Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. May 18, 2015 Improving Quality at CSR.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

NIH Research Funding Trends: FY Produced by Howard H. Garrison, Ph.D. and Kimberly McGuire FASEB Office of Public Affairs Data Sources: NIH Office.

Advertisements

June 23, 2003AVW International Mortality Comparisons Richard MacMinn Richard MacMinn Edmondson-Miller Chair Katie School College of Business Illinois.

Orientation 1, Class of 2016 Discovery Director: Maureen Powers, Ph.D. Discovery Course Coordinator: Sherice Henry, M.S.

Laurie Tompkins, PhD Acting Director, Division of Genetics and Developmental Biology NIGMS, NIH Swarthmore College May 14, 2012 NIH 101.

Review of UNECE Informative Inventory Reports (IIRs) in 2011 Justin Goodwin: ETC-ACC Supported by EEA TFEIP Meeting Stockholm 2 – 3th May 2011.

Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health Department of Health and Human Services Toni Scarpa NIH Peer Review: Continuity and Change NIDA.

Correlation between happiness and some concrete factors. GRA 5917: Public Opinion and Input Politics Term Paper Proposal Rémi Poncet.

Roger Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA Program Official National Institute on Drug Abuse 1 Update on “New” Investigator Activities.

1 NIH Grant-Writing Workshop Leora Lawton, Ph.D. Executive Director, Berkeley Population Center Summer 2015 Dlab Workshop Session 5: Human Subjects and.

How to improve the appeal of research career to university graduates? Eero Vuorio University of Turku Finland.

The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute James P. Kiley, Ph.D. National Heart,

How the ARC funds good research 8 July 2015 Professor Aidan Byrne CEO, Australian Research Council.

From Your Idea to Your First R01: Perspectives of a National Institutes of Health Extramural Scientist.

1 Sally J. Rockey, PhD Deputy Director for Extramural Research National Institutes of Health NIH Regional Seminar on Program Funding And Grants Administration.

Excellence in scientific research Prof

DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.

What is the NIH RePORTER? And How Will it Help My PI?

The Center for Symptom Management The NIH review process Kathryn Lee, RN, PhD April 3, 2009 MDP.

Professional Science Master’s Programs: Federal Budget Strategy April 4, 2008 Council of Graduate Schools.

The Review of Your NIH Grant Application Begins Here Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. Director NIH Center for Scientific Review.

CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.

The Sputnik Moment for U.S. Biomedical Research and NIH’s Formula for Success Sept. 22, 2015 – Senate Briefing Dr. Richard Nakamura, CSR Director Center.

Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.

Systems Studies Program Peer Review Meeting Albert L. Opdenaker III DOE Program Manager Holiday Inn Express Germantown, Maryland August 29, 2013.

Sponsored Research Activities in Fiscal Year 2002 Research Administrators Forum February 13, 2003 Cynthia White Director, Research Office (From a 12/6/02.

Gianpietro van de Goor, PhD Deputy Head of Unit “Strategic matters and relations with the ERC Scientific Council” ERC-DIS / European Commission Kalkara/Malta,

Equity and Economic Growth University of Warsaw, School of Economic science Zoljargal Munkhsaikhan.

Short introduction to IDEAS Programme Maria Koutrokoi Hellenic NCP of ICT, IDEAS and Research Infrastructures Programmes Department for Strategy, Planning.

Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. October 2014 CSR Goals and Philosophy.

Why is Swedish science not performing as well as expected? Staffan Karlsson, Royal Institute of Technology The 18th Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and.

Innovative Pedagogical Practices Using Technology: IEA SITES Module 2 Design Presentation to the CMEC–OECD–Canada Seminar Robert Kozma SRI International.

State of the College Address Friday August 31, 2012 COLLEGE OF BEHAVIORAL AND COMMUNITY SCIENCES.

Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.

12/11/2009 Writing a NIH Grant Application Ellen Puré, PhD, Professor and Associate Vice President of Academic Affairs, Wistar Institute Mitchell Schnall.

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) : Cooperation with Europe An Overview.

