Towards impactful foresight: Advice from the advisors Jonathan Calof, Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa Michael Jackson, Shaping tomorrow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Strategies: Joining Deaf Educators Together Deaf Education Virtual Topical Seminars Donna M. Mertens Gallaudet University October 19, 2004.
Advertisements

REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Foresight.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
QAA Research Teaching Linkages: Enhancing Graduate Attributes Theme Linda Juleff, QAA Steering Group Representative.
Tools for Policy Influence. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Practical Tools.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel Technology Acceptance Model Sherif Kamel The American University in Cairo.
From Research to Advocacy
The Use and Impact of FTA Attila Havas and Ron Johnston Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and Australian Centre for Innovation Third.
Strategic Value of the HR Function Presentation by
Managing Research and Policy Connection 16 th Metropolis Conference March 13-15, 2014.
OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.
Well Connected: History A reminder - previous presentation in December 2013: Arose out of Acute Services Review Formal collaboration between WCC, all.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Chapter 9 IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION Decision Support Systems For Business Intelligence.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
1 Day 4. 2 review of day 3 & feedback from evaluation.
Working with your Head to build an effective Leadership team.
The Evolution of Evaluation Practices in the Canadian Federal Government Presented at CES / AEA Conference Toronto, Ontario, Canada October.
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
Orienting Innovation towards Grand Challenges: a real-time experiment in the application of foresight-assisted processes Professor Ron Johnston Australian.
Microsoft 2013 All Rights Reserved. Partners in Learning School Research Background.
T HE CHALLENGES OF COMMUNICATING THE FORESIGHT STUDY OUTCOMES TO BETTER ADVISE DECISION MAKERS IN POLICY AND STRATEGY MATTERS Claudio Chauke Nehme –
Charting a course PROCESS.
Best-Fit Evaluation Strategies: Are They Possible? John Carlo Bertot, John T. Snead, & Charles R. McClure Information Use Management and Policy Institute.
Orienting Public Spending towards Achieving Results: Performance and Performance Management Joel Turkewitz World Bank.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Reporting and Using Evaluation Results Presented on 6/18/15.
Creating a Culture of Performance: The Role for Performance Appraisal in Strengthening Kazakhstan’s Civil Service Rex L. Facer II Associate Professor of.
Welcome to Workshop 3 The Foundation of Nursing Studies (FoNS) in Partnership with the Burdett Trust for Nursing Patients First: Supporting Nurse-led.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Closing the Indigenous health gap & evaluation: getting it right and making an impact Professor Ian Anderson.
SPOT AND NURTURE PART II PREPARING THE BEST MANAGERS FROM YOUR STAFF MAY 21, 2014 RON PICKETT LAB MANAGER MAGAZINE 2.
Scott Lowrey, Ed.D. (OISE/University of Toronto) CCEAM/CASEA 2014.
1. 2 Business Process Reengineering (BPR) “the fundamental rethinking and redesign of processes to achieve dramatic improvements in critical, contemporary.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Juggling the Program Management Ball 1. One day thou art an extension educator… The next day thou art a county director or district extension director…how.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Fife Partnership…Strengthening Fife’s Future Research can make a difference! Workshop on communicating and disseminating research Facilitation - Chris.
1 PP 7.2 CORE COMPETENCIES FOR RIVER BASIN PLANNERS.
Impact of evaluations matters IDEAS Conference 2011, Amman “Evidence to Policy: Lessons Learnt from Influential Impact Evaluations” Presenter: Daniel Svoboda,
KT Scotland Conference 23 April 2010 Building a Knowledge exchange culture Sarah Morton- Co-Director.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION National evaluation conference Marielle Riché Evaluation unit, DG REGIO Bucharest, 18.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Strategies for making evaluations more influential in supporting program management and informing decision-making Australasian Evaluation Society 2011.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Adaptive, Embedded, and Disruptive Foresight: Theory and Evidence for a Futures Literacy Approach Riel Miller xperidox futures consulting, Paris, France.
Influencing Policy through Research: Introduction to Principles and Tools Arnaldo Pellini:
1 Key Roles of River Basin Planners Integrators of Knowledge and People Trade-offs analysts and presenters Communicators and Facilitators CORE COMPETENCIES.
Leveraging national communications to integrate climate change issues into development policy Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
Developing Monitoring & Evaluation Frameworks: Process or Product? Anne Markiewicz.
The Key to Success is GRIT!. What’s Grit ?  Perseverance  Determination  Passion  Going the distance despite set-backs.  Focusing on winning the.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
Overview and Scrutiny, Coordinating and Call In Committee Personalisation Presentation 3 March 2009.
Mandy Williams, Participation Cymru manager
Language and communication skills make business sense: Lessons learned in marketing I CAN Secondary Talk to schools Clive Robson (I CAN Senior Education.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR GOVERNMENT LED FORESIGHT
Reading Paper discussion – Week 4
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Presentation transcript:

