Advanced LIGO Lateral/Tilt Mechanical Coupling Study Ken Smith January 8, 2004 Ref: 20008299-A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics 111: Mechanics Lecture 12
Advertisements

an extension to Tutorial 1
Definition I. Beams 1. Definition
Rigid-Frame Structures
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Beams and Frames.
Physics Montwood High School R. Casao
10 ft of veneer, out-of-plane (section property, distributed mass) 10 ft wood-stud frame, in-plane (realistic hysteresis) ¼ of mass of 10 ft of in-plane.
Lecture 2 Free Vibration of Single Degree of Freedom Systems
C-23 The effective length factor (K) was introduced in page (C-7) for six ideal conditions, these are not encountered in practical field conditions. LRFD.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO1 Mass Limits & Balancing Dennis Coyne Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication Bidder’s.
KINETIC ENERGY, WORK, PRINCIPLE OF WORK AND ENERGY
EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY & FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS
Beams – Internal Effects The external load applied to a beam can cause changes in the shape of the beam, it can bend for example. We do not want.
Chapter 4 – Lateral Force Resisting Systems
BENDING MOMENTS AND SHEARING FORCES IN BEAMS
Shear Forces & Bending Moments Shear & Moment Diagrams
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS 7th Edition
Chapter 4: Equilibrium Equilibrium means balance of forces to prevent body from translating, and balance of moments to prevent body from rotating. Vector.
ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis
Rigid Bodies II: Equilibrium
PHYS 1441 – Section 002 Lecture #22 Monday, April 22, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Work, Power and Energy in Rotation Angular Momentum Angular Momentum Conservation.
THE BASIC FUNDAMENTALS OF STATICS The physical laws used in this study that govern the action and reaction of forces on a body include Sir Isaac Newton’s.
3D Rigid Body Equilibrium. (Reference 5.5 and 5.6)
5.6 Equations of Equilibrium
EQUATIONS OF EQUILIBRIUM & TWO- AND THREE-FORCE MEMBERS
Mechanical Vibrations
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 06 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Today’s Objective: Students will be able to:
Chapter 12 Equilibrium and elasticity. Equilibrium We already introduced the concept of equilibrium in Chapter 8: dU(x)/dx = 0 More general definition.
Slide #: 1 Chapter 4 Equilibrium of Rigid Bodies.
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
THE ANALYSIS OF BEAMS & FRAMES
Generation of Influence Lines Using Statics Objectives of the materials covered: The student should be able use the equations of statics to generate an.
Statics, Fourteenth Edition R.C. Hibbeler Copyright ©2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. In-Class Activities: Check Homework Reading Quiz.
EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY & FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS
An Introduction to Rotorcraft Dynamics
HW Review 12 th Edition (p. 180) (p. 180) (p. 182) (p. 190) (p. 190) Quiz on Thursday Couple moments.
Chapter 5 EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY. APPLICATIONS A 200 kg platform is suspended off an oil rig. How do we determine the force reactions at the joints.
Describe moment of force or torque as moment = force × perpendicular distance from pivot to the line of action of force;
A A’ dr  F The work of a force F corresponding to the small displacement dr is defined as dU = F dr This scalar product can be written as dU = F ds cos.
ADAMS Assignment 2 ME451:Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems (Spring 09)
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Copyright © 2004 Alliance Spacesystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary Material of ASI. Reproduction without prior written permission.
Procedure for drawing a free-body diagram - 2-D force systems Imagine the body to be isolated or cut “free” from its constraints and connections, draw.
Lecture 1 Stress 16 July 2007 ENT 450 Mechanics of Materials Dr. Haftirman 1 ENT 450 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS (MoM) RC. Hibbler Lecture: DR. HAFTIRMAN Teaching.
ARCHITECTURE 2351 INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURE CONCEPTS.
Chapter 4 Dynamic Analysis and Forces 4.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapters …….  The dynamics, related with accelerations, loads, masses and inertias. In.
Plane Dynamics of Rigid Bodies
MESF593 Finite Element Methods
Date of download: 7/6/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Image model for flux pinning. In this model, flux pinning is described as the interaction.
EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY & FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS Objectives: a) Identify support reactions, and, b) Draw a free-body diagram.
SHERINE RAJ AP/CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF SCD
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis, 3/e By Kenneth Leet, Chia-Ming Uang, and Anne Gilbert Lecture Outline.
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
SportsNet - Contingency Plan
Kinematic Analysis (position, velocity and acceleration)
EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY & FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS
Force and Moment Vectors
EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY & FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS
EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY & FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS
A mass m = 2.0 kg is attached to a spring having a force constant k = 990 N/m as in the figure. The mass is displaced from its equilibrium position.
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY & FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS
2 DOF – Torsional System and Coordinate Coupling
EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY & FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS
Presentation transcript:

Advanced LIGO Lateral/Tilt Mechanical Coupling Study Ken Smith January 8, 2004 Ref: A

1/08/ AKS-2 Overview ASI’s understanding is that many of the LIGO design requirements are related to a desire to fully decouple the in-plane (lateral and torsion) and out-of-plane (vertical and tilt) stiffness of the mechanical system –The issues relate to tilt/horizontal confusion of the lateral seismometers, and the effect on low frequency control; thus the primary concern is with stiffness purity, and less so with coincidence of stage cg’s –Related requirements: Coincidence of the actuator plane and the lower LZMP plane to  1 mm Flatness of the spring blades Other alignment requirements Joe Giaime is in process of restating these requirements in terms of off- diagonal terms of the system stiffness matrix (or flexibility matrix) These requirements have a direct effect on the design of the springs and flexures, so ASI has been investigating system performance in this regard

1/08/ AKS-3 Overview (2) During our investigation, the following were observed: –Even the “ideal” isolation system, with perfect alignment of actuators and LZMP, has some coupling between lateral translation and tilt rotation due to gravity-related terms in the stiffness matrix –This coupling, though small, is not avoidable in the current design paradigm –The amount of coupling due to gravity is approximately 40 times larger than the coupling caused by  1 mm error in aligning the actuator plane with the LZMP plane Misalignment error of 1 mm results in a virtual pivot point ~800m from the LZMP plane, in the absence of the gravity-induced coupling The gravity-induced coupling results in a virtual pivot point ~20m from the LZMP plane These observations prompted ASI to elevate the issue to the LIGO project

1/08/ AKS-4 Analysis Approaches Three complementary analysis methods independently give evidence that the gravity-induced coupling effect is real –Free-body diagrams –Comprehensive closed-form solution of the flexure rod stiffness –NASTRAN finite element analysis with preload stiffening included Each approach is described in more detail on the following pages

1/08/ AKS-5 Approach 1: Free-Body Diagrams Assume the flexure rods are rigid pin-ended links between the UZMP and LZMP; apply a lateral force V to stage 2 at the LZMP, and an opposite force to stage 1 at the LZMP (as the actuators will do) Stage 2: applied forces are V and P 2 (gravity load); reaction provided by stage 1 at UZMP. Note that moment balance implies P 2 d = Vh. Stage 1: applied forces are V and P 2 (from stage 2) and -V from actuator; reaction provided by stage 0. Moment balance implies that stage 0 must provide a moment reaction Vh (= P 2 d) The moment from stage 0 implies that the system will tilt LZMP Plane UZMP Plane V d h P2P2 LZMP Plane UZMP Plane h V P2P2 P2P2 V VhVh Stage 2Stage 1 Actions shown in red Reactions shown in green V P2P2

1/08/ AKS-6 Approach 2: Closed-Form Flexure Rod Solution See ASI technical note B, “Analysis of LIGO Flexure Rods” Lateral/tilt stiffness matrix of a single flexure rod: Shear forces V and moments M at LZMP subscript 3 = suspended stage subscript 5 = supporting stage Lateral displacements v and tilt rotations  at LZMP subscript 3 = suspended stage subscript 5 = supporting stage This term shows that a moment is reacted to the supporting stage from a shear through the LZMP (the first column of the stiffness matrix gives the forces/moments to induce a unit translation with zero rotation)

1/08/ AKS-7 Approach 3: NASTRAN Finite Element Model Developed a simplified model of the idealized system –Stage 0 is ground –Stages 1 and 2 are rigid bodies, with mass properties similar to ETF –Leaf springs idealized as vertical-only spring elements, rigid in other directions –Flexure rods modeled as bar elements, with preload-induced stiffening –Stage cg’s and actuation planes perfectly located at LZMP of flexure rods

1/08/ AKS-8 NASTRAN Model Stage 0: GROUND Stage 1: 1914 lb R TOR = 22.3 in, R TILT = 16.4 in Stage 2: 3470 lb R TOR = 19.5 in, R TILT = 18.7 in Stage 0/1 springs and flexures r = 25 in Stage 1/2 springs and flexures r = 25 in Model shown “stretched”; stages are actually coincident under 1g

1/08/ AKS-9 Model Results Stage displacements from 1 lb force applied to stage 2 and reacted at stage 1 (in plane of LZMP) in the X direction at the stage centers Ratio of translational displacement to tilt rotation is approximately 675” Effect of 0.04” misalignment is approximately 1/40th as severe Case 1 : Perfect alignment of forces with LZMP Case 2 : Forces applied 0.04” above the LZMP Case 3 : Forces applied 0.04” below the LZMP Stage 1 tilt unaffected by misalignment Stage 2 tilt slightly affected by misalignment, but misalignment effects are much smaller than the bias seen in the “perfect” case 1