NIA: The Future of Aging Research Co-Sponsors: Friends of the National Institute on Aging American Geriatrics Society Supported by: Webinar hosted by:

Dalian May 2012 The role of peer review in the selection of academic talent Pleun van Arensbergen.

Data provided by the Division of Information Services, Reporting Branch NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH) DATA BOOK Fiscal Year 2010.

Research Funding Opportunity & Scientific Capacity Building in Developing Countries By Dina R. Andersson 1.

GO NORDIC! Are Straume Ministry of Science, Innovation and Higher Education Denmark.

Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:

An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.

Data provided by the Division of Information Services, Reporting Branch NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH) EXTRAMURAL DATA BOOK Fiscal Year 2008 Published.

The RESEARCH DATA ALLIANCE Individual & Organisational –

Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. May 18, 2015 Understanding the Stress in the Scientific Community – Inside and Out.

2 Who Are the Peer Reviewers? Senior Researchers Well-funded by NIH or Other Agencies Well-published, recognized in the field Associate Professor or higher.

Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.

1 AIRI STATISTICS: TRENDS IN NIH AWARDS Presented at Association of Independent Research Institutes 49 th Annual Meeting September 29, 2010 Washington,

Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. October 2014 CSR Update for CSRAC.

Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.

Science Funding (otherwise known as how to make your PI really happy and find someone to pay for you to do what you love)

IMMUNOLOGY 2016 TM NIH FUNDING & RESEARCH POLICY Challenges & Concerns: The Investigator’s Perspective.

Internal and External Peer Review Focused Group Discussion PAASE 06/15/2011.

Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.

The swedish research barometer 2016

PISA 2015 results in England

John Jerrim UCL Institute of Education

The European Research Council

INNOVATION AND PATENTS – AN OVERVIEW

Role of Peer Review in Solving the Problem of Reproducibility

Why and When to Write a Grant. Karen E

Enhancing NIH Grant Peer Review: A Broader Perspective

Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS

Phoenix Arizona October 3, 2006

NIH Research Funding Trends: FY

Five things you probably don’t know from PISA….

Number of NIH K Awards Fiscal Years

WPIC Research Administrators’ Forum

Funding Rates at NSF June 2016.

Presentation transcript:

Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. May 18, 2015 Improving Quality at CSR

Do highest quality peer review] –Meet needs of PI and Program communities –Quality measures –Accuracy of referral –Evaluations of peer review including its fairness –Support SROs and Reviewers Conduct peer review as efficiently as possible CSR Goals

Success Rate Fiscal Year Grant Success Rates FY 1978 – 2014

AppropriationAppropriation in 1998 Dollars (In Billions) NIH Program Level in Nominal Dollars and Constant 1998 Dollars, FY1998 – FY2014

Number of Applications Received by Fiscal Year

6 Note: Incomplete data for 2015/08 and 2015/10 Councils because applications are still coming in and meetings have not occurred Application Increase

Fellowship Application Trends

Danielle Li and Leila Agha This paper examines the success of peer-review panels in predicting the future quality of proposed research. We construct new data to track publication, citation, and patenting outcomes associated with more than 130,000 research project (R01) grants funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health from 1980 to We find that better peer-review scores are consistently associated with better research outcomes and that this relationship persists even when we include detailed controls for an investigator’s publication history, grant history, institutional affiliations, career stage, and degree types. A one–standard deviation improvement in peer-review scores among awarded grants is associated with 16% more citations, 8% more publications, 20% more high- impact publications, and 15% more follow-on patents. Science 24 April 2015: Vol. 348 no pp RESEARCH FUNDING Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? Science April 24, 2015

Danielle Li and Leila Agha: Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? Science 24 April 2015: Vol. 348 no pp Peer Review Scores Correlated with Publications and Citations

Residual Numbers of Publications/Citations and Peer Review Percentile Scores

US Science and Technology Future?

Israel 4.2 South Korea3.6 Finland3.5 Japan3.4 Sweden3.4 Germany2.9 Switzerland2.9 Denmark2.9 What Do these Countries Have in Common?

Fiscal Year National Natural Science Foundation China

Comments? Questions?