Towards impactful foresight: Advice from the advisors Jonathan Calof, Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa Michael Jackson, Shaping tomorrow Riel Miller, XperidoX Futures Consulting The 4th International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA) 12 & 13 May 2011

[Paper title] Objective of the presentation. This presentation/paper focuses on providing policy makers, academics, consultants and others involved in foresight key lessons learned for building FTA capacities for systematic and structural transformation. How has and how can FTA provide support to decision making. Through numerous case study reports which the authors have been part of, a panel/paper will be presented which explores: methods for evaluating the effectiveness of FTA (from a recent study of the National Research Council), the role of private sector consultants and other organizations for enhancing, supporting and helping to develop FTA capacity, and a look at some of the organizational forms of FTA that have led to FTA success and failure. In short, the three authors will share their experiences with conference participants on factors important to foresight success. Over 80 years collective experience as advisors, consultants, practitioners, academics in Foresight. The need to build a base of best practices that leads to impact.

Michael Jackson:

[Paper title] Jonathan Calof: At Seville 2008: Calof and Smith CSF Research World class methodology/skills Significant clear client Link to current policy agenda Links to senior policy makers Public-private connections Novel methodologies Communications strategy Stakeholder integration Academic receptors

[Paper title] From the Technology Assessment Study (2010) Calof and Bouthillier TA Success Direct Indirect Client acceptance of TA Client TA Sophistication Organizations TA acceptance/Culture Starting conditions TBA/IS skills Early project TBA/ISintegration Access to appropriate tools Appropriate process Access to appropriate info. Project process conditions TBA/IS skills Client acceptance of TA TBA/IS skills in communication Client TA sophistication TA output conditions Org culture: Sharing/integration Senior Champion TBA/IS integration in project Open minded Trust TBA rep Client openness withTBA

6 Client Classification Extent of use –Not at all –Limited use –Sometimes use –Frequently use Attitude of client –Negative user –It’s ok – I used it and will again but only ok –It’s OK – I use it when I need it but not for all decisions –Power user –It’s not for me but I send my clients to it –Don’t know what intelligence is but I want to use the TBA Sophistication –Discriminating user –Multiple products –Early involvement –Understands the use of CTI –Attitude and awareness –Well formulated intelligence needs –Receptivity –Openess –Did their homework first –Honest with the TBA –Academic orientation

From Telfer Leaders Foresight Program ++ Need to be seen helping to make today’s decision/policy relevant Educated client/management of user expectations Continual communications As shakespere said that which is called a rose would by any other name... Well maybe not for foresight Develop capacity – the problem of growth Being pulled away due to popularity

[Paper title] Riel Miller: Understand first of all that the challenge is to “use the future” to think about choices in the present, not to find the future to serve as a target. Understand second of all that the use of the future is inscribed in an anticipatory system and that you need to think about the nature and attributes, purpose and functioning of the particular anticipatory system that is pertinent to your context. When conducting an exploratory foresight exercise aimed at embracing complexity refrain from probabilistic and causal logics. Make sure to pay careful attention to ensuring a congruence between the process and outcomes in the design of the process. Do not forget that in a foresight exercise there is always a key deliverable related to “process as product”.

[Paper title] Conclusion: What has this presentation shown us