Review – Updates from Standards and Practices Julie Adams, ASCCC Executive Director Craig Rutan, ASCCC South Representative.

Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,

September 17, 2002IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations1 Post-Tenure Review Institute Oversight Committee Report Overview & Recommendations to Georgia.

Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.

San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.

Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.

Curriculum Policies Universities should have a policy that enables the creation of new courses and the modification of existing courses in a way that ensures.

Jeff Waddoups Chair, Sabbatical Leave Committee Department of Economics

Florida Department of Community Affairs - Codes and Standards Overview: Code Modification Process.

AGC Presentation – December * Brent Spitler - Business * Brian Morris - Music * Christina McElwee - English * Deborah Nordman – Rad Tech * Katie.

Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.

Organizational Self-Assessment to Achieve Health Equity Gail Brandt Health Equity Consultant National Association of Chronic Disease Directors November.

Schedule Review Team Central Michigan University.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

Student Code of Conduct Revision Presentation to AGC (3 of 3) April 8, 2014.

Eight Schools Information Security Policies: The Process at Hotchkiss.

Middle States Update Progress Report Improved Staff Development Guest Speakers Guest Speakers Superintendent's Conference Day with PGCD cooperation.

SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.

Common Syllabus Components AGC – November /3.

SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.

What leadership practices do effective School Council members use to support student success? Corine Clark

Academic Standards Review Committee Winter 2014 Team members: Dillon Carr, Daniel Gendler, Pamela Laureto, Harold Lee, Thomas Street, Fred Zomer.

Common Syllabus Components AGC – January /3.

TCNJ 2015 Promotion & Reappointment Document Faculty Information Forum November 12-13, 2015.

Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,

Policy 8.5 Catalog Policy. History This policy was revised and approved by AGC on March 11, Implementation of the policy began August 26, 2014 for.

Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – April 2016.

Information Security and the Project Management Body of Knowledge Kati Reiland COSC 481 Spring 2006.

 Comprehensive interviews with administrative staff are complete and findings are being collated and prepared in written form for Full Committee review.

Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.

Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – February 2016.

Overview: Code Modification Process Summary. PROPONENT Step 1 - Proponent has a code change in mind MODIFICATION (Mod) Step 2 - Proponent enters the mod.

Message from ExecAGC Nick Antonakis – Chair Nikki Banks Ann Alexander

Curriculum Model Policy (7.18)

Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Update – January 2016

Promotion in Extension Presented by: Ken Martin, Ph. D

Principal Evaluation Update

Curriculum Development Updates

Message from ExecAGC Nick Antonakis – Chair Nikki Banks Ann Alexander

Internship orientation: Research module basics

Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect

Student Code of Conduct Revision

Senate Meeting Summary

Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion

AGC Faculty Code of Ethics Presentation to AGC April 11, 2017.

Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb

WINTER Mandatory Orientation for New Distance Learning Students

Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Catalog Year Policy 1st Presentation to AGC January 14, 2014.

Catalog Year Policy 2nd Presentation to AGC February 11, 2014.

Living Donor Committee

District discipline lead spring meeting agenda

AGC Children in the classroom and on campus committee

UND’s Promotion & Tenure Process: Electronic Submission and Next Steps

Academic Standards Review Committee

Jennifer Batten- Chair

Presentation transcript:

Academic Standards Review Committee Fall 2014 Team members: Dillon Carr, Daniel Gendler, Pamela Laureto, Harold Lee, Thomas Street, Fred Zomer

Background Academic Standards document adopted by AGC in 2009 Companion Document to Faculty Code of Ethics Aligned to Faculty Evaluation Process and Ideology (circa 2009) Designated for Review in Current Charge from AGC Review the existing standards Gather feedback from departments or groups college wide Recommend any necessary changes

Committee Actions to Date Conducted a review of the existing standards Team members solicited feedback from their respective work areas Compiled recommendations First presentation to AGC Discussed feedback and provide response to AGC during second presentation

Committee Report Discussion has focused on two areas: 1.The function of the document 2.Revisions to language choice

What is the function of the document? Issue: Are the academic standards a set of guidelines or a policy and how does this document relate to the Code of Ethics and current Faculty Evaluation system?

What is the function of the document? The committee’s recommendation is that the document represents a set of guidelines that is aligned with the ideology governing both the Code of Ethics and Faculty Evaluation system. Our recommendation is based on the original intent of the document to serve as a set of guidelines for faculty and a companion document to the Faculty Code of Ethics (see: AGC Decision Form, 2009).

Revisions to the document language Issue: What language changes are necessary to complete the review of the academic standards?

Revisions to the document language Proposed revisions are detailed in the word document distributed to AGC for this meeting. Most changes to the wording of the guidelines were presented in detail during our 1 st visit to AGC. New language updating the implications for action section were added and are intended to clarify the role of the document along with updating that section.

Implications for Action: This document provides a set of guidelines for faculty and should be used in new faculty orientation, professional development, CARP course creation and revision in Curriculog, and should serve as a companion document to the Faculty Code of Ethics. This document conforms to current ( ) faculty evaluation process and ideology.

Where are we now? This is our 2 nd presentation to update AGC on the committee’s work. This is our final visit before we return for a vote on October 14 th. Please forward any feedback to Dillon Carr by September 19 th.